Advances in covalent drug discovery
Open accessAbstract
Covalent drugs have been used to treat diseases for more than a century, but tools that facilitate the rational design of covalent drugs have emerged more recently. The purposeful addition of reactive functional groups to existing ligands can enable potent and selective inhibition of target proteins, as demonstrated by the covalent epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors used to treat various cancers. Moreover, the identification of covalent ligands through ‘electrophile-first’ approaches has also led to the discovery of covalent drugs, such as covalent inhibitors for KRAS(G12C) and SARS-CoV-2 main protease. In particular, the discovery of KRAS(G12C) inhibitors validates the use of covalent screening technologies, which have become more powerful and widespread over the past decade. Chemoproteomics platforms have emerged to complement covalent ligand screening and assist in ligand discovery, selectivity profiling and target identification. This Review showcases covalent drug discovery milestones with emphasis on the lessons learned from these programmes and how an evolving toolbox of covalent drug discovery techniques facilitates success in this field. The rational discovery of covalent drugs depends on an expanding toolset of techniques. Here, Daniel Nomura and colleagues highlight covalent drugs that have achieved success over the past decade and discuss the tools and strategies that facilitate their discovery, describing two complementary approaches, namely, ligand-first and electrophile-first strategies.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review traces covalent drug discovery from serendipitous historical agents to rational ligand-first and electrophile-first programmes, highlighting approved inhibitors for EGFR, BTK, KRAS(G12C), SARS-CoV-2 Mpro and other targets. It argues that chemoproteomics, covalent screening and structure-guided design now form an integrated toolbox for tackling previously undruggable proteins.
Key findings
- Covalent drugs can gain potency and selectivity by adding mildly reactive electrophiles to reversible ligands or by screening electrophilic libraries; examples include osimertinib and ibrutinib, with 2020 sales of US$8.43 billion and US$4.33 billion respectively, and sotorasib, approved in 2021 for KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC.
- Electrophile-first discovery was validated by KRAS(G12C) inhibitors: an initial tethering screen of 480 disulfide fragments and later a 3,300-acrylamide screen contributed to sotorasib; KRAS is mutated in about 25% of cancers, and KRASG12C accounts for 12–14% of KRAS mutations in NSCLC.
- Covalent protease inhibitors include nirmatrelvir, which forms a reversible covalent nitrile adduct with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Cys145 and was authorized as part of Paxlovid in December 2021; HCV NS3/4a ketoamide inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir were approved in 2011 but later discontinued or withdrawn.
- Chemoproteomic platforms such as isoTOP-ABPP and SLC-ABPP enable profiling of more than 30,000 reactive cysteines, over 8,000 cysteine sites in 18 min per compound, and show that 97% of E3 ligases possess reactive cysteines, supporting covalent E3 recruiters for targeted protein degradation.
Methods
- Narrative review, not primary research; it synthesizes published literature, drug approval histories, structural biology and chemoproteomic datasets across covalent drug discovery.
- Evidence is organized by discovery approach: ligand-first (EGFR, BTK and other kinases), electrophile-first (KRAS(G12C), SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, HCV protease, proteasome, boron-containing drugs, voxelotor) and enabling tools (screening platforms, chemoproteomics, covalent docking).
- Includes tables comparing key covalent drugs and screening methods, plus figures on development timelines, inhibitor–target structures and isoTOP-ABPP workflow; no systematic search strategy or meta-analysis is described.
Limitations
- The paper states no explicit limitations. Evident: it is a selective narrative review without systematic search criteria or quantitative synthesis, so examples are chosen to illustrate milestones rather than exhaustively cover the field.
- Evident: many claims depend on cited primary studies and clinical or preclinical data that are not independently reanalysed, and the fast-moving nature of the field may date some coverage.
- Evident: the review emphasizes cysteine-targeting electrophiles and oncology or infectious disease examples, with comparatively less attention to non-cysteine nucleophilic residues and other covalent strategies.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 201 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Chemoproteomic platforms enable rapid target identification and selectivity profiling of covalent ligands.
“This ‘electrophile-first’ approach is partly facilitated by the development of chemoproteomic platforms that enable rapid target identification and selectivity profiling of covalent ligands14–18.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [14] Spradlin, J. N., Zhang, E. & Nomura, D. K. Reimagining druggability using chemoproteomic platforms. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1801–1813 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15] Roberts, A. M., Ward, C. C. & Nomura, D. K. Activity-based protein profiling for mapping and pharmacologically interrogating proteome-wide ligandable hotspots. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 43, 25–33 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16] Drewes, G. & Knapp, S. Chemoproteomics and chemical probes for target discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 1275–1286 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [17] Moellering, R. E. & Cravatt, B. F. How chemoproteomics can enable drug discovery and development. Chem. Biol. 19, 11–22 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18] Maurais, A. J. & Weerapana, E. Reactive-cysteine profiling for drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 50, 29–36 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Afatinib was FDA-approved in 2013 as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations.
“Afatinib (Boehringer Ingelheim) (Figs. 1 and 2b) was approved by the FDA in 2013 as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC with activating mutations in EGFR37,38.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] Soria, J.-C. et al. Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 16, 897–907 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Yu, H. A. & Pao, W. Afatinib — new therapy option for EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10, 551–552 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Prolonged target engagement of covalent drugs can give distinct pharmacodynamic profiles and exceptional potency.
“The prolonged target engagement of covalent drugs can provide distinct pharmacodynamic profiles and exceptional potency6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] Zhang, T., Hatcher, J. M., Teng, M., Gray, N. S. & Kostic, M. Recent advances in selective and irreversible covalent ligand development and validation. Cell Chem. Biol. 26, 1486–1500 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Covalent ligand screening from electrophilic compound libraries is becoming more common.
“Covalent ligand screening is another ligand discovery approach that is becoming more common, whereby various methods are used to discover covalent ligands from libraries of electrophilic compounds7,12,13.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] Lonsdale, R. & Ward, R. A. Structure-based design of targeted covalent inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 3816–3830 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Lagoutte, R., Patouret, R. & Winssinger, N. Covalent inhibitors: an opportunity for rational target selectivity. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 39, 54–63 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [13] Lu, W. et al. Fragment-based covalent ligand discovery. RSC Chem. Biol. 2, 354–367 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The T790M gatekeeper mutation caused disease progression in 60% of cases.
“in 60% of cases this was due to the acquisition of the T790M ‘gatekeeper mutation’34,35.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Yu, H. A. et al. Analysis of tumor specimens at the time of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in 155 patients with EGFR -mutant lung cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 2240–2247 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] Recondo, G., Facchinetti, F., Olaussen, K. A., Besse, B. & Friboulet, L. Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI? Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 694–708 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
First-generation EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib were effective against activating EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions or L858R) occurring in 10-30% of NSCLC patients.
“During clinical development in the early 2000s, the reversible, first-generation EGFR inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib (Fig. 2a) were discovered to be effective against tumours harbouring somatic activating mutations in EGFR, either deletions in exon 19 or the L858R point mutation, which occur in 10–30% of patients with NSCLC31–33.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] Lynch, T. J., Okimoto, R. A., Supko, J. G. & Settleman, J. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non–small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2129–2139 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [32] Paez, J. G. et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304, 1497–1500 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] Ou, S.-H. I. Second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): a better mousetrap? A review of the clinical evidence. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 83, 407–421 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Concerns about assay interference and poor selectivity historically discouraged investigation of reactive molecules.
“Historically, concerns about the interference of these reactive molecules with biological assays and potential lack of selectivity often discouraged further investigation2,3.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Singh, J., Petter, R. C., Baillie, T. A. & Whitty, A. The resurgence of covalent drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 307–317 (2011). This review illustrates the key features of covalent drug discovery with emphasis on targeted covalent inhibitors. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] Ghosh, A. K., Samanta, I., Mondal, A. & Liu, W. R. Covalent inhibition in drug discovery. ChemMedChem 14, 889–906 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Dose-limiting wild-type EGFR toxicity likely prevented afatinib from improving overall survival versus platinum chemotherapy in T790M cancers.
“Despite the increased potency that covalent engagement brought against the disease target, the dose-limiting toxicity caused by inhibition of wild-type EGFR likely prevented afatinib from increasing overall survival when compared head-to-head with platinum-based chemotherapy in treating cancers bearing the T790M gatekeeper mutation39.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Harvey, R. D., Adams, V. R., Beardslee, T. & Medina, P. Afatinib for the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: a review of clinical findings. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 26, 1461–1474 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
12-14% of KRAS mutations in NSCLC are KRASG12C.
“Third, 12–14% of KRAS mutations in NSCLC are KRASG12C, presenting a promising patient group that would directly benefit from KRAS(G12C) inhibition89.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Hofmann, M. H., Gerlach, D., Misale, S., Petronczki, M. & Kraut, N. Expanding the reach of precision oncology by drugging all KRAS mutants. Cancer Discov. 12, 924–937 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Directly drugging KRAS with traditional methods has been unsuccessful.
“Since the discovery of the role of KRAS in cancer nearly 30 years ago, attempts to drug it directly using traditional drug discovery methods have been unsuccessful9,10.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Moore, A. R., Rosenberg, S. C., McCormick, F. & Malek, S. RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 533–552 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Huang, L., Guo, Z., Wang, F. & Fu, L. KRAS mutation: from undruggable to druggable in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 386 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Paxlovid is highly effective at preventing progression to severe COVID-19 in symptomatic patients.
“Paxlovid was shown to be highly effective at preventing progression to severe COVID-19 in symptomatic patients105.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] Hammond, J. et al. Oral nirmatrelvir for high-risk, nonhospitalized adults with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1397–1408 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Covalent inhibitor discovery against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro emerged from work on SARS-CoV-1 protease inhibitors.
“The discovery of covalent inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro emerged from extensive work on protease inhibitors for SARS-CoV-1, which is the causative virus for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 1 (SARS1)100.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] Qiao, J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model. Science 371, 1374–1378 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Replacing the α-hydroxymethylketone moiety of PF-00835231 with a nitrile group improved its oral bioavailability.
“the oral bioavailability of PF-00835231 was improved by replacing the α-hydroxymethylketone moiety with a nitrile group, which can also act as an electrophile103.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
When reactive cysteine residues are shared across a protein family, structurally guided adaptation of known cysteine-reactive covalent inhibitors can produce selective and potent drugs for other proteins with that feature.
“Generally, when reactive cysteine residues are shared across a protein family, structurally guided adaptation of previously studied cysteine-reactive covalent inhibitors can lead to selective and potent drugs for other proteins with this feature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
α-Ketoamide-based covalent inhibitors have been developed to treat HCV by inhibiting NS3/4a.
“α-Ketoamide-based covalent inhibitors have been developed to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection through inhibiting NS3/4a”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] de Leuw, P. & Stephan, C. Protease inhibitor therapy for hepatitis C virus-infection. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 19, 577–587 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Drugs relying on covalent binding to a specific nucleophilic amino acid are generally vulnerable to resistance mutations at that site.
“Generally, drugs whose efficacy relies on covalent binding to a specific nucleophilic amino acid are vulnerable to mutations at that site, which could lead to drug resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
NS3/4a is a serine protease that cleaves the HCV polyprotein into non-structural proteins required for replication.
“NS3/4a — a serine protease that cleaves the HCV polyprotein into multiple non-structural proteins required for replication107.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] de Leuw, P. & Stephan, C. Protease inhibitor therapy for hepatitis C virus-infection. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 19, 577–587 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
BTK became a target in CLL due to its role downstream of the B cell receptor.
“BTK became a target of interest in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia owing to its crucial role downstream of the B cell receptor53.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] Pal Singh, S., Dammeijer, F. & Hendriks, R. W. Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cells and malignancies. Mol. Cancer 17, 57 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nirmatrelvir has in vivo efficacy in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 (MA10) model.
“The in vivo efficacy of nirmatrelvir was demonstrated in a mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2 MA10) model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Covalent targeting of JAK3 Cys909 yields inhibitors selective for JAK3 over other JAK family members for autoimmune diseases.
“Covalent targeting of the non-conserved Cys909 of JAK3 has yielded inhibitors selective for JAK3 over other JAK family members for the treatment of autoimmune diseases77–81.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [77] Thorarensen, A. et al. Design of a Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) specific inhibitor 1-((2S,5R)-5-((7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl)amino)-2-methylpiperidin-1-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (PF-06651600) allowing for the interrogation of JAK3 signaling in humans. J. Med. Chem. 60, 1971–1993 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [78] Goedken, E. R. et al. Tricyclic covalent inhibitors selectively target Jak3 through an active site thiol. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 4573–4589 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [79] Tan, L. et al. Development of selective covalent Janus kinase 3 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58, 6589–6606 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [80] Kempson, J. et al. Discovery of highly potent, selective, covalent inhibitors of JAK3. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27, 4622–4625 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [81] Telliez, J.-B. et al. Discovery of a JAK3-selective inhibitor: functional differentiation of JAK3-selective inhibition over pan-JAK or JAK1-selective inhibition. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 3442–3451 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Adapting earlier protease inhibitors to selectively target SARS-CoV-2 main protease exemplifies structure-based design that exploits the useful properties of covalent drugs.
“The quick adaptation of previous protease inhibitors to selectively target SARS-CoV-2 Mpro is an example of using structure-based design while taking into account the valuable properties of covalent drugs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Nitriles can covalently bind highly reactive nucleophiles.
“Nitriles can covalently bind particularly reactive nucleophiles; however, the ease of thiol elimination from the thioimidate adduct makes nitriles more reversible than some other electrophiles, such as acrylamides104.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [104] Bandyopadhyay, A. & Gao, J. Targeting biomolecules with reversible covalent chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 34, 110–116 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nirmatrelvir covalently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 main protease.
“Nirmatrelvir (Table 1) covalently inhibits the Mpro of SARS-CoV-2 (ref.3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Ghosh, A. K., Samanta, I., Mondal, A. & Liu, W. R. Covalent inhibition in drug discovery. ChemMedChem 14, 889–906 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nirmatrelvir is a highly potent reversible covalent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2.
“PF-07321332, named nirmatrelvir (Fig. 4 and Table 1), which is a highly potent SARS-CoV-2 reversible covalent inhibitor”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The nitrile group of nirmatrelvir reacts with Cys145 of SARS-CoV-2 main protease to form a covalent thioimidate adduct.
“The nitrile group of nirmatrelvir (shown in green) reacts with Cys145 of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease (shown in light blue) to form a covalent thioimidate adduct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nitriles are more reversible than acrylamides because thiol elimination from the thioimidate adduct is easy.
“the ease of thiol elimination from the thioimidate adduct makes nitriles more reversible than some other electrophiles, such as acrylamides104.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [104] Bandyopadhyay, A. & Gao, J. Targeting biomolecules with reversible covalent chemistry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 34, 110–116 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Ibrutinib's rapid clearance could enable kinase selectivity by maintaining BTK engagement while minimizing reversible off-target inhibition.
“The rapid clearance of ibrutinib (which has a half-life of 2–3 h) could also enable kinase selectivity; ibrutinib should maintain activity against BTK owing to prolonged covalent engagement, while the reversible inhibition of off-targets is minimized65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Advani, R. H. et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765) has significant activity in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 88–94 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
SARS-CoV-2 replication depends on Mpro cleavage of pp1a and pp1ab into functional viral proteins.
“Viral replication depends on successful cleavage of pp1a and pp1ab by the Mpro (also referred to as 3CLpro), which is a cysteine protease, into functional viral proteins100.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] Qiao, J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model. Science 371, 1374–1378 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Compound 12, the first mutant-selective covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitor, was found by tethering 480 disulfide fragments against GDP-bound KRAS(G12C).
“The inhibitor (compound 12 in their study) was discovered through a disulfide-fragment screening approach known as tethering, whereby a library of 480 disulfide fragments was screened against KRAS(G12C) in the GDP-bound state using intact protein mass spectrometry (MS)88,90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [88] Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A. & Shokat, K. M. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 503, 548–551 (2013). This work showcases the use of tethering as a screening methodology for discovering covalent ligands against KRAS(G12C) and further identifies ligands against this oncogenic protein. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [90] Erlanson, D. A., Wells, J. A. & Braisted, A. C. Tethering: fragment-based drug discovery. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 199–223 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
PF-00835231 potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 main protease in a FRET-based activity assay.
“PF-00835231, which demonstrated potent SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibition in an activity assay based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Success of covalent EGFR inhibitors validated engaging non-conserved cysteines near kinase active sites to improve potency and pharmacodynamics.
