Cited by 661Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models

Open access
Ekeberg, Magnus, Lövkvist, Cecilia, Lan, Yueheng, Weigt, Martin, Aurell, Erik·2013·Physical Review E

Abstract

Spatially proximate amino acids in a protein tend to coevolve. A protein's three-dimensional (3D) structure hence leaves an echo of correlations in the evolutionary record. Reverse engineering 3D structures from such correlations is an open problem in structural biology, pursued with increasing vigor as more and more protein sequences continue to fill the data banks. Within this task lies a statistical inference problem, rooted in the following: correlation between two sites in a protein sequence can arise from firsthand interaction but can also be network-propagated via intermediate sites; observed correlation is not enough to guarantee proximity. To separate direct from indirect interactions is an instance of the general problem of inverse statistical mechanics, where the task is to learn model parameters (fields, couplings) from observables (magnetizations, correlations, samples) in large systems. In the context of protein sequences, the approach has been referred to as direct-coupling analysis. Here we show that the pseudolikelihood method, applied to 21-state Potts models describing the statistical properties of families of evolutionarily related proteins, significantly outperforms existing approaches to the direct-coupling analysis, the latter being based on standard mean-field techniques. This improved performance also relies on a modified score for the coupling strength. The results are verified using known crystal structures of specific sequence instances of various protein families. Code implementing the new method can be found at http://plmdca.csc.kth.se/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreve.87.012707

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [15]S. Cocco, S. Leibler, and R. Monasson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 , 14058 (2009)
  2. [31]K. Fischer and J. Hertz, Spin Glasses (Cambridge University Press, 1993) ISBN 0521447771, 9780521447775
  3. [40]A. Schug, M. Weigt, J. Onuchic, T. Hwa, and H. Szurmant, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106 , 22124 (2009)
  4. [41]A. E. Dago, A. Schug, A. Procaccini, J. A. Hoch, M. Weigt, , and H. Szurmant, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 , 10148 (2012)
  5. [43]E. T. Jaynes, Physical Review Series II 106 , 620630 (1957)
  6. [44]E. T. Jaynes, Physical Review Series II 108 , 171190 (1957)
  7. [46]E. Pitman and J. Wishart, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 32 , 567579 (1936)
  8. [47]B. Koopman, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 39 , 399409 (1936)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ekeberg, M., Lövkvist, C., Lan, Y., Weigt, M., & Aurell, E.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • AlbaNova (SE)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Biologie Computationnelle, Quantitative et Synthétique (FR)
Venue
Physical Review E
Published
2013-01-11
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
012707-012707
ISSN
  • 1539-3755 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-2376
OpenAlex
W2137566700
Cited by
661
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
19.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review E (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
protein contact prediction, pseudo-likelihood, Potts model, direct coupling analysis, protein coevolution, indirect interactions
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Models, Statistical, Protein Interaction Mapping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review