Cited by 210Nutrition and Health in AgingCancer survivorship and careMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Effect of physical exercise on muscle mass and strength in cancer patients during treatment—a systematic review

Open access
Stene, G.B., Helbostad, J.L., Balstad, T.R., Riphagen, I.I., Kaasa, S., Oldervoll, L.M.·2013·Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

Abstract

Cancer treatment and its side effects may cause muscle wasting. Physical exercise has the potential to increase muscle mass and strength and to improve physical function in cancer patients undergoing treatment. A systematic review was conducted to study the effect of physical exercise (aerobic, resistance or a combination of both) on muscle mass and strength in cancer patients with different type and stage of cancer disease. Electronic searches were performed up to January 11th 2012, identifying 16 randomised controlled trials for final data synthesis. The studies demonstrated that aerobic and resistance exercise improves upper and lower body muscle strength more than usual care. Few studies have assessed the effect of exercise on muscle mass. Most studies were performed in patients with early stage breast or prostate cancer. Evidence on the effect of physical exercise on muscle strength and mass in cancer patients with advanced disease is lacking. More exercise studies in patients with advanced cancer and at risk of cancer cachexia are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.07.001

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stene, G. B., Helbostad, J. L., Balstad, T. R., Riphagen, I. I., Kaasa, S., & Oldervoll, L. M.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Stene, G.B.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
88
Issue
3
Pages
573-593
ISSN
1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964900534
Cited by
210
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
physical activity, muscle mass, muscle strength, cancer patients, cancer cachexia, muscle atrophy, aerobic exercise, resistance training, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cancer treatment side effects, physical function
MeSH terms
Humans, Neoplasms, Organ Size, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review