Cited by 81Problem and Project Based LearningEducation and Critical Thinking DevelopmentInnovations in Medical Education

The impact of team-based learning on the critical thinking skills of pharmacy students

Silberman, Dave, Carpenter, Rob, Takemoto, Jody K., Coyne, Leanne·2021·Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Abstract

Introduction Critical thinking is an important ability for pharmacists, but few studies have found improvements in pharmacy student critical thinking skills as a consequence of their education. Team-based learning (TBL) is an active learning strategy that encourages students to think critically to solve problems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of TBL on the critical thinking skills of pharmacy students.Methods One hundred ninety students from the first two cohorts at a pharmacy school were invited to participate. The Health Science Reasoning Test (HSRT) was administered prior to the first semester and after two years of the TBL-based pharmacy curriculum. Student's t-test was used for a pairwise analysis along with Welch's t-test for unequal variances when comparing HSRT score modulation.Results There was an overall increase in mean HSRT score. However, some participants (29%) with initially higher mean HSRT scores did not demonstrate an increase. Nearly all (99%) participants demonstrated improvements of one of the eight domains of critical thinking evaluated in the HSRT. This corresponded with an improvement in score of the majority of participants (n = 115).Conclusion This study provides evidence that TBL improves critical thinking skills. More research is needed to identify the specific aspects of TBL that influence critical thinking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.008

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silberman, D., Carpenter, R., Takemoto, J. K., & Coyne, L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Tyler (US)
Corresponding author
Coyne, Leanne
Venue
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
116-121
ISSN
1877-1297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092164080
Cited by
81
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13
FWCI
17.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-11-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
team-based learning, critical thinking skills, pharmacy students, pharmacy education, active learning, pharmacy curriculum, problem solving
MeSH terms
Education, Pharmacy, Educational Measurement, Humans, Learning, Schools, Pharmacy, Students, Pharmacy, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review