THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION
Abstract
Cetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved. Cetaceans are remarkably diverse, varying in both phenotypes by several orders of magnitude, with notable differences between the two extant suborders, Mysticeti and Odontoceti. We analyzed the evolutionary history of brain and body mass, and relative brain size measured by the encephalization quotient (EQ), using a data set of extinct and extant taxa to capture temporal variation in the mode and direction of evolution. Our results suggest that cetacean brain and body mass evolved under strong directional trends to increase through time, but decreases in EQ were widespread. Mysticetes have significantly lower EQs than odontocetes due to a shift in brain:body allometry following the divergence of the suborders, caused by rapid increases in body mass in Mysticeti and a period of body mass reduction in Odontoceti. The pattern in Cetacea contrasts with that in primates, which experienced strong trends to increase brain mass and relative brain size, but not body mass. We discuss what these analyses reveal about the convergent evolution of large brains, and highlight that until recently the most encephalized mammals were odontocetes, not primates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
17 of 69 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Brain:body allometry in cetaceans differs significantly from other mammals.
“This is of particular interest given evidence that brain:body allometry in cetaceans differs significantly from other mammals (Manger 2006;Boddy et al. 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Including data from extinct taxa may improve analyses of trait evolution.
“Including data from extinct taxa may improve such analyses (Finarelli and Flynn 2006;Montgomery et al. 2010;Slater et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The rate of body mass evolution in cetaceans far exceeds that of terrestrial mammals.
“Furthermore, the rate of body mass evolution in cetaceans far exceeds that of terrestrial mammals (Evans et al. 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Evans et al. 2012 source
- Premisecitation
Primates show a strong trend for directional increases in relative brain size.
“Primates are one order that shows a strong trend for directional increases in relative brain size (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
- Interpretationcitation
The shift in brain:body allometry at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to changes in body mass development well after the move to aquatic habitats.
“suggests the shift in brain:body allometry at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to changes in body mass development well after the move to aquatic habitats (Manger 2006;Boddy et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Manger 2006 source
- cites Boddy et al. 2012 source
The ‘EQ within Primates and Cetartiodactyla’ section reports that increased mysticete body mass contributed to a change in relative brain size, but it also reports that odontocete brain mass increased substantially while body mass decreased only slightly. The ‘Adaptive explanations for variation in brain size’ section places high odontocete encephalization at least 10 million years after the adoption of a fully aquatic lifestyle. These passages do not establish that a shift at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to body-mass changes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Differences in constraints, such as the absence of a limiting bony birth canal in cetaceans, may explain why the evolution of the cetacean brain proceeded along a unique path.
“These, or other, differences in constraints, such as the absence of a limiting bony birth canal in cetaceans (Connor 2007), may explain why the evolution of the cetacean brain proceeded along a unique path (Marino 2004b;Hof et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Connor 2007 source
Connor (2007) is cited specifically for the absence of a limiting bony birth canal in cetaceans; the sentence cites other works for the proposed unique evolutionary path. Sections 11 and 12 discuss odontocete brain-size differences and energetic costs, but our copy does not address a bony birth canal or a birth-canal constraint. Searches for those terms and related pelvic and birth terminology found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Marino 2004b source
- cites Hof et al. 2005 source
- Premisecitation
Mysticete body mass is potentially linked to the ability to ingest and process large aggregations of prey.
“Mysticete body mass is potentially linked to the ability to ingest and process large aggregations of prey (Fitzgerald 2006;Demere et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Across cetaceans, brain mass increased across 74% of evolutionary time.
“body mass increased across 78% of evolutionary time (total time across all branches of the phy-logeny), brain mass increased across 74% of evolutionary time, but EQ increased across only 34% of evolutionary time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within stem Cetacea, body and brain mass increased in parallel along the lineages leading to crown Cetacea and Basilosaurus.
“Within stem Cetacea, body and brain mass increased in parallel along the lineages leading to crown Cetacea and Basilosaurus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The most basal node in Cetacea had an estimated EQ of 0.371.
“Brain mass is estimated to be 308.738g (95% CI = 308.074-309.404g), a 4.32-fold increase, giving an EQ of 0.371”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no support for a directional model of evolution for EQ across cetaceans.
“However, there is no support for a directional model of evolution when applied to EQ (BF = -0.589).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across cetaceans, EQ increased across only 34% of evolutionary time.
“body mass increased across 78% of evolutionary time (total time across all branches of the phy-logeny), brain mass increased across 74% of evolutionary time, but EQ increased across only 34% of evolutionary time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The allometric relationship between brain and body mass differs significantly between extant odontocetes and mysticetes.
“Based on the available data, the allometric relationship between brain and body mass differs significantly between extant odontocetes and mysticetes (t 40 = 2.146, P = 0.038).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Extant mysticetes have significantly lower encephalization quotients (EQs) than extant odontocetes.
“This results in mysticetes having significantly lower EQs (t 40 = 2.225, P = 0.032).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Across cetaceans, body mass increased across 78% of evolutionary time.
“body mass increased across 78% of evolutionary time (total time across all branches of the phy-logeny), brain mass increased across 74% of evolutionary time, but EQ increased across only 34% of evolutionary time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within odontocetes, brain mass evolved under a directional trend to increase.
“brain mass (BF = 5.336) but not for EQ (BF = -1.106).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within odontocetes, body mass evolved under a directional trend to increase.
“There is good support for an evolutionary trend to both body mass (BF = 5.779) and”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Decreases in EQ were widespread across cetaceans.
“Our results suggest that cetacean brain and body mass evolved under strong directional trends to increase through time, but decreases in EQ were widespread.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Inclusion of fossil data substantially affects estimates of ancestral states compared to analysis of extant species alone.
“Because of these trends, the inclusion of fossil data substantially affects estimates of ancestral states compared to analysis of extant species alone (Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae had an estimated body mass of 43.478 kg.
“The estimated body and brain masses for the last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae (node 1; Fig. 1) are 43.478kg and 71.457 g respectively, giving an EQ of 0.465.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cetacean brain mass evolved under a strong directional trend to increase through time.
“There is very strong evidence that the directional model fits both body mass (BF = 10.208) and brain mass (BF = 10.167)better than the nondirectional model, suggesting both traits typically increased through time across cetaceans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cetacean body mass evolved under a strong directional trend to increase through time.
“There is very strong evidence that the directional model fits both body mass (BF = 10.208) and brain mass (BF = 10.167)better than the nondirectional model, suggesting both traits typically increased through time across cetaceans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae had an estimated brain mass of 71.457 g.
“The estimated body and brain masses for the last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae (node 1; Fig. 1) are 43.478kg and 71.457 g respectively, giving an EQ of 0.465.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae had an estimated EQ of 0.465.
“The estimated body and brain masses for the last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae (node 1; Fig. 1) are 43.478kg and 71.457 g respectively, giving an EQ of 0.465.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within odontocetes, there is no support for a directional trend in EQ.
“brain mass (BF = 5.336) but not for EQ (BF = -1.106).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within Odontoceti there is no evidence for shifts in the allometric relationship.
“Hence, within Odontoceti there is no evidence for shifts in the allometric relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Body mass decreased on five of six branches identified with major increases in EQ.
“Indeed, body mass decreased on five of six branches identified with major increases in EQ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes had an estimated EQ of 0.702.
“The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes (node 10) is estimated to have had a body mass of 2800.881kg (95% CI = 2770.297-2831.803kg), a brain mass of 1229.946g (95% CI = 1222.536-1237.402g), and an EQ of 0.702 (95% CI = 0.694-0.710;Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During the diversification of Odontoceti, brain mass increased across 67% of evolutionary time.
“However, body mass increased across the majority (72%) of evolutionary time during the diversification of the Odontoceti.This compares to 67% for brain mass and just 34% for EQ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Body mass decreased from 1,275.073 kg at node 4 to 166.571 kg at node 9 after the split between Basilosaurus and the lineage leading to crown Cetacea, an overall decrease of 87%.
“body mass is estimated to have decreased from 1,275.073 kg (node 4) to 166.571 kg (node, 9 [95% CI = 165.774-167.371kg]) after the split between Basilosaurus and the lineage leading to crown Cetacea.This is an overall decrease of 87%.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When ranked for the rate of increase in EQ, 23 of 38 branches in the top 25% are cetacean lineages.
“When ranked for the rate of increase in EQ, 23 of 38 branches in the top 25% are cetacean lineages.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average rate of body mass evolution is significantly higher in cetaceans than primates.
“The average rate of body mass evolution is significantly higher in cetaceans than primates (t 97 = 2.152, P = 0.034) but the rate of brain mass evolution is significantly higher in primates (t 116 = 4.18, P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The decrease in body and brain mass resulted in a major increase in EQ from 0.464 to 1.383, well within the range of modern odontocetes.
“This results in a major increase in EQ from 0.464 to 1.383, well within the range of modern odontocetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The rate of brain mass evolution along the terminal Homo branch is exceeded by five branches; one cetacean and four primate lineages.
“The rate of brain mass evolution along the terminal Homo branch is exceeded by five branches; one cetacean and four primate lineages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
During the diversification of Odontoceti, body mass increased across 72% of evolutionary time.
“However, body mass increased across the majority (72%) of evolutionary time during the diversification of the Odontoceti.This compares to 67% for brain mass and just 34% for EQ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Continued body mass expansion is observed throughout mysticetes.
“Continued body mass expansion is observed throughout mysticetes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During the diversification of Odontoceti, EQ increased across just 34% of evolutionary time.
