Cited by 31Marine animal studies overviewPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Dolphin Cognition

Open access
Marino, Lori·2004·Current Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in constraints, such as the absence of a limiting bony birth canal in cetaceans, may explain why the evolution of the cetacean brain proceeded along a unique path.

    “These, or other, differences in constraints, such as the absence of a limiting bony birth canal in cetaceans (Connor 2007), may explain why the evolution of the cetacean brain proceeded along a unique path (Marino 2004b;Hof et al. 2005).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marino, L.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Marino, Lori
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
14
Issue
21
Pages
R910-R911
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4247447600
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
dolphin cognition, odontocetes, multisensory perception, echolocation, auditory perception, river dolphins, cetaceans
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Cognition, Dolphins, Language, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review