Cited by 107Evolution and Paleontology StudiesMarine animal studies overviewMorphological variations and asymmetry

THE EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF CETACEAN BRAIN AND BODY SIZE: CETACEAN BRAIN EVOLUTION

Montgomery, Stephen H., Geisler, Jonathan H., McGowen, Michael R., Fox, Charlotte, Marino, Lori, Gatesy, John·2013·Evolution

Abstract

Cetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved. Cetaceans are remarkably diverse, varying in both phenotypes by several orders of magnitude, with notable differences between the two extant suborders, Mysticeti and Odontoceti. We analyzed the evolutionary history of brain and body mass, and relative brain size measured by the encephalization quotient (EQ), using a data set of extinct and extant taxa to capture temporal variation in the mode and direction of evolution. Our results suggest that cetacean brain and body mass evolved under strong directional trends to increase through time, but decreases in EQ were widespread. Mysticetes have significantly lower EQs than odontocetes due to a shift in brain:body allometry following the divergence of the suborders, caused by rapid increases in body mass in Mysticeti and a period of body mass reduction in Odontoceti. The pattern in Cetacea contrasts with that in primates, which experienced strong trends to increase brain mass and relative brain size, but not body mass. We discuss what these analyses reveal about the convergent evolution of large brains, and highlight that until recently the most encephalized mammals were odontocetes, not primates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/evo.12197

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

17 of 69 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Brain:body allometry in cetaceans differs significantly from other mammals.

    “This is of particular interest given evidence that brain:body allometry in cetaceans differs significantly from other mammals (Manger 2006;Boddy et al. 2012)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Manger 2006 source
    • cites Boddy et al. 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    Including data from extinct taxa may improve analyses of trait evolution.

    “Including data from extinct taxa may improve such analyses (Finarelli and Flynn 2006;Montgomery et al. 2010;Slater et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Finarelli and Flynn 2006 source
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
    • cites Slater et al. 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    The rate of body mass evolution in cetaceans far exceeds that of terrestrial mammals.

    “Furthermore, the rate of body mass evolution in cetaceans far exceeds that of terrestrial mammals (Evans et al. 2012)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans et al. 2012 source
  • Premisecitation

    Primates show a strong trend for directional increases in relative brain size.

    “Primates are one order that shows a strong trend for directional increases in relative brain size (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The shift in brain:body allometry at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to changes in body mass development well after the move to aquatic habitats.

    “suggests the shift in brain:body allometry at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to changes in body mass development well after the move to aquatic habitats (Manger 2006;Boddy et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Manger 2006 source
    • cites Boddy et al. 2012 source

      The ‘EQ within Primates and Cetartiodactyla’ section reports that increased mysticete body mass contributed to a change in relative brain size, but it also reports that odontocete brain mass increased substantially while body mass decreased only slightly. The ‘Adaptive explanations for variation in brain size’ section places high odontocete encephalization at least 10 million years after the adoption of a fully aquatic lifestyle. These passages do not establish that a shift at the origin of crown cetaceans was largely due to body-mass changes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The consensus is that large brain size is evidence of, or necessary for, the behavioral complexity and cognitive abilities observed in cetaceans.

    “Although noncognitive hypotheses have been proposed to explain the large brains of odontocetes (Manger 2006), the consensus is that large brain size is evidence of, or necessary for, the behavioral complexity and cognitive abilities observed in cetaceans (Marino 2002;Simmonds 2006;Connor 2007;Marino et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Marino 2002 source
    • cites Simmonds 2006 source
    • cites Connor 2007 source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) links complex dolphin alliances to potential cognitive demands and says social competition selected for greater cognitive abilities and large brain size. The Introduction (page unavailable) presents social competition as a hypothesis that may best explain extreme brain size, not as a consensus; the copy also does not establish that a large brain is necessary for the observed abilities. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In contrast to cetaceans, primate evolution has been characterized by a directional trend in brain mass, but not body mass, resulting in a strong trend toward increasing relative brain size.

    “In contrast to cetaceans, primate evolution has been characterized by a directional trend in brain mass, but not body mass, resulting in a strong trend toward increasing relative brain size (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increases in relative brain size are almost ubiquitous across the primate tree and are produced by directional evolution of increased brain mass in a background of body mass evolution that shows no significant trend to increase through time.

    “Increases in relative brain size are almost ubiquitous across the primate tree and are produced by directional evolution of increased brain mass in a background of body mass evolution that shows no significant trend to increase through time (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Cetacean brain:body allometry is predominantly altered during three key periods (the origin of crown cetaceans, the origin of odontocetes, and the origin of mysticetes), whereas primate brain and body mass evolved under contrasting selective regimes across longer periods of time resulting in a continuous allometric change and the expansion of relative brain size.