“The success of covalent EGFR inhibitors has validated the approach of covalently engaging non-catalytic, non-conserved cysteines adjacent to kinase active sites to increase the potency and modulate the pharmacodynamics of initially reversible ligands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The shared features of JAK3 and mutant EGFR(T790M) enabled discovery of potent JAK3-selective covalent inhibitors starting from an EGFR inhibitor.
“These shared features enabled the discovery of potent JAK3-selective covalent inhibitors using an EGFR inhibitor as a starting point”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Tan, L. et al. Development of selective covalent Janus kinase 3 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58, 6589–6606 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The kinact/Ki second-order rate constant is preferred over IC50 for measuring covalent inhibitor potency because it describes potency in a time-independent manner.
“Although half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values are often used to measure the potency of covalent inhibitors, the kinact/Ki second-order rate constant (where Ki is the inhibition constant and kinact is the rate of enzyme inactivation) is preferred because it describes inhibitor potency in a time-independent manner212,213.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [212] Strelow, J. M. A perspective on the kinetics of covalent and irreversible inhibition. SLAS Discov. 22, 3–20 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [213] McWhirter, C. in Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry (eds Ward, R. A. & Grimster, N. P.) vol. 56 1–31 (Elsevier, 2021).
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ABPP was pioneered by Cravatt and Bogyo using active-site-directed chemical probes that covalently target catalytic residues of hydrolases, proteases, and kinases.
“ABPP was pioneered by Cravatt and Bogyo using active-site-directed chemical probes that covalently target catalytic residues of various enzyme classes, including hydrolases, proteases and kinases173,174.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [173] Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T. & Kozarich, J. W. Activity-based protein profiling: from enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 383–414 (2008). This review highlights the tools involved in ABPP and explains their corresponding applications. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [174] Edgington, L. E., Verdoes, M. & Bogyo, M. Functional imaging of proteases: recent advances in the design and application of substrate-based and activity-based probes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 15, 798–805 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Boceprevir, telaprevir, and narlaprevir use a ketoamide electrophile to covalently engage the catalytic serine of NS3/4a.
“These compounds, along with narlaprevir113, use a ketoamide electrophile to covalently engage the catalytic serine of NS3/4a.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [113] Arasappan, A. et al. Discovery of narlaprevir (SCH 900518): a potent, second generation HCV NS3 serine protease inhibitor. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 1, 64–69 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cysteine-targeted DNA-encoded or protein-nucleic acid-encoded libraries have identified covalent ligands for bromodomains including PCAF and BRD4, as well as for JNK1, MEK2, and HER2.
“over the past 5 years, cysteine-targeted DNA-encoded or protein–nucleic acid-encoded libraries have been used to identify covalent ligands for bromodomains, including PCAF and BRD4, as well as for JNK1, MEK2 and HER2 (refs.160–162).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [160] Zimmermann, G. et al. A specific and covalent JNK-1 ligand selected from an encoded self-assembling chemical library. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 8152–8155 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [161] Zambaldo, C., Daguer, J.-P., Saarbach, J., Barluenga, S. & Winssinger, N. Screening for covalent inhibitors using DNA-display of small molecule libraries functionalized with cysteine reactive moieties. Med. Chem. Commun. 7, 1340–1351 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [162] Daguer, J.-P. et al. Identification of covalent bromodomain binders through DNA display of small molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6057–6061 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Over the past decade, covalent ligand discovery has shifted towards screening more drug-like electrophilic fragments.
“Over the past decade, covalent ligand discovery has shifted towards screening more drug-like electrophilic fragments13.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Lu, W. et al. Fragment-based covalent ligand discovery. RSC Chem. Biol. 2, 354–367 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Covalent docking software provides useful information on ligand-protein interactions when key assumptions can be made, namely when the electrophile's reactivity and the site of modification are known.
“Overall, covalent docking software provides useful information on ligand–protein interactions when key assumptions can be made — namely, when the reactivity of the electrophile and the site of modification is known.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The success of ketoamide-based NS3/4a inhibitors in increasing interferon-ribavirin efficacy highlights the ketoamide group's utility as a serine-reactive electrophile for covalent antivirals.
“Nevertheless, the success of ketoamide-based NS3/4a inhibitors in increasing the efficacy of interferon–ribavirin therapy emphasizes the utility of the ketoamide group as a serine-reactive electrophile in designing covalent antivirals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Larger covalent DELs with approximately 100,000,000 members have been developed and used to identify acrylamide-based and epoxide-based BTK inhibitors with novel scaffolds.
“More recently, even larger covalent DELs (with approximately 100,000,000 members) have been developed and used to identify acrylamide-based and epoxide-based BTK inhibitors with novel scaffolds165.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [165] Guilinger, J. P. et al. Novel irreversible covalent BTK inhibitors discovered using DNA-encoded chemistry. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 42, 116223 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The epoxyketone moiety in carfilzomib forms a morpholino ring with the catalytic N-terminal threonine of the 20S proteasome.
“The epoxyketone moiety in carfilzomib forms a morpholino ring with the catalytic N-terminal threonine of the 20S proteasome”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [127] Groll, M., Kim, K. B., Kairies, N., Huber, R. & Crews, C. M. Crystal structure of epoxomicin:20S proteasome reveals a molecular basis for selectivity of α‘,β‘-epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 1237–1238 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
With an appropriate time-point choice, IC50 values can be a useful tool to rapidly assess potency for covalent inhibitors.
“However, with an appropriate time-point choice, IC50 values can be a useful tool to rapidly assess potency for covalent inhibitors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Replacing an aldehyde electrophile with a boronic acid substantially increased proteasome inhibition potency.
“Exchange of the aldehyde electrophile for a boronic acid substantially increased the potency of proteasome inhibition121.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] Adams, J. et al. Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 333–338 (1998). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Tethering uses libraries of compounds linked to disulfides to identify fragments that bind cysteine-adjacent pockets.
“Originally, MS-based compound screening grew out of ‘tethering’, which is a technique employed since 2000 that uses libraries of compounds linked to disulfides to identify fragments that bind cysteine-adjacent pockets90,147.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [90] Erlanson, D. A., Wells, J. A. & Braisted, A. C. Tethering: fragment-based drug discovery. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 199–223 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [147] Erlanson, D. A. et al. Site-directed ligand discovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9367–9372 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A commercial library of 993 acrylamides and chloroacetamides was screened using intact MS to identify ligands of OTUB2 and NUDT7.
“More recently, a commercial library of 993 acrylamides and chloroacetamides was screened using intact MS to identify ligands of the deubiquitinase OTUB2 and the pyrophosphatase NUDT7 (ref.156).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] Resnick, E. et al. Rapid covalent-probe discovery by electrophile-fragment screening. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 8951–8968 (2019). This paper highlights the use of intact MS screening methods paired with structure-guided design to identify covalent fragment ligands against protein targets. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Emerging technologies allow covalent ligand discovery to start from an electrophile-first perspective, identifying covalent ligands against targets before structure-based optimization.
“However, emerging technologies make it possible to approach covalent ligand discovery from an electrophile-first perspective, in which covalent ligands against protein targets of interest are identified before structure-based optimization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The proposed carfilzomib mechanism illustrates how covalency can drive selectivity through highly specific mechanisms.
“this proposed mechanism of carfilzomib illustrates how covalency can help to drive selectivity through highly specific mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
An aldehyde-containing natural product and several synthetic aldehyde analogues prevent HbS polymerization by increasing its affinity for oxygen.
“An aldehyde-containing natural product and several synthetic aldehyde analogues were found to prevent polymerization by increasing the affinity of HbS for oxygen143.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143] Metcalf, B. et al. Discovery of GBT440, an orally bioavailable r-state stabilizer of sickle cell hemoglobin. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 321–326 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Chemoproteomic platforms enable identification of covalent compounds and their ligandable sites on target proteins directly in complex biological systems.
“Chemoproteomic platforms enable the identification of covalent compounds and their corresponding ligandable sites on target proteins directly in complex biological systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The reversibility of the serine-boron bond hinders chemoproteomic profiling experiments commonly used to characterize covalent ligand selectivity.
“The reversibility of the serine–boron bond hinders chemoproteomic profiling experiments commonly used to characterize the selectivity of covalent ligands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The success of voxelotor, like that of ibrutinib, shows that covalent drugs can be dosed at high amounts when ADME properties are favourable.
“The success of voxelotor is similar to that of ibrutinib in demonstrating that covalent drugs can be dosed at high amounts given favourable absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Bortezomib's boronic acid covalently binds the hydroxy group of the β5 subunit N-terminal threonine of the 20S proteasome, inhibiting its chymotrypsin-like activity.
“The effect of bortezomib comes from the boronic acid covalently binding to the hydroxy group of the β5 subunit N-terminal threonine of the 20S proteasome, leading to inhibition of the proteasome’s chymotrypsin-like activity125.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] Cromm, P. M. & Crews, C. M. The proteasome in modern drug discovery: second life of a highly valuable drug target. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 830–838 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
ABPP facilitates discovery of covalently ligandable sites and corresponding ligands in complex biological samples.
“ABPP facilitates the discovery of covalently ligandable sites and the corresponding ligands in complex biological samples.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Most computational programs for covalent docking rely on directly linking models to model conformations under the constraint of a predefined bond between a ligand and a corresponding amino acid site.
“Most computational programs for covalent docking rely on directly linking models to model conformations under the constraint of a predefined bond between a ligand and a corresponding amino acid site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The discovery of voxelotor shows that identifying unusually reactive amino acid residues, such as the α-haemoglobin N-terminus, creates opportunities for drug discovery.
“Furthermore, the discovery of voxelotor shows how the identification of unusually reactive amino acid residues, such as the α-haemoglobin N-terminus, provides opportunities for drug discovery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A library of 3,300 acrylamides was screened in a thiol reactivity assay, a RAF-coupled nucleotide exchange assay, and an intact MS assay.
“A library of 3,300 acrylamides was screened in three assays: a thiol reactivity assay, a RAF-coupled nucleotide exchange assay and an intact MS assay158.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [158] Shin, Y. et al. Discovery of N-(1-acryloylazetidin-3-yl)-2-(1H-indol-1-yl)acetamides as covalent inhibitors of KRASG12C. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 10, 1302–1308 (2019). This study details the discovery of covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors through screening an acrylamide library, which laid the groundwork for the discovery of sotorasib. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Covalent binding can be maintained in tethering by replacing the disulfide with an electrophile such as an acrylamide, as in the initial covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors.
“but covalent binding can be maintained by replacing the disulfide with an electrophile such as an acrylamide, as in the case of the initial covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors88.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A. & Shokat, K. M. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 503, 548–551 (2013). This work showcases the use of tethering as a screening methodology for discovering covalent ligands against KRAS(G12C) and further identifies ligands against this oncogenic protein. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The covalent interaction between ketoamide inhibitors and NS3/4a is relatively reversible because the serine alcohol group is eliminated from the protein-inhibitor adduct.
“This covalent interaction is relatively reversible owing to elimination of the serine alcohol group from the protein–inhibitor adduct114.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] McCauley, J. A. & Rudd, M. T. Hepatitis C virus NS3/4a protease inhibitors. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 30, 84–92 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
DOCKovalent uses non-covalent docking methods to pre-generate conformations and states for an electrophilic virtual library and then samples each state against the target nucleophile.
“DOCKovalent uses non-covalent docking methods to pre-generate conformations and states for an electrophilic virtual library and then samples each state against the target nucleophile.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [169] London, N. et al. Covalent docking of large libraries for the discovery of chemical probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 1066–1072 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Electrophilic compounds are frequently tested for reactivity, usually with respect to thiols, to ensure that potent covalent inhibitors are not promiscuous ligands lacking selectivity.
“To ensure that potent covalent inhibitors are not promiscuous ligands that lack selectivity, electrophilic compounds are frequently tested for reactivity, usually with respect to thiols.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Several additional boron-containing drugs inhibit serine hydrolases beyond the proteasome by forming covalent adducts between catalytic serine residues and boron.
“Several additional boron-containing drugs inhibit serine hydrolases beyond the proteasome through formation of covalent adducts between catalytic serine residues and boron133,134.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [133] Diaz, D. B. & Yudin, A. K. The versatility of boron in biological target engagement. Nat. Chem. 9, 731–742 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [134] Plescia, J. & Moitessier, N. Design and discovery of boronic acid drugs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 195, 112270 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cysteine reactivity and ligandable sites were mapped in mutant KEAP1 and compared with wild-type KEAP1 NSCLC lines.
“cysteine reactivity and ligandable sites were mapped in mutant Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1) and compared with those in wild-type KEAP1 NSCLC lines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Bar-Peled, L. et al. Chemical proteomics identifies druggable vulnerabilities in a genetically defined cancer. Cell 171, 696–709.e23 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Identification of non-inhibitory covalent ligands has the potential to contribute to discovery of novel induced proximity modalities.
“Beyond degradation, the identification of non-inhibitory covalent ligands has the potential to contribute to the discovery of novel induced proximity modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The covalent ligands and corresponding ligandable sites discovered with competitive isoTOP-ABPP helped elucidate the roles of caspase 8 and caspase 10 in extrinsic apoptosis in T cells.
“The covalent ligands discovered with this approach and their corresponding ligandable sites were used to help elucidate the role of caspase 8 and caspase 10 in extrinsic apoptosis in T cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Backus, K. M. et al. Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems. Nature 534, 570–574 (2016). This work demonstrates how chemoproteomics can be paired with covalent ligand screening to identify the protein targets of covalent ligands in complex biological samples. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Competitive isoTOP-ABPP was expanded to identify proteome-wide targets of a small covalent fragment library by competing acrylamide and chloroacetamide fragments against an iodoacetamide-alkyne probe.
“The use of competitive isoTOP-ABPP was expanded to identify proteome-wide targets of a small covalent fragment library by competing individual acrylamide and chloroacetamide fragments against an iodoacetamide–alkyne probe180.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Backus, K. M. et al. Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems. Nature 534, 570–574 (2016). This work demonstrates how chemoproteomics can be paired with covalent ligand screening to identify the protein targets of covalent ligands in complex biological samples. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cysteine hyper-reactivity predicts cysteine function in catalysis and at post-translational modification sites.
“Using this approach, it was discovered that the hyper-reactivity of cysteines predicts their functionality in catalysis and at sites of post-translational modifications177.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177] Weerapana, E. et al. Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes. Nature 468, 790–795 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In the first isoTOP-ABPP reports, an iodoacetamide probe carrying an alkyne handle was used to identify hyper-reactive cysteines across the proteome.
“In the first reports of the isoTOP-ABPP (isotopic tandem orthogonal proteolysis–activity-based protein profiling) approach, an iodoacetamide probe functionalized with an alkyne handle was used to identify hyper-reactive cysteines across the proteome176,177”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [176] Weerapana, E., Speers, A. E. & Cravatt, B. F. Tandem orthogonal proteolysis-activity-based protein profiling (TOP-ABPP) — a general method for mapping sites of probe modification in proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1414–1425 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [177] Weerapana, E. et al. Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes. Nature 468, 790–795 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Since 2019, covalent recruiters have been used to validate a large proportion of E3 ligases harnessed for targeted protein degradation, including RNF114, RNF4, DCAF16, DCAF11, KEAP1 and FEM1B.
“Since 2019, covalent recruiters have been used to validate a large proportion of the E3 ligases that have been harnessed for targeted protein degradation, including RING finger protein 114 (RNF114), RNF4, DDB1 and CUL4-associated factor 16 (DCAF16), DCAF11, KEAP1 and, most recently, fem-1 homologue B (FEM1B)187–193.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked- cites [187] Spradlin, J. N. et al. Harnessing the anti-cancer natural product nimbolide for targeted protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 747–755 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [188] Luo, M. et al. Chemoproteomics-enabled discovery of covalent RNF114-based degraders that mimic natural product function. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 559–566.e15 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [189] Ward, C. C. et al. Covalent ligand screening uncovers a RNF4 E3 ligase recruiter for targeted protein degradation applications. ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 2430–2440 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [190] Zhang, X., Crowley, V. M., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Dix, M. M. & Cravatt, B. F. Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by engaging DCAF16. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 737–746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [191] Zhang, X. et al. DCAF11 supports targeted protein degradation by electrophilic proteolysis-targeting chimeras. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 5141–5149 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [192] Tong, B. et al. Bardoxolone conjugation enables targeted protein degradation of BRD4. Sci. Rep. 10, 15543 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [193] Henning, N. J. et al. Discovery of a covalent FEM1B recruiter for targeted protein degradation applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 44, 701–708 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Most bifunctional degraders recruit CRBN or VHL, but there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.
