Second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): A better mousetrap? A review of the clinical evidence
Abstract
The discovery of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 2004 heralded the era of molecular targeted therapy in NSCLC. First-generation small molecule, reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of EGFR, gefitinib and erlotinib, had been approved for second- or third-line treatment of NSCLC prior to the knowledge of these mutations. However, resistance to gefitinib and erlotinib invariably develops after prolonged clinical use. Two second-generation irreversible EGFR TKIs, afatinib (BIBW 2992) and dacomitinib (PF-00299804), that can potentially overcome the majority of these resistances are in late stage clinical development. Here I will review the clinical data of EGFR TKIs and discuss the appropriate future role of afatinib and dacomitinib in NSCLC: whether as replacement of erlotinib or gefitinib or only after erlotinib or gefitinib failure and whether different subgroups would benefit from different approaches.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
First-generation EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib were effective against activating EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions or L858R) occurring in 10-30% of NSCLC patients.
“During clinical development in the early 2000s, the reversible, first-generation EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib (Fig. 2a) were discovered to be effective against tumours harbouring somatic activating mutations in EGFR, either deletions in exon 19 or the L858R point mutation, which occur in 10–30% of patients with NSCLC31–33.”
From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 182
- Authors
- Ou, S.-H. I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ou, Sai-Hong Ignatius
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-421
- ISSN
- 1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968656389
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- University of California, Irvine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Keywords
- EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib, dacomitinib, gefitinib, erlotinib, non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, drug resistance, targeted therapy, second-line therapy
- MeSH terms
- Afatinib, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Quinazolines, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Quinazolinones, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review