    “Whereas cetacean brain:body allometry is predominantly altered during three key periods (the origin of crown cetaceans, the origin of odontocetes, and the origin of mysticetes), primate brain and body mass evolved under contrasting selective regimes across longer periods of time resulting in a continuous allometric change and the expansion of relative brain size (Montgomery et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A trade-off between relative brain size and the amount of adipose depots has recently been demonstrated across mammals.

    “Similarly, a trade-off between relative brain size and the amount of adipose depots has recently been demonstrated across mammals (Navarrete et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Navarrete et al. 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Social communication and structure are often complex in mysticetes, and include long-term social bonds, long-range communication, cooperative hunting, cultural traditions, and fission-fusion like social behavior.

    “The available information suggests, however, that social communication and structure are often complex in mysticetes, and include long-term social bonds, long-range communication, cooperative hunting, cultural traditions, and fission-fusion like social behavior (Simmonds 2006;Marino et al. 2007;Whitehead 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Simmonds 2006 source
    • cites Marino et al. 2007 source

      In “Cetacean Cognition and Behavior in the Wild” (page not supplied), the paper identifies cultural traditions in humpback whales and describes mysticetes as low-frequency sound producers. But its examples of long-term bonds, cooperative group hunting, and fission-fusion society concern dolphins or killer whales, not mysticetes; it also does not establish long-range communication specifically. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Whitehead 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Primates show a strong directional trend for relative brain size to increase through time whereas cetaceans do not.

    “First, primates show a strong directional trend for relative brain size to increase through time (Montgomery et al. 2010) whereas cetaceans do not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2010 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    This trade-off is postulated to be due to locomotor constraints associated with carrying fat depots conflicting with the need for fat storage as a means of surviving periods of low food availability.

    “This trade-off is postulated to be due to locomotor constraints associated with carrying fat depots conflicting with the need for fat storage as a means of surviving periods of low food availability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Navarrete et al. 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both mysticete and odontocete clades possess a highly expanded and convoluted cortex and cerebellum, suggesting that either major structural changes occurred in parallel in mysticetes and odontocetes or that these changes occurred before the origin of crown Cetacea.

    “both clades possess a highly expanded and convoluted cortex and cerebellum suggesting that either major structural changes occurred in parallel in mysticetes and odontocetes or that these changes occurred before the origin of crown Cetacea (Marino et al. 2000;Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002;Marino 2004;Tartarelli and Bisconti 2006;Hof and van der Gucht 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Marino et al. 2000 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Marino 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Recent studies point toward brain and body mass having independent genetic bases and different aspects of brain development evolving independently, suggesting selection can act on brain size and structure, or body mass, without causing correlated shifts in the other.

    “Recent studies point toward brain and body mass having independent genetic bases and different aspects of brain development evolving independently (Barton and Capellini 2011;Montgomery et al. 2011;Hager et al. 2012), suggesting selection can act on brain size and structure, or body mass, without causing correlated shifts in the other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Barton and Capellini 2011 source
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2011 source
    • cites Hager et al. 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most basal node in Cetacea had an estimated brain mass of 308.738 g, a 4.32-fold increase.

    “Brain mass is estimated to be 308.738g (95% CI = 308.074-309.404g), a 4.32-fold increase, giving an EQ of 0.371”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The most basal node in Cetacea had an estimated body mass of 541.330 kg, within the range of extant odontocetes and over a 10-fold increase relative to the common ancestor of hippos and whales.

    “It is estimated to have had a body mass of 541.330 kg (95% confidence interval [CI] = 539.181-543.487kg), within the range of extant odontocetes and representing over a 10-fold increase in body mass relative to the common ancestor of hippos and whales”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The rate of increase in EQ along the terminal Homo lineage is exceeded by three primate and four cetacean branches, with the terminal T. truncatus branch having the highest rate.

    “The rate of increase in EQ along the terminal Homo lineage is exceeded by three primate and four cetacean branches; with the terminal T. truncatus branch having the highest rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    During the descent of P. macrocephalus, brain mass increased by only 6.5-fold, leading to a decrease in EQ from 2.022 to 0.575.

    “During the descent of P. macrocephalus, brain mass increased by only 6.5-fold, leading to a decrease in EQ from 2.022 (95% CI = 2.009-2.035g) to 0.575.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    During this period, brain mass remained relatively constant between 520 and 540 g, and EQ climbed steadily from 1.383 to 2.146.

