Cited by 2Biblical Studies and InterpretationPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyHistorical Philosophy and Science

The Creation of the world and the birth of chronology

Open access
Richet, Pascal·2017·Comptes Rendus. Géoscience

Abstract

The eternity of the world and, correlatively, the cyclical nature of time were agreed upon by all Greek philosophical schools except the Platonists. As for matter, all of them posited that it was eternal so that the idea that something could be made from nothing was considered as pure absurdity. With the advent of Christianity, however, a matter coeternal with God raised fundamental theological difficulties. Toward the end of the second century, apologists such as Tatian the Assyrian, Theophilus of Antioch, Irenaeus of Lyons or Tertullian thus emphasized God's absolute freedom and power by claiming that Creation had been made from nothing. Along with the Passion of Christ and the Last Judgment, the initial moment defined by the Creation then conferred to time an irreversible, linear orientation and to history both a new sense and an obsessing concern for chronology. Unambiguously, the Creation became the reference point for the world's history. From Scripture analyses, one determined that it took place about 5500 years earlier within a framework where the History of man and that of the earth were not distinct. Having designed a consistent, universal time scale from chronological data recorded for all ancient peoples, Eusebius of Caesarea could thus attribute to the Great Flood the fossils found on the top of Mount Lebanon. The short Mosaic chronologies were eventually rejected during the 18th century, but Eusebius’ chronological procedure was unknowingly transposed when a relative geological timescale was then set up from the fossil record. The close association of Creation with Christian dogma in turn induced some circles to reject the second law of thermodynamics at the end of the 19th century and, a few decades later, the thesis of an expanding universe. In both cases, the reason was that continuously increasing entropy would imply some low-entropy initial state akin to a Creation.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This historical essay traces how the Christian doctrine of Creation ex nihilo emerged among 2nd–3rd century Church Fathers and helped replace cyclical with linear time, while also shaping early chronology. It argues that Eusebius of Caesarea’s universal chronology anticipated, by 15 centuries, the fossil-correlation methods later used by 19th-century geologists.

Key findings

  • The paper shows that Creation ex nihilo was defended by figures such as Tatian, Theophilus of Antioch, Irenaeus, and Tertullian against the ancient assumption of eternal matter; Theophilus dated the creation to 5695 years by the death of Aurelius Verus in 169, while Eusebius derived 5228 years to the beginning of Christ’s public life, yielding about 5199 years for the Nativity.
  • Eusebius of Caesarea’s *Chronicle* established a universal chronology from Abraham to 311 AD by harmonizing Chaldean, Assyrian, Mede, Lydian, Persian, Hebrew, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman data in synoptic tables; Jerome translated and extended it to 378 AD, and an Armenian version preserves Eusebius’s use of fish fossils on Mt. Lebanon as evidence for the Great Flood, which the paper calls “the very first absolute geological dating.”
  • By the 18th century, Mosaic chronology remained active but inconsistent: Des Vignoles collected more than 200 calculations, with the shortest counting 3483 years and the longest 6984 years from creation to Jesus Christ; fossil ubiquity helped cause rejection of these short chronologies and contributed to the birth of geology.
  • The paper argues that 19th-century geologists unknowingly applied Eusebius’s correlation procedure to natural history when they used fossils as time markers, and that Creation ex nihilo’s linear time later resurfaced in debates over the second law of thermodynamics and the expanding universe, including Lemaître’s primeval atom.

Methods

  • Historical and textual analysis rather than empirical research; the paper synthesizes primary sources (e.g., Aristotle, Augustine, Tatian, Theophilus, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Eusebius) and secondary literature.
  • The main analysis is a narrative and comparative account contrasting Greek eternal/cyclical worldviews with Christian Creation ex nihilo and tracing chronology from Late Antiquity to 19th-century geology.
  • Table 1 contrasts Atomist tenets with those of Platonist, Peripatetic, Stoic, and Neoplatonist schools on matter, soul, motion, dynamics, Earth, universe, and explanation.

Limitations

  • Stated: the paper notes that the arguments in the ancient debate were “not scientific, but philosophical and theological,” and it quotes Eusebius’s caution that “there can be complete accuracy with respect to chronology.”
  • Evident: there is no formal limitations section; as a historical essay, it presents no new empirical data, no systematic quantitative uncertainty analysis, and relies on selected textual sources and broad synthesis.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crte.2017.08.001

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning

    For early Christians, the Creation was a divine act whose reality was beyond any doubt.

