Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 Educational Outcomes
Open accessAbstract
An initiative of the Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (formerly the Center for the Advancement of Pharmaceutical Education) (CAPE), the CAPE Educational Outcomes are intended to be the target toward which the evolving pharmacy curriculum should be aimed. Their development was guided by an advisory panel composed of educators and practitioners nominated for participation by practitioner organizations. CAPE 2013 represents the fourth iteration of the Educational Outcomes, preceded by CAPE 1992, CAPE 1998 and CAPE 2004 respectively. The CAPE 2013 Educational Outcomes were released at the AACP July 2013 Annual meeting and have been revised to include 4 broad domains, 15 subdomains, and example learning objectives.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Faculty judges and student jurors evaluated competencies based on a standardised evaluation rubric (Appendix A), which paralleled the competencies described in CAPE 2013 and ACPE Standards 2016, including cognitive and affective domain outcomes such as critical thinking, teamwork, communication, and professionalism.
“Faculty judges and student jurors evaluated competencies based on a standardised evaluation rubric (Appendix A), which paralleled the competencies described in CAPE 2013 (Medina et al., 2013) and ACPE Standards 2016 (Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education, 2015), including cognitive and affective domain outcomes such as critical thinking, teamwork, communication, and professionalism.”
From Students’ performance and perceptions of mock trials as a teaching and assessment activity over three years at two institutions (2024) · cites this paper as Medina et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [41]41. Report of the National Expert Panel on Social Determinants of Health Equity: Recommendations for Advancing Efforts to Achieve Health Equity. Atlanta, GA. September 2009. http://www.unnaturalcauses.org/assets/uploads/file/SDOH%20Expert%20Panel%20Report%20final%2009%2025%202009.pdf. Accessed May 2013. [Google Scholar] 42.National Transitions of Care Coalition. Improving Transitions of care: the vision of the National Transitions of Care Coalition. http://www.ntocc.org/Portals/0/PDF/Resources/PolicyPaper.pdf. Accessed June 2013. [Google Scholar] 43.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Eligible professional meaningful use menu set measures. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/downloads/8_Transition_of_Care_Summary.pdf. Accessed May 2013. [Google Scholar] Articles from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education are provided here courtesy of American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kiles, T., Jasmin, H., Nichols, B., Haddad, R., & Renfro, C. P. (2020) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8241 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Using communication technology to enhance interprofessional education simulations
Shrader, S., Kostoff, M., Shin, T., Heble, A., Kempin, B., Miller, A., & Patykiewicz, N. (2016) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe80113 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Examining Health Care Students’ Attitudes toward E-Professionalism
Gettig, J. P., Noronha, S., Graneto, J., Obucina, L., Christensen, K. J., & Fjortoft, N. F. (2016) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8010169 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Davis, L. E. (2014) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe7810191 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Rosenberg, E., Hsu, S.-Y., Truong, H.-A., & Taheri, R. (2024) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2024.241.2939
- Authors
- Medina, M. S., Plaza, C. M., Stowe, C. D., Robinson, E. T., DeLander, G., Beck, D. E., Melchert, R. B., Supernaw, R. B., Roche, V. F., Gleason, B. L., Strong, M. N., Bain, A., Meyer, G. E., Dong, B. J., Rochon, J., & Johnston, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma (US)
- American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (US)
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
- Western New England University (US)
- Oregon State University (US)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
- Wingate University (US)
- Creighton University (US)
- University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy (US)
- Indian Health Service (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 162
- ISSN
- 0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3806946
- OpenAlex
- W2027986181
- Cited by
- 951
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 89 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 72.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Creighton Digital Repository (CDR) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
- American Pharmacists Association
- American College of Clinical Pharmacy
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- pharmacy curriculum, learning outcomes, pharmacy education, learning objectives, curriculum development
- MeSH terms
- Education, Pharmacy, Humans, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