- Premisecitation
The approach identified several proteins that could be targeted covalently to impair T cell activity, including BIRC2, BIRC3, the NuRD complex, and kinases ITK and CYTIP.
“this approach was also used to identify several proteins that could be targeted covalently to impair T cell activity, including BIRC2 and BIRC3, the nucleosome remodelling deacetylase (NuRD) complex, and the kinases ITK and CYTIP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] Vinogradova, E. V. et al. An activity-guided map of electrophile-cysteine interactions in primary human T cells. Cell 182, 1009–1026.e29 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Analyses of chemoproteomic data sets assessing cysteine reactivity indicate that 97% of E3 ligases possess reactive cysteines.
“On the basis of analyses of chemoproteomic data sets assessing cysteine reactivity, 97% of E3 ligases possess reactive cysteines”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] Belcher, B. P., Ward, C. C. & Nomura, D. K. Ligandability of E3 ligases for targeted protein degradation applications. Biochemistry https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00464 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Most bifunctional degraders recruit CRBN or VHL, but there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.
- Interpretationreasoning
Identification of non-inhibitory allosteric ligands through covalent ligand screening has the potential to facilitate recruitment of other enzymes such as kinases and deacetylases to target proteins and direct protein function to neosubstrates for therapeutic benefit.
“In general, the identification of non-inhibitory, allosteric ligands through covalent ligand screening has the potential to facilitate recruitment of other enzymes (such as kinases and deacetylases) to target proteins and direct protein function to neosubstrates for therapeutic benefit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In both cases, covalent engagement of a cysteine residue disrupted a protein-protein interaction to modulate immune cell function.
“In both cases, covalent engagement of a cysteine residue disrupted a protein–protein interaction to modulate immune cell function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [184] Blewett, M. M. et al. Chemical proteomic map of dimethyl fumarate–sensitive cysteines in primary human T cells. Sci. Signal. 9, rs10 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [185] Zaro, B. W. et al. Dimethyl fumarate disrupts human innate immune signaling by targeting the IRAK4–MyD88 complex. J. Immunol. 202, 2737–2746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
This approach can rapidly identify compounds that target proteins of biological interest.
“showing that this approach can rapidly identify compounds that target proteins of biological interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Backus, K. M. et al. Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems. Nature 534, 570–574 (2016). This work demonstrates how chemoproteomics can be paired with covalent ligand screening to identify the protein targets of covalent ligands in complex biological samples. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Disrupting the IRAK4-MYD88 interaction suppressed interferon-α production in plasmacytoid dendritic cells.
“disrupting the IRAK4–MYD88 interaction suppressed the production of interferon-α in plasmacytoid dendritic cells184,185.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] Zaro, B. W. et al. Dimethyl fumarate disrupts human innate immune signaling by targeting the IRAK4–MyD88 complex. J. Immunol. 202, 2737–2746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pairing ABPP with a MYC transcription factor activity assay identified EN4 as a covalent MYC ligand.
“ABPP was paired with a MYC transcription factor activity assay to identify a covalent MYC ligand, EN4 (ref.179).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Boike, L. et al. Discovery of a functional covalent ligand targeting an intrinsically disordered cysteine within MYC. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 4–13 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The direct covalent targets of dimethyl fumarate remained unclear until recently, despite its long use for psoriasis and FDA approval for multiple sclerosis in 2013.
“Although dimethyl fumarate has been used for three decades to treat psoriasis and was approved by the FDA in 2013 for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, the direct covalent targets of dimethyl fumarate remained unclear until more recently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [184] Blewett, M. M. et al. Chemical proteomic map of dimethyl fumarate–sensitive cysteines in primary human T cells. Sci. Signal. 9, rs10 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [185] Zaro, B. W. et al. Dimethyl fumarate disrupts human innate immune signaling by targeting the IRAK4–MyD88 complex. J. Immunol. 202, 2737–2746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several hydrazine-containing compounds act as mechanism-based inhibitors of MAO A and B, with MAO activation enabling alkylation of a flavin cofactor and enzyme inhibition.
“Several hydrazine-containing compounds act as mechanism-based inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO) A and B, whereby activation by MAO enables alkylation of a flavin cofactor, inhibiting the enzyme196.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] Binda, C. et al. Structural and mechanistic studies of arylalkylhydrazine inhibition of human monoamine oxidases A and B. Biochemistry 47, 5616–5625 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
SLC-ABPP was used to analyse spleen tissue from C57BL/6 mice treated with ibrutinib.
“SLC-ABPP was used to analyse spleen tissue extracted from C57BL/6 mice treated with ibrutinib183.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183] Kuljanin, M. et al. Reimagining high-throughput profiling of reactive cysteines for cell-based screening of large electrophile libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 630–641 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Disrupting the PKCθ-CD28 interaction reduced T cell activation.
“Disrupting the interaction of PKCθ with the costimulatory receptor CD28 reduced T cell activation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [184] Blewett, M. M. et al. Chemical proteomic map of dimethyl fumarate–sensitive cysteines in primary human T cells. Sci. Signal. 9, rs10 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Compounds were discovered that bind a ligandable cysteine on NR0B1, which is regulated by NRF2, a KEAP1 substrate.
“The authors discovered compounds that bind to a ligandable cysteine on the nuclear receptor NR0B1, which is regulated by NRF2, a substrate of KEAP1 (ref.181).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Bar-Peled, L. et al. Chemical proteomics identifies druggable vulnerabilities in a genetically defined cancer. Cell 171, 696–709.e23 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Separate chemoproteomic studies identified PKCθ and IRAK4 as targets of dimethyl fumarate.
“In separate studies, chemoproteomic approaches were used to identify protein kinase Cθ (PKCθ) and IRAK4 as targets of dimethyl fumarate184,185.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [184] Blewett, M. M. et al. Chemical proteomic map of dimethyl fumarate–sensitive cysteines in primary human T cells. Sci. Signal. 9, rs10 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [185] Zaro, B. W. et al. Dimethyl fumarate disrupts human innate immune signaling by targeting the IRAK4–MyD88 complex. J. Immunol. 202, 2737–2746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
When paired with a parallel phenotypic screen for a desired outcome such as cancer cell death, this methodology facilitates high-throughput identification of functional covalent ligands and their protein targets.
“When paired with a parallel phenotypic screen against a desired outcome (such as cancer cell death), this methodology facilitates the identification of functional covalent ligands and their corresponding protein targets in a high-throughput manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The high proportion of E3 ligases with reactive cysteines suggests that covalent approaches to harness more E3 ligases could continue to be successful.
“suggesting that covalent approaches to harness more E3 ligases could continue to be successful194.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] Belcher, B. P., Ward, C. C. & Nomura, D. K. Ligandability of E3 ligases for targeted protein degradation applications. Biochemistry https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00464 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Most bifunctional degraders recruit CRBN or VHL, but there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.
- Premisecitation
Recent activity-based protein profiling approaches use mass spectrometry and broadly reactive chemical probes to map allosteric sites in addition to active sites.
“Instead of focusing on active sites, more recent ABPP approaches use MS and broadly reactive chemical probes to also map allosteric sites176.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] Weerapana, E., Speers, A. E. & Cravatt, B. F. Tandem orthogonal proteolysis-activity-based protein profiling (TOP-ABPP) — a general method for mapping sites of probe modification in proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1414–1425 (2007). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
IsoTOP-ABPP can identify the protein targets of known electrophilic drugs.
“IsoTOP-ABPP can also be used to identify the protein targets of known electrophilic drugs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Covalent drug discovery platforms have facilitated expansion of targeted protein degradation by enabling discovery of covalent recruiters against E3 ubiquitin ligases.
“Covalent drug discovery platforms have facilitated the expansion of targeted protein degradation approaches by enabling the discovery of covalent recruiters against E3 ubiquitin ligases14,187–193.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [14] Spradlin, J. N., Zhang, E. & Nomura, D. K. Reimagining druggability using chemoproteomic platforms. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1801–1813 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [187] Spradlin, J. N. et al. Harnessing the anti-cancer natural product nimbolide for targeted protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 747–755 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [188] Luo, M. et al. Chemoproteomics-enabled discovery of covalent RNF114-based degraders that mimic natural product function. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 559–566.e15 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [189] Ward, C. C. et al. Covalent ligand screening uncovers a RNF4 E3 ligase recruiter for targeted protein degradation applications. ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 2430–2440 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [190] Zhang, X., Crowley, V. M., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Dix, M. M. & Cravatt, B. F. Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by engaging DCAF16. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 737–746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [191] Zhang, X. et al. DCAF11 supports targeted protein degradation by electrophilic proteolysis-targeting chimeras. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 5141–5149 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [192] Tong, B. et al. Bardoxolone conjugation enables targeted protein degradation of BRD4. Sci. Rep. 10, 15543 (2020).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [193] Henning, N. J. et al. Discovery of a covalent FEM1B recruiter for targeted protein degradation applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 44, 701–708 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Most bifunctional degraders recruit CRBN or VHL, but there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.
- Premisecitation
A targeted protein stabilization platform called DUBTACs has been developed using a covalent deubiquitinase recruiter.
“a targeted protein stabilization platform, termed deubiquitinase-targeting chimeras (DUBTACs) has been developed using a covalent deubiquitinase recruiter195.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] Henning, N. J. et al. Deubiquitinase-targeting chimeras for targeted protein stabilization. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 412–421 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Among about 9,200 cysteine sites identified, BTK Cys481 was one of the cysteines most liganded by ibrutinib.
“Of ~9,200 cysteine sites identified, BTK Cys481 was one of the cysteines most liganded by ibrutinib.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183] Kuljanin, M. et al. Reimagining high-throughput profiling of reactive cysteines for cell-based screening of large electrophile libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 630–641 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Through chemoproteomic data analysis and an ABPP-based screen, a covalent OTUB1 recruiter was discovered that could be incorporated into bifunctional compounds that stabilize mutant CFTR, whose degradation drives cystic fibrosis.
“Through analysis of chemoproteomic data and an ABPP-based screen, a covalent OTUB1 recruiter was discovered that could be incorporated into bifunctional compounds that stabilize mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), the degradation of which drives cystic fibrosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [195] Henning, N. J. et al. Deubiquitinase-targeting chimeras for targeted protein stabilization. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 412–421 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cysteine ligandability in activated T cells was explored using promiscuous fragment-like scout fragments to map ligandability and functional assays to identify more structurally complex electrophilic compounds that suppress T cell activity.
“Cysteine ligandability has also been explored in activated T cells through the use of promiscuous fragment-like compounds, termed ‘scout fragments’, to map ligandability and functional assays to identify more structurally complex electrophilic compounds that suppress T cell activity182.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] Vinogradova, E. V. et al. An activity-guided map of electrophile-cysteine interactions in primary human T cells. Cell 182, 1009–1026.e29 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cys313 on BLK, which like BTK contains a cysteine in the ATP-binding pocket, was also identified as an off-target of ibrutinib.
“Cys313 on B lymphocyte kinase (BLK), which, analogous to BTK, contains a cysteine within the ATP-binding pocket, was also identified as an off-target of ibrutinib183.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183] Kuljanin, M. et al. Reimagining high-throughput profiling of reactive cysteines for cell-based screening of large electrophile libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 630–641 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A multiplexed in vivo screening platform was developed in which barcoded pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lines were pretreated with electrophilic compounds and injected into mice to observe compound-dependent decrease in metastatic potential.
“a multiplexed in vivo screening platform was developed in which barcoded pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma lines were pretreated with electrophilic compounds and injected into mice to observe the compound-dependent decrease in metastatic potential186.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [186] Grüner, B. M. et al. An in vivo multiplexed small-molecule screening platform. Nat. Methods 13, 883–889 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Hydrazine-based probes have been used to identify and characterize ligands for proteins with electrophilic cofactors or post-translational modifications.
“Hydrazine-based probes have also been used to help identify and characterize ligands for proteins with electrophilic cofactors or post-translational modifications198,199.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [198] Wang, X. et al. Discovery of potent and selective inhibitors against protein-derived electrophilic cofactors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 5377–5388 (2022). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [199] Lin, Z. et al. Activity-based hydrazine probes for protein profiling of electrophilic functionality in therapeutic targets. ACS Cent. Sci. 7, 1524–1534 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
IsoTOP-ABPP experiments using several lysine-directed probes have proved powerful in profiling lysine reactivity across the proteome.
“IsoTOP-ABPP experiments using several lysine-directed probes have proved powerful in profiling lysine reactivity across the proteome200,201.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [200] Hacker, S. M. et al. Global profiling of lysine reactivity and ligandability in the human proteome. Nat. Chem. 9, 1181–1190 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [201] Ward, C. C., Kleinman, J. I. & Nomura, D. K. NHS-esters as versatile reactivity-based probes for mapping proteome-wide ligandable hotspots. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1478–1483 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
- Premisecitation
A sulfonyl fluoride-bearing promiscuous kinase inhibitor that targets a conserved lysine in the ATP-binding site was used as a probe to profile kinase inhibitor selectivity in live cells.
“A sulfonyl fluoride-bearing promiscuous kinase inhibitor that targets a conserved lysine in the ATP-binding site was also used as a probe to profile kinase inhibitor selectivity in live cells208.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [208] Zhao, Q. et al. Broad-spectrum kinase profiling in live cells with lysine-targeted sulfonyl fluoride probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 680–685 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
- Premisecitation
ABPP principles and reverse-polarity probes have been employed to study electrophilic post-translational modifications such as N-terminal pyruvoyl and glyoxylyl modifications that can react with hydrazine-containing compounds.
“ABPP principles and ‘reverse-polarity’ probes have been employed to study electrophilic post-translational modifications, such as N-terminal pyruvoyl and glyoxylyl modifications, that can react with hydrazine-containing compounds197.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [197] Matthews, M. L. et al. Chemoproteomic profiling and discovery of protein electrophiles in human cells. Nat. Chem. 9, 234–243 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A recent preprint reported a chemoproteomic approach to profile the amino acid reactivity preference of 54 different electrophiles.
“A recent preprint reported the use of a chemoproteomic approach to profile the amino acid reactivity preference of 54 different electrophiles, which will prove to be a great resource for covalent ligand discovery210.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [210] Zanon, P. R. A. et al. Profiling the proteome-wide selectivity of diverse electrophiles. ChemRxiv https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.14186561.v1 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
- May combine two claims. 67
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOsimertinib received accelerated FDA approval in 2015 as second-line NSCLC treatment and was approved first-line for metastatic NSCLC in 2018.
“Osimertinib was granted accelerated approval by the FDA in 2015 as a second-line treatment for NSCLC, and was approved as a first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC in 2018 (ref.49).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Mok, T. S. et al. Osimertinib or platinum–pemetrexed in EGFR T790M–positive lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 629–640 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany early covalent drugs were discovered by chance and bind active sites to inhibit enzymatic activity.
“Many early covalent drugs were discovered serendipitously and bind active sites to inhibit enzymatic activity4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] De Cesco, S., Kurian, J., Dufresne, C., Mittermaier, A. K. & Moitessier, N. Covalent inhibitors design and discovery. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 138, 96–114 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationC797X mutations account for 15% of resistance to second-line osimertinib because osimertinib requires Cys797.
“However, osimertinib depends on Cys797 for covalent binding, and C797X mutations account for 15% of cases of resistance to second-line osimertinib50–52.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [50] Passaro, A., Jänne, P. A., Mok, T. & Peters, S. Overcoming therapy resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Nat. Cancer 2, 377–391 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [51] Leonetti, A. et al. Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer 121, 725–737 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [52] Thress, K. S. et al. Acquired EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to AZD9291 in non–small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M. Nat. Med. 21, 560–562 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAspirin's anti-inflammatory effect is via acetylation of Ser529 in COX-1, preventing arachidonic acid conversion to prostaglandins.
“Aspirin’s mechanism of action was unknown until 1971, when it was discovered to exert its anti-inflammatory effects by acetylating Ser529 in the substrate-binding channel of cyclooxygenase 1, preventing conversion of the substrate arachidonic acid into prostaglandins20.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Vane, J. R. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin-like drugs. Nature 231, 232–235 (1971).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitationβ-Lactam antibiotics such as penicillin bind PBPs and acylate active-site serines, inhibiting cell wall synthesis and causing membrane rupture.
“β-Lactam antibiotics such as penicillin (Fig. 1), produced by Penicillium fungi, bind to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), which are involved in bacterial cell wall synthesis21.”
