Cited by 744Long-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Respiratory rehabilitation in elderly patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled study

Open access
Liu, Kai, Zhang, Weitong, Yang, Yadong, Zhang, Jinpeng, Li, Yunqian, Chen, Ying·2020·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background Different degrees of disorders are reported in respiratory function, physical function and psychological function in patients with corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in elderly patients. With the experience of improved and discharged COVID-19 patients, timely respiratory rehabilitation intervention may improve prognosis, maximize functional preservation and improve quality of life (QoL), but there lacks of studies worldwide exploring the outcome of this intervention. Objective To investigate the effects of 6-week respiratory rehabilitation training on respiratory function, QoL, mobility and psychological function in elderly patients with COVID-19. Methods This paper reported the findings of an observational, prospective, quasi-experimental study, which totally recruited 72 participants, of which 36 patients underwent respiratory rehabilitation and the rest without any rehabilitation intervention. The following outcomes were measured: pulmonary function tests including plethysmography and diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), functional tests (6-min walk distance test), Quality of life (QoL) assessments (SF-36 scores), activities of daily living (Functional Independence Measure, FIM scores), and mental status tests (SAS anxiety and SDS depression scores). Results After 6 weeks of respiratory rehabilitation in the intervention group, there disclosed significant differences in FEV1(L), FVC(L), FEV1/FVC%, DLCO% and 6-min walk test. The SF-36 scores, in 8 dimensions, were statistically significant within the intervention group and between the two groups. SAS and SDS scores in the intervention group decreased after the intervention, but only anxiety had significant statistical significance within and between the two groups. Conclusions Six-week respiratory rehabilitation can improve respiratory function, QoL and anxiety of elderly patients with COVID-19, but it has little significant improvement on depression in the elderly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101166

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our findings concur with the previous randomised controlled trial [14] that respiratory rehabilitation improves SpO2 in elderly patients with COVID-19 without COPD.

    “Only one previous study among elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with COVID-19 without COPD using a randomised controlled trial of six-week respiratory rehabilitation found improvement in SpO2 [14], and our findings concur.”

    From Effects of short-term breathing exercises on respiratory recovery in patients with COVID-19: a quasi-experimental study (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Method section includes patients aged 65 or older with COVID-19 and no COPD, and the Discussion describes improved respiratory function after six weeks of rehabilitation. The Method > Assessment section says SpO2 was measured before and after a six-minute walk, but the Results do not report an improvement in SpO2. Improved respiratory function does not establish the specific SpO2 finding attributed to this study. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a randomised controlled trial, elderly patients (aged ≥ 65) with COVID-19 without COPD improved their SpO2 following respiratory rehabilitation [14].

    “Only one previous study among elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with COVID-19 without COPD using a randomised controlled trial of six-week respiratory rehabilitation found improvement in SpO2 [14], and our findings concur.”

    From Effects of short-term breathing exercises on respiratory recovery in patients with COVID-19: a quasi-experimental study (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Method section describes an open randomized trial of six-week respiratory rehabilitation in patients aged at least 65 with COVID-19 and no COPD. The Assessment section says SpO2 was measured, but the Results report improvements in pulmonary-function measures and six-minute walk distance, not an improvement in SpO2. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]Wu Y.C. Chen C.S. Chan Y.J. The outbreak of COVID-19: an overview J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 83 2020 217 220 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000270 32134861 PMC7153464 · DOI
  2. [2]Johansson M.A. Saderi D. Open peer-review platform for COVID-19 preprints Nature 579 2020 29 10.1038/d41586-020-00613-4 32127711 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Mikolajewska A. Witzenrath M. Community-acquired pneumonia in adults Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 145 2020 359 370 10.1055/a-0993-0874 32191976 · DOI
  4. [4]Jo T. Yasunaga H. Michihata N. Influence of Parkinsonism on outcomes of elderly pneumonia patients Park. Relat. Disord. 54 2018 25 29 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.03.028 29627432 · DOI
  5. [5]Maki N. Sakamoto H. Takata Y. Effect of respiratory rehabilitation for frail older patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial J. Rehabil. Med. 50 2018 908 913 10.2340/16501977-2490 30328470 · DOI
  6. [6]Prunera-Pardell M.J. Padín-López S. Domenech-Del Rio A. Effectiveness of a respiratory rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Enferm Clin. 28 2018 5 12 10.1016/j.enfcli.2017.11.001 29287828 · DOI
  7. [7]Rodriguez-Morales A.J. Cardona-Ospina J.A. Gutiérrez-Ocampo E. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020 101623 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 32179124 PMC7102608 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Cui L. Liu H. Sun L. Multidisciplinary respiratory rehabilitation in combination with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of elderly patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Pak. J. Med. Sci. 35 2019 500 505 10.12669/pjms.35.2.459 31086540 PMC6500851 · DOI
  9. [9]Giansanti D. Maccioni G. Toward the integration of devices for pulmonary respiratory rehabilitation in telemedicine and e-health Telemed. J. e Health 25 3 2019 257 259 10.1089/tmj.2018.0057 30040535 · DOI
  10. [10]Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine Recommendations for respiratory rehabilitation of COVID-19 in adult Zhonghua Jiehe He Huxi Zazhi 43 2020 E029 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200228-00206 0 32294814 · DOI
  11. [11]Maki N. Sakamoto H. Takata Y. Effect of respiratory rehabilitation for frail older patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized controlled trial J. Rehabil. Med. 50 10 2018 908 913 10.2340/16501977-2490 30328470 · DOI
  12. [12]Levy J. Prigent H. Bensmail D. Respiratory rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a narrative review of rehabilitation techniques Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 61 1 2018 Jan 38 45 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.06.002 29128525 · DOI
  13. [13]Schneeberger T. Jarosch I. Moll J. Ncreased asthma control after a 3-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program Respir. Med. 165 2020 Mar 8 105930 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105930 32174451 · DOI
  14. [14]Wytrychowski K. Hans-Wytrychowska A. Piesiak P. Pulmonary rehabilitation in interstitial lung diseases: a review of the literature Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 29 2 2020 Feb 257 264 10.17219/acem/115238 32101645 · DOI
  15. [15]Rebelo P. Oliveira A. Andrade L. Minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported outcome measures of fatigue in patients with COPD after pulmonary rehabilitation Chest 20 2020 Mar 14 30442 30446 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.045 pii: S0012-3692 32184112 · DOI
  16. [16]Liu Kai Chen Ying Wu Duozhi Effects of progressive muscle relaxation on anxiety and sleep quality in patients with COVID-19 Compl. Ther. Clin. Pract. 39 2020 101132 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101132 PMC7102525 32379667 · DOI
  17. [17]McNamara R.J. Dale M. McKeough Z.J. Innovative strategies to improve the reach and engagement in pulmonary rehabilitation J. Thorac. Dis. 11 Suppl 17 2019 Oct S2192 S2199 10.21037/jtd.2019.10.29 31737346 PMC6831919 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, K., Zhang, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Y., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hainan General Hospital (CN)
  • Huanggang Central Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Ying
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
39
Pages
101166
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013906377
Cited by
744
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 171 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 73
FWCI
62.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
pulmonary rehabilitation, COVID-19 pandemic, elderly patients, lung function, quality of life, anxiety, depression, 6-minute walk test, activities of daily living, functional independence, post-discharge rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pneumonia, Viral, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Respiratory Function Tests, Respiratory Therapy, Walking, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review