Cited by 59Frailty in Older AdultsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareAging and Gerontology Research

Prescribers’ attitudes toward elderly breast cancer patients. Discrimination or empathy?

Protière, Christel, Viens, Patrice, Rousseau, Frédérique, Moatti, Jean Paul·2010·Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Abstract

Advancing age is often associated with co-morbidities. Patients' chronological and physiological ages do not always correspond. Elderly patients are often excluded from clinical trials and given sub-optimum treatment. In this context, the question of equity in access to health care arises. A specially designed questionnaire was mailed to French oncologists to determine what factors influenced them and to elicit their medical practice using four clinical cases. Significant differences in treatment choice depending only on patient's age were observed. The likelihood of an elderly breast cancer patient undergoing chemotherapy was found to depend on physician specialty and gender, kind of care structure, physician's perception of the age at which patients become elderly, and their knowledge about geriatric assessments. Some physicians did not always prescribe potentially beneficial treatments when dealing with elderly patients. Given the multidimensional nature of the care process, patients' preferences should be taken into account in medical decision-making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.09.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protière 2010 found significant negative differences in treatment choice for older patients.

    “Significant negative differences in treatment choice for older patients.”
  • Many assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians and by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work.

    “many of the assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians [25–41] and also by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work [27–36, 39, 41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Protière, C., Viens, P., Rousseau, F., & Moatti, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR)
Corresponding author
Protière, Christel
Venue
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
138-150
ISSN
1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985975803
Cited by
59
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
elderly breast cancer, physician attitudes, geriatric assessment, chemotherapy prescribing, physician specialty, gender differences in treatment, patient preferences, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Attitude of Health Personnel, Breast Neoplasms, Decision Making, Empathy, Female, France, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review