- Also stated in: § History of covalent drugs · plain
“All PBPs contain active-site serine residues that can be acylated by penicillin, inhibiting PBP activity and leading to cell membrane rupture21.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Nicola, G., Tomberg, J., Pratt, R. F., Nicholas, R. A. & Davies, C. Crystal structures of covalent complexes of β-lactam antibiotics with Escherichia coli penicillin-binding protein 5: toward an understanding of antibiotic specificity. Biochemistry 49, 8094–8104 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § History of covalent drugs · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCovalent drugs contain a mildly reactive group that forms a covalent bond with protein targets, adding affinity beyond non-covalent binding.
“Covalent drugs incorporate a mildly reactive functional group that forms a covalent bond with protein targets to confer additional affinity beyond the non-covalent interactions involved in drug binding1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Tuley, A. & Fast, W. The taxonomy of covalent inhibitors. Biochemistry 57, 3326–3337 (2018). This review summarizes the mechanisms of covalent inhibition of enzymes and comprehensively covers examples for each mechanism. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBortezomib covalently inhibits a catalytic threonine of the 26S proteasome and was FDA-approved in 2003 for multiple myeloma.
“Bortezomib (Fig. 1), a dipeptide boronic acid that covalently binds to and inhibits a catalytic threonine residue of the 26S proteasome, was approved by the FDA in 2003 to treat patients with multiple myeloma30.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Curran, M. P. & McKeage, K. Bortezomib: a review of its use in patients with multiple myeloma. Drugs 69, 859–888 (2009). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOver the past 30 years, rational design of covalent drugs has increased and targeting non-conserved amino acids for selectivity has become common.
“Over the past 30 years, the rational design of covalent drugs has garnered increased interest, and covalently targeting non-conserved amino acids to increase selectivity has become commonplace2,5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] Singh, J., Petter, R. C., Baillie, T. A. & Whitty, A. The resurgence of covalent drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 307–317 (2011). This review illustrates the key features of covalent drug discovery with emphasis on targeted covalent inhibitors. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [5] Sutanto, F., Konstantinidou, M. & Dömling, A. Covalent inhibitors: a rational approach to drug discovery. RSC Med. Chem. 11, 876–884 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCovalent modification has enabled targeting of traditionally undruggable proteins, exemplified by sotorasib approval for KRAS(G12C).
“Moreover, potent inhibition through covalent modification has enabled targeting of traditionally ‘undruggable’ proteins, exemplified by the approval of sotorasib (Amgen), which is an inhibitor of mutant KRAS(G12C), a GTPase that resisted decades of drug discovery efforts9,10”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] Moore, A. R., Rosenberg, S. C., McCormick, F. & Malek, S. RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 19, 533–552 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Huang, L., Guo, Z., Wang, F. & Fu, L. KRAS mutation: from undruggable to druggable in cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 386 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCovalent second-generation EGFR inhibitors with acrylamide react with Cys797 and partially restore activity against T790M.
“Cys797 is located adjacent to the ATP-binding site, and irreversible binding of EGFR ligands to EGFR partially restores activity against the T790M gatekeeper mutant33.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Ou, S.-H. I. Second-generation irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs): a better mousetrap? A review of the clinical evidence. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 83, 407–421 (2012). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThird-generation EGFR inhibitors selectively target T790M over wild-type EGFR, including osimertinib.
“A third generation of EGFR inhibitors followed afatinib; these covalent inhibitors selectively target the T790M mutant over wild-type EGFR, and include WZ4002 (Dana–Farber Cancer Institute)43, osimertinib44,45 and rociletinib (Clovis Oncology; CO-1686)46 (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [43] Zhou, W. et al. Novel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M. Nature 462, 1070–1074 (2009). This paper reports the discovery of covalent EGFR inhibitors selective for the T790M gatekeeper mutation. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [44] Cross, D. A. E. et al. AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 4, 1046–1061 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [45] Finlay, M. R. V. et al. Discovery of a potent and selective EGFR inhibitor (AZD9291) of both sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations that spares the wild type form of the receptor. J. Med. Chem. 57, 8249–8267 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [46] Walter, A. O. et al. Discovery of a mutant-selective covalent inhibitor of EGFR that overcomes T790M-mediated resistance in NSCLC. Cancer Discov. 3, 1404–1415 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEGFR overactivity drives NSCLC progression, making EGFR a key oncology target.
“Overactivity of the receptor tyrosine kinase EGFR drives the progression of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), making EGFR a key drug target in oncology31.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Lynch, T. J., Okimoto, R. A., Supko, J. G. & Settleman, J. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non–small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2129–2139 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFosfomycin reacts with MurA catalytic cysteine, disrupting peptidoglycan synthesis and causing membrane rupture.
“Another covalent antibiotic is the epoxide-containing fosfomycin (Fig. 1), which is produced by some Streptomyces bacteria and acts by reacting with the catalytic cysteine of UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA) to disrupt peptidoglycan synthesis and induce membrane rupture22–24.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] Dijkmans, A. C. et al. Fosfomycin: pharmacological, clinical and future perspectives. Antibiotics 6, 24 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [23] Hendlin, D. et al. Phosphonomycin, a new antibiotic produced by strains of Streptomyces. Science 166, 122–123 (1969). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Kahan, F. M., Kahan, J. S., Cassidy, P. J. & Kropp, H. The mechanism of action of fosfomycin (phosphonomycin). Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 235, 364–386 (1974). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNirmatrelvir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 main protease, showing covalent protease active-site targeting yields valuable drugs.
“more traditional covalent targeting of protease active sites has continued to yield valuable drugs, such as nirmatrelvir (Pfizer), which inhibits the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) main protease (Mpro)11”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Vandyck, K. & Deval, J. Considerations for the discovery and development of 3-chymotrypsin-like cysteine protease inhibitors targeting SARS-CoV-2 infection. Curr. Opin. Virol. 49, 36–40 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIbrutinib and osimertinib had 2020 sales of US$8.43 billion and $4.33 billion, respectively.
“include the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib (AbbVie) and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor osimertinib (AstraZeneca), with sales totalling US$8.43 billion and $4.33 billion in 2020, respectively7,8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Lonsdale, R. & Ward, R. A. Structure-based design of targeted covalent inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 3816–3830 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Sagonowsky, E. The top 20 drugs by worldwide sales in 2020. Fierce Pharma https://www.fiercepharma.com/special-report/top-20-drugs-by-2020-sales (2021).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe T790M mutation lowers binding affinity of many reversible EGFR inhibitors and increases EGFR's affinity for ATP.
“This mutation of the gatekeeper residue in the ATP-binding site of EGFR not only decreases the binding affinity of many reversible inhibitors for EGFR but also increases the binding affinity of EGFR for ATP36.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Yun, C.-H. et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2070–2075 (2008). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKRAS is mutated in about 25% of cancers, especially pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers.
“KRAS is a GTPase-encoding oncogene that is mutated in about 25% of all cancers, most notably in pancreatic, colorectal and lung cancers86.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Goebel, L., Müller, M. P., Goody, R. S. & Rauh, D. KRasG12C inhibitors in clinical trials: a short historical perspective. RSC Med. Chem. 11, 760–770 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNirmatrelvir inhibits all human coronaviruses in a FRET-based assay and shows no inhibition of human cysteine or serine proteases.
“displayed potent inhibition in a FRET-based assay across all human coronaviruses, while no inhibitory effects were seen against human cysteine or serine proteases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationARS-853 is a selective covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitor with low micromolar cellular efficacy.
“In 2016, Wellspring Biosciences disclosed ARS-853, which is a selective covalent inhibitor of KRAS(G12C) with in cellulo efficacy in the low micromolar range92.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Patricelli, M. P. et al. Selective inhibition of oncogenic KRAS output with small molecules targeting the inactive state. Cancer Discov. 6, 316–329 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationARS-853 treatment reduced active KRAS(G12C), inhibited downstream RAS signalling and induced apoptosis in dependent cell lines.
“ARS-853 treatment in KRAS(G12C)-dependent cell lines decreased the amount of active KRAS(G12C), inhibited downstream RAS signalling and induced apoptosis92.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Patricelli, M. P. et al. Selective inhibition of oncogenic KRAS output with small molecules targeting the inactive state. Cancer Discov. 6, 316–329 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompound 12 binding to the switch II pocket impaired KRAS signalling by shifting nucleotide affinity toward GDP and accumulating inactive KRAS.
“Binding of compound 12 to the switch II pocket impaired KRAS signalling by shifting nucleotide affinity from favouring GTP to GDP and led to the accumulation of KRAS in its inactive state91.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Lito, P., Solomon, M., Li, L.-S., Hansen, R. & Rosen, N. Allele-specific inhibitors inactivate mutant KRAS G12C by a trapping mechanism. Science 351, 604–608 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCovalent FGFR4 inhibitors target Cys552 to gain selectivity over FGFR1-3 and overcome resistance mutations in HCC.
“Several covalent inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 (FGFR4) target the non-conserved Cys552 residue in FGFR4 to confer selectivity over FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3, as well as to overcome mutations that confer resistance to reversible FGFR inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)83,84.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [83] Kim, R. D. et al. First-in-human phase I study of fisogatinib (BLU-554) validates aberrant FGF19 signaling as a driver event in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 9, 1696–1707 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [84] Tan, L. et al. Development of covalent inhibitors that can overcome resistance to first-generation FGFR kinase inhibitors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4869–E4877 (2014).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationJAK3 and mutant EGFR(T790M) both have a methionine gatekeeper and a homologous cysteine next to the ATP-binding site.
“Both JAK3 and mutant EGFR(T790M) contain a methionine gatekeeper, as well as a homologous cysteine adjacent to the ATP-binding site.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Tan, L. et al. Development of selective covalent Janus kinase 3 inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 58, 6589–6606 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany KRAS mutations reduce GTPase activity, causing low GTP hydrolysis and elevated RAS signalling that drives tumorigenesis.
“Wild-type KRAS is carefully regulated between the active GTP-bound state and inactive GDP-bound state, but many KRAS mutations attenuate GTPase activity, leading to low rates of GTP hydrolysis and elevated RAS signalling, driving tumorigenesis87.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Janes, M. R. et al. Targeting KRAS mutant cancers with a covalent G12C-specific inhibitor. Cell 172, 578–589.e17 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPaxlovid received FDA Emergency Use Authorization in December 2021 for mild-to-moderate COVID-19, the first approved oral treatment.
“In December 2021, the FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization for Pfizer’s Paxlovid (a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) to treat mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (caused by SARS-CoV-2) in adults and some paediatric patients, marking the first approved oral treatment for the disease99.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] US FDA. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Authorizes First Oral Antiviral for Treatment of COVID-19. FDA https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-authorizes-first-oral-antiviral-treatment-covid-19 (2021).
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKRAS lacks accessible pockets for reversible inhibitors, competitive inhibitors face picomolar GTP/GDP affinity, and wild-type KRAS inhibitors could cause on-target toxicity.
“KRAS does not have accessible pockets for reversible inhibitors to bind to, competitive inhibitors would need to overcome the picomolar binding affinities of GTP and GDP, and inhibitors active against wild-type KRAS could show on-target toxicity86,88.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [86] Goebel, L., Müller, M. P., Goody, R. S. & Rauh, D. KRasG12C inhibitors in clinical trials: a short historical perspective. RSC Med. Chem. 11, 760–770 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [88] Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A. & Shokat, K. M. K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions. Nature 503, 548–551 (2013). This work showcases the use of tethering as a screening methodology for discovering covalent ligands against KRAS(G12C) and further identifies ligands against this oncogenic protein. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSARS-CoV-2 main protease has 96% sequence identity with SARS-CoV-1 main protease, and their catalytic sites overlap completely.
“SARS-CoV-2 Mpro shares 96% sequence identity with SARS-CoV-1 Mpro, and there is 100% sequence overlap of the catalytic sites102.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Hoffman, R. L. et al. Discovery of ketone-based covalent inhibitors of coronavirus 3CL proteases for the potential therapeutic treatment of COVID-19. J. Med. Chem. 63, 12725–12747 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuccess of ibrutinib shows rationally designed covalent drugs can achieve acceptable safety and blockbuster status.
“Overcoming historical concerns relating to the potential toxicity of covalent drugs, the success of ibrutinib demonstrates that rationally designed covalent drugs can achieve acceptable safety profiles and blockbuster status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPF-00835231 shows activity in antiviral cell-based assays, stability in plasma, and low clearance in vivo.
“activity in antiviral cell-based assays, stability in plasma and low clearance in vivo103.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021). This work describes the discovery of PF-07321332, later named nirmatrelvir, an orally bioavailable SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAcalabrutinib was FDA-approved in 2019 for CLL and contains a less reactive butyramide electrophile, hypothesized to explain superior BTK selectivity and fewer cardiovascular events.
“Most prominent among these is acalabrutinib (AstraZeneca), approved by the FDA in 2019 to treat CLL, which contains a butyramide electrophile instead of an acrylamide69.”
- Also stated in: § Covalent BTK inhibitors · hedged
“The butyramide electrophile is less reactive than an acrylamide, which, in addition to other substitutions, is hypothesized to account for the superior selectivity of acalabrutinib compared with ibrutinib for BTK and could be responsible for the reduced number of adverse cardiovascular events70,71.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [69] Barf, T. et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196): a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a differentiated selectivity and in vivo potency profile. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 363, 240–252 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70] Byrd, J. C. et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 323–332 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [71] Byrd, J. C. et al. Acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of the first randomized phase III trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 3441–3452 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Covalent BTK inhibitors · hedged
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSotorasib was the first selective KRAS(G12C) inhibitor to enter clinical trials in 2018 and was FDA-approved in May 2021 for KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC.
“Sotorasib (AMG-510) (Table 1) was the first selective KRAS(G12C) inhibitor to enter clinical trials in 2018 and was developed by Amgen, building on discoveries from a partnership with Carmot Therapeutics in which a custom library of small molecules that covalently bind cysteine were screened against KRAS(G12C)93.”
- Also stated in: § Covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors · plain
“A phase II clinical trial investigating sotorasib was successfully completed in 2020, and was followed by FDA approval for the treatment of adults with KRASG12C-mutated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC in May 2021 (ref.95).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [93] Canon, J. et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 575, 217–223 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [95] Skoulidis, F. et al. Sotorasib for lung cancers with KRAS p.G12C mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2371–2381 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuccess of covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors validates electrophile-first approaches and covalent fragment screening.
“The success of covalent KRAS(G12C) inhibitors validates an electrophile-first approach to covalent drug discovery and affirms the importance of covalent fragment screening techniques (discussed below).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIbrutinib binds Cys481 in BTK and should be selective because few kinases have a homologous cysteine.
“Similarly to EGFR inhibitors, ibrutinib binds to a cysteine residue (Cys481) adjacent to the ATP-binding site in BTK, and because only a few kinases have a homologous cysteine, ibrutinib should exhibit a degree of selectivity for BTK over other kinases64.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Davids, M. S. & Brown, J. R. Ibrutinib: a first in class covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. Future Oncol. 10, 957–967 (2014). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationARS-1620 was the first KRAS(G12C) inhibitor suitable for in vivo studies and showed efficacy in patient-derived xenografts at 200 mg/kg.
“Ultimately, ARS-1620 was identified as the first KRAS(G12C) inhibitor suitable for in vivo studies and showed efficacy in KRAS(G12C) patient-derived xenograft models treated at 200 mg kg−1 once per day or twice per day87.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Janes, M. R. et al. Targeting KRAS mutant cancers with a covalent G12C-specific inhibitor. Cell 172, 578–589.e17 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe N-terminal amine of α-haemoglobin was found almost 50 years ago to have a low pKa of 6.9, making it primarily unprotonated and more nucleophilic under physiological conditions.
“Almost 50 years ago, this N-terminal amine was discovered to have a particularly low pKa of 6.9, indicating that it is primarily unprotonated under physiological conditions and, thus, more nucleophilic144.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144] Garner, M. H., Bogardt, R. A. & Gurd, F. R. Determination of the pK values for the alpha-amino groups of human hemoglobin. J. Biol. Chem. 250, 4398–4404 (1975). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMany emerging covalent ligand screening platforms use MS-based detection, enabled by covalent bond formation between the compound and protein.