    “As part of a History centered on Man, it was a divine act whose reality was beyond any doubt.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Matter had the status of a fundamental principle.

    “Matter thus had the status of a fundamental principle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Tertullian made a similar plea when refuting Hermogenes, who invoked an eternal uncreated matter.

    “Tertullian (160-225), another Pagan-born apologist of note, made a similar plea when refuting a contemporaneous Platonizing Christian named Hermogenes, whose gnostic penchants led him to invoke a matter ''equally unborn, equally unmade, equally eternal, set forth as being without a beginning, without an end''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    In the middle of the 2nd century, the Creation issue took on great importance in polemics with gnostic sects that raised the problem of how the good God could have caused evil if everything had a divine origin.

    “It was in the middle of the 2nd century that the Creation issue took on a great importance in the course of polemetics with gnostic sects that were raising a major theological problem: if everything had a divine origin, how could the good God of the Scriptures have caused the existence of evil?”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    That Rome had been founded the first year of the seventh Olympiad allowed Eusebius to tighten mutually the Latin and Greek chronologies.

    “That Rome had been founded the first year of the seventh Olympiad, for instance, allowed him to tighten mutually the Latin and Greek chronologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Jewish tradition was of little help because it stressed the mystery of the creative operation and associated the beginning with the presence of Yahweh and the ensuing Alliance.

    “As for the Jewish tradition, it was of little help, because it was rather stressing the mystery of the creative operation and at the same time closely associating with this beginning the presence of the One who is [Yahweh] and conferring a special importance to the ensuing Alliance with the elected people.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    At the time Creation ex nihilo was enunciated and defended, it represented a thesis whose total absurdity was unanimously agreed upon.

    “It is thus useful to summarize how it was enunciated and defended at a time where it was representing a thesis whose total absurdity was unanimously agreed upon.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The 5228 years derived by Eusebius did not prevail.

    “The 5228 years derived by Eusebius did not prevail.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    A major issue in the debate was whether matter was itself eternal.

    “Actually, a major issue was to know whether or not matter was itself eternal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Eusebius of Caesarea derived a younger age of 5228 years at the beginning of Christ's public life, yielding about 5199 years for the Nativity.

    “Among other dates, a younger age of 5228 years at the beginning of Christ's public life was derived by Eusebius of Caesarea, yielding about 5199 years for the Nativity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Aristotle's picture of a small universe remained accepted for two millennia without being really questioned in the Middle Ages, either in Islam or the Latin West.

    “Aristotle's picture of a small universe remained accepted for two millennia without having been really questioned in the Middle Ages, either in Islam or in the Latin West.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Theophilus of Antioch described a two-step Creation from nothing and gave a real philosophical justification for it.

    “In a letter written to Autolycus, which included the brief but most ancient known commentary on Genesis, the pagan-born bishop Theophilus of Antioch (d.190) likewise described a two-step Creation from nothing for which he gave a real philosophical justification:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Tatian claimed matter was not a principle and was originated and brought into being by the sole creator.

    “Matter was not a principle, did he claim, ''for matter is not without beginning like God, nor because of having beginning is it also of equal power with God''.Instead ''it was originated and brought into being by none other, projected by the sole creator of all that is''.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Augustine most clearly spelled out the break with cyclical conceptions, stating Christ died once and the wicked walk in a circle not because life recurs but because their false doctrine is circuitous.

    “This major break with previous conceptions was most clearly spelled out by Augustine in his City of God: ''For once Christ died for our sins; and, rising from the dead, He dieth no more'', so that only ''the wicked walk in a circle not because their life is to recur by means of these circles, which these philosophers imagine, but because the path in which their false doctrine now runs is circuit”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Despite fundamental disagreements, both Atomists and Stoics assumed the world was endlessly going through cycles of formation and destruction, caused by chance atomic collisions or divinely ordained conflagrations, respectively.

