Cited by 261Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Brooding and reflection as subtypes of rumination: evidence from confirmatory factor analysis in nonclinical samples using the dutch ruminative response scale.

Schoofs, Hanne, Hermans, Dirk, Raes, Filip·2010·Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10862-010-9182-9

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schoofs, H., Hermans, D., & Raes, F.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Schoofs, Hanne
Venue
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Published
2010-03-02
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
609-617
ISSN
  • 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
  • 0882-2689
  • 1573-3505
OpenAlex
W2028185525
Cited by
261
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
rumination, brooding, reflection, depressive rumination, Ruminative Response Scale, psychometric properties, factor structure, depressive symptoms, non-clinical sample

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review