The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive computational analysis of the SRK–SP11 molecular interaction underlying self-incompatibility in Brassicaceae using improved structure prediction for cysteine-rich proteins
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
ABSTRACT Plants employ self-incompatibility (SI) to promote cross-fertilization. In Brassicaceae, this process is regulated by the formation of a complex between the pistil determinant S receptor kinase (SRK) and the pollen determinant S -locus protein 11 (SP11, also known as S -locus cysteine-rich protein, SCR). In our previous study, we used the crystal structures of two eSRK–SP11 complexes in Brassica rapa S 8 and S 9 haplotypes and nine computationally predicted complex models to demonstrate that only the SRK ectodomain (eSRK) and SP11 pairs derived from the same S haplotype exhibit high binding free energy. However, predicting the eSRK–SP11 complex structures for the other 100+ S haplotypes and genera remains difficult because of SP11 polymorphism in sequence and structure. Although protein structure prediction using AlphaFold2 exhibits considerably high accuracy for most protein monomers and complexes, 46% of the predicted SP11 structures that we tested showed < 75 mean per-residue confidence score (pLDDT). Here, we demonstrate that the use of curated multiple sequence alignment (MSA) for cysteine-rich proteins significantly improved model accuracy for SP11 and eSRK–SP11 complexes. Additionally, we calculated the binding free energies of the predicted eSRK–SP11 complexes using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and observed that some Arabidopsis haplotypes formed a binding mode that was critically different from that of B. rapa S 8 and S 9 . Thus, our computational results provide insights into the haplotype-specific eSRK–SP11 binding modes in Brassicaceae at the residue level. The predicted models are freely available at Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8047768 .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · Cited by 1,434
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., & Schwede, T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · Cited by 1,138
Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2
Bryant, P., Pozzati, G., & Elofsson, A. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.15.460468 · Cited by 1,022
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- de Nettancourt D.: Incompatibility and Incongruity in Wild and Cultivated Plants. Berlin: Springer 2001. · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144249 · DOI
- Bateman A.J.: Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms: III. Cruciferae. Heredity 1955; 9: 53. · DOI
- Nou S., Watanabe M., Isogai A. and Hinata K.: Comparison of S-alleles and S-glyeoproteins between two wild populations of Brassica campestris in Turkey and Japan. Sex Plant Reprod 1993; 6: 79. · DOI
- Ruffio-Chable V. and Gaude T.: S-haplotype polymorphism in Brassica oleracea. Acta Hortic 2001; : 257. · DOI
- Kao T.H. and McCubbin A.G.: How flowering plants discriminate between self and non-self pollen to prevent inbreeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 12059. · DOI
- Kao T.H. and Tsukamoto T.: The molecular and genetic bases of S-RNase-based self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 2004; 16: S72. · DOI
- McClure B.A., Haring V., Ebert P.R., Anderson M.A., Simpson R.J., Sakiyama F. et al: Style self-incompatibility gene products of Nicotiana alata are ribonucleases. Nature 1989; 342: 955. · DOI
- Franklin-Tong N. and Franklin F.C.H.: Gametophytic self-incompatibility inhibits pollen tube growth using different mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 2003; 8: 598. · DOI
- Foote H.C.C., Ride J.P., Franklintong V.E., Walker E.A., Lawrence M.J. and Franklin F.C.H.: Cloning and expression of a distinctive class of self-incompatibility (S) gene from Papaver rhoeas L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 2265. · DOI
- Lane M.D. and Lawrence M.J.: The population genetics of the self-incompatibility polymorphism in Papaver rhoeas. VII. Number S-alleles Species, Hered 1993; 71: 596.