    “In spite of really fundamental disagreements (Table 1), both the Atomists and Stoics assumed that the world was endlessly going through cycles of formation and destruction, the latter being caused either by chance atomic collisions or divinely ordained general conflagrations, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Theophilus claimed that at the death of Roman emperor Aurelius Verus in 169, the total number of years from the creation of the world is 5695, with additional months and days.

    “As claimed by Theophilus, at the death of the Roman emperor Aurelius Verus in 169, ''the total number of years from the creation of the world is 5695, with the additional months and days''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The Gospels were silent about the origin of matter, and the first words of Genesis were ambiguous.

    “The Gospels, in particular, were silent in this respect, whereas the very first words of Genesis ''In the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth.The Earth was formless and void'', were ambiguous.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Half a century later, the Chronological canons were translated into Latin, complemented and extended until 378 AD by Saint Jerome (347-420).

    “Half a century later, the Chronological canons were translated into Latin, complemented and extended until 378 AD by Saint Jerome (347-420).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Irenaeus argued that God Himself invented the matter of His work, since previously it did not exist, contrary to men who cannot make anything out of nothing.

    “By postulating a transcendent God who had first created formless matter, and then a Demiurge creator of all things, the Gnostics declined to admit that, contrary to men, who ''cannot make anything out of nothing; only out of matter that exists'', God ''Himself invented the matter of His work, since previously it did not exist''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The arguments in the debate were not scientific but philosophical and theological.

    “The arguments put forward in the debate were of course not scientific, but philosophical and theological.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The Greek original of the Chronicle was lost.

    “Whereas the Greek original was lost”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Disagreements remained irremediable between Pagans and Christians, a case in point being the eternity of the world defended by Pagans and denied by Christians.

    “But disagreements remained of course irremediable between Pagans and Christians.A case in point was the eternity of the world defended by the former, which kept being vigorously denied by the latter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The method followed by Theophilus had previously been used by Flavius Josephus within the framework of Alexandrian polemics between Greeks and Jews about the relative antiquities of Plato and Moses.

    “The method followed by Theophilus has previously been put to use by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus (37-100) within the framework of the Alexandrian polemics between Greeks and Jews about the relative antiquities of Plato and Moses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The main difficulty in geology's heroic age was recognizing that the Earth's surface had a history, making depiction via stratigraphic column the main purpose of the new science.

    “The main difficulty had been to recognize that the Earth's surface had a history, so that depicting it, first and foremost through reconstitution of the stratigraphic column, became the main purpose of the new science.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Plato in Timaeus claimed the world was created and purposely created by a Demiurge out of the khora, later identified with formless matter.

    “In the great cosmological account given in his Timeaus, only did Plato claim that the world was created and that it was purposely created by a Demiurge out of the kho ˆra, a third kind or receptacle that was later identified with formless matter.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Historically, the idea that the world came into existence at a given moment seemed ludicrous to almost all ancient philosophers, who posited an eternal world and cyclical time.

    “Historically, however, such an idea would have actually seemed ludicrous, if not outright absurd to almost all ancient philosophers who posited instead a world eternal along with a time of cyclical nature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In accordance with Theophilus' calculations, the world was from 5600 to 5700 years old.

    “In accordance with Theophilus' calculations, the world was from 5600 to 5700 year old.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    It took only a few generations for belief in Creation ex nihilo to prevail among Christians.

    “It took only a few generations for belief in Creation ex nihilo to prevail among Christians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The original text of the Chronicle is otherwise known by a 5th-century Armenian translation.

    “the original text of the Chronicle is otherwise known by a 5th-century Armenian translation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For early Christians, the Creation of the world was neither a matter of dogma nor a cosmological problem.

    “For early Christians, however, the Creation of the world was neither a matter of dogma nor a cosmological problem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Eusebius published his work in two installments.

    “He published his work in two installments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The methods developed by early 19th-century geologists to set up a relative chronological scale from the fossil record had already been designed by Eusebius of Caesarea for establishing a universal chronology applicable to human history in relation to the age of the world.

    “Of particular interest will be that the methods developed by the early 19th-century geologists to set up a relative chronological scale from the fossil record had already been designed by Eusebius of Caesarea (265-339), of early Church-history fame, for establishing a universal chronology applicable to human history in relation to the age of the world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Since God could not have created the world out of Himself, the only reasonable way to explain evil was to keep a Demiurge-like Creation made out of preexisting matter.

