Cited by 114Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

A Conserved Role for Drosophila Neuroglian and Human L1-CAM in Central-Synapse Formation

Open access
Godenschwege, Tanja A., Kristiansen, Lars V., Uthaman, Smitha B., Hortsch, Michael, Murphey, Rodney K.·2006·Current Biology

Abstract

Background Drosophila Neuroglian (Nrg) and its vertebrate homolog L1-CAM are cell-adhesion molecules (CAM) that have been well studied in early developmental processes. Mutations in the human gene result in a broad spectrum of phenotypes (the CRASH-syndrome) that include devastating neurological disorders such as spasticity and mental retardation. Although the role of L1-CAMs in neurite extension and axon pathfinding has been extensively studied, much less is known about their role in synapse formation. Results We found that a single extracellular missense mutation in nrg(849) mutants disrupted the physiological function of a central synapse in Drosophila. The identified giant neuron in nrg(849) mutants made a synaptic terminal on the appropriate target, but ultrastructural analysis revealed in the synaptic terminal a dramatic microtubule reduction, which was likely to be the cause for disrupted active zones. Our results reveal that tyrosine phosphorylation of the intracellular ankyrin binding motif was reduced in mutants, and cell-autonomous rescue experiments demonstrated the indispensability of this tyrosine in giant-synapse formation. We also show that this function in giant-synapse formation was conserved in human L1-CAM but neither in human L1-CAM with a pathological missense mutation nor in two isoforms of the paralogs NrCAM and Neurofascin. Conclusions We conclude that Nrg has a function in synapse formation by organizing microtubules in the synaptic terminal. This no…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.062

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Godenschwege, T. A., Kristiansen, L. V., Uthaman, S. B., Hortsch, M., & Murphey, R. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Godenschwege, Tanja A.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
12-23
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042172817
Cited by
114
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS044609)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Neuroglian, L1CAM, synaptogenesis, adhesion molecules, giant synapse, microtubule organization, active zone, tyrosine phosphorylation, neurofascin, NrCAM, Drosophila, axon guidance
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Drosophila, Electric Conductivity, Genotype, Humans, Models, Biological, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Synapses, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal, Conserved Sequence, Mutation, Missense, Amino Acid Motifs, Drosophila Proteins, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1, Structural Homology, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review