- Hearn M.J., Franklin F.C.H. and Ride J.P.: Identification of a membrane glycoprotein in pollen of Papaver rhoeas which binds stigmatic self-incompatibility (S-) proteins. Plant J 1996; 9: 467. · DOI
- Jordan N.D., Kakeda K., Conner A., Ride J.P., Franklin-Tong V.E. and Franklin F.C.H.: S-protein mutants indicate a functional role for SBP in the self-incompatibility reaction of Papaver rhoeas. Plant J 1999; 20: 119. · DOI
- Nasrallah M.E. and Wallace D.H.: Immunogenetics of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea L. Heredity 1967; 22: 519. · DOI
- Nishio T. and Hinata K.: Analysis of S-specific proteins in stigma of Brassica oleracea L. by isoelectric focusing. Heredity 1977; 38: 391. · DOI
- 10.1038/35002628 · DOI
- Stein J.C., Howlett B., Boyes D.C., Nasrallah M.E. and Nasrallah J.B.: Molecular cloning of a putative receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88: 8816. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.040556397 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.286.5445.1697 · DOI
- 10.1104/pp.125.4.2095 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/153.1.391 · DOI
- 10.1038/35097104 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1062509 · DOI
- Shimosato H., Yokota N., Shiba H., Iwano M., Entani T., Che F.S. et al: Characterization of the SP11/SCR high-affinity binding site involved in self/nonself recognition in Brassica self-incompatibility. Plant Cell 2007; 19: 107. · DOI
- 10.1038/35065626 · DOI
- Nasrallah J.B.: Stop and go signals at the stigma–pollen interface of the Brassicaceae. kiad301 Plant Physiol 2023; . kiad301. · DOI
- Boyes D.C. and Nasrallah J.B.: Physical linkage of the SLG and SRK genes at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Mol Gen Genet 1993; 236: 369. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0705186104 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7673 · DOI
- Sato K., Nishio T., Kimura R., Kusaba M., Suzuki T., Hatakeyama K. et al: Coevolution of the S-locus genes SRK, SLG and SP11/SCR in Brassica oleracea and B. rapa. Genetics 2002; 162: 931. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01514-3 · DOI
- Shiba H., Iwano M., Entani T., Ishimoto K., Shimosato H., Che F.S. et al: The dominance of alleles controlling self-incompatibility in Brassica pollen is regulated at the RNA level. Plant Cell 2002; 14: 491. · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09308 · DOI
- Yasuda S., Wada Y., Kakizaki T., Tarutani Y., Miura-Uno E., Murase K. et al: A complex dominance hierarchy is controlled by polymorphism of small RNAs and their targets. Nat Plants 2017; 3: 16206. · DOI
- 10.1038/cr.2016.129 · DOI
- Murase K., Moriwaki Y., Mori T., Liu X., Masaka C., Takada Y. et al: Mechanism of self/nonself-discrimination in Brassica self-incompatibility. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 4916. · DOI
- Ockendon D.J.: The S-allele collection of Brassica oleracea. Acta Hortic 2000; 539: 25. · DOI
- Evans R., O’Neill M., Pritzel A., Antropova N., Senior A., Green T. et al: Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. 2004.463034 bioRxiv 2022; 2021. 2004.463034.
- Johnson L.S., Eddy S.R. and Portugaly E.: Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinforma 2010; 11: 431. · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
- Steinegger M., Meier M., Mirdita M., Vohringer H., Haunsberger S.J. and Soding J.: HH-suite3 for fast remote homology detection and deep protein annotation. BMC Bioinforma 2019; 20: 473. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty1057 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00282753 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00438-003-0844-0 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1010664704926 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.109.102442 · DOI
- Delorme V., Giranton J.L., Hatzfeld Y., Friry A., Heizmann P., Ariza M.J. et al: Characterization of the S locus genes, SLG and SRK, of the Brassica S3 haplotype: identification of a membrane-localized protein encoded by the S locus receptor kinase gene. Plant J 1995; 7: 429. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02048-2 · DOI
- Kusaba M., Dwyer K., Hendershot J., Vrebalov J., Nasrallah J.B. and Nasrallah M.E.: Self-incompatibility in the genus Arabidopsis: Characterization of the S locus in the outcrossing A. lyrata and its autogamous relative A. thaliana. Plant Cell 2001; 13: 627. · DOI
- 10.1007/s00122-009-1240-x · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/154.1.413 · DOI
- Yamakawa S., Watanabe M., Hinata K., Suzuki A. and Isogai A.: The Sequences of S-Receptor Kinases (SRK) Involved in Self-incompatibility and Their Homologies to S-Locus Glycoproteins of Brassica campestris. Biosci, Biotechnol, Biochem 1995; 59: 161. · DOI
- Kumar V. and Trick M.: Expression of the S-locus receptor kinase multigene family in Brassica oleracea. Plant J 1994; 6: 807. · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002495 · DOI
- 10.1266/ggs.81.63 · DOI
- Cabrillac D., Delorme V., Garin J., Ruffio-Chable V., Giranton J.L., Dumas C. et al: The S15 self-Incompatibility haplotype in Brassica oleracea includes three S gene family members expressed in stigmas. Plant Cell 1999; 11: 971.