    “During this period, brain mass remained relatively constant, between 520 and 540 g, and as a result, EQ climbed steadily from 1.383 to 2.146 (node 22; 95% CI = 2.135-2.157).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The frequency of decreases in brain mass and EQ is much greater in cetaceans, whereas the frequency of body mass decreases is greater in primates.

    “The frequency of decreases in brain mass and EQ is much greater in cetaceans, whereas the frequency of body mass decreases is greater in primates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Large proportional increases in EQ are observed on the stem lineage to crown Cetacea, on the stem to crown Odontoceti, and on terminal branches leading to Lagenorhynchus albirostris and Globicephala macrorhynchus.

    “Large proportional increases in EQ are observed on the stem lineage to crown Cetacea (nodes 1-9: 0.454-1.383),on the stem to crown Odontoceti (nodes 9-22: 1.383-2.146),and on the terminal branches leading to Lagenorhynchus albirostris and Globicephala macrorhynchus, both of which show very little change in brain mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No mysticete branch is estimated to have experienced a decrease in brain or body mass, whereas 7 of 11 branches show decreases in EQ.

    “No branch is estimated to have experienced a decrease in brain or body mass, whereas 7 of 11 branches show decreases in EQ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Orcinus orca shows a 5.3-fold increase in brain mass, which together with its large body size leads to a decrease in EQ from 3.867 to 2.764.

    “Orcinus orca shows a 5.3-fold increase in brain mass, which together with its large body size also leads to a decrease in EQ from 3.867 (95% CI = 3.851-3.883)to 2.764.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The ancestral odontocete had an estimated brain mass of 539.533 g, within the 95% CIs for the estimate at node 9.

    “Brain mass is estimated to have been 539.533g (95% CI = 538.282-549.787g), within the 95% CIs for the estimate at node 9.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The origin of extant mysticetes from the last common ancestor of crown Cetacea was accompanied by a doubling of brain mass but a 16-fold increase in body mass, resulting in decreased EQ.

    “The origin of extant mysticetes from the last common ancestor of crown Cetacea (between nodes 9 and 10) is therefore accompanied by a doubling of brain mass but more notably a 16-fold increase in body mass resulting in a decreased EQ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The ancestral odontocete (node 15) had an estimated body mass of 130.472 kg, a 22% decrease from the ancestral crown cetacean (node 9).

    “The ancestral odontocete (node 15) had an estimated body mass of 130.472 kg (95% CI = 129.927-131.022kg), a decrease in body mass of 22% from the ancestral crown cetacean (node 9).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The distribution of EQ values across cetaceans is dominated by a major decrease on the stem to crown Mysticeti and a major increase on the stem to crown Odontoceti, in both cases driven by changes in body mass.

    “the distribution of EQ values across cetaceans is dominated by a major decrease on the stem to crown Mysticeti and a major increase on the stem to crown Odontoceti, in both cases driven by changes in body mass.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The expectation that relative brain size tends to increase through time in mammals is not met in Cetacea as a whole, or within Odontoceti.

    “The expectation that relative brain size tends to increase through time in mammals (Jerison 1973;Gould 1988) is not met in Cetacea as a whole, or within Odontoceti.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jerison 1973

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Gould 1988 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Both mysticetes and odontocetes show similar patterns of body and brain mass evolution, with both traits generally increasing through time.

    “Despite large differences in EQ, both mysticetes and odontocetes show similar patterns of body and brain mass evolution, with both traits generally increasing through time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved.

    “Cetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Marino 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The most basal node in Cetacea included in the phylogeny was probably predominantly aquatic but capable of some terrestrial locomotion.

    “The most basal node in Cetacea included in our phylogeny (node 2) was probably predominantly aquatic but, like Dalanistes and Rodhocetus (Gingerich 2003), capable of some terrestrial locomotion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gingerich 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is evidence linking whole brain size to cognitive performance and survival in novel environments.

    “Yet, despite being a somewhat crude measure, there is evidence linking whole brain size to cognitive performance (Deaner et al. 2007;Reader et al. 2011) and survival in novel environments (Sol et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Deaner et al. 2007 source
    • cites Reader et al. 2011 source
    • cites Sol et al. 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Data on ECV and brain mass from the same species showed negligible differences, with the slope not significantly different from one and the intercept not significantly different from zero.

    “Data on ECV and brain mass from the same species showed negligible differences (OLS regression: P < 0.001, ECV = 0.995[mass] + 0.011) with the slope not significantly different to one (P = 0.490) and the intercept not significantly different to 0 (P = 0.568)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A 1 g/cc^3 relationship between brain volume and brain mass holds for species for which only volumetric data are available.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Cetaceans reached high levels of encephalization long before primates, and primates only exceeded cetaceans with the emergence of Homo.

