The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The design and implementation of an undergraduate health professional degree elective course on scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Strong writing skills are critical to the pharmacy profession. This paper describes the design, delivery, and impact of a course intended to develop pharmacy students' scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal skills. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: The course was offered in the final year of an undergraduate pharmacy program with students whose first language is not English. In this course, students write two structured pharmacy review articles (PRA) based on assigned scientific research articles and peer assess each others' written PRAs. Students also critically appraise scientific research articles on a weekly basis, complete one pre-journal club written reflective critique based on a assigned scientific research article, and moderate one journal club session. FINDINGS: Course rubrics were developed and validated by the course coordinators. A survey administered to students enrolled in the course identified that 85% of the students perceived that they gained adequate writing skills in the course. More than 70% of the students indicated they had the necessary skills to evaluate their peers' written assessments, and 93% felt comfortable providing and receiving feedback from peers. More than 90% of the students indicated that writing PRAs and the peer assessment improved their critical and analytical skills. SUMMARY: This course improved students' scientific writing, peer assessment, and critical appraisal skills. Further practice is required to reinforce the skills learned and to strengthen the writing skills of students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, some studies have documented that peer feedback activity significantly contribute to the enhancement of students’ critical and analytical skills (e.g., Osman et al., 2022), and the confidence in providing constructive peer feedback (Davis, 2014).”
From Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Osman et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 Educational Outcomes
Medina, M. S., Plaza, C. M., Stowe, C. D., Robinson, E. T., DeLander, G., Beck, D. E., Melchert, R. B., Supernaw, R. B., Roche, V. F., Gleason, B. L., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe778162 · Cited by 951
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Holiday-Goodman, 1994, Development of a teaching module on written and verbal communication skills, Am J Pharm Educ, 58, 257, 10.1016/S0002-9459(24)04198-6 · DOI
- Ranelli, 1998, Assessing writing perceptions and practices of pharmacy students, Am J Pharm Educ, 62, 426, 10.1016/S0002-9459(24)02034-5 · DOI
- Hobson, 2002, Writing tasks performed by doctor of pharmacy students during clerkship rotations, Am J Health Syst Pharm, 59, 58, 10.1093/ajhp/59.1.58 · DOI
- Diaz-Gilbert, 2005, Writing skills of advanced pharmacy practice experience students whose first or best language is not English, Am J Pharm Educ, 69, 101, 10.5688/aj6905101 · DOI
- Rawson, 2005, Writing-skills development in the health professions, Teach Learn Med, 17, 233, 10.1207/s15328015tlm1703_6 · DOI
- Alkhuzaee, 2019, Identifying the facilitators and barriers for scientific writing among pharmacy students in college of pharmacy, umm Al-Qura university – a qualitative study, Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 11, 1265, 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.09.004 · DOI
- Hobson, 1996, Writing across the pharmacy curriculum: an annotated bibliography, J Pharm Teach, 5, 37, 10.1300/J060v05n03_04 · DOI
- Maddux MS, Hobson EH, Vrahnos D, Holstad S, Roth MT, Zlatic TD. Developing a curriculum for tomorrow's pharmacy practitioners. Pharmaguide Hospital Medicine 1996;9(1):1–4,9–12.
- Prosser, 1997, Teaching pharmacy students to write in the medical record, Am J Pharm Educ, 61, 136, 10.1016/S0002-9459(24)08153-1 · DOI
- Ranelli, 1991, Using student-written book reviews as a teaching tool, J Pharm Teach, 2, 42
- Dolinsky, 1983, Student design and evaluation of written patient medication information, Am J Pharm Educ, 47, 123, 10.1016/S0002-9459(24)04119-6 · DOI
- Douchy, 1999, The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review, Stud High Educ, 24, 331, 10.1080/03075079912331379935 · DOI · Paper page
- Lynch, 2004, Assessing professionalism: a review of the literature, Med Teach, 26, 366, 10.1080/01421590410001696434 · DOI
- Rees, 2002, Communication skills assessment: the perceptions of medical students at the university of Nottingham, Med Educ, 36, 868, 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01300.x · DOI
- Falchikov, 2003, Involving students in assessment, Psychol Learn Teach, 3, 102, 10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102 · DOI
- Miesner, 2012, Use of student pharmacist peer feedback during a journal club in an advanced in pharmacy practice experience, Curr Pharm Teach Learn, 4, 165, 10.1016/j.cptl.2012.04.005 · DOI
- Kritikos, 2011, Intergroup peer assessment in problem-based learning tutorials for undergraduate pharmacy students, Am J Pharm Educ, 75, 73, 10.5688/ajpe75473 · DOI
- Wu, 2012, Pharmacy students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards peer assessment within a drug literature evaluation course, Am J Pharm Educ, 76, 62, 10.5688/ajpe76462 · DOI
- Odiema, 2015, Critical appraisal training increases understanding and confidence and enhances the use of evidence in diverse categories of learners, Health Expect, 18, 273, 10.1111/hex.12030 · DOI
- Black, 2016, Administration of a Canadian critical appraisal exam to pharmacy students in the Middle East, Pharm Educ, 16, 95
- Hobson, 1994, Writing and critical thinking: writing-to-learn in large classes, Am J Pharm Educ, 58, 423, 10.1016/S0002-9459(24)04235-9 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: a systematic review of benefits and challenges
Wei, Y., & Liu, D. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1506725 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Osman, A., Al-Badriyeh, D., Hussain, F. N., Riaz, S., Elewa, H., & Mraiche, F.
- Affiliations
- Qatar University (QA)
- Corresponding author
- Mraiche, Fatima
- Venue
- Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 765-772
- ISSN
- 1877-1297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283699422
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Qatar University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- scientific writing, peer assessment, critical appraisal, pharmacy students, journal club, non-English speaking students, writing skills, peer feedback
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Education, Pharmacy, Humans, Peer Review, Students, Pharmacy, Writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review