The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask)
Open accessAbstract
This article aims at discussing the cosmological constant problem at a pedagogical but fully technical level. We review how the vacuum energy can be regularized in flat and curved space–time and how it can be understood in terms of Feynman bubble diagrams. In particular, we show that the properly renormalized value of the zero-point energy density today (for a free theory) is in fact far from being 122 orders of magnitude larger than the critical energy density, as often quoted in the literature. We mainly consider the case of scalar fields but also treat the cases of fermions and gauge bosons which allows us to discuss the question of vacuum energy in super-symmetry. Then, we discuss how the cosmological constant can be measured in cosmology and constrained with experiments such as measurements of planet orbits in our solar system or atomic spectra. We also review why the Lamb shift and the Casimir effect seem to indicate that the quantum zero-point fluctuations are not an artifact of the quantum field theory formalism. We investigate how experiments on the universality of free fall can constrain the gravitational properties of vacuum energy and we discuss the status of the weak equivalence principle in quantum mechanics, in particular the Colella, Overhauser and Werner experiment and the quantum Galileo experiment performed with a Salecker–Wigner–Peres clock. Finally, we briefly conclude with a discussion on the solutions to the cosmological constant problem that have been proposed so far.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables
W., J. W., Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2004114 · Cited by 18,663
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables
Owen, D. B., Abramowitz, M., & Stegun, I. A. (1965) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1266136 · Cited by 16,138
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
Guth, A. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 · Cited by 9,983
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
Table of Integrals, Series, and Products
S., D., Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (1966) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2003554 · Cited by 8,092
A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity
Starobinsky, A. A. (1980) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(80)90670-x · Cited by 7,677
The cosmological constant problem
Weinberg, S. (1989) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.61.1 · Cited by 7,341
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Implications for Cosmology
Spergel, D. N., Bean, R., Dore, O., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Dunkley, J., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Komatsu, E., Page, L., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513700 · Cited by 6,778
Cited by
Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity
Joyce, A., Lombriser, L., & Schmidt, F. (2016) · Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553 · Cited by 463
A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419
“the cosmological constant problem [7, 8], representing the largest discrepancy between theoretical predictions and observations in all of science.”
BackgroundFarooq, O., Madiyar, F. R., Crandall, S., & Ratra, B. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/26 · Cited by 365
Yu, H., Ratra, B., & Wang, F.-Y. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab0a2 · Cited by 319
Born–Infeld inspired modifications of gravity
Beltrán Jiménez, J., Heisenberg, L., Olmo, G. J., & Rubiera-Garcia, D. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.001 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J.
- Venue
- Comptes Rendus. Physique
- Publisher
- MathDoc/Centre Mersenne
- Published
- 2012-07-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6-7
- Pages
- 566-665
- ISSN
- 1631-0705 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-1535
- OpenAlex
- W1983233159
- Cited by
- 913
- References
- 133
- FWCI
- 18.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.crhy.2012.04.008
- The paper
- Martin, J. (2012). Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask). Comptes Rendus. Physique. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2012.04.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.