A Conserved Role for Drosophila Neuroglian and Human L1-CAM in Central-Synapse Formation
Open accessAbstract
Background Drosophila Neuroglian (Nrg) and its vertebrate homolog L1-CAM are cell-adhesion molecules (CAM) that have been well studied in early developmental processes. Mutations in the human gene result in a broad spectrum of phenotypes (the CRASH-syndrome) that include devastating neurological disorders such as spasticity and mental retardation. Although the role of L1-CAMs in neurite extension and axon pathfinding has been extensively studied, much less is known about their role in synapse formation. Results We found that a single extracellular missense mutation in nrg(849) mutants disrupted the physiological function of a central synapse in Drosophila. The identified giant neuron in nrg(849) mutants made a synaptic terminal on the appropriate target, but ultrastructural analysis revealed in the synaptic terminal a dramatic microtubule reduction, which was likely to be the cause for disrupted active zones. Our results reveal that tyrosine phosphorylation of the intracellular ankyrin binding motif was reduced in mutants, and cell-autonomous rescue experiments demonstrated the indispensability of this tyrosine in giant-synapse formation. We also show that this function in giant-synapse formation was conserved in human L1-CAM but neither in human L1-CAM with a pathological missense mutation nor in two isoforms of the paralogs NrCAM and Neurofascin. Conclusions We conclude that Nrg has a function in synapse formation by organizing microtubules in the synaptic terminal. This no…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LOF of Nrg causes significant reduction in microtubules at synaptic terminals.
“LOF of Nrg causes significant reduction in microtubules at synaptic terminals (140,141)”
From Functional genomic screen and network analysis reveal novel modifiers of tauopathy dissociated from tau phosphorylation (2011) · cites this paper as [140]
Cites
Anatomy of the giant fibre pathway inDrosophila. I. Three thoracic components of the pathway
King, D. G., & Wyman, R. J. (1980) · Journal of Neurocytology · doi:10.1007/bf01205017 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
HDAC4 Governs a Transcriptional Program Essential for Synaptic Plasticity and Memory
Sando, R., Gounko, N., Pieraut, S., Liao, L., Yates, J., & Maximov, A. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.037 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Ambegaokar, S. S., & Jackson, G. R. (2011) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr432 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
“LOF of Nrg causes significant reduction in microtubules at synaptic terminals (140,141), and previous efforts have suggested that tau toxicity may be partially due to ‘hyperstabilization’ of microtubules (42); therefore, an increase in cytoskeletal instability caused by reduced Nrg in a tau-induced hyperstabilized env…”
Background
- Authors
- Godenschwege, T. A., Kristiansen, L. V., Uthaman, S. B., Hortsch, M., & Murphey, R. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Godenschwege, Tanja A.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-23
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042172817
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (vor, 2754 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS044609)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- Neuroglian, L1CAM, synaptogenesis, adhesion molecules, giant synapse, microtubule organization, active zone, tyrosine phosphorylation, neurofascin, NrCAM, Drosophila, axon guidance
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Drosophila, Electric Conductivity, Genotype, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Synapses, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal, Conserved Sequence, Mutation, Missense, Amino Acid Motifs, Drosophila Proteins, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1, Structural Homology, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review