The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanog Overcomes Reprogramming Barriers and Induces Pluripotency in Minimal Conditions
Open accessAbstract
Induced pluripotency requires the expression of defined factors and culture conditions that support the self-renewal of embryonic stem (ES) cells. Small molecule inhibition of MAP kinase (MEK) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) with LIF (2i/LIF) provides an optimal culture environment for mouse ES cells and promotes transition to naive pluripotency in partially reprogrammed (pre-iPS) cells. Here we show that 2i/LIF treatment in clonal lines of pre-iPS cells results in the activation of endogenous Nanog and rapid downregulation of retroviral Oct4 expression. Nanog enables somatic cell reprogramming in serum-free medium supplemented with LIF, a culture condition which does not support induced pluripotency or the self-renewal of ES cells, and is sufficient to reprogram epiblast-derived stem cells to naive pluripotency in serum-free medium alone. Nanog also enhances reprogramming in cooperation with kinase inhibition or 5-aza-cytidine, a small molecule inhibitor of DNA methylation. These results highlight the capacity of Nanog to overcome multiple barriers to reprogramming and reveal a synergy between Nanog and chemical inhibitors that promote reprogramming. We conclude that Nanog induces pluripotency in minimal conditions. This provides a strategy for imposing naive pluripotency in mammalian cells independently of species-specific culture requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal
Ying, Q.-L., Wray, J., Nichols, J., Batlle-Morera, L., Doble, B., Woodgett, J., Cohen, P., & Smith, A. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06968 · Cited by 3,442
Self-citationA parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells
Niwa, H., Ogawa, K., Shimosato, D., & Adachi, K. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08113 · Cited by 872
Cited by
Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds.
Hou, P., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, C., Guan, J., Li, H., Zhao, T., Ye, J., Yang, W., Liu, K., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239278 · Cited by 1,402
Boroviak, T., Loos, R., Bertone, P., Smith, A., & Nichols, J. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2965 · Cited by 441
Self-citationEsrrb Is a Direct Nanog Target Gene that Can Substitute for Nanog Function in Pluripotent Cells
Festuccia, N., Osorno, R., Halbritter, F., Karwacki-Neisius, V., Navarro, P., Colby, D., Wong, F., Yates, A., Tomlinson, S. R., & Chambers, I. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.08.002 · Cited by 334
Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state
Plath, K., & Lowry, W. E. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2955 · Cited by 289
Wei, Z., Gao, F., Kim, S., Yang, H., Lyu, J., An, W., Wang, K., & Lu, W. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.010 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Theunissen, T. W., van Oosten, A. L., Castelo-Branco, G., Hall, J., Smith, A., & Silva, J. C. R.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-71
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056257429
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanog Overcomes Reprogramming Barriers and Induces Pluripotency in Minimal Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.074
- The paper
- Theunissen, T. W., van Oosten, A. L., Castelo-Branco, G., Hall, J., Smith, A., & Silva, J. C. R. (2011). Nanog Overcomes Reprogramming Barriers and Induces Pluripotency in Minimal Conditions. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.