Cited by 100Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Association between gambling disorder and emotion (dys)regulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Velotti, P., Rogier, G., Beomonte Zobel, S., Billieux, J.·2021·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the role of emotion (dys)regulation in gambling disorder (GD). PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were systematically searched for articles published until November 3, 2020. Forty-nine studies were considered for the systematic review; of these, 38 comprising 5242 participants met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Associations were found between GD and specific emotion regulation (ER) deficits, namely (1) nonacceptance of negative emotional states, (2) difficulties in maintaining goal-directed behaviors when faced with intense emotional contexts, (3) lack of clarity about emotional states (poor emotional awareness), (4) low impulse control in reaction to negative emotional states, and (5) difficulties in accessing adaptive ER strategies. We furthermore found that GD is associated with a tendency for emotional suppression, which is known as a maladaptive ER strategy and linked with reduced mindfulness abilities. Additional moderator analyses were conducted regarding age, gender, type of instrument used to measure GD, clinical status of the samples, and quality of the studies. Overall, the data demonstrated consistent and significant associations between GD and ER. This systematic review and meta-analysis mostly supports the conceptualization of GD as an addictive disorder characterized by ER deficits and stresses the need to develop inte…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102037

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velotti, P., Rogier, G., Beomonte Zobel, S., & Billieux, J.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Velotti, P.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
87
Pages
102037
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163948696
Cited by
100
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
gambling addiction, emotion regulation, emotional dysregulation, emotional awareness, emotional suppression, mindfulness, impulse control, maladaptive emotion regulation, addiction
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Emotions, Gambling, Humans, Behavior, Addictive, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review