“Many emerging covalent ligand screening platforms involve MS-based detection, enabled by covalent bond formation between the compound and protein.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVoxelotor has a red blood cell to plasma ratio of about 150 that likely reduces off-target effects, and it was approved by the FDA in 2019 at a recommended dose of 1.5 g daily, an unusually high dose for a covalent drug.
“With a remarkable red blood cell to plasma ratio of ~150 that likely reduces off-target effects, voxelotor was approved by the FDA in 2019 with a recommended dose of 1.5 g daily, which is an unusually high dose for a covalent drug142,146.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSickle cell anaemia is caused by a single mutation in the β-haemoglobin gene that induces polymerization of mutant haemoglobin (HbS) under hypoxic conditions.
“Sickle cell anaemia is caused by a single mutation in the gene encoding the β-haemoglobin chain that induces polymerization of mutant haemoglobin (HbS) under hypoxic conditions142.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [142] Vichinsky, E. et al. A phase 3 randomized trial of voxelotor in sickle cell disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 509–519 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBortezomib was the first boron-containing drug approved by the FDA and was approved for multiple myeloma in 2003.
“Bortezomib (Takeda) was the first boron-containing drug to be approved by the FDA, and was approved for treatment of multiple myeloma in 2003 (ref.120).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] Bross, P. F. et al. Approval summary for bortezomib for injection in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 3954–3964 (2004). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe chloroacetamide sulfopin was selective for Pin1 in a CITe-Id chemoproteomics experiment and regressed neuroblastoma growth in mice.
“The resulting chloroacetamide sulfopin was shown to be selective for Pin1 in a covalent inhibitor target-site identification (CITe-Id) chemoproteomics experiment and was effective in regressing neuroblastoma growth in mice157.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] Dubiella, C. et al. Sulfopin is a covalent inhibitor of Pin1 that blocks Myc-driven tumors in vivo. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 954–963 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDetermination of kinact/Ki provides the most complete information to medicinal chemists about the binding affinity and kinetics of covalent target engagement.
“Regardless, determination of kinact/Ki provides the most complete information to medicinal chemists about the binding affinity and kinetics of covalent target engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAssaying for reactivity is a crucial step, particularly for key molecules and for compound series containing novel electrophiles.
“Assaying for reactivity is a crucial step, particularly for key molecules and for compound series containing novel electrophiles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenABPP approaches have transformed the characterization of electrophilic compounds, aiding selectivity profiling and target identification.
“Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) approaches have transformed the characterization of electrophilic compounds, facilitating selectivity profiling and target identification experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVoxelotor was discovered through a structure-guided effort to increase HbS oxygen affinity and was designed to bind the HbS tetramer in a 1:1 stoichiometry, unlike the 2:1 ratio of earlier compounds.
“Based on earlier aldehydes, voxelotor was discovered through a structure-guided effort to discover compounds that increase the oxygen affinity of HbS, and was designed to bind the HbS tetramer in a 1:1 stoichiometry, unlike the 2:1 ratio of earlier compounds143,145.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [143] Metcalf, B. et al. Discovery of GBT440, an orally bioavailable r-state stabilizer of sickle cell hemoglobin. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 321–326 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [145] Oksenberg, D. et al. GBT 440 increases haemoglobin oxygen affinity, reduces sickling and prolongs RBC half-life in a murine model of sickle cell disease. Br. J. Haematol. 175, 141–153 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCovDock does not consider electrophile reactivity, which can limit virtual study of docking ligands with different electrophilic functional groups.
“This approach does not consider the reactivity of the electrophile, which can limit the ability to virtually study the differences in docking ligands with different electrophilic functional groups167.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167] Scarpino, A., Ferenczy, G. G. & Keserű, G. M. Comparative evaluation of covalent docking tools. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 1441–1458 (2018). This article compares the reproducibility of known binding data for covalent complexes across AutoDock4, CovDock, FITTED, GOLD, ICM-Pro and MOE docking programs. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMany covalent drug discovery programmes, including those for covalent EGFR and BTK inhibitors, have added reactive functional groups to previously identified ligands.
“Many covalent drug discovery programmes, including those for covalent EGFR and BTK inhibitors, have involved the addition of reactive functional groups to previously identified ligands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe discovery of covalent proteasome inhibitors illustrates the utility of boronic acid electrophiles for protease active sites and shows that a project can start with an unoptimized electrophile and later introduce an alternative one.
“The discovery of these covalent proteasome inhibitors illustrates the utility of boronic acid electrophiles for targeting protease active sites and demonstrates how a covalent drug discovery project can use an unoptimized electrophile as a starting point and subsequently introduce an alternative electrophile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAdvances in chemoproteomics have facilitated discovery of covalent ligands against undruggable targets and enabled proteome-wide selectivity profiling to identify targets and off-targets.
“Advances in chemoproteomics have facilitated the discovery of covalent ligands against undruggable disease targets and enabled the selectivity profiling of covalent ligands across the proteome to identify targets and off-targets of these ligands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese aldehydes bind reversibly and covalently, forming a Schiff base with the N-terminal valine of the α-haemoglobin chain.
“These aldehydes bind in a reversible covalent manner, forming a Schiff base with the N-terminal valine of the α-haemoglobin chain143.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143] Metcalf, B. et al. Discovery of GBT440, an orally bioavailable r-state stabilizer of sickle cell hemoglobin. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 321–326 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenVoxelotor is a lysine-targeting covalent drug used to treat sickle cell anaemia, and its discovery depended on knowledge of heightened lysine side chain reactivity.
“Voxelotor (Global Blood Therapeutics) is a lysine-targeting covalent drug used to treat sickle cell anaemia, and the discovery of voxelotor (Table 1) was dependent on knowledge of heightened lysine side chain reactivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe development of bortezomib validated the proteasome as a cancer target and encouraged discovery of other proteasome inhibitors.
“The development of bortezomib validated the proteasome as a cancer target, encouraging the discovery of other proteasome inhibitors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese boron-based drugs target serine hydrolases, and the weak boron-sulfur bond potentially provides selectivity for serine over cysteine hydrolases.
“These boron-based drugs target serine hydrolases, and the weak boron–sulfur bond potentially provides selectivity for serine over cysteine hydrolases121.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] Adams, J. et al. Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: dipeptidyl boronic acids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 8, 333–338 (1998). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUsing highly reactive electrophiles to gain an initial foothold can be beneficial, although targeting especially nucleophilic protease active sites may allow greater flexibility in electrophile choice.
“Although targeting especially nucleophilic protease active sites might provide greater flexibility in terms of electrophile choice, using highly reactive electrophiles to gain an initial foothold can be beneficial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe growth of commercial libraries of electrophilic fragment-like compounds is a key factor contributing to the rise of electrophile-first discovery strategies.
“The growth of commercial libraries of electrophilic fragment-like compounds is a key factor contributing to the rise of these electrophile-first discovery strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe electrophile-first approach has been successful for KRAS(G12C) and has facilitated rapid discovery of E3 ligase ligands for targeted protein degradation.
“For example, this type of approach proved successful in drugging KRAS(G12C) and has facilitated the rapid discovery of E3 ligase ligands for targeted protein degradation applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThis carfilzomib mechanism has been proposed to confer selectivity because most proteases lack nucleophilic side chains at their N terminus.
“this mechanism has been proposed to confer selectivity because most proteases do not have nucleophilic side chains at their N terminus127.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [127] Groll, M., Kim, K. B., Kairies, N., Huber, R. & Crews, C. M. Crystal structure of epoxomicin:20S proteasome reveals a molecular basis for selectivity of α‘,β‘-epoxyketone proteasome inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 1237–1238 (2000). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningDNA-encoded libraries enable screening of massive small-molecule libraries, but covalency provides no specialized advantage for DEL screening.
“DNA-encoded libraries (DELs) present an alternative approach that enables the screening of massive libraries of small molecules. Unlike MS or ABPP approaches, there is no specialized advantage of covalency in enabling DEL screening”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCovDock uses traditional non-covalent docking to dock a ligand to a protein target, then models the covalent bond attachment and refines the complex.
“CovDock uses traditional non-covalent docking approaches to dock a ligand to a protein target, and then models the covalent bond attachment and refines the complex166.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [166] Sotriffer, C. Docking of covalent ligands: challenges and approaches. Mol. Inf. 37, 1800062 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFixed-time-point IC50 values can serve as a valuable surrogate for kinact/Ki, as suggested by scientists at Pfizer.
“Scientists working on a covalent JAK3 inhibitor programme at Pfizer, however, suggested that fixed-time-point IC50 values can serve as a valuable surrogate for kinact/Ki (ref. 218).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [218] Thorarensen, A. et al. The advantages of describing covalent inhibitor in vitro potencies by IC50 at a fixed time point. IC50 determination of covalent inhibitors provides meaningful data to medicinal chemistry for SAR optimization. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 29, 115865 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoceprevir and telaprevir were effective in treating HCV and were approved by the FDA in 2011 after successful trials.
“Boceprevir and telaprevir were effective in treating HCV and were approved by the FDA in 2011 after successful trials115,116.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [115] Kwo, P. Y. et al. Efficacy of boceprevir, an NS3 protease inhibitor, in combination with peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C infection (SPRINT-1): an open-label, randomised, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet 376, 705–716 (2010). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [116] Sherman, K. E. et al. Response-guided telaprevir combination treatment for hepatitis C virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1014–1024 (2011). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 2019, isoTOP-ABPP identified RNF114 as the target of the enone-containing natural product nimbolide, which was used to make bifunctional degraders of BRD4 and BCR-ABL.
“In 2019, isoTOP-ABPP was used to identify RNF114 as the target of the enone-containing natural product nimbolide, which was used to make bifunctional degraders of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) and BCR–ABL187.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [187] Spradlin, J. N. et al. Harnessing the anti-cancer natural product nimbolide for targeted protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 747–755 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationABPP probes contain a warhead that covalently reacts with nucleophilic amino acids such as cysteine and a reporter handle such as a fluorophore, biotin, or alkyne moiety for click chemistry.
“ABPP probes contain a warhead that covalently reacts with nucleophilic amino acids (such as cysteine) and a reporter handle to monitor probe binding, such as a fluorophore, biotin or alkyne moiety for subsequent click chemistry-enabled applications173 (Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T. & Kozarich, J. W. Activity-based protein profiling: from enzyme chemistry to proteomic chemistry. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 383–414 (2008). This review highlights the tools involved in ABPP and explains their corresponding applications. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA TMT-based SLC-ABPP methodology was designed and used to profile an electrophilic fragment library at a depth of more than 8,000 reactive cysteine sites with 18 min total instrument time per compound.
“a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based streamlined cysteine activity-based protein profiling (SLC-ABPP) methodology was designed and used to profile an electrophilic fragment library at an impressive depth of more than 8,000 reactive cysteine sites with a total instrument time of 18 min per compound183.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [183] Kuljanin, M. et al. Reimagining high-throughput profiling of reactive cysteines for cell-based screening of large electrophile libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 630–641 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenReactivity profiling produces large-scale information across thousands of proteins and gives a relatively unbiased view of nucleophilic amino acid reactivity, usually cysteine.
“Overall, reactivity profiling generates large quantities of information across thousands of proteins, ultimately providing a relatively unbiased picture of nucleophilic (usually cysteine) amino acid reactivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBeyond identifying ABHD6 as crucial for metastatic fitness, the approach enabled screening in a biological context more relevant to disease through adaptation of covalent ligand screening to a multiplexed in vivo phenotypic assay.
“Beyond identifying the lipase ABHD6 as crucial for metastatic fitness, this approach enabled screening in a biological context more relevant to the disease state through adaptation of covalent ligand screening to a multiplexed in vivo phenotypic assay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [186] Grüner, B. M. et al. An in vivo multiplexed small-molecule screening platform. Nat. Methods 13, 883–889 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEN4 targets MYC Cys171, which lies in a predicted intrinsically disordered region, and showed proteome-wide selectivity in profiling more than 1,500 cysteines by competitive isoTOP-ABPP.
“EN4 targets Cys171, which is located within a predicted intrinsically disordered region of MYC, and showed selectivity on a proteome-wide scale in profiling of more than 1,500 cysteines using competitive isoTOP-ABPP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Boike, L. et al. Discovery of a functional covalent ligand targeting an intrinsically disordered cysteine within MYC. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 4–13 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningReactivity profiling information can be used to select protein targets for drug discovery or to identify allosteric sites on proteins previously considered un-ligandable or undruggable.
“This information can be used to either select for appropriate protein targets in drug discovery programmes or to identify allosteric sites on proteins of interest that may have previously been considered un-ligandable or undruggable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that study, more than 700 ligandable cysteines were identified and proteome-wide selectivity information was provided for each covalent fragment in the library.
“In this study, more than 700 ligandable cysteines were identified, and information was provided about the proteome-wide selectivity of each covalent fragment in the library.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Backus, K. M. et al. Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems. Nature 534, 570–574 (2016). This work demonstrates how chemoproteomics can be paired with covalent ligand screening to identify the protein targets of covalent ligands in complex biological samples. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsoTOP-ABPP identified the lipase ABHD6 as the target of hit compounds from that screen, although ABHD6 was not previously known to have a role in metastasis or cancer progression.
“IsoTOP-ABPP experiments also enabled the identification of the lipase ABHD6 as the target of hit compounds from this screen, even though ABHD6 was not previously known to have a role in metastasis or cancer progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [186] Grüner, B. M. et al. An in vivo multiplexed small-molecule screening platform. Nat. Methods 13, 883–889 (2016). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCovalent ligands are useful not only as functional inhibitors but also have important roles in emerging induced proximity modalities.
“Covalent ligands are not only useful as functional inhibitors, but also have important roles in emerging induced proximity modalities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCys171 was first identified as a ligandable hotspot on MYC from compiled cysteine-reactive chemoproteomics data, which prompted the search for a selective covalent ligand against it.
“Cys171 was initially identified as a ligandable hotspot on MYC through analysis of compiled cysteine-reactive chemoproteomics data, and this information spurred the subsequent search for a selective covalent ligand against that cysteine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Boike, L. et al. Discovery of a functional covalent ligand targeting an intrinsically disordered cysteine within MYC. Cell Chem. Biol. 28, 4–13 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a separate study, scout fragments were used to construct bifunctional FKBP12 and BRD4 degraders, and DCAF16 was identified as the target E3 ligase responsible for degradation.
“In a separate study, scout fragments were used to construct bifunctional FKBP12 and BRD4 degraders, and the authors identified DCAF16 as the target E3 ligase responsible for degradation190.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [190] Zhang, X., Crowley, V. M., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Dix, M. M. & Cravatt, B. F. Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by engaging DCAF16. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 737–746 (2019). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Most bifunctional degraders recruit CRBN or VHL, but there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTarget identification experiments using chemoproteomic platforms are crucial for investigating the mechanism of action of electrophilic compounds discovered through phenotypic assays.
“In general, target identification experiments using chemoproteomic platforms are crucial in investigating the mechanism of action of electrophilic compounds discovered through phenotypic assays.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationABPP can identify off-targets and assess the selectivity of covalent molecules.
“ABPP can also be used to identify off-targets and generally assess the selectivity of covalent molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSuch ligands include a kinetic transthyretin stabilizer, an isoform-selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, and inhibitors of CDK2 and Hsp90.
“Such ligands include a kinetic transthyretin stabilizer204, an isoform-selective PI3Kδ inhibitor205 and inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2)206 and Hsp90 (ref.207).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [204] Grimster, N. P. et al. Aromatic sulfonyl fluorides covalently kinetically stabilize transthyretin to prevent amyloidogenesis while affording a fluorescent conjugate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5656–5668 (2013). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [205] Dalton, S. E. et al. Selectively targeting the kinome-conserved lysine of PI3Kδ as a general approach to covalent kinase inhibition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 932–939 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [206] Anscombe, E. et al. Identification and characterization of an irreversible inhibitor of CDK2. Chem. Biol. 22, 1159–1164 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [207] Cuesta, A., Wan, X., Burlingame, A. L. & Taunton, J. Ligand conformational bias drives enantioselective modification of a surface-exposed lysine on Hsp90. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 3392–3400 (2020). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSulfonyl fluoride-based probes are not completely selective for lysine and have also been used to target tyrosine residues.
“However, sulfonyl fluoride-based probes are not completely selective for lysine and have also been used to target tyrosine residues209.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [209] Hett, E. C. et al. Rational targeting of active-site tyrosine residues using sulfonyl fluoride probes. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1094–1098 (2015). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOver the past decade, advances in covalent drug discovery have led to successful drugs including inhibitors of EGFR, BTK, KRAS(G12C) and SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.
