The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of different treatments of copper surface on its total hemispherical absorptivity bellow 77K
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even for materials of identical composition, preparation methods and surface structure can lead to substantial variations in emissivity.
“These results highlight that even for materials of identical composition, preparation methods and surface structure can lead to substantial variations in emissivity.”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Musilova, 2005, Low temperature radiative properties of materials used in cryogenics, Cryogenics, 45, 529, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
- Domoto, 1969, Prediction of the total emissivity of metals at cryogenic temperatures, Adv Cryog Eng, 14, 230, 10.1007/978-1-4757-0549-2_29 · DOI
- Ramanathan, 1952, Infra-red absorption by metals at low temperatures, Proc Phys Soc London, A65, 532, 10.1088/0370-1298/65/7/308 · DOI
- Hanzelka, 1993, Numerical modelling in cryostat design: methods and experimental verification, Cryogenics, 33, 454, 10.1016/0011-2275(93)90177-P · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review
Li, B., & Shen, F. (2026) · Cryo · doi:10.3390/cryo2010004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Musilova, V., Kralik, T., Hanzelka, P., & Srnka, A.
- Venue
- Cryogenics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-261
- ISSN
- 0011-2275
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review