Cited by 172Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesViral Infections and Outbreaks Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epidemic Models of Contact Tracing: Systematic Review of Transmission Studies of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome

Open access
Kwok, Kin On, Tang, Arthur, Wei, Vivian W.I., Park, Woo Hyun, Yeoh, Eng Kiong, Riley, Steven·2019·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

The emergence and reemergence of coronavirus epidemics sparked renewed concerns from global epidemiology researchers and public health administrators. Mathematical models that represented how contact tracing and follow-up may control Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) transmissions were developed for evaluating different infection control interventions, estimating likely number of infections as well as facilitating understanding of their likely epidemiology. We reviewed mathematical models for contact tracing and follow-up control measures of SARS and MERS transmission. Model characteristics, epidemiological parameters and intervention parameters used in the mathematical models from seven studies were summarized. A major concern identified in future epidemics is whether public health administrators can collect all the required data for building epidemiological models in a short period of time during the early phase of an outbreak. Also, currently available models do not explicitly model constrained resources. We urge for closed-loop communication between public health administrators and modelling researchers to come up with guidelines to delineate the collection of the required data in the midst of an outbreak and the inclusion of additional logistical details in future similar models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2019.01.003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When SARS-CoV-2 was first identified, initial assessments of its potential epidemic impact and intervention options were informed by epidemiological and modelling analyses.

    “In conclusion, when SARS-CoV-2 was first identified, initial assessments of its potential epidemic impact and intervention options were informed by epidemiological and modelling analyses.”

    From Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) mathematical models and disease parameters: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Summary and Outlook says mathematical models can inform intervention choices early in future coronavirus outbreaks, and the Introduction describes their use in assessing infection burden and control measures. But this 2019 review addresses SARS and MERS; it does not report what informed the initial assessments after SARS-CoV-2 was identified. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The analyses, in the absence of characterisation of the new coronavirus, assumed that its natural history and epidemiology (eg, degree of superspreading) would be similar to those of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV.

    “The analyses, in the absence of characterisation of the new coronavirus, assumed that its natural history and epidemiology (eg, degree of superspreading) would be similar to those of SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV.25,26,129,130”

    From Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) mathematical models and disease parameters: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Introduction describes the epidemiology of SARS and MERS, and the Summary and Outlook discusses how models might address future coronavirus outbreaks, including superspreading. Neither section says that analyses of a new coronavirus assumed its natural history or epidemiology would resemble SARS or MERS; searches for that assumption found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. WHO : Summary of probable SARS cases with onset of illness from 1 November 2002 to 31 July. : 2018: 2003.
  2. WHO : MERS situation update July 2018. : 2018.
  3. Incubation. In: Encyclopedia of Public Health. Edited by W. Kirch. Dordrecht: Springer 2008. · DOI
  4. Latency. In: Encyclopedia of Public Health. Edited by W. Kirch. Dordrecht: Springer 2008. · DOI
  5. South Korean man infected by MERS virus, first case in 3 years. : 2018. [Reuters/AFP/aj].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kwok, K. O., Tang, A., Wei, V. W. I., Park, W. H., Yeoh, E. K., & Riley, S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kwok, Kin On
  • Tang, Arthur
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2019-01
Volume
17
Pages
186-194
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913820390
Cited by
172
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (200861/Z/16/Z)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (MIDAS U01 GM110721-01)
  • Health and Medical Research Fund (17160302)
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Keywords
contact tracing, follow-up, SARS, MERS, coronavirus transmission, epidemic modeling, mathematical model, infection control interventions, epidemiological parameters, resource constraints, public health administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review