Cited by 182Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): A better mousetrap? A review of the clinical evidence

Ou, Sai-Hong Ignatius·2012·Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Abstract

The discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2004 heralded the era of molecular targeted therapy in NSCLC. First-generation small molecule, reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of EGFR, gefitinib and erlotinib, had been approved for second- or third-line treatment of NSCLC prior to the knowledge of these mutations. However, resistance to gefitinib and erlotinib invariably develops after prolonged clinical use. Two second-generation irreversible EGFR TKIs, afatinib (BIBW 2992) and dacomitinib (PF-00299804), that can potentially overcome the majority of these resistances are in late stage clinical development. Here I will review the clinical data of EGFR TKIs and discuss the appropriate future role of afatinib and dacomitinib in NSCLC: whether as replacement of erlotinib or gefitinib or only after erlotinib or gefitinib failure and whether different subgroups would benefit from different approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.11.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First-generation EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib were effective against activating EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions or L858R) occurring in 10-30% of NSCLC patients.

    “During clinical development in the early 2000s, the reversible, first-generation EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib (Fig. 2a) were discovered to be effective against tumours harbouring somatic activating mutations in EGFR, either deletions in exon 19 or the L858R point mutation, which occur in 10–30% of patients with NSCLC31–33.”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 111 · Cited by 182

Authors
Ou, S.-H. I.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Ou, Sai-Hong Ignatius
Venue
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
407-421
ISSN
1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968656389
Cited by
182
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • University of California, Irvine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib, dacomitinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, drug resistance, targeted therapy, second-line therapy
MeSH terms
Afatinib, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Quinazolines, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Quinazolinones, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review