“However, body mass increased across the majority (72%) of evolutionary time during the diversification of the Odontoceti.This compares to 67% for brain mass and just 34% for EQ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pattern of decreasing body mass continued on branches leading to the last common ancestors of Synrhina, Delphinida + Ziphiidae, and Delphinoidea.
“This pattern of decreasing body mass continued on branches leading to the last common ancestors of Synrhina (nodes 22-27), Delphinida + Ziphiidae (nodes 27-31), and Delphinoidea (nodes 31-35).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
In each case, the decrease in brain mass is limited such that EQ increased.
“In each case, the decrease in brain mass is limited such that EQ increased.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Brain:body allometry does not differ significantly between extant mysticetes and stem Cetacea.
“In contrast, brain:body allometry does not differ significantly between extant mysticetes and stem Cetacea (t 11 = 1.968,P = 0.075).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Branches with the highest rates of body and brain mass evolution are mostly within the Delphinidae.
“Branches with the highest rates of body and brain mass evolution are mostly within the Delphinidae.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Within Odontoceti, the largest increases in body mass are on branches leading to Physeter macrocephalus (107-fold) and Orcinus orca (20-fold).
“Within Odontoceti, the largest increases in body mass are observed on branches leading to Physeter macrocephalus (107-fold increase from the last common ancestor of Physeteroidea; Fig. 4B) and Orcinus orca (20-fold increase).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The ancestral odontocete had an estimated EQ of 1.680.
“This resulted in an increase in EQ to 1.680 (95% CIs = 1.674-1.687).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The largest decreases in EQ are associated with large increases in body mass.
“Similarly, the largest decreases in EQ are associated with large increases in body mass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is no evidence for an allometric shift between extant and extinct odontocetes.
“Within Odontoceti, we find no evidence for an allometric shift in Delphinidae (t 34 = 1.286,P = 0.207), or between extant and extinct odontocetes (t 45 = 1.681,P = 0.100).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average rate of change in EQ does not differ between primates and cetaceans.
“The average rate of change in EQ does not differ between the two orders (t 139 = 1.196, P = 0.217).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The early stages of odontocete evolution are characterized by decreases in body mass.
“In contrast with mysticetes, the early stages of odontocete evolution are characterized by decreases in body mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Brain mass decreased from 685.473 g at node 4 to 522.982 g at node 9.
“Brain mass also decreased, but to a lesser extent, from 685.473 g (95% CI = 683.449-687.391g) to 522.982 g (95% CI = 521.607-524.360g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Odontocetes differ from stem cetaceans in brain:body allometry.
“However, odontocetes do differ from stem cetaceans (t 54 = 4.291, P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reduction in body mass was continuous, with all internal branches estimated to have experienced decreases in body mass between node 9 and node 22, where body mass is 86.471 kg.
“The reduction in body mass was continuous, with all internal branches estimated to have experienced decreases in body mass between the ancestral crown cetacean (node 9) and the ancestral crown odontocete (node 22), where body mass is 86.471 kg (95% CI = 85.967-86.978kg).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes had an estimated brain mass of 1229.946 g.
“The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes (node 10) is estimated to have had a body mass of 2800.881kg (95% CI = 2770.297-2831.803kg), a brain mass of 1229.946g (95% CI = 1222.536-1237.402g), and an EQ of 0.702 (95% CI = 0.694-0.710;Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The EQ decrease in P. macrocephalus is the second largest EQ decrease across cetaceans.
“This is the second largest EQ decrease across cetaceans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The rate of brain mass evolution is significantly higher in primates than cetaceans.
“The average rate of body mass evolution is significantly higher in cetaceans than primates (t 97 = 2.152, P = 0.034) but the rate of brain mass evolution is significantly higher in primates (t 116 = 4.18, P < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Changes in brain and body mass are significantly correlated.
“Changes in brain and body mass are significantly correlated (t 81 = 14.670,P < 0.001; Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within Odontoceti, there is no evidence for an allometric shift in Delphinidae.
“Within Odontoceti, we find no evidence for an allometric shift in Delphinidae (t 34 = 1.286,P = 0.207), or between extant and extinct odontocetes (t 45 = 1.681,P = 0.100).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes had an estimated body mass of 2800.881 kg.
“The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes (node 10) is estimated to have had a body mass of 2800.881kg (95% CI = 2770.297-2831.803kg), a brain mass of 1229.946g (95% CI = 1222.536-1237.402g), and an EQ of 0.702 (95% CI = 0.694-0.710;Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Removal of all extant mysticetes and other selected taxa close to these nodes suggests that ancestral mass estimates for the last common ancestor of extant cetaceans are stable.
“However, removal of all extant mysticetes and other selected taxa close to these nodes suggest that these estimates are stable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Increases in both brain and body mass have dominated cetacean evolution.
“Increases in both brain and body mass have dominated cetacean evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The discrepancy between the pattern of brain and body mass evolution is much greater in primates than in cetaceans.
“Second, the discrepancy between the pattern of brain and body mass evolution is much greater in primates than in cetaceans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this analysis, comparisons of results with/without fossils and including/excluding taxa in key phylogenetic positions suggest that a major factor affecting ancestral state reconstructions in Cetacea is accommodation of directional biases in trait evolution.
“In this analysis, comparisons of the results obtained with/without fossils and including/excluding taxa in key phylogenetic positions (Supporting Information) suggest that a major factor affecting ancestral state reconstructions in Cetacea is accommodation of directional biases in trait evolution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The data set is a phylogenetically unbiased sample of past and present diversity.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no bias in the extinct taxa sampled due to preservation and discovery of specimens or data collection.
- Findingnone given
EQ has not evolved by a directional, increasing trend in cetaceans.
“Although EQ has not evolved by a directional, increasing trend in cetaceans, lineage-specific selection pressures presumably resulted in some cetaceans becoming highly encephalized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The initial transition to an obligatory aquatic lifestyle was not accompanied by a marked increase in relative brain size.
“The initial transition to an obligatory aquatic lifestyle was not accompanied by a marked increase in relative brain size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Cetaceans reached high levels of encephalization before primates.
“We confirm that cetaceans reached high levels of encephalization before primates (Fig. 5; Marino 1998) but our analysis reveals two key differences in brain evolution between primates and cetaceans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marino 1998 source
- Interpretationown data
The allometric shift between mysticetes and odontocetes was caused by rapid increases in body mass in Mysticeti and a period of body mass reduction in Odontoceti.
“Mysticetes have significantly lower EQs than odontocetes due to a shift in brain:body allometry following the divergence of the suborders, caused by rapid increases in body mass in Mysticeti and a period of body mass reduction in Odontoceti.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lower EQ of mysticetes relative to odontocetes is due to a shift in brain:body allometry following the divergence of the suborders.
“Mysticetes have significantly lower EQs than odontocetes due to a shift in brain:body allometry following the divergence of the suborders, caused by rapid increases in body mass in Mysticeti and a period of body mass reduction in Odontoceti.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Even when all mysticetes are excluded from the analysis, the same pattern of decreasing body mass and increasing EQ in early odontocetes is observed.
“but even when all mysticetes are excluded from the analysis the same pattern is observed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The increased variation in cetacean EQ through time is contrasted with the directional progression inferred in primates.
“Similarly, the increased variation in cetacean EQ through time is contrasted with the directional progression inferred in primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Brain:body allometry shifted at least once during the diversification of cetaceans in Odontoceti.
“This suggests that brain:body allometry shifted at least once during the diversification of cetaceans in Odontoceti.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The distribution of EQ values across cetaceans suggests that high levels of encephalization have evolved convergently multiple times.
“The distribution of EQ values across cetaceans suggests that high levels of encephalization have evolved convergently multiple times (Marino 1998;Marino et al. 2004)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
If the evolution of a trait was directionally biased, or characterized by heterogeneous evolutionary rates, reconstructions of past events may be unreliable using extant taxa alone.
“If the evolution of a trait was directionally biased, or characterized by heterogeneous evolutionary rates, reconstructions of past events may be unreliable using extant taxa alone (Oakley and Cunningham 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oakley and Cunningham 2000 source
- Study design and conductown data
Because of the lack of brain size data for extinct mysticetes, the authors were unable to test for trends in this clade.
“Because of the lack of brain size data for extinct mysticetes, we were unable to test for trends in this clade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A more parsimonious answer for the primate EQ-muscle correlation is that selection for greater muscle mass acted on postnatal growth and therefore deflated EQ as brain growth ceases earlier in development.
“but a more parsimonious answer is simply that selection for greater muscle mass acted on postnatal growth and therefore deflated EQ as brain growth ceases earlier in development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Leonard et al. 2007 source
- cites Muchlinski et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In primates there is some evidence that EQ is negatively correlated with relative amounts of muscle mass.
“In primates there is some evidence that EQ is negatively correlated with relative amounts of muscle mass (Muchlinski et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muchlinski et al. 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The aquatic lifestyle of cetaceans likely results in altered physical constraints on brain size when compared to arboreal or terrestrial mammals such as primates, for which a larger head may result in substantial costs related to locomotion.
“It is likely, however, that the aquatic lifestyle of cetaceans also results in altered physical constraints on brain size when compared to arboreal or terrestrial mammals such as primates, for which a larger head may result in substantial costs related to locomotion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Other neuroanatomical features of mysticete brains, for example, level of cortical folding and neocortical architecture, show that they are at least as complex as the brains of some odontocetes.
“Other neuroanatomical features of mysticete brains, for example, level of cortical folding and neocortical architecture (Oelschlager and Oelschlager 2002;Hof and van der Gucht 2007) show that they are at least as complex as the brains of some odontocetes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Oelschlager and Oelschlager 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Hof and van der Gucht 2007 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The difference between mysticetes and odontocetes can largely be explained by a higher rate of body mass evolution in Mysticeti and decreases in body mass at the origin of Odontoceti resulting in an allometric grade-shift between the two suborders.
