Cited by 89Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsNuclear Structure and Function

Spindle assembly in the absence of a RanGTP gradient requires localized CPC activity

Open access
Maresca, Thomas J., Groen, Aaron C., Gatlin, Jesse C., Ohi, Ryoma, Mitchison, Timothy J., Salmon, Edward D.·2009·Current Biology

Abstract

During animal cell division, a gradient of GTP-bound Ran is generated around mitotic chromatin. It is generally accepted that this RanGTP gradient is essential for organizing the spindle, because it locally activates critical spindle assembly factors. Here, we show in Xenopus laevis egg extract, where the gradient is best characterized, that spindles can assemble in the absence of a RanGTP gradient. Gradient-free spindle assembly occurred around sperm nuclei but not around chromatin-coated beads and required the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC). Artificial enrichment of CPC activity within hybrid bead arrays containing both immobilized chromatin and the CPC supported local microtubule assembly even in the absence of a RanGTP gradient. We conclude that RanGTP and the CPC constitute the two major molecular signals that spatially promote microtubule polymerization around chromatin. Furthermore, we hypothesize that the two signals mainly originate from discreet physical sites on the chromosomes to localize microtubule assembly around chromatin: a RanGTP signal from any chromatin and a CPC-dependent signal predominantly generated from centromeric chromatin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.061

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The local concentrations and activation of Ran-GTP and Aurora B/CPC could differentially affect the activity of their downstream targets, some of which are identical between the two pathways.

    “While it is known that both pathways contribute to spindle assembly [60], their local concentrations and activation could differentially affect the activity of their downstream targets, some of which are identical between the two pathways.”

    From Regulatory mechanisms that control mitotic kinesins (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

  • Both the Ran-GTP and Aurora B/CPC pathways contribute to spindle assembly.

    “While it is known that both pathways contribute to spindle assembly [60], their local concentrations and activation could differentially affect the activity of their downstream targets, some of which are identical between the two pathways.”

    From Regulatory mechanisms that control mitotic kinesins (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maresca, T. J., Groen, A. C., Gatlin, J. C., Ohi, R., Mitchison, T. J., & Salmon, E. D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Marine Biological Laboratory (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Maresca, Thomas J.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
19
Issue
14
Pages
1210-1215
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121696619
Cited by
89
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM-24364)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA078048-09, P01CA078048, CA078048)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R37GM024364, GM24364, F32GM080049, R01GM024364)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
Keywords
spindle assembly, chromosomal passenger complex, microtubule nucleation, mitosis, centromeric chromatin, sperm nucleus, Xenopus egg extracts, mitotic chromatin, microtubule assembly
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Division, Chromatin, Kinetics, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Microspheres, Microtubules, Spindle Apparatus, Xenopus laevis, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Centrosome, Kinetochores, ran GTP-Binding Protein, Multiprotein Complexes, Aurora Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review