“Over the past decade, advances in covalent drug discovery have led to successful drugs, including inhibitors of EGFR, BTK, KRAS(G12C) and SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA library of approximately 180 electrophiles was assembled and isoTOP-ABPP experiments were performed to assess selectivity of different chemotypes and identify lysines ligandable with small molecules.
“a library of approximately 180 electrophiles was assembled and isoTOP-ABPP experiments then performed to assess the selectivity of different chemotypes and identify lysines ligandable with small molecules202.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [202] Abbasov, M. E. et al. A proteome-wide atlas of lysine-reactive chemistry. Nat. Chem. 13, 1081–1092 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThrough isoTOP-ABPP experiments, more than 9,000 ligandable lysines were identified, and more elaborated pentafluorophenol-containing or N-hydroxysuccinimide-ester-containing compounds could selectively label specific proteins of interest.
“Through isoTOP-ABPP experiments, more than 9,000 ligandable lysines were identified and more elaborated pentafluorophenol-containing or N-hydroxysuccinimide-ester-containing compounds could selectively label specific proteins of interest200,201.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [200] Hacker, S. M. et al. Global profiling of lysine reactivity and ligandability in the human proteome. Nat. Chem. 9, 1181–1190 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [201] Ward, C. C., Kleinman, J. I. & Nomura, D. K. NHS-esters as versatile reactivity-based probes for mapping proteome-wide ligandable hotspots. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1478–1483 (2017). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAdoption of electrophile-first discovery strategies represents a notable shift in the field.
“Adoption of electrophile-first discovery strategies represents a notable shift in the field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThat study yielded more broadly reactive electrophiles, such as dicarboxaldehydes, for further lysine profiling, and identified less-reactive electrophiles, including N-acyl-N-alkyl sulfonamides, previously used as bioconjugation tools in cells.
“This study yielded more broadly reactive electrophiles, such as dicarboxaldehydes, that could be used for further lysine profiling experiments, but also identified less-reactive electrophiles, including N-acyl-N-alkyl sulfonamides, which had been previously used as tools for bioconjugation in cells202,203.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [202] Abbasov, M. E. et al. A proteome-wide atlas of lysine-reactive chemistry. Nat. Chem. 13, 1081–1092 (2021). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [203] Tamura, T. et al. Rapid labelling and covalent inhibition of intracellular native proteins using ligand-directed N-acyl-N-alkyl sulfonamide. Nat. Commun. 9, 1870 (2018). source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
- Rests on an assumption: The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCovalent drug discovery overcomes obstacles in designing ligands against otherwise undruggable protein targets.
“Covalent drug discovery overcomes obstacles in designing ligands against otherwise undruggable protein targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe approvals of these drugs are milestones that show covalent drug discovery has evolved from a serendipitous effort to a field with established roadmaps for success.
“The approvals of these drugs represent milestones that showcase the evolution of covalent drug discovery from a serendipitous effort to a field with established roadmaps for success.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Each covalent drug candidate must balance reactivity, potency, and selectivity.
“each compound must balance reactivity, potency and selectivity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cysteine's low abundance provides selectivity but restricts opportunities to covalently target specific proteins.
“The low abundance of cysteine enables selectivity but limits opportunities for covalently targeting specific proteins of interest.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The ε-amino group of lysine is not nucleophilic enough under physiological conditions, so efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands require unusually reactive lysines.
“Owing to the low nucleophilicity of the ε-amino group of lysine under physiological conditions, the discovery of efficient lysine-targeting covalent ligands requires identification of unusually reactive lysines.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most protein-reactive covalent drugs are electrophilic so that they can react with nucleophilic amino acids.
“Most protein-reactive covalent drugs tend to be electrophilic, to enable reactions with nucleophilic amino acids.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Nucleophilic drugs can react with electrophilic cofactors and post-translational modifications.
“By contrast, nucleophilic drugs can react with electrophilic cofactors and post-translational modifications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most bifunctional degraders recruit CRBN or VHL, but there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.
“Although most bifunctional degrader molecules (proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs)) recruit the E3 ligases cereblon (CRBN) or von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein to degrade target proteins, there are more than 600 E3 ligases with varying substrate scopes.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Afatinib forms hydrogen bonds to the main chain of Met793 in the hinge region and interacts with hydrophobic regions; the furanyl group is exposed to the solvent, and the 3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl group is located near the gatekeeper residue.
“Similar to the first-generation EGFR TKI, afatinib forms hydrogen bonds to the main chain of Met793 in the hinge region and interacts with hydrophobic regions. The furanyl group is exposed to the solvent, and the 3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl group is located near the “gatekeeper” residue.50”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Voxelotor is assigned two different amino-acid targets
MinorThe text calls voxelotor lysine-targeting, but later says its aldehyde-based compounds form a covalent bond with the N-terminal valine of the α-haemoglobin chain. Valine and lysine are different amino acids.
“Voxelotor (Global Blood Therapeutics) is a lysine-targeting covalent drug used to treat sickle cell anaemia, and the discovery of voxelotor (Table 1) was dependent on knowledge of heightened lysine side chain reactivity.”
“These aldehydes bind in a reversible covalent manner, forming a Schiff base with the N-terminal valine of the α-haemoglobin chain143.”
Tavaborole does not fit the stated target class
MinorThe paragraph groups these boron-based drugs as serine-hydrolase inhibitors, but describes tavaborole as trapping tRNA in leucyl-tRNA synthetase through bonds to tRNA hydroxy groups.
“These boron-based drugs target serine hydrolases, and the weak boron–sulfur bond potentially provides selectivity for serine over cysteine hydrolases121.”
“Tavaborole covalently binds to the 2′ and 3′ hydroxy groups on the 3′ terminus of leucyl-tRNA, trapping the tRNA–tavaborole adduct in the editing site of leucyl-tRNA synthetase to block protein synthesis138.”
Cites
Lynch, T. J., Bell, D. W., Sordella, R., Gurubhagavatula, S., Okimoto, R. A., Brannigan, B. W., Harris, P. L., Haserlat, S. M., Supko, J. G., Haluska, F. G., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040938 · Cited by 11,486 · see citing works
<i>EGFR</i> Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy
Paez, J. G., Jänne, P. A., Lee, J. C., Tracy, S., Greulich, H., Gabriel, S., Herman, P., Kaye, F. J., Lindeman, N., Boggon, T. J., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099314 · Cited by 9,368 · see citing works
Inhibition of Prostaglandin Synthesis as a Mechanism of Action for Aspirin-like Drugs
VANE, J. R. (1971) · Nature New Biology · doi:10.1038/newbio231232a0 · Cited by 8,605 · see citing works
Osimertinib or Platinum–Pemetrexed in <i>EGFR</i> T790M–Positive Lung Cancer
Mok, T. S., Wu, Y.-L., Ahn, M.-J., Garassino, M. C., Kim, H. R., Ramalingam, S. S., Shepherd, F. A., He, Y., Akamatsu, H., Theelen, W. S. M. E., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1612674 · Cited by 3,379 · see citing works
K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions
Ostrem, J. M., Peters, U., Sos, M. L., Wells, J. A., & Shokat, K. M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12796 · Cited by 2,557 · see citing works
Yu, H. A., Arcila, M. E., Rekhtman, N., Sima, C. S., Zakowski, M. F., Pao, W., Kris, M. G., Miller, V. A., Ladanyi, M., & Riely, G. J. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-2246 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19
Hammond, J., Leister-Tebbe, H., Gardner, A., Abreu, P., Bao, W., Wisemandle, W., Baniecki, M., Hendrick, V. M., Damle, B., Simón-Campos, A., et al. (2022) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2118542 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
The Clinical KRAS(G12C) Inhibitor AMG 510 Drives Anti-Tumour Immunity
Canon, J., Rex, K., Saiki, A. Y., Mohr, C., Cooke, K., Bagal, D., Gaida, K., Holt, T., Knutson, C. G., Koppada, N., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1694-1 · Cited by 2,277 · see citing works
Targeting BTK with Ibrutinib in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Byrd, J. C., Furman, R. R., Coutre, S. E., Flinn, I. W., Burger, J. A., Blum, K. A., Grant, B., Sharman, J. P., Coleman, M., Wierda, W. G., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1215637 · Cited by 2,270 · see citing works
Cross, D. A. E., Ashton, S. E., Ghiorghiu, S., Eberlein, C., Nebhan, C. A., Spitzler, P. J., Orme, J. P., Finlay, M. R. V., Ward, R. A., Mellor, M. J., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0337 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP
Yun, C.-H., Mengwasser, K. E., Toms, A. V., Woo, M. S., Greulich, H., Wong, K.-K., Meyerson, M., & Eck, M. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709662105 · Cited by 2,118 · see citing works
AZD9291 in EGFR Inhibitor–Resistant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Jänne, P. A., Yang, J. C.-H., Kim, D.-W., Planchard, D., Ohe, Y., Ramalingam, S. S., Ahn, M.-J., Kim, S.-W., Su, W.-C., Horn, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1411817 · Cited by 2,116 · see citing works
An oral SARS-CoV-2 M <sup>pro</sup> inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19
Owen, D. R., Allerton, C. M. N., Anderson, A. S., Aschenbrenner, L., Avery, M., Berritt, S., Boras, B., Cardin, R. D., Carlo, A., Coffman, K. J., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl4784 · Cited by 2,033 · see citing works
The resurgence of covalent drugs
Singh, J., Petter, R. C., Baillie, T. A., & Whitty, A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3410 · Cited by 1,873 · see citing works
Sotorasib for Lung Cancers with <i>KRAS</i> p.G12C Mutation
Skoulidis, F., Li, B. T., Dy, G. K., Price, T. J., Falchook, G. S., Wolf, J., Italiano, A., Schuler, M., Borghaei, H., Barlesi, F., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2103695 · Cited by 1,849 · see citing works
Coronavirus Main Proteinase (3CL pro ) Structure: Basis for Design of Anti-SARS Drugs
Anand, K., Ziebuhr, J., Wadhwani, P., Mesters, J. R., & Hilgenfeld, R. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1085658 · Cited by 1,734 · see citing works
Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma
Wang, M. L., Rule, S., Martin, P., Goy, A., Auer, R., Kahl, B. S., Jurczak, W., Advani, R. H., Romaguera, J. E., Williams, M. E., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1306220 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
Quantitative reactivity profiling predicts functional cysteines in proteomes
Weerapana, E., Wang, C., Simon, G. M., Richter, F., Khare, S., Dillon, M. B. D., Bachovchin, D. A., Mowen, K., Baker, D., & Cravatt, B. F. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09472 · Cited by 1,684 · see citing works
Thress, K. S., Paweletz, C. P., Felip, E., Cho, B. C., Stetson, D., Dougherty, B., Lai, Z., Markovets, A., Vivancos, A., Kuang, Y., et al. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3854 · Cited by 1,589 · see citing works
Honigberg, L. A., Smith, A. M., Sirisawad, M., Verner, E., Loury, D., Chang, B., Li, S., Pan, Z., Thamm, D. H., Miller, R. A., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1004594107 · Cited by 1,561 · see citing works
Hideshima, T., Richardson, P. G. G., Chauhan, D., Palombella, V. J., Elliott, P. J., Adams, J., & Anderson, K. C. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,518 · see citing works
Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
Leonetti, A., Sharma, S., Minari, R., Perego, P., Giovannetti, E., & Tiseo, M. (2019) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-019-0573-8 · Cited by 1,446 · see citing works
Hallin, J., Engstrom, L. D., Hargis, L., Calinisan, A., Aranda, R., Briere, D. M., Sudhakar, N., Bowcut, V., Baer, B. R., Ballard, J. A., et al. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1167 · Cited by 1,304 · see citing works
Activity-Based Protein Profiling: From Enzyme Chemistry to Proteomic Chemistry
Cravatt, B. F., Wright, A. T., & Kozarich, J. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.101304.124125 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Targeting KRAS mutant cancers with a covalent G12C-specific inhibitor
Janes, M. R., Zhang, J., Li, L.-S., Hansen, R., Peters, U., Guo, X., Chen, Y., Babbar, A., Firdaus, S. J., Darjania, L., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.006 · Cited by 1,172 · see citing works
Activity-based protein profiling: The serine hydrolases
Liu, Y., Patricelli, M. P., & Cravatt, B. F. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.26.14694 · Cited by 1,133 · see citing works
Advani, R. H., Buggy, J. J., Sharman, J. P., Smith, S. M., Boyd, T. E., Grant, B., Kolibaba, K. S., Furman, R. R., Rodriguez, S., Chang, B. Y., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.42.7906 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
KRAS Mutation: From Undruggable to Druggable in Cancer
Huang, L., Guo, Z., Wang, F., & Fu, L. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00780-4 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged?