“Our results suggest the difference between these two suborders can largely be explained by a higher rate of body mass evolution in Mysticeti and decreases in body mass at the origin of Odontoceti resulting in an allometric grade-shift between the two suborders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Shifts in mysticete development and life history could alter EQ by shaping body mass evolution independently of overall brain mass.
“Hence, shifts in mysticete development and life history could alter EQ by shaping body mass evolution independently of overall brain mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The inclusion of fossils will improve ancestral state reconstructions if the strength of the directional bias can be reliably estimated from the sample of extinct taxa in the analysis.
“Hence, in addition to more fully capturing the biological diversity of a group, the inclusion of fossils will improve ancestral state reconstructions if the strength of the directional bias can be reliably estimated from the sample of extinct taxa in the analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The data set is a phylogenetically unbiased sample of past and present diversity.
- The authors state this as an assumption: There is no bias in the extinct taxa sampled due to preservation and discovery of specimens or data collection.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
- May combine two claims. 45
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe consensus is that large brain size is evidence of, or necessary for, the behavioral complexity and cognitive abilities observed in cetaceans.
“Although noncognitive hypotheses have been proposed to explain the large brains of odontocetes (Manger 2006), the consensus is that large brain size is evidence of, or necessary for, the behavioral complexity and cognitive abilities observed in cetaceans (Marino 2002;Simmonds 2006;Connor 2007;Marino et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Marino 2002 source
- cites Simmonds 2006 source
- cites Connor 2007 source
The Abstract (page unavailable) links complex dolphin alliances to potential cognitive demands and says social competition selected for greater cognitive abilities and large brain size. The Introduction (page unavailable) presents social competition as a hypothesis that may best explain extreme brain size, not as a consensus; the copy also does not establish that a large brain is necessary for the observed abilities. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn contrast to cetaceans, primate evolution has been characterized by a directional trend in brain mass, but not body mass, resulting in a strong trend toward increasing relative brain size.
“In contrast to cetaceans, primate evolution has been characterized by a directional trend in brain mass, but not body mass, resulting in a strong trend toward increasing relative brain size (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreases in relative brain size are almost ubiquitous across the primate tree and are produced by directional evolution of increased brain mass in a background of body mass evolution that shows no significant trend to increase through time.
“Increases in relative brain size are almost ubiquitous across the primate tree and are produced by directional evolution of increased brain mass in a background of body mass evolution that shows no significant trend to increase through time (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationCetacean brain:body allometry is predominantly altered during three key periods (the origin of crown cetaceans, the origin of odontocetes, and the origin of mysticetes), whereas primate brain and body mass evolved under contrasting selective regimes across longer periods of time resulting in a continuous allometric change and the expansion of relative brain size.
“Whereas cetacean brain:body allometry is predominantly altered during three key periods (the origin of crown cetaceans, the origin of odontocetes, and the origin of mysticetes), primate brain and body mass evolved under contrasting selective regimes across longer periods of time resulting in a continuous allometric change and the expansion of relative brain size (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA trade-off between relative brain size and the amount of adipose depots has recently been demonstrated across mammals.
“Similarly, a trade-off between relative brain size and the amount of adipose depots has recently been demonstrated across mammals (Navarrete et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Navarrete et al. 2011 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSocial communication and structure are often complex in mysticetes, and include long-term social bonds, long-range communication, cooperative hunting, cultural traditions, and fission-fusion like social behavior.
“The available information suggests, however, that social communication and structure are often complex in mysticetes, and include long-term social bonds, long-range communication, cooperative hunting, cultural traditions, and fission-fusion like social behavior (Simmonds 2006;Marino et al. 2007;Whitehead 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Simmonds 2006 source
- cites Marino et al. 2007 source
In “Cetacean Cognition and Behavior in the Wild” (page not supplied), the paper identifies cultural traditions in humpback whales and describes mysticetes as low-frequency sound producers. But its examples of long-term bonds, cooperative group hunting, and fission-fusion society concern dolphins or killer whales, not mysticetes; it also does not establish long-range communication specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Whitehead 2011
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationPrimates show a strong directional trend for relative brain size to increase through time whereas cetaceans do not.
“First, primates show a strong directional trend for relative brain size to increase through time (Montgomery et al. 2010) whereas cetaceans do not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThis trade-off is postulated to be due to locomotor constraints associated with carrying fat depots conflicting with the need for fat storage as a means of surviving periods of low food availability.
“This trade-off is postulated to be due to locomotor constraints associated with carrying fat depots conflicting with the need for fat storage as a means of surviving periods of low food availability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Navarrete et al. 2011 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth mysticete and odontocete clades possess a highly expanded and convoluted cortex and cerebellum, suggesting that either major structural changes occurred in parallel in mysticetes and odontocetes or that these changes occurred before the origin of crown Cetacea.
“both clades possess a highly expanded and convoluted cortex and cerebellum suggesting that either major structural changes occurred in parallel in mysticetes and odontocetes or that these changes occurred before the origin of crown Cetacea (Marino et al. 2000;Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002;Marino 2004;Tartarelli and Bisconti 2006;Hof and van der Gucht 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites Marino et al. 2000 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Marino 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent studies point toward brain and body mass having independent genetic bases and different aspects of brain development evolving independently, suggesting selection can act on brain size and structure, or body mass, without causing correlated shifts in the other.
“Recent studies point toward brain and body mass having independent genetic bases and different aspects of brain development evolving independently (Barton and Capellini 2011;Montgomery et al. 2011;Hager et al. 2012), suggesting selection can act on brain size and structure, or body mass, without causing correlated shifts in the other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most basal node in Cetacea had an estimated brain mass of 308.738 g, a 4.32-fold increase.
“Brain mass is estimated to be 308.738g (95% CI = 308.074-309.404g), a 4.32-fold increase, giving an EQ of 0.371”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe most basal node in Cetacea had an estimated body mass of 541.330 kg, within the range of extant odontocetes and over a 10-fold increase relative to the common ancestor of hippos and whales.
“It is estimated to have had a body mass of 541.330 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] = 539.181-543.487kg), within the range of extant odontocetes and representing over a 10-fold increase in body mass relative to the common ancestor of hippos and whales”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe rate of increase in EQ along the terminal Homo lineage is exceeded by three primate and four cetacean branches, with the terminal T. truncatus branch having the highest rate.
“The rate of increase in EQ along the terminal Homo lineage is exceeded by three primate and four cetacean branches; with the terminal T. truncatus branch having the highest rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the descent of P. macrocephalus, brain mass increased by only 6.5-fold, leading to a decrease in EQ from 2.022 to 0.575.
“During the descent of P. macrocephalus, brain mass increased by only 6.5-fold, leading to a decrease in EQ from 2.022 (95% CI = 2.009-2.035g) to 0.575.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningDuring this period, brain mass remained relatively constant between 520 and 540 g, and EQ climbed steadily from 1.383 to 2.146.
“During this period, brain mass remained relatively constant, between 520 and 540 g, and as a result, EQ climbed steadily from 1.383 to 2.146 (node 22; 95% CI = 2.135-2.157).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe frequency of decreases in brain mass and EQ is much greater in cetaceans, whereas the frequency of body mass decreases is greater in primates.
“The frequency of decreases in brain mass and EQ is much greater in cetaceans, whereas the frequency of body mass decreases is greater in primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLarge proportional increases in EQ are observed on the stem lineage to crown Cetacea, on the stem to crown Odontoceti, and on terminal branches leading to Lagenorhynchus albirostris and Globicephala macrorhynchus.
“Large proportional increases in EQ are observed on the stem lineage to crown Cetacea (nodes 1-9: 0.454-1.383),on the stem to crown Odontoceti (nodes 9-22: 1.383-2.146),and on the terminal branches leading to Lagenorhynchus albirostris and Globicephala macrorhynchus, both of which show very little change in brain mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo mysticete branch is estimated to have experienced a decrease in brain or body mass, whereas 7 of 11 branches show decreases in EQ.
“No branch is estimated to have experienced a decrease in brain or body mass, whereas 7 of 11 branches show decreases in EQ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningOrcinus orca shows a 5.3-fold increase in brain mass, which together with its large body size leads to a decrease in EQ from 3.867 to 2.764.
“Orcinus orca shows a 5.3-fold increase in brain mass, which together with its large body size also leads to a decrease in EQ from 3.867 (95% CI = 3.851-3.883)to 2.764.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ancestral odontocete had an estimated brain mass of 539.533 g, within the 95% CIs for the estimate at node 9.
“Brain mass is estimated to have been 539.533g (95% CI = 538.282-549.787g), within the 95% CIs for the estimate at node 9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe origin of extant mysticetes from the last common ancestor of crown Cetacea was accompanied by a doubling of brain mass but a 16-fold increase in body mass, resulting in decreased EQ.
“The origin of extant mysticetes from the last common ancestor of crown Cetacea (between nodes 9 and 10) is therefore accompanied by a doubling of brain mass but more notably a 16-fold increase in body mass resulting in a decreased EQ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe ancestral odontocete (node 15) had an estimated body mass of 130.472 kg, a 22% decrease from the ancestral crown cetacean (node 9).
“The ancestral odontocete (node 15) had an estimated body mass of 130.472 kg (95% CI = 129.927-131.022kg), a decrease in body mass of 22% from the ancestral crown cetacean (node 9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe distribution of EQ values across cetaceans is dominated by a major decrease on the stem to crown Mysticeti and a major increase on the stem to crown Odontoceti, in both cases driven by changes in body mass.