- 10.1093/molbev/msl042 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.104.037267 · DOI
- Dwyer K.G., Berger M.T., Ahmed R., Hritzo M.K., McCulloch A.A., Price M.J. et al: Molecular characterization and evolution of self-Incompatibility genes in Arabidopsis thaliana: The case of the Sc haplotype. Genetics 2013; 193: 985. · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00355.x · DOI
- Hatakeyama K., Takasaki T., Watanabe M. and Hinata K.: Molecular characterization of S locus genes, SLG and SRK, in a pollen-recessive self-incompatibility haplotype of Brassica rapa L. Genetics 1998; 149: 1587. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03058.x · DOI
- Suzuki G., Watanabe M., Isogai A. and Hinata K.: Highly conserved 5'-flanking regions of two self-incompatibility genes, SLG9 and SRK9. Gene 1997; 191: 123. · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1024819129785 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.107.073825 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000426 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
- Shafee T.M.A., Robinson A.J., van der Weerden N. and Anderson M.A.: Structural homology guided alignment of cysteine rich proteins. Springerplus 2016; 5: 27. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac387 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq366 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3290 · DOI · Paper page
- Konagurthu A.S., Whisstock J.C., Stuckey P.J. and Lesk A.M.: MUSTANG: A multiple structural alignment algorithm. Protein: Struct Funct Bioinform 2006; 64: 559. · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ar000033j · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
- 10.1021/jz501780a · DOI
- 10.1021/jp066831u · DOI
- Shafee T.M.A., Lay F.T., Hulett M.D. and Anderson M.A.: The defensins consist of two independent, convergent protein superfamilies. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33: 2345. · DOI
- Chantreau M., Poux C., Lensink M.F., Brysbaert G., Vekemans X. and Castric V.: Asymmetrical diversification of the receptor-ligand interaction controlling self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis. eLife 2019; 8: e50253. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0805923106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.22934 · DOI · Paper page
- Ekeberg M., Lovkvist C., Lan Y.H., Weigt M. and Aurell E.: Improved contact prediction in proteins: Using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys Rev E: Stat Phys, Plasmas, Fluids 2013; 87: 012707. · DOI · Paper page
- Kamisetty H., Ovchinnikov S. and Baker D.: Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue-residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 15674. · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01208.x · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msi153 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz679 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Sawa, T., Moriwaki, Y., Jiang, H., Murase, K., Takayama, S., Shimizu, K., & Terada, T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Moriwaki, Yoshitaka
- Venue
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 5228-5239
- ISSN
- 2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10624595
- OpenAlex
- W4387817985
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP21K06110)
- Fujitsu (FX1000, GX2570)
- Tokyo Institute of Technology
- University of Tokyo
- Nagoya University
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Reproductive Biology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Ecology and Taxonomy Studies
- Keywords
- self-incompatibility, S receptor kinase, SCR, cysteine-rich proteins, protein-protein complex structure prediction, multiple sequence alignment, binding free energy, Brassicaceae, Brassica rapa, Arabidopsis, AlphaFold2, molecular dynamics simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review