Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of different treatments of copper surface on its total hemispherical absorptivity bellow 77K

Musilova, V., Kralik, T., Hanzelka, P., Srnka, A.·2007·Cryogenics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2007.02.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even for materials of identical composition, preparation methods and surface structure can lead to substantial variations in emissivity.

    “These results highlight that even for materials of identical composition, preparation methods and surface structure can lead to substantial variations in emissivity.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Musilova, 2005, Low temperature radiative properties of materials used in cryogenics, Cryogenics, 45, 529, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Domoto, 1969, Prediction of the total emissivity of metals at cryogenic temperatures, Adv Cryog Eng, 14, 230, 10.1007/978-1-4757-0549-2_29 · DOI
  3. Ramanathan, 1952, Infra-red absorption by metals at low temperatures, Proc Phys Soc London, A65, 532, 10.1088/0370-1298/65/7/308 · DOI
  4. Hanzelka, 1993, Numerical modelling in cryostat design: methods and experimental verification, Cryogenics, 33, 454, 10.1016/0011-2275(93)90177-P · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Musilova, V., Kralik, T., Hanzelka, P., & Srnka, A.
Venue
Cryogenics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
257-261
ISSN
0011-2275
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review