“the distribution of EQ values across cetaceans is dominated by a major decrease on the stem to crown Mysticeti and a major increase on the stem to crown Odontoceti, in both cases driven by changes in body mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe expectation that relative brain size tends to increase through time in mammals is not met in Cetacea as a whole, or within Odontoceti.
“The expectation that relative brain size tends to increase through time in mammals (Jerison 1973;Gould 1988) is not met in Cetacea as a whole, or within Odontoceti.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jerison 1973
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gould 1988 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBoth mysticetes and odontocetes show similar patterns of body and brain mass evolution, with both traits generally increasing through time.
“Despite large differences in EQ, both mysticetes and odontocetes show similar patterns of body and brain mass evolution, with both traits generally increasing through time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved.
“Cetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marino 1998 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe most basal node in Cetacea included in the phylogeny was probably predominantly aquatic but capable of some terrestrial locomotion.
“The most basal node in Cetacea included in our phylogeny (node 2) was probably predominantly aquatic but, like Dalanistes and Rodhocetus (Gingerich 2003), capable of some terrestrial locomotion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gingerich 2003 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is evidence linking whole brain size to cognitive performance and survival in novel environments.
“Yet, despite being a somewhat crude measure, there is evidence linking whole brain size to cognitive performance (Deaner et al. 2007;Reader et al. 2011) and survival in novel environments (Sol et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataData on ECV and brain mass from the same species showed negligible differences, with the slope not significantly different from one and the intercept not significantly different from zero.
“Data on ECV and brain mass from the same species showed negligible differences (OLS regression: P < 0.001, ECV = 0.995[mass] + 0.011) with the slope not significantly different to one (P = 0.490) and the intercept not significantly different to 0 (P = 0.568)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A 1 g/cc^3 relationship between brain volume and brain mass holds for species for which only volumetric data are available.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCetaceans reached high levels of encephalization long before primates, and primates only exceeded cetaceans with the emergence of Homo.
“It is clear from this that cetaceans reached high levels of encephalization long before primates, and primates only exceeded cetaceans with the emergence of Homo (Fig. 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMysticete brain and body mass evolved with directional trends to increase, but EQ did not.
“our ancestral state reconstructions suggest that mysticete brain and body mass evolved with directional trends to increase; but EQ did not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataResults are stable to the inclusion or exclusion of different extinct taxa and suggest the approach taken is robust.
“The results are stable to the inclusion/exclusion of different extinct taxa and suggest the approach taken is robust (Supporting Information).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe data set includes 13 of 14 extant families (93%) and fossil taxa span a range of key taxonomic transitions.
“In this regard our data set includes 13 of 14 extant families (93%) and our fossil taxa span a range of key taxonomic transitions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBrain and body mass evolution has become developmentally decoupled in primates, and selection may have acted on the developmental mechanisms controlling brain mass.
“This suggests that brain and body mass evolution has become developmentally decoupled in primates (Lande 1979) and that selection may have acted on the developmental mechanisms controlling brain mass (Montgomery et al. 2011;Montgomery and Mundy 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe G. macrorhynchus body mass estimate lies toward the lower end of the adult range and may be a subadult, which could inflate EQ.
“but note the G. macrorhynchus body mass estimate lies toward the lower end of the adult range and may be a subadult which could inflate EQ”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe data set includes 42 extant species, about 48% of living species, and 20 extinct species, about 4% of valid extinct species.
“In total, our data set includes 42 extant species, ∼48% of living species, and 20 extinct species, ∼4% of valid extinct species (Supporting Information).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataMCMC settings were sufficient to achieve chain convergence with acceptable range of data deviation values for all nodes except the basal node, which was run longer.
“These settings were sufficient to achieve chain convergence with acceptable range of data deviation values for all nodes except the basal node for which the MCMC chain was run for 7.5 million generations with a burn-in of 3 million generations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIt has been argued that aquatic weightlessness will lead to underestimates of encephalization for many cetaceans when compared to terrestrial mammals.
“It has been argued that this will lead to underestimates of encephalization for many cetaceans when compared to terrestrial mammals (Harvey and Krebs 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Harvey and Krebs 1990 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe few Oligocene odontocetes whose inner ears have been studied in detail resemble the ears of extant odontocetes, suggesting they were specialized for hearing high-frequency sounds.
“The few Oligocene odontocetes whose inner ears have been studied in detail resemble the ears of extant odontocetes (Fleischer 1976;Luo and Eastman 1995), suggesting they were specialized for hearing high-frequency sounds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fleischer 1976
- cites Luo and Eastman 1995 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMysticetes appear to have divergent developmental trajectories compared to odontocetes, with extremely high rates of both pre-and postnatal body growth.
“Although data are limited, mysticetes do appear to have divergent developmental trajectories compared to odontocetes, with extremely high rates of both pre-and postnatal body growth (Frazer and Hugget 1973).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frazer and Hugget 1973 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLande (1979) postulated that the genetic basis of brain and body mass evolution in primates may have become increasingly decoupled to facilitate an evolutionary expansion of the brain without leading to gigantism and antagonistic selection on body mass.
“For example, Lande (1979) postulated that the genetic basis of brain and body mass evolution in primates may have become increasingly decoupled to facilitate an evolutionary expansion of the brain without leading to gigantism and antagonistic selection on body mass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lande 1979 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenLineage-specific selection pressures presumably resulted in some cetaceans becoming highly encephalized.
“Although EQ has not evolved by a directional, increasing trend in cetaceans, lineage-specific selection pressures presumably resulted in some cetaceans becoming highly encephalized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe stasis in brain size during the period immediately subsequent to the origin of Odontoceti may reflect stabilizing selection on brain mass whereas directional selection acted to decrease body mass.
“it may be that the stasis in brain size during this period reflects stabilizing selection on brain mass whereas direc-tional selection acted to decrease body mass.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVon Economo neurons are found in both mysticetes and odontocetes and, as in hominoid primates, show a derived regionally specific distribution.
“Von Economo neurons, which may be linked to some higher cognitive faculties (Allman et al. 2005;Butti et al. 2013), are found in both mysticetes and odontocetes (Butti et al. 2009) and, as in hominoid primates, show a derived regionally specific distribution (Butti and Hoff 2010;Butti et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningShifts in such constraints in marine habitats likely result in a rebalancing of this trade-off and may contribute to the altered brain:body allometry seen in cetaceans.
“Shifts in such constraints in marine habitats likely results in a rebalancing of this trade-off and may contribute to the altered brain:body allometry seen in cetaceans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLimited data on neuron numbers suggest that, despite large size differences, mysticete and odontocete brains have similar numbers of neurons, both being comparable to the number found in an average chimpanzee brain.
“Limited data on neuron numbers suggest that, despite large size differences, mysticete and odontocete brains have similar numbers of neurons (Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002;Eriksen and Pakkenberg 2007), both being comparable to the number found in an average chimpanzee brain (Huggenberger 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe low EQs of mysticetes have previously been attributed to differences in blubber content, which may deflate EQ in large whales, but this appears to have a minimal effect.
“Although the low EQs of mysticetes have previously been attributed to differences in blubber content, which may deflate EQ in large whales, this appears to have a minimal effect (Tartarelli and Bisconti 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tartarelli and Bisconti 2006 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA recent simulation study suggests that the inclusion of even a small proportion of extinct diversity can improve our ability to select the best-fitting model of evolution and obtain improved reconstruction of a trait's evolutionary history.
“a recent simulation study suggests that the inclusion of even a small proportion of extinct diversity can improve our ability to select the best-fitting model of evolution and obtain improved reconstruction of a trait's evolutionary history (Slater et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Slater et al. 2012 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese behaviors are observed in some odontocetes and primates, and are considered cognitively demanding.
“These behaviors are observed in some odontocetes and primates, and are considered cognitively demanding (Barrett et al. 2003;Simmonds 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCetaceans have pursued an alternative route to complexity by multiplying existing structures, resulting in a thin but highly folded cortex.
“cetaceans have pursued an alternative route to complexity by multiplying existing structures (Morgane et al. 1990;Marino 2004;Huggenberger 2008) resulting in a thin but highly folded cortex (Morgane et al. 1990;Marino 2004b;Huggenberger 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis type of elaboration may have not been available to smaller-bodied terrestrial mammals due to mechanical and gravitational constraints favoring more size-efficient schemes of cortical elaboration.
“This type of elaboration may have not been available to smaller-bodied terrestrial mammals due to mechanical and gravitational constraints favoring more size-efficient schemes of cortical elaboration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
A 1 g/cc^3 relationship between brain volume and brain mass holds for species for which only volumetric data are available.
“we therefore assumed a 1 g/cc 3 relationship in species for which only volumetric data were available.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The constant-variance Brownian motion model is an appropriate null model for trait evolution.
“Bayes Traits assumes a constant-variance Brownian motion model but adopts a model-building approach to test for deviation from the null model.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The data set is a phylogenetically unbiased sample of past and present diversity.
“Of course this relies on the data set being a phylogenetically unbiased sample of past and present diversity (Ackerly 2000;Freckleton 2009).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
There is no bias in the extinct taxa sampled due to preservation and discovery of specimens or data collection.
“Although we cannot rule this out, for this study, we know of no reason to expect a bias in the extinct taxa sampled, either due to preservation and discovery of specimens or data collection.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Crown mysticete EQ conflicts with the stated formula
MajorUsing the stated brain mass and converting the stated body mass to grams gives an EQ of approximately 0.491 under the paper's formula, not 0.702. This changes the reported ancestral EQ for a key clade.