    “And since God could not have created the world out of Himself, in view of His indivisibility and immutability, the only reasonable way to explain the existence of evil was to keep a Demiurge-like Creation made out of preexisting matter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Dating the Big Bang and the formation of a planetary system approximate dating the creation from nothing and from formless matter, respectively.

    “Dating the Big Bang and the formation of a planetary system in effect approximate dating the creation from nothing and from formless matter, respectively, if the latter is meant to designate the product of element nucleosynthesis in stars.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Any historical account necessarily rests on an adequate chronology that should extend back to its starting point.

    “But any historical account necessarily rests on an adequate chronology, which should in particular extend back in time up to its starting point.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The issue of Creation ex nihilo came back to the foreground at the end of the 19th century as a result of problems raised by the second law of thermodynamics and then by the expansion of the universe, which contradicted the idea of an eternal or cyclic world.

    “Jumping finally to the end of the19th century, we will briefly mention how the issue Creation ex nihilo came back to the foreground as a result of the problems raised by the second law of thermodynamics and then by the expansion of the universe, which were both contradicting the philosophically grounded idea of an eternal or cyclic world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The second law of thermodynamics and the expansion of the universe contradict the idea of an eternal or cyclic world.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Creation had taken place on the 23rd of March, 15 days before the Moon first appeared, 5509 years before the Passion of Christ.

    “It was claiming that the Creation had taken place on the 23rd of March, 15 days before the Moon first appeared, 5509 years before the Passion of Christ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Grumel, 1958

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    According to R.M. Berchman, the Church Fathers became philologists, text-critics, historians, ethnographers, chronologists in accord with the best standards of their times.

    “As summarized by R.M. Berchman (2005), ''first reactive, then proactive, the Church Fathers became philologists, text-critics, historians, ethnographers, chronologists in accord with the best standards of their times''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites R.M. Berchman (2005) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As reported by Eusebius, the flood arose above the highest mountains.

    “As we are writing this chronicle we have received confirmation that the flood arose above the highest mountains -a contemporary eyewitness account of the veracity of the account.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eusebius

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The first words of Genesis could have meant that formless matter was preexisting at the Creation, as understood in the Septuagint where God's creative act was described with the verb poiein previously used by Plato for his Demiurge.

    “They could have meant that formless matter was preexisting at the Creation of the world, as actually understood when, in the Septuagint (the Greek version of the Torah), the Jewish translators described God's creative act with the verb poı ¨ein previously used by Plato for that of his Demiurge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Jerome's translation would meet in Occident with a long success.

    “which would meet in Occident with a long success.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Tertullian stressed that the world's return to nothingness at the end of times would not make sense if matter were eternal, concluding that all things produced from nothing will in the end come to nothing.

    “And since the world would return to nothingness at the end of times, as stated by the Scriptures, Tertullian stressed that such an epilogue would not make any sense if matter were eternal.One thus had to conclude that ''all things produced from nothing will in the end come to nothing''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Tatian, Theophilus, Irenaeus and Tertullian independently transformed the initial cosmological question of the formation of the world into the theological problem of the divine power of Creation.

    “Whether in Rome, Lyons or Antioch, Tatian, Theophilus, Irenaeus and Tertullian independently transformed the initial cosmological question of the formation of the world into the theological problem of the divine power of Creation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    As reported by Eusebius, fossils of ocean fish were discovered up Mt. Lebanon, pressed into the mud, and preserved as evidence that the old story of the flood is credible.

    “In our day, [the fossils of] fish were discovered up Mt.Lebanon.It happened that while rocks were being quarried there for construction in the valley, [the fossils of] various types of ocean fish were uncovered, pressed into the mud.These [fossils] had been preserved to the present, thus providing evidence that the old story [of the flood] is credible.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eusebius

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Eusebius founded chronography, the science to date any event of human history with reference to a universal chronological system.

    “the science which Eusebius founded to date any event of human history with reference to a universal chronological system.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A haunting concern for chronology appeared within this context to accompany the new sense of history that was emerging.

    “As illustrated by the first apologists, a haunting concern for chronology appeared within this context to accompany the new sense of history that was emerging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Des Vignoles gathered more than 200 different calculations of the time from the creation of the world to Jesus Christ, ranging from 3483 to 6984 years.