    “It is clear from this that cetaceans reached high levels of encephalization long before primates, and primates only exceeded cetaceans with the emergence of Homo (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Mysticete brain and body mass evolved with directional trends to increase, but EQ did not.

    “our ancestral state reconstructions suggest that mysticete brain and body mass evolved with directional trends to increase; but EQ did not.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Results are stable to the inclusion or exclusion of different extinct taxa and suggest the approach taken is robust.

    “The results are stable to the inclusion/exclusion of different extinct taxa and suggest the approach taken is robust (Supporting Information).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data set includes 13 of 14 extant families (93%) and fossil taxa span a range of key taxonomic transitions.

    “In this regard our data set includes 13 of 14 extant families (93%) and our fossil taxa span a range of key taxonomic transitions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Brain and body mass evolution has become developmentally decoupled in primates, and selection may have acted on the developmental mechanisms controlling brain mass.

    “This suggests that brain and body mass evolution has become developmentally decoupled in primates (Lande 1979) and that selection may have acted on the developmental mechanisms controlling brain mass (Montgomery et al. 2011;Montgomery and Mundy 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lande 1979 source
    • cites Montgomery et al. 2011 source
    • cites Montgomery and Mundy 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The G. macrorhynchus body mass estimate lies toward the lower end of the adult range and may be a subadult, which could inflate EQ.

    “but note the G. macrorhynchus body mass estimate lies toward the lower end of the adult range and may be a subadult which could inflate EQ”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The data set includes 42 extant species, about 48% of living species, and 20 extinct species, about 4% of valid extinct species.

    “In total, our data set includes 42 extant species, ∼48% of living species, and 20 extinct species, ∼4% of valid extinct species (Supporting Information).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    MCMC settings were sufficient to achieve chain convergence with acceptable range of data deviation values for all nodes except the basal node, which was run longer.

    “These settings were sufficient to achieve chain convergence with acceptable range of data deviation values for all nodes except the basal node for which the MCMC chain was run for 7.5 million generations with a burn-in of 3 million generations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    It has been argued that aquatic weightlessness will lead to underestimates of encephalization for many cetaceans when compared to terrestrial mammals.

    “It has been argued that this will lead to underestimates of encephalization for many cetaceans when compared to terrestrial mammals (Harvey and Krebs 1990).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Harvey and Krebs 1990 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The few Oligocene odontocetes whose inner ears have been studied in detail resemble the ears of extant odontocetes, suggesting they were specialized for hearing high-frequency sounds.

    “The few Oligocene odontocetes whose inner ears have been studied in detail resemble the ears of extant odontocetes (Fleischer 1976;Luo and Eastman 1995), suggesting they were specialized for hearing high-frequency sounds.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fleischer 1976
    • cites Luo and Eastman 1995 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Mysticetes appear to have divergent developmental trajectories compared to odontocetes, with extremely high rates of both pre-and postnatal body growth.

    “Although data are limited, mysticetes do appear to have divergent developmental trajectories compared to odontocetes, with extremely high rates of both pre-and postnatal body growth (Frazer and Hugget 1973).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Frazer and Hugget 1973 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lande (1979) postulated that the genetic basis of brain and body mass evolution in primates may have become increasingly decoupled to facilitate an evolutionary expansion of the brain without leading to gigantism and antagonistic selection on body mass.

    “For example, Lande (1979) postulated that the genetic basis of brain and body mass evolution in primates may have become increasingly decoupled to facilitate an evolutionary expansion of the brain without leading to gigantism and antagonistic selection on body mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lande 1979 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Lineage-specific selection pressures presumably resulted in some cetaceans becoming highly encephalized.

    “Although EQ has not evolved by a directional, increasing trend in cetaceans, lineage-specific selection pressures presumably resulted in some cetaceans becoming highly encephalized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The stasis in brain size during the period immediately subsequent to the origin of Odontoceti may reflect stabilizing selection on brain mass whereas directional selection acted to decrease body mass.

    “it may be that the stasis in brain size during this period reflects stabilizing selection on brain mass whereas direc-tional selection acted to decrease body mass.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Von Economo neurons are found in both mysticetes and odontocetes and, as in hominoid primates, show a derived regionally specific distribution.

    “Von Economo neurons, which may be linked to some higher cognitive faculties (Allman et al. 2005;Butti et al. 2013), are found in both mysticetes and odontocetes (Butti et al. 2009) and, as in hominoid primates, show a derived regionally specific distribution (Butti and Hoff 2010;Butti et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Butti et al. 2009 source
    • cites Butti and Hoff 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Butti et al. 2011 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Shifts in such constraints in marine habitats likely result in a rebalancing of this trade-off and may contribute to the altered brain:body allometry seen in cetaceans.