“The last common ancestor of crown mysticetes (node 10) is estimated to have had a body mass of 2800.881kg (95% CI = 2770.297-2831.803kg), a brain mass of 1229.946g (95% CI = 1222.536-1237.402g), and an EQ of 0.702”
“EQ = Brain mass [g]/(0.12 × Body mass[g] 0.67 ).”
Two different EQs are given for node 1
MinorThe ancestral EQ at node 1 is reported as both 0.465 and 0.454. The difference cannot be explained by rounding at the printed precision.
“The estimated body and brain masses for the last common ancestor of Cetacea and Hippopotamidae (node 1; Fig. 1) are 43.478kg and 71.457 g respectively, giving an EQ of 0.465.”
“Large proportional increases in EQ are observed on the stem lineage to crown Cetacea (nodes 1-9: 0.454-1.383)”
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558 · see citing works
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice
Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. T., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1995) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14835 · Cited by 7,927 · see citing works
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200 · see citing works
QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1979.tb04694.x · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry
Lande, R. (1979) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2407630 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(92)90081-j · Cited by 2,542 · see citing works
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291091 · Cited by 2,359 · see citing works
The expensive-tissue hypothesis: The brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution
Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P. (1995) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/204350 · Cited by 2,291 · see citing works
Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence.
Radinsky, L., & Jerison, H. J. (1975) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2407154 · Cited by 1,974 · see citing works
Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice
Gasparini, M., Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. T., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1997) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271145 · Cited by 1,881 · see citing works
(1994) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 · Cited by 1,859 · see citing works
Bayesian Estimation of Ancestral Character States on Phylogenies
Pagel, M. D., Meade, A., & Barker, D. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490522232 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates
Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.062041299 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
Principles of brain evolution.
Striedter, G. (2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5260 · Cited by 1,124 · see citing works
Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies
PAGEL, M. (1997) · Zoologica Scripta · doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.1997.tb00423.x · Cited by 1,106 · see citing works
Pagel, M., & Meade, A. (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/503444 · Cited by 920 · see citing works
New and Revised Data on Volumes of Brain Structures in Insectivores and Primates
Stephan, H., Frahm, H. D., & Baron, G. (1981) · Folia Primatologica · doi:10.1159/000155963 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals
Barton, R. A., & Harvey, P. H. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35016580 · Cited by 797 · see citing works
Encyclopedia of marine mammals
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-0656 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Introducing Markov chain Monte Carlo
Gilks, W., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. (1995) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b14835-6 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
: Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains.
Herculano-Houzel, S., Mota, B., & Lent, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604911103 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Clutton‐Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1980) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1980.tb01430.x · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Deaner, R. O., Isler, K., Burkart, J., & van Schaik, C. (2007) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000102973 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence
Reader, S. M., Hager, Y., & Laland, K. N. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0342 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Intuition and autism: a possible role for Von Economo neurons
Allman, J. M., Watson, K. K., Tetreault, N. A., & Hakeem, A. Y. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.06.008 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Energetics and the evolution of human brain size
Navarrete, A., van Schaik, C. P., & Isler, K. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10629 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments
Sol, D., Bacher, S., Reader, S. M., & Lefebvre, L. (2008) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/588304 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Cellular scaling rules for primate brains.
Herculano-Houzel, S., Collins, C. E., Wong, P., & Kaas, J. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0611396104 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Divergence date estimation and a comprehensive molecular tree of extant cetaceans
McGowen, M. R., Spaulding, M., & Gatesy, J. (2009) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.018 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Self-citationConvergence of Complex Cognitive Abilities in Cetaceans and Primates
Marino, L. (2002) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000063731 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores
Barton, R. A., Purvis, A., & Harvey, P. H. (1995) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0076 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis
FRECKLETON, R. P. (2009) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01757.x · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Cetaceans have complex brains for complex cognition
Marino, L., Connor, R. C., Fordyce, R. E., Herman, L. M., Hof, P. R., Lefebvre, L., Lusseau, D., McCowan, B., Nimchinsky, E. A., Pack, A. A., et al. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050139 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Self-citationSlater, G. J., Harmon, L. J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01723.x · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence
Gould, S. J. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4149.400 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Diversity versus disparity and the radiation of modern cetaceans
Slater, G. J., Price, S. A., Santini, F., & Alfaro, M. E. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0408 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution
Gould, S. J. (1988) · Journal of Paleontology · doi:10.1017/s0022336000059126 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Fasting Endurance and the Evolution of Mammalian Body Size
Millar, J. S., & Hickling, G. J. (1990) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2389646 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Connor, R. C. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1997 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs
Organ, C. L., Shedlock, A. M., Meade, A., Pagel, M. D., & Edwards, S. V. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05621 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Deméré, T. A., McGowen, M. R., Berta, A., & Gatesy, J. (2008) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701884632 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationHarvey, P. H., & Krebs, J. R. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2196673 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Hof, P. R., & Van Der Gucht, E. (2007) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.20407 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Finarelli, J. A., & Flynn, J. J. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150500541698 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Rethinking mammalian brain evolution
DEACON, T. W. (1990) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/30.3.629 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005246107 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Effects of brain evolution on human nutrition and metabolism
Leonard, W. R., Snodgrass, J. J., & Robertson, M. L. (2007) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093659 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
A comparison of encephalization between odontocete cetaceans and anthropoid primates
Marino, L. (1998) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000006540 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolutionary radiations and convergences in the structural organization of mammalian brains
de Winter, W., & Oxnard, C. E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35055547 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
A supermatrix analysis of genomic, morphological, and paleontological data from crown Cetacea
Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Yang, G., et al. (2011) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-112 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationBoth social and ecological factors predict ungulate brain size
Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3283 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
TAXON SAMPLING, CORRELATED EVOLUTION, AND INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS
Ackerly, D. D. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00694.x · Cited by 219 · see citing works
The giant bite of a new raptorial sperm whale from the Miocene epoch of Peru
Lambert, O., Bianucci, G., Post, K., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09067 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum
Barton, R. A. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0112 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Maternal investment, life histories and the costs of brain growth in mammals
Barton, R. A., & Capellini, I. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1019140108 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
BODDY, A. M., McGOWEN, M. R., SHERWOOD, C. C., GROSSMAN, L. I., GOODMAN, M., & WILDMAN, D. E. (2012) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02491.x · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationBody size and skeletal muscle myoglobin of cetaceans: adaptations for maximizing dive duration
Noren, S. R., & Williams, T. M. (2000) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/s1095-6433(00)00182-3 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Manger, P. R. (2006) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793106007019 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Pyenson, N. D., & Sponberg, S. (2011) · Journal of Mammalian Evolution · doi:10.1007/s10914-011-9170-1 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Uhen, M. D. (2004) · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Brain size and ecology in small mammals
Mace, G. M., Harvey, P. H., & Clutton‐Brock, T. H. (1981) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb03449.x · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Origin and evolution of large brains in toothed whales
Marino, L., McShea, D. W., & Uhen, M. D. (2004) · The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.20128 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Self-citationA bizarre new toothed mysticete (Cetacea) from Australia and the early evolution of baleen whales
Fitzgerald, E. M. G. (2006) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3664 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Primate cognition: from ‘what now?’ to ‘what if
Barrett, L. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.005 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS SUCCEED WHERE ANCESTOR RECONSTRUCTION FAILS IN A KNOWN BACTERIOPHAGE PHYLOGENY
Oakley, T. H., & Cunningham, C. W. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00042.x · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Total number and volume of Von Economo neurons in the cerebral cortex of cetaceans
Butti, C., Sherwood, C. C., Hakeem, A. Y., Allman, J. M., & Hof, P. R. (2009) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.22055 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Insular dwarfism in hippos and a model for brain size reduction in Homo floresiensis
Weston, E., & Lister, A. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07922 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Pagel, & Meade (2006) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.2307/3844739 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Adaptive evolution of four microcephaly genes and the evolution of brain size in anthropoid primates
Montgomery, S. H., Capellini, I., Venditti, C., Barton, R. A., & Mundy, N. I. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq237 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationBrains matter, bodies maybe not: the case for examining neuron numbers irrespective of body size
Herculano‐Houzel, S. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05976.x · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Genetics of Growth Predict Patterns of Brain-Size Evolution
Riska, B., & Atchley, W. R. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.229.4714.668 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
(1976) · Journal of Paleontology · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Von Economo neurons: Clinical and evolutionary perspectives
Butti, C., Santos, M., Uppal, N., & Hof, P. R. (2011) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.004 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
The maximum rate of mammal evolution
Evans, A. R., Jones, D., Boyer, A. G., Brown, J. H., Costa, D. P., Ernest, S. K. M., Fitzgerald, E. M. G., Fortelius, M., Gittleman, J. L., Hamilton, M. J., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1120774109 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Cortical complexity in cetacean brains
