Cited by 98Cultural Heritage Management and PreservationDisaster Management and ResilienceConservation Techniques and Studies

Climate change-induced disasters and cultural heritage: Optimizing management strategies in Central Europe

Open access
Cacciotti, Riccardo, Kaiser, Anna, Sardella, Alessandro, De Nuntiis, Paola, Drdácký, Miloš, Hanus, Christian, Bonazza, Alessandra·2021·Climate Risk Management

Abstract

Due to climate change, it is foreseen that the frequency and magnitude of extreme climate events such as heavy precipitation, flooding and drought will increase throughout Europe. In recent times, numerous areas suffered from disasters that produced significant damage to cultural heritage. Although different risk management strategies are currently enforced in Central Europe, there still exist many challenges that undermine their effectiveness. This study reviews the necessary points to be addressed for strengthening existing management strategies within the region and the characteristics of potential resilience building measures. It presents feasible and tailored ICT solutions (e.g. a web GIS platform) and decision support tools (e.g. a manual for cultural heritage resilience and a handbook on transnational rescue procedures) for the protection of cultural heritage against floods, heavy rain and fire. These tools result from the Interreg Central Europe project ProteCHt2save, concentrating on risk assessment and sustainable protection of cultural heritage in changing environments. The proposed measures are tested at pilot sites and successfully integrated in local risk management plans. Future work is also proposed for further implementation of the results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100301

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • International databases on displacement, population movement, and urbanization increasingly allow migration to be measured, so researchers can statistically analyze climate-related mobility.

    “Migration is also increasingly measurable through international databases on displacement, population movements, and urbanization patterns, enabling statistical analysis of how climatic stressors influence mobility (Cacciotti et al., 2021).”

    From Climate Security, Water Governance, and Resilience How Climate-Induced Water Stress and Migration Challenge State Capacity (2026) · cites this paper as Cacciotti et al., 2021

