Cited by 3DNA Repair MechanismsEnzyme Structure and FunctionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

A structural phylogenetic tree of Rad52 and its annealase superfamily

Open access
Al-Fatlawi, Ali, Hossen, Md. Ballal, de Paula Lopes, Stella, Stewart, A. Francis, Schroeder, Michael·2025·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

1 Abstract Rad52, a highly conserved eukaryotic protein, plays a crucial role in DNA repair, especially in double-strand break repair. Recent findings reveal that its distinct structural features, including a characteristic β -sheet and β -hairpin motif, are shared with the lambda phage single-strand annealing proteins, Red β , indicating a common superfamily. Our analysis of over 10,000 single-strand annealing proteins (SSAPs) across all kingdoms of life supports this hypothesis, confirming their possession of the characteristic motif despite variations in size and composition. We found that archaea, representing only 1% of the studied proteins, exhibit most of these variations. Through the examination of four representative archaeal SSAPs, we elucidate the structural relationship between eukaryotic and bacterial SSAPs, highlighting differences in β -sheet size and β -hairpin complexity. Furthermore, we identify an archaeal SSAP with a structure nearly identical to the human variant and screen over 100 million unannotated proteins for potential SSAP candidates. Our computational analysis complements existing sequence with structural evidence supporting the suggested orthology among five SSAP families across all kingdoms: Rad52, Red β , RecT, Erf, and Sak3.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.12.012

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Fatlawi, A., Hossen, M. B., de Paula Lopes, S., Stewart, A. F., & Schroeder, M.
Affiliations
  • Biotechnologisches Zentrum (DE)
  • Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  • Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (DE)
Corresponding author
Schroeder, Michael
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
27
Pages
360-368
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405761093
Cited by
3
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
RAD52, protein structure, DNA repair, homologous recombination, ERF

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review