Hof, P. R., Chanis, R., & Marino, L. (2005) · The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.20258 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These, or other, differences in constraints, such as the absence of a limiting bony birth canal in cetaceans (Connor 2007), may explain why the evolution of the cetacean brain proceeded along a unique path (Marino 2004b; Hof et al. 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe insular cortex: a comparative perspective
Butti, C., & Hof, P. R. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0264-y · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Genetic architecture supports mosaic brain evolution and independent brain-body size regulation
Hager, R., Lu, L., Rosen, G. D., & Williams, R. W. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2086 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
McGowen, M. R., Grossman, L. I., & Wildman, D. E. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0869 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citationNational Audubon Society guide to marine mammals of the world
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-1549 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Montgomery, S. H., Capellini, I., Barton, R. A., & Mundy, N. I. (2010) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-8-9 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationStriedter, G. F. (2004) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012547626-3/50002-8 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
McGowen, M. R. (2011) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.05.003 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationThe size of the neocortex in relation to ecology and social structure in monkeys and apes
Sawaguchi, T. (1992) · Folia Primatologica · doi:10.1159/000156620 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Luo, Z., & Eastman, E. R. (1995) · Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology · doi:10.1080/02724634.1995.10011239 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Atchley, W. R., Riska, B., Kohn, L. A. P., Plummer, A. A., & Rutledge, J. J. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2408625 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Atchley, W. R., Riska, B., Kohn, L. A. P., Plummer, A. A., & Rutledge, J. J. (1984) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05640.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Marino, L., Butti, C., Connor, R. C., Fordyce, R. E., Herman, L. M., Hof, P. R., Lefebvre, L., Lusseau, D., McCowan, B., Nimchinsky, E. A., et al. (2008) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00049.x · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationTotal neocortical cell number in the mysticete brain
Eriksen, N., & Pakkenberg, B. (2007) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.20404 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Cetacean Brain Evolution: Multiplication Generates Complexity
Marino, L. (2004) · International Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.46867/ijcp.2004.17.01.06 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinct evolutionary patterns of brain and body size during adaptive radiation
Gonzalez-Voyer, A., Winberg, S., & Kolm, N. (2009) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00705.x · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Muscle Mass Scaling in Primates: An Energetic and Ecological Perspective
Muchlinski, M. N., Snodgrass, J. J., & Terranova, C. J. (2012) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.21990 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Butti, C., Raghanti, M. A., Sherwood, C. C., & Hof, P. R. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05980.x · Cited by 48 · see citing works
EVOLUTION OF <i>ASPM</i> IS ASSOCIATED WITH BOTH INCREASES AND DECREASES IN BRAIN SIZE IN PRIMATES
Montgomery, S. H., & Mundy, N. I. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01487.x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationLambert, O. (2005) · Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute) · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Marino, L., Uhen, M. D., Frohlich, B., Aldag, J. M., Blane, C., Bohaska, D., & Whitmore, F. C. (2000) · Journal of Mammalian Evolution · doi:10.1023/a:1009417831601 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationSimmonds, M. P. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.015 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Whales and Dolphins: Cognition, Culture, Conservation and Human Perceptions
Stachowitsch, M. (2011) · Marine Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.2011.00499.x · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Clauset, A. J. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053967 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Comparative and Evolutionary Anatomy of the Visual Cortex of the Dolphin
Morgane, P. J., Glezer, I. I., & Jacobs, M. S. (1990) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3824-0_4 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Specific foetal growth rates of cetaceans
Frazer, J. F. D., & Huggett, A. S. G. (1973) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb04656.x · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Phylogeny and adaptive evolution of the brain-development gene microcephalin (MCPH1) in cetaceans
McGowen, M. R., Montgomery, S. H., Clark, C., & Gatesy, J. (2011) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-98 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationPositive selection at the ASPM gene coincides with brain size enlargements in cetaceans
Xu, S., Chen, Y., Cheng, Y., Yang, D., Zhou, X., Xu, J., Zhou, K., & Yang, G. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1729 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Marino, L. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.010 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationThe size and complexity of dolphin brains-a paradox?
Huggenberger, S. (2008) · Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · doi:10.1017/s0025315408000738 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The pattern of evolution in Pleistocene human brain size.
Lee, S.-H., & Wolpoff, M. H. (2003) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300018054 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Hof, P. R., & der Gucht, E. V. (2006) · The Anatomical Record Part A Discoveries in Molecular Cellular and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.20407 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Trajectories and constraints in brain evolution in primates and cetaceans
Tartarelli, G., & Bisconti, M. (2006) · Human Evolution · doi:10.1007/s11598-006-9027-4 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behaviour
Braude, S. H. (1997) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(97)89921-1 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Evolution of Primate General and Cultural Intelligence*
Reader, S. M., Hager, Y., & Laland, K. N. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199608966.003.0009 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Marino (1996) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6505(1996)5:3
Self-citationINDEPENDENT CONTRASTS SUCCEED WHERE ANCESTOR RECONSTRUCTION FAILS IN A KNOWN BACTERIOPHAGE PHYLOGENY
Oakley, T. H., & Cunningham, C. W. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0397:icswar]2.0.co;2
The coordinated structure of mosaic brain evolution
Barton, R. A. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01253953
Erratum: The giant bite of a new raptorial sperm whale from the Miocene epoch of Peru
Lambert, O., Bianucci, G., Post, K., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09381
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Breakdown of brain–body allometry and the encephalization of birds and mammals
Tsuboi, M., van der Bijl, W., Kopperud, B. T., Erritzøe, J., Voje, K. L., Kotrschal, A., Yopak, K. E., Collin, S. P., Iwaniuk, A. N., & Kolm, N. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0632-1 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
The evolution of mammalian brain size
Smaers, J. B., Rothman, R. S., Hudson, D. R., Balanoff, A. M., Beatty, B. L., Dechmann, D. K. N., de Vries, D., Dunn, J. C., Fleagle, J. G., Gilbert, C. C., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe2101 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
The Origin of High-Frequency Hearing in Whales
Churchill, M., Martínez-Cáceres, M., de MUIZON, C., et al. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.004 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationThe social and cultural roots of whale and dolphin brains
Fox, K. C. R., Muthukrishna, M., & Shultz, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0336-y · Cited by 128 · see citing works
“We also evaluated EQ because it is often used in investigations of cetacean brain evolution 28,29 , but our analyses contribute to a growing body of research”
Brain evolution and development: adaptation, allometry and constraint
Montgomery, S. H., Mundy, N. I., & Barton, R. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.0433 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationBeyond brain size: Uncovering the neural correlates of behavioral and cognitive specialization
Logan, C., Avin, S., Boogert, N. J., Buskell, A., Cross, F. R., Currie, A., Jelbert, S. A., Lukas, D., Marés, R., Navarrete, A. F., et al. (2018) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2018.130008 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationEnergetic tradeoffs control the size distribution of aquatic mammals
Gearty, W., McClain, C. R., & Payne, J. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1712629115 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Pilecky, M., Závorka, L., Arts, M. T., & Kainz, M. J. (2021) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.12747 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
“Cetaceans also possess a high number of neurons in the cerebral cortex compared to total brain mass (Montgomery et al., 2013; Sousa et al., 2017), which they probably require for their extensive social behaviours (Dunbar, 1992; Sawaguchi, 1992), physiological adaption to their environment (Shultz &…”
BackgroundThe allometry of brain size in mammals
Burger, J. R., George, M. A., Leadbetter, C., & Shaikh, F. (2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz043 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Inactivation of thermogenic UCP1 as a historical contingency in multiple placental mammal clades
Gaudry, M. J., Jastroch, M., Treberg, J. R., Hofreiter, M., Paijmans, J. L. A., Starrett, J., Wales, N., Signore, A. V., Springer, M. S., & Campbell, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1602878 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
The Origin of Filter Feeding in Whales
Geisler, J. H., Boessenecker, R. W., Brown, M., et al. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.003 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“A recent study inferred that the most recent common ancestor of all extant cetaceans was 167 kg [35], whereas another suggested that this taxon was about 2.”
Self-citationRelating enhancer genetic variation across mammals to complex phenotypes using machine learning
Kaplow, I. M., Lawler, A. J., Schäffer, D. E., Srinivasan, C., Sestili, H. H., Wirthlin, M. E., Phan, B. N., Prasad, K., Brown, A. R., Zhang, X., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abm7993 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“…( 43 , 44 ) because brain size is highly correlated with overall body size ( 45 , 46 ) and because we were able to obtain brain size residual annotations for 158boreoeutherianmammals( 43 , 44 ) — primates, lagomorphs, rodents,…”
BackgroundSelf-citationUltrasonic hearing and echolocation in the earliest toothed whales
Park, T., Fitzgerald, E. M. G., & Evans, A. R. (2016) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2016.0060 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Positive phenotypic selection inferred from phylogenies
Baker, J., Meade, A., Pagel, M. D., & Venditti, C. (2015) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/bij.12649 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Brawn before brains in placental mammals after the end-Cretaceous extinction
Bertrand, O., Shelley, S. L., Williamson, T. E., Wible, J. R., Chester, S. G. B., Flynn, J. J., Holbrook, L., Lyson, T. R., Meng, J., Miller, I. M., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abl5584 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Lambert, O., Bianucci, G., Urbina, M., et al. (2017) · CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) · doi:10.1111/zoj.12479 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationBigger Brains Led to Bigger Bodies?: The Correlated Evolution of Human Brain and Body Size
Grabowski, M. (2016) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/685655 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“As larger animals generally have larger brains (Jerison 1973), relative brain size—that is, enlargement of the brain beyond what would be expected by allometric scaling for body size—has often been used to compare cognition across species (e.g., Boddy et al. 2012; Montgomery et al. 2013).”
MethodRidgway, S. H., Carlin, K. P., Alstyne, K. R. V., Hanson, A. C., & Tarpley, R. J. (2016) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000454797 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“…brain size does not vary strictly with body size [Pilleri and Gihr, 1970; Pirlot and Kamiya, 1975; Miyazaki et al., 1981; Ridgway and Brownson, 1984; Worthy and Hickie, 1986; Marino et al., 2004; Turner et al., 2006; Connor, 2007; Montgomery et al., 2013; Gingerich, 2015; Mallette et al., 2016].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe impact of locomotion on the brain evolution of squirrels and close relatives
Bertrand, O., Püschel, H. P., Schwab, J. A., Silcox, M. T., & Brusatte, S. L. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01887-8 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Boessenecker, R. W., Ahmed, E., & Geisler, J. H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186476 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationGillet, A., Frédérich, B., & Parmentier, É. (2019) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.1771 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“As the ancestor of crown cetaceans had an estimated body weight comparable to extant dolphins, small body size is likely the ancestral condition and gigantism is a derived state [58].”