    “As summarized with some disappointment by A. Des Vignoles (1649-1744), director of the Academy of Sciences in Berlin, in 1738, ''I myself have gathered more than 200 different calculations, of which the shortest counts only 3483 years from the creation of the world to Jesus Christ, and the longest counts 6984''.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Des Vignoles (1649-1744)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Creation from nothing represented a unique and unambiguous chronological starting point, while the Passion of Christ and the perspective of the Last Judgment gave time an irreversible linear orientation.

    “Whereas Creation from nothing represented a unique and unambiguous chronological starting point, the Passion of Christ and the perspective of the Last Judgment were giving time an irreversible linear orientation as it was unthinkable to assume that such events could happen twice or more.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The philosophical problems raised by Creation ex nihilo were still lingering at the end of the 19th century when the second law of thermodynamics met with strong opposition in materialist and positivist circles because entropy increase implied heat death and an initial state of minimum entropy identifiable with Christian creation.

    “In this respect, it is worth reminding that the philosophical problems raised by Creation ex nihilo were still lingering on at the end of the 19th century when the second law of thermodynamics met with strong opposition in materialist and positivist circles because a continuous increase in the entropy of the universe was implying at one end the ultimate heat death of the universe and, at the other”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Byzantine Era of the world was defined by this solution and became the official calendric reference up to the end of the Byzantine Empire and even later in Russia.

    “It was in this way that the Byzantine Era of the world got defined, which would become the official calendric reference up to the end of the Byzantine Empire and even later in Russia.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
45 of 45
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The second law of thermodynamics and the expansion of the universe contradict the idea of an eternal or cyclic world.

    “Jumping finally to the end of the19th century, we will briefly mention how the issue Creation ex nihilo came back to the foreground as a result of the problems raised by the second law of thermodynamics and then by the expansion of the universe, which were both contradicting the philosophically grounded idea of an eternal or cyclic world.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Christ suffered passion on Nissan 14 at full moon.

    “It was known that Christ suffered passion on Nissan 14 at full moon.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The world had been created at a noble stage of the celestial revolutions.

    “Besides, it seemed reasonable to assume that the world had been created at a noble stage of the celestial revolutions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The vernal equinox was the obvious choice because, from time immemorial, it has been selected as the reference longitude in astronomy.

    “In this respect, the vernal equinox was the obvious choice because, from time immemorial, it has been selected as the reference longitude in astronomy.”
4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [Des Vignoles, 1738] Des Vignoles, A. Chronologie de l’histoire sainte et des histoires étrangères qui la concernent depuis la sortie d’Égypte juqu’à la captivité de Babylone, 2 vols, A. Haude, Berlin, 1738
  2. [Ellenberger, 1988] Ellenberger, F. Histoire de la géologie, vol. 1, Des Anciens à la première moitié du XVIIe siècle, Lavoisier, Paris, tr. by R. K. Kaula and M. Carozzi, History of Geology, vol. 1, From Ancient Times to the First Half of Seventeenth Century, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Brookfield, VT, USA, 1988
  3. [Furley, 1986] Furley, D., Comsic problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1986), pp. 223-235
  4. [Grumel, 1958] Grumel, V. Traité d’études byzantines, I. La Chronologie, Presses universitaires de France, Paris, 1958
  5. [Nautin, 1973] Nautin, P., In Principio, Interprétations des, premiers versets de la Genèse, Études augustiniennes, Paris (1973), pp. 61-94
  6. [Richet, 1999] Richet, P. L’Âge du monde – à la découverte de l’immensité du temps, Le Seuil, Paris ; tr. by J. Venerella, 2007, A Natural History of Time, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1999

Authors
Richet, P.
Affiliations
Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR)
Corresponding author
Richet, Pascal
Venue
Comptes Rendus. Géoscience
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
349
Issue
5
Pages
226-232
ISSN
  • 1631-0713 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-7025
OpenAlex
W2758905550
Cited by
2
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comptes Rendus Géoscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Geoscience (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Historical Philosophy and Science
Keywords
creation ex nihilo, chronology, Eusebius of Caesarea, Great Flood, Christian apologetics, second law of thermodynamics, entropy, cosmic expansion, linear time, cyclical time, history of geology, fossil record

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review