Moore, A. R., Rosenberg, S. C., McCormick, F., & Malek, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0068-6 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
Telaprevir and Peginterferon with or without Ribavirin for Chronic HCV Infection
Hézode, C., Forestier, N., Dusheiko, G. M., Ferenci, P., Pol, S., Goeser, T., Bronowicki, J., Bourlière, M., Gharakhanian, S., Bengtsson, L., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0807650 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
Novel mutant-selective EGFR kinase inhibitors against EGFR T790M
Zhou, W., Ercan, D., Chen, L., Yun, C.-H., Li, D., Capelletti, M., Cortot, A. B., Chirieac, L., Iacob, R. E., Padera, R., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08622 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Proteome-wide covalent ligand discovery in native biological systems
Backus, K. M., Correia, B. E., Lum, K. M., Forli, S., Horning, B. D., González-Páez, G. E., Chatterjee, S., Lanning, B. R., Teijaro, J. R., Olson, A. J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18002 · Cited by 940 · see citing works
Ibrutinib in Previously Treated Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia
Treon, S. P., Tripsas, C. K., Meid, K., Warren, D. L., Varma, G., Green, R., Argyropoulos, K. V., Yang, G., Cao, Y., Xu, L., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1501548 · Cited by 939 · see citing works
Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Byrd, J. C., Harrington, B. K., O'Brien, S. M., Jones, J. A., Schuh, A., Devereux, S., Chaves, J. M., Wierda, W. G., Awan, F. T., Brown, J. R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1509981 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Herman, S. E. M., Gordon, A. L., Hertlein, E., Ramanunni, A., Zhang, X., Jaglowski, S., Flynn, J., Jones, J., Blum, K. A., Buggy, J. J., et al. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-01-328484 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
THE MECHANISM OF ACTION OF FOSFOMYCIN (PHOSPHONOMYCIN)
Kahan, F. M., Kahan, J. S., Cassidy, P. J., & Kropp, H. (1974) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb43277.x · Cited by 778 · see citing works
Lanman, B. A., Allen, J. R., Allen, J. G., Amegadzie, A. K., Ashton, K. S., Booker, S. K., Chen, J. J., Chen, N., Frohn, M. J., Goodman, G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01180 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Selective inhibition of oncogenic KRAS output with small molecules targeting the inactive state
Patricelli, M. P., Janes, M. R., Li, L.-S., Hansen, R., Peters, U., Kessler, L. V., Chen, Y., Kucharski, J. M., Feng, J., Ely, T., et al. (2016) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-1105 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Identification and Biological Activity of the Active Metabolite of Clopidogrel
Savi, P., Pereillo, J., Uzabiaga, M.-F., Combalbert, J., Picard, C., Maffrand, J., Pascal, M., & Herbert, J. (2000) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1614133 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Response-Guided Telaprevir Combination Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Sherman, K. E., Flamm, S. L., Afdhal, N. H., Nelson, D. R., Sulkowski, M., Everson, G. T., Fried, M. W., Adler, M., Reesink, H. W., Martin, M., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1014463 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in B cells and malignancies
Pal Singh, S., Dammeijer, F., & Hendriks, R. W. (2018) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0779-z · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Kwo, P. Y., Lawitz, E., McCone, J., Schiff, E. R., Vierling, J. M., Pound, D., Davis, M. N., Galati, J., Gordon, S. C., Ravendhran, N., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60934-8 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Allele-specific inhibitors inactivate mutant KRAS G12C by a trapping mechanism
Lito, P., Solomon, M., Li, L.-S., Hansen, R., & Rosen, N. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad6204 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Discovery of Selective Irreversible Inhibitors for Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase
Pan, Z., Scheerens, H., Li, S., Schultz, B. E., Sprengeler, P. A., Burrill, L. C., Mendonca, R. V., Sweeney, M. D., Scott, K. C. K., Grothaus, P. G., et al. (2006) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200600221 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Potent and selective inhibitors of the proteasome: Dipeptidyl boronic acids
Adams, J., Behnke, M., Chen, S., Cruickshank, A. A., Dick, L. R., Grenier, L., Klunder, J. M., Ma, Y.-T., Plamondon, L., & Stein, R. L. (1998) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00029-8 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Byrd, J. C., Hillmen, P., Ghia, P., Kater, A. P., Chanan-Khan, A., Furman, R. R., O'Brien, S. M., Yenerel, M. N., Illés, Á., Kay, N. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01210 · Cited by 676 · see citing works
Developing Irreversible Inhibitors of the Protein Kinase Cysteinome
Liu, Q., Sabnis, Y. A., Zhao, Z., Zhang, T., Buhrlage, S. J., Jones, L. H., & Gray, N. S. (2013) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.12.006 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Fell, J. B., Fischer, J. P., Baer, B. R., Blake, J. F., Bouhana, K., Briere, D. M., Brown, K. D., Burgess, L. E., Burns, A. C., Burkard, M. R., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02052 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
An Antifungal Agent Inhibits an Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase by Trapping tRNA in the Editing Site
Rock, F. L., Mao, W., Yaremchuk, A. D., Tukalo, M. A., Crépin, T., Zhou, H., Zhang, Y.-K., Hernandez, V. S., Akama, T., Baker, S. J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1142189 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Finlay, M. R. V., Anderton, M., Ashton, S., Ballard, P., Bethel, P. A., Box, M. R., Bradbury, R. H., Brown, S. J., Butterworth, S., Campbell, A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500973a · Cited by 636 · see citing works
A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Voxelotor in Sickle Cell Disease
Vichinsky, E. P., Hoppe, C. C., Ataga, K. I., Ware, R. E., Nduba, V., El-Beshlawy, A. M., Hassab, H. M. A., Achebe, M. M., Alkindi, S. S. A., Brown, C., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1903212 · Cited by 634 · see citing works
Walter, A. O., Sjin, R. T. T., Haringsma, H. J., Ohashi, K., Sun, J., Lee, K., Dubrovskiy, A., Labenski, M., Zhu, Z., Wang, Z., et al. (2013) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-13-0314 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Phosphonomycin, a New Antibiotic Produced by Strains of Streptomyces
Hendlin, D., STAPLEY, E. O., Jackson, M., Wallick, H., Miller, A. K., Wolf, F. J., Miller, T. W., Chaiet, L., Kahan, F. M., Foltz, E. L., et al. (1969) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.166.3901.122 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Overcoming therapy resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer
Passaro, A., Jänne, P. A., Mok, T., & Peters, S. (2021) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-021-00195-8 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
Lawitz, E., Poordad, F. F., Pang, P. S., Hyland, R. H., Ding, X. L., Mo, H., Symonds, W. T., McHutchison, J. G., & Membreno, F. E. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62121-2 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Ibrutinib for chronic graft-versus-host disease after failure of prior therapy
Miklos, D. B., Cutler, C. S., Arora, M., Waller, E. K., Jagasia, M., Pusic, I., Flowers, M. E. D., Logan, A. C., Nakamura, R., Blazar, B. R., et al. (2017) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2017-07-793786 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Hoffman, R. L., Kania, R. S., Brothers, M. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01063 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Evaluation of the Proteasome Inhibitor MLN9708 in Preclinical Models of Human Cancer
Kupperman, E., Lee, E. C. Y., Cao, Y., Bannerman, B. M., Fitzgerald, M., Berger, A., Yu, J., Yu, Y., Hales, P., Bruzzese, F. J., et al. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2766 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Reversible targeting of noncatalytic cysteines with chemically tuned electrophiles
Serafimova, I. M., Pufall, M. A., Krishnan, S., Duda, K., Cohen, M. S., Maglathlin, R. L., McFarland, J. M., Miller, R. M., Frödin, M., & Taunton, J. (2012) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.925 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Electrophilic PROTACs that degrade nuclear proteins by engaging DCAF16
Zhang, X., Crowley, V. M., Wucherpfennig, T. G., Dix, M. M., & Cravatt, B. F. (2019) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0279-5 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Global profiling of lysine reactivity and ligandability in the human proteome
Hacker, S. M., Backus, K. M., Lazear, M. R., Forli, S., Correia, B. E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2017) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2826 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Site-directed ligand discovery
Erlanson, D. A., Braisted, A. C., Raphael, D. R., Randal, M., Stroud, R. M., Gordon, E. M., & Wells, J. A. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.17.9367 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
SARS-CoV-2 M <sup>pro</sup> inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model
Qiao, J., Li, Y.-S., Zeng, R., Liu, F.-L., Luo, R.-H., Huang, C., Wang, Y.-F., Zhang, J., Quan, B., Shen, C., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf1611 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Soria, J.-C., Felip, E., Cobo, M., Lu, S., Syrigos, K., Lee, K. H., Göker, E., Georgoulias, V., Li, W., Isla, D., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00006-6 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Harnessing the anti-cancer natural product nimbolide for targeted protein degradation
Spradlin, J. N., Hu, X., Ward, C. C., Brittain, S. M., Jones, M. D., Ou, L., To, M., Proudfoot, A., Ornelas, E., Woldegiorgis, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0304-8 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Self-citationProlonged and tunable residence time using reversible covalent kinase inhibitors
Bradshaw, J. M., McFarland, J. M., Paavilainen, V. O., Bisconte, A. R., Tam, D., Phan, V. T., Romanov, S., Finkle, D., Shu, J., Patel, V. P., et al. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1817 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Hecker, S. J., Reddy, K. R., Totrov, M. M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00127 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Covid-19: Pfizer’s paxlovid is 89% effective in patients at risk of serious illness, company reports
Mahase, E. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n2713 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
A proton-pump inhibitor expedition: the case histories of omeprazole and esomeprazole
Olbe, L. C., Carlsson, E. I., & Lindberg, P. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1010 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
A Perspective on the Kinetics of Covalent and Irreversible Inhibition
Strelow, J. M. (2017) · SLAS Discovery · doi:10.1177/1087057116671509 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Barf, T. A., Covey, T. M., Izumi, R. E., van de Kar, B., Gulrajani, M., van Lith, B., Hoek, M. E.-V., de Zwart, E., Mittag, D., Demont, D., et al. (2017) · Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1124/jpet.117.242909 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Covalent inhibitors: a rational approach to drug discovery
Sutanto, F., Konstantinidou, M., & Dömling, A. (2020) · RSC Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d0md00154f · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Broad-Spectrum Kinase Profiling in Live Cells with Lysine-Targeted Sulfonyl Fluoride Probes
Zhao, Q., Ouyang, X., Wan, X., Gajiwala, K. S., Kath, J. C., Jones, L. H., Burlingame, A. L., & Taunton, J. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b08536 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Tethering: Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Erlanson, D. A., Wells, J. A., & Braisted, A. C. (2004) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.33.110502.140409 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Binding of small molecules to an adaptive protein–protein interface
Arkin, M. R., Randal, M., DeLano, W. L., Hyde, J., Luong, T. N., Oslob, J. D., Raphael, D. R., Taylor, L., Wang, J., McDowell, R. S., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252756299 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Hu, N., Yu, D., Zhou, C., Shi, G., Zhang, B., Wei, M., Liu, J., Luo, L., et al. (2019) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00687 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Transporter-Mediated Permeation of Drugs Across the Blood–Brain Barrier
Tamai, I., & Tsuji, A. (2000) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/1520-6017(200011)89:11 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
An Activity-Guided Map of Electrophile-Cysteine Interactions in Primary Human T Cells
Vinogradova, E. V., Zhang, X., Remillard, D., Lazar, D. C., Suciu, R. M., Wang, Y., Bianco, G., Yamashita, Y., Crowley, V. M., Schafroth, M. A., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.001 · Cited by 351 · see citing works
Deubiquitinase-targeting chimeras for targeted protein stabilization
Henning, N. J., Boike, L., Spradlin, J. N., Ward, C. C., Liu, G., Zhang, E., Belcher, B. P., Brittain, S. M., Hesse, M. J., Dovala, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-022-00971-2 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure-based design of targeted covalent inhibitors
Lonsdale, R., & Ward, R. A. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00220c · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Approval Summary for Bortezomib for Injection in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Bross, P. F., Kane, R. C., Farrell, A. T., Abraham, S., Benson, K. A., Brower, M. E., Bradley, S. P., Gobburu, J. V. S., Goheer, A., Lee, S., et al. (2004) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0781 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Flanagan, M. E., Abramite, J. A., Anderson, D. P., AULABAUGH, A. E., Dahal, U. P., Gilbert, A. M., Li, C., Montgomery, J. I., Oppenheimer, S. R., Ryder, T. F., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm501412a · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Expanding the Reach of Precision Oncology by Drugging All <i>KRAS</i> Mutants
Hofmann, M. H., Gerlach, D., Misale, S., Petronczki, M., & Kraut, N. (2022) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1331 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Ward, C. C., Kleinman, J. I., Brittain, S. M., Lee, P. S., Chung, C. Y. S., Kim, K., Petri, Y., Thomas, J. R., Tallarico, J. A., McKenna, J. M., et al. (2019) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.8b01083 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Self-citationRapid Covalent-Probe Discovery by Electrophile-Fragment Screening
Resnick, E., Bradley, A., Gan, J., Douangamath, A., Krojer, T., Sethi, R., Geurink, P. P., Aimon, A., Amitai, G., Bellini, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b02822 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
The versatility of boron in biological target engagement
Diaz, D. B., & Yudin, A. K. (2017) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2814 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI?
Recondo, G., Facchinetti, F., Olaussen, K. A., Besse, B., & Friboulet, L. (2018) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Chauhan, D., Tian, Z., Zhou, B., Kuhn, D. J., Orlowski, R. Z., Raje, N. S., Richardson, P. G. G., & Anderson, K. C. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0476 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Covalent inhibitors design and discovery.
De Cesco, S., Kurian, J., Dufresne, C., Mittermaier, A. K., & Moitessier, N. (2017) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.06.019 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Baker, S. J., Zhang, Y.-K., Akama, T., et al. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0603724 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Kuljanin, M., Mitchell, D. C., Schweppe, D. K., Gikandi, A. S., Nusinow, D. P., Bulloch, N. J., Vinogradova, E. V., Wilson, D. L., Kool, E. T., Mancias, J. D., et al. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-00778-3 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Groll, M., Kim, K. B., Kairies, N., Huber, R., & Crews, C. M. (2000) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja993588m · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Tsou, H., Overbeek, E., Hallett, W. A., Reich, M. F., Floyd, M. B., Johnson, B. D., Michalak, R. S., Nilakantan, R., Discafani, C. M., Golas, J., et al. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm040159c · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Chandrasekharan, N., & Simmons, D. L. (2004) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-9-241 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Richardson, P. G., Hideshima, T., & Anderson, K. C. (2003) · Cancer Control · doi:10.1177/107327480301000502 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Venkatraman, S., Bogen, S. L., Arasappan, A., et al. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm060325b · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Ward, R. A., Anderton, M. J., Ashton, S., Bethel, P. A., Box, M., Butterworth, S., Colclough, N., Chorley, C. G., Chuaqui, C., Cross, D. A. E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm400822z · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Kim, R. D., Sarker, D., Meyer, T., Yau, T. C. C., Macarulla, T. M., Park, J., Choo, S. P., Hollebecque, A., Sung, M. W., Lim, H.-Y., et al. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0555 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Weerapana, E., Speers, A. E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.194 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Covalent docking of large libraries for the discovery of chemical probes
London, N., Miller, R. M., Krishnan, S., Uchida, K., Irwin, J. J., Eidam, O., Gibold, L., Cimermančič, P., Bonnet, R., Shoichet, B. K., et al. (2014) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1666 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Zhou, H.-J., Aujay, M. A., Bennett, M. K., Dajee, M., Demo, S. D., Fang, Y., Ho, M. N., Jiang, J., Kirk, C. J., Laidig, G. J., et al. (2009) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm801329v · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Kwong, A. D., Kauffman, R. S., Hurter, P. N., & Mueller, P. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2020 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Covalent Inhibition in Drug Discovery
Ghosh, A. K., Samanta, I., Mondal, A., & Liu, W. R. (2019) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.201900107 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Chemical Proteomics Identifies Druggable Vulnerabilities in a Genetically Defined Cancer
Bar-Peled, L., Kemper, E. K., Suciu, R. M., Vinogradova, E. V., Backus, K. M., Horning, B. D., Paul, T. A., Ichu, T.-A., Svensson, R. U., Olucha, J., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.051 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Oksenberg, D., Dufu, K., Patel, M. P., Chuang, C.-Y., Li, Z., Xu, Q. R., Silva‐Garcia, A., Zhou, C., Hutchaleelaha, A., Patskovska, L. N., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.14214 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Tamura, T., Ueda, T., Goto, T., Tsukidate, T., Shapira, Y., Nishikawa, Y., Fujisawa, A., & Hamachi, I. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04343-0 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Lin, C., Kwong, A. D., & Perni, R. B. (2006) · Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/187152606776056706 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
A proteome-wide atlas of lysine-reactive chemistry
Abbasov, M. E., Kavanagh, M. E., Ichu, T.-A., Lazear, M. R., Tao, Y., Crowley, V. M., Ende, C. W. A., Hacker, S. M., Ho, J. S., Dix, M. M., et al. (2021) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-021-00765-4 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Recent Developments in the Chemistry and Biological Applications of Benzoxaboroles
Adamczyk‐Woźniak, A., Borys, K. M., & Sporzyński, A. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500642d · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Discovery of a Covalent FEM1B Recruiter for Targeted Protein Degradation Applications
Henning, N. J., Manford, A. G., Spradlin, J. N., Brittain, S. M., Zhang, E., McKenna, J. M., Tallarico, J. A., Schirle, M., Rape, M., & Nomura, D. K. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c03980 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationAkama, T., Baker, S. J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2009) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.007 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
The role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase in B-cell development and function: a genetic perspective
Satterthwaite, A. B., & Witte, O. N. (2000) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2000.imr017504.x · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Telliez, J.-B., Dowty, M. E., Wang, L., Jussif, J., Lin, T., Li, L., Moy, E., Balbo, P., Li, W., Zhao, Y., et al. (2016) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.6b00677 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Discovery of GBT440, an Orally Bioavailable R-State Stabilizer of Sickle Cell Hemoglobin
Metcalf, B., Chuang, C., Dufu, K., Patel, M. P., Silva-Garcia, A., Johnson, C., Lu, Q., Partridge, J. R., Patskovska, L., Patskovsky, Y., et al. (2017) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.6b00491 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Design and discovery of boronic acid drugs
Plescia, J., & Moitessier, N. (2020) · European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112270 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Progress with covalent small-molecule kinase inhibitors
Zhao, Z., & Bourne, P. E. (2018) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.035 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