BackgroundTsagkogeorga, G., McGowen, M. R., Davies, K. T. J., Jarman, S., Polanowski, A. M., Bertelsen, M. F., & Rossiter, S. J. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150156 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“These results are contrary to expectations, as mysticetes, while possessing large absolute brain size in some species, have smaller brain to body size ratios than odontocetes and might be expected to have fewer nervous system genes under selection [58].”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationBody Weight and Relative Brain Size (Encephalization) in Eocene Archaeoceti (Cetacea)
Gingerich, P. D. (2015) · Journal of Mammalian Evolution · doi:10.1007/s10914-015-9304-y · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“ERTC values for archaeocete species are taken from Table 1; those for mysticete and odontocete species were calculated from supplemental information in Montgomery et al. (2013), with anomalous values for Balaena mysticetus replaced by those of Thewissen et al. (2011). Time scale is from Vandenberghe et al. (2012). Abb…”
MethodInfluentialRidgway, S. H., & Hanson, A. C. (2014) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000360519 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Cetaceans are thought to have large cerebella [Breathnach, 1960; Pilleri and Gihr, 1971; Clark et al., 2001; Maseko et al., 2012; Montgomery et al., 2013].”
BackgroundCan Cognitive Ability Give Invasive Species the Means to Succeed? A Review of the Evidence
Szabo, B., Damas‐Moreira, I., & Whiting, M. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00187 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“…analyses are hampered because the relationship between brain size and body size is not linear in all taxa [e.g., Fitzpatrick et al. (2012) cited by Montgomery et al. (2013), Logan et al. (2018) cited by Logan et al. (2018)] and often, brain measures used in comparative studies are based on a few…”
Microcephaly genes evolved adaptively throughout the evolution of eutherian mammals
Montgomery, S. H., & Mundy, N. I. (2014) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-14-120 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“In our phylogeny three episodes of brain expansion are relatively well documented in the fossil record and form taxon-pairs with smaller brain species; the expansion of human [40,41], dolphin [42,43] and elephant brain sizes”
Self-citationJebb, D., & Hiller, M. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.38906 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The extinct shark Otodus megalodon was a transoceanic superpredator: Inferences from 3D modeling
Cooper, J. A., Hutchinson, J. R., Bernvi, D. C., Cliff, G., Wilson, R. P., Dicken, M. L., Menzel, J. R., Wroe, S., Pirlo, J., & Pimiento, C. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abm9424 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Novel Genomic Insights into Body Size Evolution in Cetaceans and a Resolution of Peto’s Paradox
Sun, D., Chai, S., Huang, X., Wang, Y., Xiao, L., Xu, S., & Yang, G. Z. (2021) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/717768 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Previous studies have suggested that the much higher evolutionary rate of body mass in cetaceans than in terrestrial relatives might be associated with aquatic weightlessness, an abundant diet, thermoregulation, predator defense, and migratory behavior (Evans et al. 2012; Montgomery et al. 2013).”
BackgroundDeCasien, A. R., González, N. T., Williams, S. A., & Shattuck, M. R. (2018) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13633 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“For cetaceans, we used the 10KTrees consensus tree (N = 37 species; Version 1; Arnold et al. 2010) and a composite of published molecular trees (N = 27 species; McGowen et al. 2009; McGowen 2011) that was aggregated by Montgomery and colleagues (Montgomery et al. 2013).”
MethodAlzheimer's disease‐like neuropathology in three species of oceanic dolphin
Vacher, M. C., Durrant, C. S., Rose, J. L., Hall, A. J., Spires‐Jones, T. L., Gunn‐Moore, F. J., & Dagleish, M. P. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15900 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Xu, S., Sun, X., Niu, X., Zhang, Z., Tian, R., Ren, W., Zhou, K., & Yang, G. (2017) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1051-7 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Lineage-specific selection analyses found extensive positive selection at CDK5RAP2 along cetacean lineages from the ancestor of cetaceans to descendant lineages, especially in lineages with both increased and decreased EQs.”
BackgroundInfluentialInsights into body size variation in cetaceans from the evolution of body-size-related genes
Sun, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Lin, Y., Yin, D., Xu, S., & Yang, G. (2019) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-019-1461-9 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“feeding ecology in an aquatic environment [14].”
BackgroundThe impact of environmental factors on the evolution of brain size in carnivorans
Michaud, M., Toussaint, S., & Gilissen, E. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03748-4 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Encephalization (i.e. the relative brain size regarding the body mass) has been extensively studied within taxa whose representatives display unusually large brains, especially in mammals and notably primates [2–4] , cetaceans [5–7] , and birds [8–10] .”
BackgroundMacroevolution of Toothed Whales Exceptional Relative Brain Size
Serio, C., Castiglione, S., Tesone, G., Piccolo, M., Melchionna, M., Mondanaro, A., Febbraro, M. D., & Raia, P. (2019) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-019-09485-7 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ancestral State Estimation with Phylogenetic Ridge Regression
Castiglione, S., Serio, C., Mondanaro, A., Melchionna, M., Carotenuto, F., Febbraro, M. D., Profico, A., Tamagnini, D., & Raia, P. (2020) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-020-09505-x · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Brain evolution in Proboscidea (Mammalia, Afrotheria) across the Cenozoic
Benoît, J., Legendre, L. J., Tabuce, R., Obada, T., Mararescul, V., & Manger, P. R. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45888-4 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Small brains predisposed Late Quaternary mammals to extinction
Dembitzer, J., Castiglione, S., Raia, P., & Meiri, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07327-9 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Enhanced long-term memory and increased mushroom body plasticity in Heliconius butterflies
Young, F. J., Anton, A. A., Melo‐Flórez, L., Couto, A., Foley, J. M., Monllor, M., McMillan, W. O., & Montgomery, S. H. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.108949 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationModeling the Evolution of Rates of Continuous Trait Evolution
Martin, B. S., Bradburd, G. S., Harmon, L. J., & Weber, M. G. (2022) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac068 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
No time to die: Evolution of a post‐reproductive life stage
Monaghan, P., & Ivimey‐Cook, E. R. (2023) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.13096 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Venn-Watson, S. K. (2024) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo14070355 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The pattern of brain-size change in the early evolution of cetaceans
Waugh, D. A., & Thewissen, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257803 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Brain size evolution in whales and dolphins: new data from fossil mysticetes
McCurry, M. R., Marx, F. G., Evans, A. R., Park, T., Pyenson, N. D., Kohno, N., Castiglione, S., & Fitzgerald, E. M. G. (2021) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blab054 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Castiglione, S., Serio, C., Mondanaro, A., Febbraro, M. D., Profico, A., Girardi, G., & Raia, P. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210101 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Cetacean genome size diversity
Oziolor, E. M., Gregory, T. R., Bickham, J. W., et al. (2019) · Marine Mammal Science · doi:10.1111/mms.12576 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Boessenecker, R. W., & Geisler, J. H. (2023) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d15111154 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative genomics of brain size evolution
Enard, W. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00345 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Evolution of whale sensory ecology: Frontiers in nondestructive anatomical investigations
Racicot, R. A. (2021) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.24761 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“Among odontocetes, present-day oceanic dolphins exhibit EQs second only to humans, complex social interactions, tool use, and mirror self-recognition (Connor, 2007; Marino et al., 2007; Montgomery et al., 2013).”
BackgroundA natural endocast of an early Miocene odontocete and its implications in cetacean brain evolution
Bisconti, M., Damarco, P., Tartarelli, G., Pavia, M., & Carnevale, G. (2020) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.25015 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“In the datasets provided by Marino et al. (2004), Boddy et al. (2012), and Montgomery et al. (2013), there is only a handful of taxa from Pliocene but published analyses of cetacean diversity have demonstrated that the Pliocene represented a period of major diversification pulses in cetacean…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCo‐evolution of cerebral and cerebellar expansion in cetaceans
Muller, A. S., & Montgomery, S. H. (2019) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13539 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“…constraints on brain expansion that are associated with aquatic weightless‐ ness, major increases in body mass (Huggenberger, 2008; Marino, 1998; Montgomery et al., 2013) and an energy‐rich diet (Evans et al., 2012) may have resulted in the unique brain structure and mode of expansion…”
BackgroundSelf-citationEcomorphology of toothed whales (Cetacea, Odontoceti) as revealed by 3D skull geometry
Vicari, D., McGowen, M. R., Lambert, O., Brown, R. P., Bianucci, G., Sabin, R., & Meloro, C. (2023) · Journal of Mammalian Evolution · doi:10.1007/s10914-022-09642-4 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationMultivariate Meta-Analysis of Brain-Mass Correlations in Eutherian Mammals
Steinhausen, C., Zehl, L., Haas-Rioth, M., Morcinek, K., Walkowiak, W., & Huggenberger, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2016.00091 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Moreover, odontocetes as well as anthropoid primates have a greater variance in EQ, suggesting that evolutionary constraints resulting in a strict correlation between brain and body mass had become relaxed (Boddy et al., 2012; Montgomery et al., 2013).”
