Cited by 27Traditional Chinese Medicine StudiesTraditional Chinese Medicine AnalysisTraditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Filling the gap between traditional Chinese medicine and modern medicine, are we heading to the right direction?

Chen, Xiuping, Pei, Lixia, Lu, Jinjian·2013·Complementary Therapies in Medicine

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), the ancient medicine popular in China and surrounding areas, has been recognized as a typical representative of complementary and alternative medicine. Over long period in clinical practice, especially the progress in basic research, data on the effectiveness and beneficial contribution of TCM herbs to public health and disease control have been accumulated while the quality of the evidence is generally poor. The most common clinical practice of TCM herbs is herb combination called formula which consists of several types of medicinal herbs or minerals, which is quite different from modern medicine. Definitely, tens of hundreds of compounds could be identified in even a small formula. With the regained enthusiasm on natural products based new drug R&D, the proposed multi-target drug discovery strategy, the booming of -omics technologies, and the implementation of ambitious plan of TCM modernization in China, attempts have been made to fill the gap between TCM herbs and modern drugs. However, are we heading to the right direction?

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctim.2013.01.001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To date, conceptual frameworks such as systems biology, pharmacogenomics, and 'omics' technologies have not resulted in marketable products.

    “But to date these conceptual frameworks have not resulted in marketable products, leading X. Chen, Pei, and Lu to observe that it is 'embarrassing' that Chinese medicine has been unable to make 'any key breakthroughs despite using such technologies.'”

    From Indian Imaginaries of Chinese Success in the Global Herbal Medicine Market: A Critical Assessment (2019) · cites this paper as X. Chen, Pei, and Lu 2013 273-74

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chen, 2011, Discussion on research and development models in innovative Chinese Materia Medica, Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 42, 1255
  2. Zhang, 2005, The fundamental study on critical scientific problem of prescriptions, Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Pei, L., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Xiuping
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
272-275
ISSN
0965-2299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133304607
Cited by
27
References
32
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Research
Keywords
traditional Chinese medicine, herbal formula, multi-target drug discovery, natural product drug development, omics technologies, TCM modernization, quality of evidence, complementary and alternative medicine
MeSH terms
China, Delivery of Health Care, Drug Combinations, Drugs, Chinese Herbal, Humans, Medicine, Chinese Traditional, Phytotherapy, Plants, Medicinal, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review