    Section 3.2 describes a GIS tool for mapping climate hazards and risks to cultural heritage in Central Europe, not databases measuring human migration. Searches for displacement and population movements, and for migration, mobility, and statistical analysis of climatic stressors, found no passage addressing the attributed claim. The available section labels do not provide page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Bonazza, A., Sabbioni, C., Messina, P., Guaraldi, C., De Nuntiis, P., 2009a. Climate change impact: Mapping thermal stress on Carrara marble in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 407 (15), 4506-4512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.04.008. · DOI
  2. Bonazza, A., Vidorni, G., Natali, I., Ciantelli, C., Giosuè, C., Tittarelli, F., 2017. Durability assessment to environmental impact of nano-structured consolidants on Carrara marble by field exposure tests. Sci. Total Environ. 575, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.004. · DOI
  3. Cacciotti, R., 2020. Brick masonry response to wind driven rain. Eng. Struct. 204, 110080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110080. · DOI
  4. Copping, A., 2002. The development of a fire safety evaluation procedure for the property protection of parish churches. Fire Technol. 38 (4), 319-334.
  5. Drdácký, Miloš.F., 2010. Flood Damage to Historic Buildings and Structures. J. Perform. Constr. Facil 24 (5), 439-445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943- 5509.0000065. · DOI
  6. Drdácký, M., Slížková, Z., 2012. Structural strategies and measures for reducing flood action on architectural heritage, in Brebbia, C.A. (Ed.), Risk Analysis VIII, WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, Vol 44. WIT Press, Southampton, UK, pp. 249-259.
  7. Fatorić, S., Seekamp, E., 2017. Are cultural heritage and resources threatened by climate change? A systematic literature review. Clim. Change 142 (1-2), 227-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1929-9. · DOI
  8. Figueiredo, R., Romão, X., Paupério, E., 2020. Flood risk assessment of cultural heritage at large spatial scales: Framework and application to mainland Portugal. J. Cult. Heritage 43, 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.11.007. · DOI
  9. Gómez-Bolea, A., Llop, E., Ariño, X., Saiz-Jimenez, C., Bonazza, A., Messina, P., Sabbioni, C., 2012. Mapping the impact of climate change on biomass accumulation on stone. J. Cult. Heritage 13 (3), 254-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2011.10.003. · DOI
  10. Holický, M., Sýkora, M., 2010. Assessment of Flooding Risk to Cultural Heritage in Historic Sites. J. Perform. Constr. Facil 24 (5), 432-438. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000053. · DOI
  11. IPCC, 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation, Field, C.B., V., Barros, T.F. ,Stocker, D., Qin, D.J,. Dokken, K.L., Ebi, M.D., Mastrandrea, K.J., Mach, G.-K., Plattner, S.K., Allen, M. ,Tignor, and P.M., Midgley (Eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K. Kaiser, 2019. Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Rescue Team (CHRT), Interreg Central Europe ProteCHt2save deliverable, (accessed 10 August 2020).
  12. Proag, V., 2014. The Concept of Vulnerability and Resilience. Procedia Econ. Finan. 18, 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00952-6. · DOI
  13. Romão, X., Paupério, E., Pereira, N., 2016. A framework for the simplified risk analysis of cultural heritage assets. J. Cult. Heritage 20, 696-708. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.culher.2016.05.007. · DOI
  14. Sabbioni, C., Brimblecombe, P., Cassar, M., 2012. Atlas of climate change impact on European Cultural Heritage. Anthem Press, London.
  15. Sardella, A., Palazzi, E., von Hardenberg, J., Del Grande, C., De Nuntiis, P., Sabbioni, C., Bonazza, A., 2020. Risk mapping for the sustainable protection of cultural heritage in extreme changing environments. Special Issue Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Urban Cultural Heritage. Atmosphere 11 (7), 700. https:// doi.org/10.3390/atmos11070700. · DOI
  16. Schramm, H., 2019. Integration von zivilenAkteuren des Kulturgüterschutzes in einenEinsatzstab.Master Thesis Danube University Krems, Austria.
  17. Sesana, E., Gagnon, A.S., Bonazza, A., Hughes, J.J., 2020. An integrated approach for assessing the vulnerability of World Heritage Sites to climate change impacts. J. Cult. Heritage 41, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.013. · DOI
  18. Sevieri, G., Galasso, C., D'Ayala, D., De Jesus, R., Oreta, A., Grio, M., Ibabao, R., 2020. A multi-hazard risk prioritization framework for cultural heritage assets. Nat. Hazard Earth Sys. 20 (5), 1391.
  19. Tandon, A., 2016. Endangered Heritage. Emergency Evacuation of Heritage Collections. In Tandon, A. (Ed.), ICCROM-ATHAR.
  20. Tandon, A., 2018. First Aid to Cultural Heritage in Times of Crisis. Vol. I: Handbook for coordinated emergency preparedness and response to secure tangible and intangible heritage. Vol. II: Toolkit for coordinated emergency preparedness and response to secure tangible and intangible heritage. In Tandon, A. (Ed.), ICCROM / Prince Claus Fund.
  21. Trnka, M., Balek, J., Štěpánek, P., Zahradníček, P., Možný, M., Eitzinger, J., Žalud, Z., Formayer, H., Turňa, M., Nejedlík, P., Semerádová, D., Hlavinka, P., Brázdil, R., 2016. Drought trends over part of Central Europe between 1961 and 2014. Clim. Res. 70 (2), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01420. · DOI
  22. UNESCO, 2017. Manual for Contingency Procedures in Historical Archives in the Events of Natural Disasters. General Guide for dealing with Natural Disasters. In: UNESCO and Ministerio de Cultura y Patrimonio del Ecuador (eds.).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacciotti, R., Kaiser, A., Sardella, A., De Nuntiis, P., Drdácký, M., Hanus, C., & Bonazza, A.
Affiliations
  • Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (IT)
Corresponding author
Cacciotti, Riccardo
Venue
Climate Risk Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
32
Pages
100301
ISSN
2212-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3144760868
Cited by
98
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7
FWCI
74.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Risk Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Czech Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Conservation Techniques and Studies
Keywords
climate change, cultural heritage, disaster risk management, heritage resilience, flood risk, heavy rainfall, drought, fire risk, WebGIS, decision support system, risk assessment, Central Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review