DCAF11 Supports Targeted Protein Degradation by Electrophilic Proteolysis-Targeting Chimeras
Zhang, X., Luukkonen, L. M., Eissler, C. L., Crowley, V. M., Yamashita, Y., Schafroth, M. A., Kikuchi, S., Weinstein, D. S., Symons, K. T., Nordin, B. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c00990 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Fosfomycin: Pharmacological, Clinical and Future Perspectives
Dijkmans, A. C., Zacarı́as, N. V. O., Burggraaf, J., et al. (2017) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics6040024 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Electrophilic Fragment-Based Design of Reversible Covalent Kinase Inhibitors
Miller, R. M., Paavilainen, V. O., Krishnan, S., Serafimova, I. M., & Taunton, J. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja401221b · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Ibrutinib: A First in Class Covalent Inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase
Davids, M. S., & Brown, J. R. (2014) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon.14.51 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Chemical proteomic map of dimethyl fumarate–sensitive cysteines in primary human T cells
Blewett, M. M., Xie, J., Zaro, B. W., Backus, K. M., Altman, A., Teijaro, J. R., & Cravatt, B. F. (2016) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.aaf7694 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Rational Targeting of Active-Site Tyrosine Residues Using Sulfonyl Fluoride Probes
Hett, E. C., Xu, H., Geoghegan, K. F., Gopalsamy, A., Kyne, R. E., Menard, C. A., Narayanan, A., Parikh, M. D., Liu, S., Roberts, L. R., et al. (2015) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/cb5009475 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Narita, Y., Nagane, M., Mishima, K., Terui, Y., Arakawa, Y., Yonezawa, H., Asai, K., Fukuhara, N., Sugiyama, K., Shinojima, N., et al. (2020) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa145 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Grimster, N. P., Connelly, S., Baranczak, A., Dong, J., Krasnova, L. B., Sharpless, K. B., Powers, E. T., Wilson, I. A., & Kelly, J. W. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja311729d · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Luo, M., Spradlin, J. N., Boike, L., Tong, B., Brittain, S. M., McKenna, J. M., Tallarico, J. A., Schirle, M., Maimone, T. J., & Nomura, D. K. (2021) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.01.005 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationByrd, J. C., Furman, R. R., Coutre, S. E., Flinn, I. W., Burger, J. A., Blum, K. A., Sharman, J. P., Wierda, W. G., Zhao, W., Heerema, N. A., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2856 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
How Chemoproteomics Can Enable Drug Discovery and Development
Moellering, R. E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2012) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.001 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Ou, S.-H. I. (2012) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2011.11.010 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Selective and Irreversible Covalent Ligand Development and Validation
Zhang, T., Hatcher, J. M., Teng, M., Gray, N. S., & Kostic, M. (2019) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.09.012 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Tan, L., Wang, J., Tanizaki, J., Huang, Z., Aref, A. R., Rusan, M., Zhu, S.-J., Zhang, Y., Ercan, D., Liao, R. G., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403438111 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Keedy, D. A., Hill, Z. B., Biel, J. T., Kang, E., Rettenmaier, T. J., Brandão-Neto, J., Pearce, N. M., von Delft, F., Wells, J. A., & Fraser, J. S. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.36307 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Reimagining Druggability Using Chemoproteomic Platforms
Spradlin, J. N., Zhang, E., & Nomura, D. K. (2021) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00065 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationThorarensen, A., Dowty, M. E., Banker, M. E., Juba, B., Jussif, J., Lin, T., Vincent, F., Czerwinski, R. M., Casimiro-Garcia, A., Unwalla, R., et al. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01694 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
From epoxomicin to carfilzomib: chemistry, biology, and medical outcomes
Kim, K. B., & Crews, C. M. (2013) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/c3np20126k · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Covalent Targeting of the Vacuolar H+-ATPase Activates Autophagy Via mTORC1 Inhibition
Chung, C., Shin, H. R., Berdan, C. A., Ford, B., Ward, C. C., Olzmann, J. A., Zoncu, R., & Nomura, D. (2019) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-019-0308-4 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Self-citationA Fragment-Based Method to Discover Irreversible Covalent Inhibitors of Cysteine Proteases
Kathman, S. G., Xu, Z., & Statsyuk, A. V. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500345q · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Danenberg, P. V., Langenbach, R. J., & Heidelberger, C. (1974) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00702a016 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Edgington, L. E., Verdoes, M., & Bogyo, M. (2011) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.10.012 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Reactive-cysteine profiling for drug discovery
Maurais, A. J., & Weerapana, E. (2019) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.02.010 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Cee, V. J., Volak, L. P., Chen, Y., Bartberger, M. D., Tegley, C. M., Arvedson, T., McCarter, J. D., Tasker, A. S., & Fotsch, C. H. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01018 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
The Taxonomy of Covalent Inhibitors
Tuley, A., & Fast, W. L. (2018) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00315 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Curran, M. P., & McKeage, K. (2009) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-200969070-00006 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Sulfopin is a covalent inhibitor of Pin1 that blocks Myc-driven tumors in vivo
Dubiella, C., Pinch, B. J., Koikawa, K., Zaidman, D., Poon, E., Manz, T. D., Nabet, B., He, S., Resnick, E., Rogel, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-021-00786-7 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Mechanism-Based Inhibition: Deriving KI and kinact Directly from Time-Dependent IC50 Values
Krippendorff, B., Neuhaus, R., Lienau, P., Reichel, A., & Huisinga, W. (2009) · SLAS DISCOVERY · doi:10.1177/1087057109336751 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
NHS-Esters As Versatile Reactivity-Based Probes for Mapping Proteome-Wide Ligandable Hotspots
Ward, C. C., Kleinman, J. I., & Nomura, D. K. (2017) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b00125 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationBruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib (PCI-32765)
Burger, J. A., & Buggy, J. J. (2013) · Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · doi:10.3109/10428194.2013.777837 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Dacomitinib: First Global Approval
Shirley, M. (2018) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-018-1028-x · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Discovery of a Functional Covalent Ligand Targeting an Intrinsically Disordered Cysteine within MYC
Boike, L., Cioffi, A. G., Majewski, F. C., Co, J., Henning, N. J., Jones, M. D., Liu, G., McKenna, J. M., Tallarico, J. A., Schirle, M., et al. (2021) · Cell Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools
Scarpino, A., Ferenczy, G. G., & Keserű, G. M. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00228 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Caldwell, R. D., Qiu, H., Askew, B. C., Bender, A. T., Brügger, N., Camps, M., Dhanabal, M., Dutt, V., Eichhorn, T., Gardberg, A. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00794 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Bardoxolone conjugation enables targeted protein degradation of BRD4
Tong, B., Luo, M., Xie, Y., Spradlin, J. N., Tallarico, J. A., McKenna, J. M., Schirle, M., Maimone, T. J., & Nomura, D. K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-72491-9 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationNeratinib: First Global Approval
Deeks, E. D. (2017) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-017-0811-4 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
5‐FLUOROURACIL: A PHARMACOLOGICAL PARADIGM IN THE USE OF CYTOTOXICS
Thomas, D. M., & Zalcberg, J. R. (1998) · Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.1998.tb02339.x · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Targeting biomolecules with reversible covalent chemistry
Bandyopadhyay, A., & Gao, J. (2016) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.08.011 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Covalent inhibitors: an opportunity for rational target selectivity
Lagoutte, R., Patouret, R., & Winssinger, N. (2017) · Current Opinion in Chemical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2017.05.008 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
The Proteasome in Modern Drug Discovery: Second Life of a Highly Valuable Drug Target
Cromm, P. M., & Crews, C. M. (2017) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00252 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Fragment-based covalent ligand discovery
Lu, W., Kostic, M., Zhang, T., Che, J., Patricelli, M. P., Jones, L. H., Chouchani, E. T., & Gray, N. S. (2021) · RSC Chemical Biology · doi:10.1039/d0cb00222d · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Identification and Characterization of an Irreversible Inhibitor of CDK2
Anscombe, E., Meschini, E., Mora-Vidal, R., Martin, M. P., Staunton, D., Geitmann, M., Danielson, U. H., Stanley, W. A., Wang, L.-Z., Reuillon, T. D., et al. (2015) · Chemistry & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.07.018 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Ligandability of E3 Ligases for Targeted Protein Degradation Applications
Belcher, B. P., Ward, C. C., & Nomura, D. K. (2023) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00464 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationChemoproteomics and Chemical Probes for Target Discovery
Drewes, G., & Knapp, S. (2018) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.06.008 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
KRasG12C inhibitors in clinical trials: a short historical perspective
Goebel, L., Müller, M. P., Goody, R. S., & Rauh, D. (2020) · RSC Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d0md00096e · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Vandyck, K., & Deval, J. (2021) · Current Opinion in Virology · doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2021.04.006 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Dalton, S. E., Dittus, L., Thomas, D. A., Convery, M. A., Nunes, J., Bush, J. T., Evans, J. P., Werner, T., Bantscheff, M., Murphy, J. A., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b08979 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Johansson, H., Tsai, Y. I., Fantom, K. G. M., Chung, C., Kuemper, S., Martino, L., Thomas, D. A., Eberl, H. C., Muelbaier, M., House, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b13193 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Development of Selective Covalent Janus Kinase 3 Inhibitors
Tan, L., Akahane, K., McNally, R., Reyskens, K. M. S. E., Ficarro, S. B., Liu, S., Herter-Sprie, G. S., Koyama, S., Pattison, M. J., Labella, K., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00710 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Hepatitis C virus NS3/4a protease inhibitors
McCauley, J. A., & Rudd, M. T. (2016) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2016.07.015 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Benkovic, S. J., Baker, S. J., Alley, M. R. K., et al. (2005) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm050676a · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Afatinib for the treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC: A review of clinical findings
Harvey, R. D., Adams, V. R., Beardslee, T., & Medina, P. (2020) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155220931926 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Shin, Y., Jeong, J. W., Wurz, R. P., Achanta, P., Arvedson, T., Bartberger, M. D., Campuzano, I. D. G., Fucini, R., Hansen, S. K., Ingersoll, J., et al. (2019) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00258 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Roberts, A. M., Ward, C. C., & Nomura, D. K. (2017) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.08.003 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationWeiss, A., Adler, F., Buhles, A., Stamm, C., Fairhurst, R. A., Kiffe, M., Sterker, D., Centeleghe, M., Wartmann, M., Kinyamu-Akunda, J., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-18-1291 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Determination of the pK values for the alpha-amino groups of human hemoglobin.
Garner, M. H., Bogardt, R. A., & Gurd, F. R. N. (1975) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)41315-x · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Kathman, S. G., Span, I., Smith, A. T., Xu, Z., Zhan, J., Rosenzweig, A. C., & Statsyuk, A. V. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b06839 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Afatinib—new therapy option for EGFR-mutant lung cancer
Yu, H. A., & Pao, W. (2013) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.154 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Discovery of Narlaprevir (SCH 900518): A Potent, Second Generation HCV NS3 Serine Protease Inhibitor
Arasappan, A., Bennett, F., Bogen, S. L., Venkatraman, S., Blackman, M., Chen, K. X., Hendrata, S., Huang, Y., Huelgas, R. M., Nair, L., et al. (2010) · ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/ml9000276 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Tricyclic Covalent Inhibitors Selectively Target Jak3 through an Active Site Thiol
Goedken, E. R., Argiriadi, M. A., Banach, D. L., Fiamengo, B. A., Foley, S. E., Frank, K. E., George, J. S., Harris, C. M., Hobson, A. D., Ihle, D. C., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m114.595181 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Boron-Containing heterocycles as promising pharmacological agents
Das, B. C., Shareef, M. A., Das, S., Nandwana, N. K., Das, Y., Saito, M., & Weiss, L. M. (2022) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116748 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Keeley, A. B., Ábrányi-Balogh, P., & Keserű, G. M. (2018) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c8md00327k · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Chan, A. I., McGregor, L. M., Jain, T., & Liu, D. R. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b04880 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Chemoproteomic profiling and discovery of protein electrophiles in human cells
Matthews, M. L., He, L., Horning, B. D., Olson, E. J., Correia, B. E., Yates, J. R., Dawson, P. E., & Cravatt, B. F. (2017) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2645 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
SP3‐FAIMS Chemoproteomics for High‐Coverage Profiling of the Human Cysteinome**
Yan, T., Desai, H. S., Boatner, L. M., Yen, S. L., Cao, J. X., Palafox, M. F., Jami‐Alahmadi, Y., & Backus, K. M. (2021) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202000870 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Robinson, M. F., DAMJANOV, N. S., Stamenkovic, B. N., et al. (2020) · Arthritis & Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/art.41316 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Debaene, F., Silva, J. A. D., Pianowski, Z., Durán, F., & Winssinger, N. (2007) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/j.tet.2007.03.033 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Cardoso, R., Love, R., Nilsson, C. L., Bergqvist, S., Nowlin, D., Yan, J., Liu, K. K. ‐., Zhu, J., Chen, P., Deng, Y., et al. (2012) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.2172 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A Specific and Covalent JNK‐1 Ligand Selected from an Encoded Self‐Assembling Chemical Library
Zimmermann, G., Rieder, U., Bajic, D., Vanetti, S., Chaikuad, A., Knapp, S., Scheuermann, J., Mattarella, M., & Neri, D. (2017) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201701644 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Zambaldo, C., Daguer, J.-P., Saarbach, J., Barluenga, S., & Winssinger, N. (2016) · MedChemComm · doi:10.1039/c6md00242k · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Binda, C., Wang, J., Li, M., Hubalek, F., Mattevi, A., & Edmondson, D. E. (2008) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi8002814 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Birkholz, A. B., Kopecky, D. J., Volak, L. P., Bartberger, M. D., Chen, Y., Tegley, C. M., Arvedson, T., McCarter, J. D., Fotsch, C. H., & Cee, V. J. (2020) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00749 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Fragment‐Based Stabilizers of Protein–Protein Interactions through Imine‐Based Tethering
Wolter, M., Valenti, D., Cossar, P. J., Levy, L. M., Hristeva, S., Genski, T., Hoffmann, T., Brunsveld, L., Tzalis, D., & Ottmann, C. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202008585 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Thorarensen, A., Balbo, P., Banker, M. E., Czerwiński, R., Kühn, M., Maurer, T. S., Telliez, J., Vincent, F., & Wittwer, A. J. (2020) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115865 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Ligand Conformational Bias Drives Enantioselective Modification of a Surface-Exposed Lysine on Hsp90
Cuesta, A., Wan, X., Burlingame, A. L., & Taunton, J. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b09684 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Xu, H., Faber, C., Uchiki, T., Racca, J. D., & Dealwis, C. G. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600440103 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Dimethyl Fumarate Disrupts Human Innate Immune Signaling by Targeting the IRAK4–MyD88 Complex
Zaro, B. W., Vinogradova, E. V., Lazar, D. C., Blewett, M. M., Suciu, R. M., Takaya, J., Studer, S., de la Torre, J. C., Casanova, J.-L., Cravatt, B. F., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1801627 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Venkatraman, S. (2012) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tips.2012.03.012 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Covalent Docking Identifies a Potent and Selective MKK7 Inhibitor
Shraga, A., Olshvang, E., Davidzohn, N., Khoshkenar, P., Germain, N., Shurrush, K. A., Carvalho, S., Avram, L., Albeck, S., Unger, T., et al. (2018) · Cell chemical biology · doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.10.011 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Identification of Covalent Bromodomain Binders through DNA Display of Small Molecules
Daguer, J., Zambaldo, C., Abegg, D., Barluenga, S., Tallant, C., Müller, S., Adibekian, A., & Winssinger, N. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201412276 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
An in vivo multiplexed small-molecule screening platform
Grüner, B. M., Schulze, C. J., Yang, D., Ogasawara, D., Dix, M. M., Rogers, Z. N., Chuang, C.-H., McFarland, C. D., Chiou, S.-H., Brown, J. M., et al. (2016) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3992 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Docking of Covalent Ligands: Challenges and Approaches
Sotriffer, C. (2018) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201800062 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Wang, J., Martin-Romano, P., Cassier, P., Johnson, M., Haura, E., Lenox, L., Guo, Y., Bandyopadhyay, N., Russell, M., Shearin, E., et al. (2022) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1093/oncolo/oyab080 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Nicola, G., Tomberg, J., Pratt, R. F., Nicholas, R. A., & Davies, C. (2010) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi100879m · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- McWhirter, C. in Annual Reports in Medicinal Chemistry (eds Ward, R. A. & Grimster, N. P.) vol. 56 1–31 (Elsevier, 2021).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Xia, Y., Zhang, J., & Chen, L. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01911-3 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials
Xie, X., Yu, T., Li, X., Zhang, N., Foster, L. J., Peng, C., Huang, W., & He, G. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01589-z · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Development of covalent inhibitors: Principle, design, and application in cancer
Zheng, L., Li, Y., Wu, D., Xiao, H., Zheng, S., Wang, G., & Sun, Q. (2023) · MedComm – Oncology · doi:10.1002/mog2.56 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Advancing Targeted Protein Degradation via Multiomics Profiling and Artificial Intelligence
Duran-Frigola, M., Cigler, M., & Winter, G. E. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c11098 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boike, L., Henning, N. J., & Nomura, D. K.
- Affiliations
- Innovative Genomics Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nomura, Daniel K.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Published
- 2022-08-25
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 881-898
- ISSN
- 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1784
- PMC
- PMC9403961
- OpenAlex
- W4293084539
- Semantic Scholar
- b94c42b5629eb6be15dea45d3c538519c52f5ee7
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 219
- Citations by year
- 2026: 172 · 2025: 256 · 2024: 236 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Mark Foundation For Cancer Research
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (F31CA268278, R01CA240981, R35CA263814)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- covalent drug discovery, covalent inhibitors, chemoproteomics, KRAS G12C inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, reactive functional groups, target identification, selectivity profiling
- MeSH terms
- Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Humans, Ligands, Structure-Activity Relationship, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Drug Discovery, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review