BackgroundPaleoneurology of Artiodactyla, an Overview of the Evolution of the Artiodactyl Brain
Orliac, M. J., Maugoust, J., Balcarcel, A. M., & Gilissen, E. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13983-3_13 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Ridgway, S. H., Carlin, K. P., & Alstyne, K. R. V. (2017) · Marine Mammal Science · doi:10.1111/mms.12464 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Another problem arose from the use of endocasts as a proxy for brain mass (Jerison 1973; Marino et al. 2000, 2004; Montgomery et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMontgomery, S. H., Mundy, N. I., & Barton, R. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1743 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationEvolution and development of the cetacean skull roof: a case study in novelty and homology
Roston, R. A., Boessenecker, R. W., & Geisler, J. H. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0086 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationHebberecht, L., Wainwright, J. B., Thompson, C., Kershenbaum, S., McMillan, W. O., & Montgomery, S. H. (2023) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.14188 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Neuropils are physically connected through projection neurons, and as a result it is possible that an expansion in one neuropil would lead to knock- on volumetric effects in other neuropils (Kinoshita et al., 2015; Montgomery et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEndocranial volume is heritable and is associated with longevity and fitness in a wild mammal
Logan, C., Kruuk, L. E. B., Stanley, R., Thompson, A. M., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.160622 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Adaptations to marine environments and the evolution of slow-paced life histories in endotherms
Sol, D., Prego, A., Olivé, L., Genovart, M., Oró, D., & Hernández‐Matías, A. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59273-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Exploiting these prey may require accumulating knowledge and socially learning a variety of complex foraging skills, including cooperative hunting and tool use, which may have been facilitated by an encephalized brain and enhanced body manoeuvrability 49,50 .”
Bestwick, J., Godoy, P. L., Maidment, S. C. R., Ezcurra, M. D., Wroe, M., Raven, T. J., Bonsor, J. A., & Butler, R. J. (2022) · Palaeontology · doi:10.1111/pala.12599 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Insights into longevity and virus-driven adaptation from Myotis bat genomesPreprint
Vázquez, J. M., Lauterbur, M. E., Mottaghinia, S., Gaucherand, L., Maesen, S., Singer, M. S., Villa, S., Bucci, M. E., Fraser, D. L., Gray-Sandoval, G., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.10.617725 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Marine Mammal Captivity Issue: Time for a Paradigm Shift
Marino, L. (2018) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-36671-9_13 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationHolm, J. S., Dasmeh, P., & Kepp, K. P. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.04.004 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Brain, Spinal Cord, and Cranial Nerves
Cozzi, B., Huggenberger, S., & Oelschläger, H. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407229-9.00006-3 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Knoflacher, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-69423-7_6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Cetacean Brain, Cognition, and Social Complexity
Marino, L. (2022) · Ethology and behavioral ecology of marine mammals · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98100-6_4 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationTanaka, Y., Ortega, M., & Fordyce, R. E. (2022) · New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics · doi:10.1080/00288306.2021.2021956 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“…evolutionary succession from the Archaeoceti to modern odontocetes, brain size has increased relative to their body size (Marino 2007; Marino 2009; Montgomery et al. 2013; Thewissen 2018; Bisconti et al. 2021; McCurry et al. 2021), and there has also been a loss of olfaction; the sense of smell…”
BackgroundVenn-Watson, S. K., Jensen, E. D., & Schork, N. J. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1918755117 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Evolution of Large Brain and Body Size in Mammals
Montgomery, S. H. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804042-3.00034-8 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationReconstruction of body mass evolution in the Cetartiodactyla and mammals using phylogenomic dataPreprint
Figuet, E., Ballenghien, M., Lartillot, N., & Galtier, N. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/139147 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The longevity of habitable planets and the development of intelligent life
Simpson, F. (2016) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550416000306 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“Over the past 50 million years the blue whale has maintained a remarkable growth rate, increasing in body mass by three orders of magnitude (Montgomery et al. 2013).”
BackgroundBeaked Whales: A Complete Guide to Their Biology and Conservation
Ellis, R., & Mead, J. G. (2017) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Marino, L. (2020) · Advances in neuroethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31011-0_10 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationThe evolution of hearing and brain size in Eocene whales
Peacock, J., Waugh, D. A., Bajpai, S., & Thewissen, J. G. M. (2025) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/pab.2024.64 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Numerous studies have made valuable contributions to understanding cetacean brain-size evolution, including the pioneering work of Marino et al. (2004), which has been built upon by various authors (e.g., Montgomery et al. 2013; Boessenecker et al. 2017; Waugh and Thewissen 2021).”
Waqas, M., Smith, T., Rana, R. S., & Orliac, M. J. (2024) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000542574 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The brain mass/body mass allometry is a bit more negative in Cetacea and may result from a massive increase of body mass in this clade (see [57]: fi g. 1) concurrent with aquatic life and release from the constraints of gravity.”
InfluentialZhao, L., Zhou, X., Rokas, A., & Cone, R. D. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05962-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
High Encephalization in a Fossil Rorqual Illuminates Baleen Whale Brain Evolution
Bisconti, M., Daniello, R., Damarco, P., Tartarelli, G., Pavia, M., & Carnevale, G. (2021) · Brain Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000519852 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The blue whale brain misrepresented by an alcohol dehydrated brain of 3,636 grams
Ridgway, S. H., & Alstyne, K. R. V. (2016) · Marine Mammal Science · doi:10.1111/mms.12364 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The endocranial anatomy of protocetids and its implications for early whale evolution
Berger, E., Amson, E., Peri, E., Gohar, A. S., Sallam, H., Ferreira, G. S., Chowdhury, R. R., & Martinez, Q. (2025) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpaf109 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Evolution of the Mammalian Brain with a Focus on the Whale Olfactory Bulb
Kishida, T. (2017) · Diversity and commonality in animals · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-56469-0_14 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Metabolism: Evolution of dolphin sperm endurance
Cooper, L. N. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.075 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Is Cetacean Intelligence Special? New Perspectives on the Debate
Chinea, A. (2017) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e19100543 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“These behaviors are observed in some large-brained odontocetes like the Sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) and primates, and are considered cognitively demanding [92].”
BackgroundMajor Steps in the Evolution of Cetaceans
Marx, F. G., Lambert, O., & Uhen, M. D. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118561546.ch5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Reconstruction of body mass evolution in the Cetartiodactyla and mammals using phylogenomic data
Figuet, E., Ballenghien, M., Lartillot, N., & Galtier, N. (2021) · Peer Community Journal · doi:10.24072/pcjournal.55 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Children of time: the geological recency of intelligence and its implications for SETI
Mussini, G. (2023) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s1473550423000253 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Delphinoids comprise the most cognitively sophisticated cetaceans, with neocortex folding and encephalization levels in dolphins (EQs ∼ 4 – 5) surpassing those of all nonhuman primates (Marino et al ., 2004; Montgomery et al ., 2013; Marino, 2017; Smaers et al ., 2021).”
InfluentialCellular Composition of the Brain of a Northern Minke Whale
Avelino‐de‐Souza, K., Patzke, N., Karlsson, K. Æ., Manger, P. R., & Herculano‐Houzel, S. (2025) · The Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.70089 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“How and why cetaceans evolved large brains, especially as this is presumed to incur a high metabolic cost (Aiello and Wheeler 1995), making it unlikely to be a neutral shift with respect to overall fitness (Montgomery et al. 2013), is a currently unresolved question.”
Marx, F. G., Lambert, O., & Uhen, M. D. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118561546.ch1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Into the Blue: Exploring genetic mechanisms behind the evolution of baleen whales
Genty, G., Sandoval‐Castillo, J., Beheregaray, L. B., & Möller, L. M. (2024) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2024.148822 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Intrinsic negative feedback as a limiting factor for the evolution of higher forms of intelligence
Arold, S. T. (2020) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.22039.1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Intrinsic negative feedback as a limiting factor for the evolution of higher forms of intelligence
Arold, S. T. (2020) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.22039.2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Marx, F. G., Lambert, O., & Uhen, M. D. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118561546.ch3 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Widespread selection relaxation in aquatic mammalsPreprint
Farina, B. M., Latrille, T., Salamin, N., Silvestro, D., & Faurby, S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.09.18.613479 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“These adaptations include consistent changes, such as body mass increases (Gearty, McClain, and Payne 2018; Farina, Faurby, and Silvestro 2023; Montgomery et al. 2013), and hindlimb reduction (Gol’din 2014; Sun et al. 2022; Gingerich 2003; Gingerich, Smith, and Simons 1990).”
BackgroundForsdyke, D. R. (2016) · Evolutionary Bioinformatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28755-3_20
Neo-connectionism, Neurodynamics and Large-Scale Networks
Rutten, G.-J. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54633-9_7
Muskiet, F. A. J. (2018) · Bijblijven · doi:10.1007/s12414-018-0318-2
“De voorouders van de dolfijn gingen meer dan 50mjg van het land terug naar het water en hun EQ bereikte een maximum rond 15mjg [61, 62].”
BackgroundStriedter, G. F., & Northcutt, R. G. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195125689.003.0006
Adaptive Evolution of Microcephaly Genes
Montgomery, S. H. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0028393
Self-citationFaculty Opinions recommendation of The evolution of mammalian brain size.
Витальевич, П. В. (2021) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.740012939.793585350
Marx, F. G., Lambert, O., & Uhen, M. D. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118561546.ch7
- Authors
- Montgomery, S. H., Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Fox, C., Marino, L., & Gatesy, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- New York Institute of Technology (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Emory University (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-23
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3339-3353
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1942775828
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB (1025260, 0640313, 0743724)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- cetaceans, brain size, body mass, encephalization quotient, brain-body allometry, baleen whales, odontocetes, convergent evolution, brain evolution, primate comparison, extinct taxa, evolutionary trends
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Body Weight, Brain, Cetacea, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phylogeny, Primates
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review