Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and In Vivo Tissue Stiffening

Open access
Klein, Eric A., Yin, Liqun, Kothapalli, Devashish, Castagnino, Paola, Byfield, Fitzroy J., Xu, Tina, Levental, Ilya, Hawthorne, Elizabeth, Janmey, Paul A., Assoian, Richard K.·2009·Current Biology

Abstract

Summary Background A number of adhesion-mediated signaling pathways and cell cycle events have been identified that regulate cell proliferation, yet studies to date have been unable to determine which of these pathways control mitogenesis in response to physiologically relevant changes in tissue elasticity. In this report, we have used hydrogel-based substrata matched to biological tissue stiffness to investigate the effects of matrix elasticity on the cell cycle. Results We find that physiological tissue stiffness acts as a cell cycle inhibitor in mammary epithelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells; subcellular analysis in these cells, mouse embryo fibroblasts, and osteoblasts shows that cell cycle control by matrix stiffness is widely conserved. Remarkably, most mitogenic events previously documented as ECM/integrin-dependent proceed normally when matrix stiffness is altered in the range that controls mitogenesis. These include ERK activity, immediately-early gene expression, and cdk inhibitor expression. In contrast, FAK-dependent Rac activation, Rac-dependent cyclin D1 gene induction, and cyclin D1-dependent Rb phosphorylation are strongly inhibited at physiological tissue stiffness and rescued when the matrix is stiffened in vitro. Importantly, the combined use of atomic force microscopy and fluorescence imaging in the mouse shows that comparable increases in tissue stiffness occur at sites of cell proliferation in vivo. Conclusion Matrix remodeling associated with pathogenesis is, in itself, a positive regulator of the cell cycle through a highly selective effect on integrin-dependent signaling to FAK, Rac, and cyclin D1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.069

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
Klein, E. A., Yin, L., Kothapalli, D., Castagnino, P., Byfield, F. J., Xu, T., Levental, I., Hawthorne, E., Janmey, P. A., & Assoian, R. K.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
19
Issue
18
Pages
1511-1518
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055940657
Cited by
421
References
2
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and In Vivo Tissue Stiffening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.069
The paper
Klein, E. A., Yin, L., Kothapalli, D., Castagnino, P., Byfield, F. J., Xu, T., Levental, I., Hawthorne, E., Janmey, P. A., & Assoian, R. K. (2009). Cell-Cycle Control by Physiological Matrix Elasticity and In Vivo Tissue Stiffening. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.069

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.