    “Shifts in such constraints in marine habitats likely results in a rebalancing of this trade-off and may contribute to the altered brain:body allometry seen in cetaceans.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Limited data on neuron numbers suggest that, despite large size differences, mysticete and odontocete brains have similar numbers of neurons, both being comparable to the number found in an average chimpanzee brain.

    “Limited data on neuron numbers suggest that, despite large size differences, mysticete and odontocete brains have similar numbers of neurons (Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002;Eriksen and Pakkenberg 2007), both being comparable to the number found in an average chimpanzee brain (Huggenberger 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Oelschläger and Oelschläger 2002

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Eriksen and Pakkenberg 2007 source
    • cites Huggenberger 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The low EQs of mysticetes have previously been attributed to differences in blubber content, which may deflate EQ in large whales, but this appears to have a minimal effect.

    “Although the low EQs of mysticetes have previously been attributed to differences in blubber content, which may deflate EQ in large whales, this appears to have a minimal effect (Tartarelli and Bisconti 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tartarelli and Bisconti 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent simulation study suggests that the inclusion of even a small proportion of extinct diversity can improve our ability to select the best-fitting model of evolution and obtain improved reconstruction of a trait's evolutionary history.

    “a recent simulation study suggests that the inclusion of even a small proportion of extinct diversity can improve our ability to select the best-fitting model of evolution and obtain improved reconstruction of a trait's evolutionary history (Slater et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Slater et al. 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These behaviors are observed in some odontocetes and primates, and are considered cognitively demanding.

    “These behaviors are observed in some odontocetes and primates, and are considered cognitively demanding (Barrett et al. 2003;Simmonds 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barrett et al. 2003 source
    • cites Simmonds 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cetaceans have pursued an alternative route to complexity by multiplying existing structures, resulting in a thin but highly folded cortex.

    “cetaceans have pursued an alternative route to complexity by multiplying existing structures (Morgane et al. 1990;Marino 2004;Huggenberger 2008) resulting in a thin but highly folded cortex (Morgane et al. 1990;Marino 2004b;Huggenberger 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Morgane et al. 1990 source
    • cites Marino 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Huggenberger 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This type of elaboration may have not been available to smaller-bodied terrestrial mammals due to mechanical and gravitational constraints favoring more size-efficient schemes of cortical elaboration.

    “This type of elaboration may have not been available to smaller-bodied terrestrial mammals due to mechanical and gravitational constraints favoring more size-efficient schemes of cortical elaboration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
51 of 51
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A 1 g/cc^3 relationship between brain volume and brain mass holds for species for which only volumetric data are available.

    “we therefore assumed a 1 g/cc 3 relationship in species for which only volumetric data were available.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The constant-variance Brownian motion model is an appropriate null model for trait evolution.

    “Bayes Traits assumes a constant-variance Brownian motion model but adopts a model-building approach to test for deviation from the null model.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The data set is a phylogenetically unbiased sample of past and present diversity.

    “Of course this relies on the data set being a phylogenetically unbiased sample of past and present diversity (Ackerly 2000;Freckleton 2009).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is no bias in the extinct taxa sampled due to preservation and discovery of specimens or data collection.

    “Although we cannot rule this out, for this study, we know of no reason to expect a bias in the extinct taxa sampled, either due to preservation and discovery of specimens or data collection.”
4 of 4

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Crown mysticete EQ conflicts with the stated formula

    Major

    Using the stated brain mass and converting the stated body mass to grams gives an EQ of approximately 0.491 under the paper's formula, not 0.702. This changes the reported ancestral EQ for a key clade.

  • Two different EQs are given for node 1

    Minor

    The ancestral EQ at node 1 is reported as both 0.465 and 0.454. The difference cannot be explained by rounding at the printed precision.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montgomery, S. H., Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Fox, C., Marino, L., & Gatesy, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • New York Institute of Technology (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Venue
Evolution
Published
2013-07-23
Volume
67
Issue
11
Pages
3339-3353
ISSN
0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1942775828
Cited by
106
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
FWCI
5.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (acceptedVersion)
  • WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB (1025260, 0640313, 0743724)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
cetaceans, brain size, body mass, encephalization quotient, brain-body allometry, baleen whales, odontocetes, convergent evolution, brain evolution, primate comparison, extinct taxa, evolutionary trends
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Brain, Cetacea, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phylogeny, Primates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review