Burst Firing Synchronizes Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex during Attentional Control
Open accessAbstract
Background It is widely held that single cells in anterior cingulate and lateral prefrontal cortex (ACC/PFC) coordinate their activity during attentional processes, although cellular activity that may underlie such coordination across ACC/PFC has not been identified. We thus recorded cells in five ACC/PFC subfields of macaques engaged in a selective attention task, characterized those spiking events that indexed attention, and identified how spiking of distinct cell populations synchronized between brain areas.Results We found that cells in ACC/PFC increased the firing of brief 200 Hz spike bursts when subjects shifted attention and engaged in selective visual processing. In contrast to nonburst spikes, burst spikes synchronized over large distances to local field potentials at narrow beta (12-20 Hz) and at gamma (50-75 Hz) frequencies. Long-range burst synchronization was anatomically specific, functionally connecting those subfields in area 24 (ACC) and area 46 (PFC) that are key players of attentional control. By splitting cells into putative excitatory (pE) and inhibitory (pI) cells by their broad and narrow spikes, we identified that bursts of pI cells preceded and that bursts of pE cells followed in time periods of maximal beta coherent network activity. In contrast, gamma bursts were transient impulses with equal timing across cell classes.Conclusions These findings suggest that processes underlying burst firing and burst synchronization are candidate mechanisms to coordinate attention information across brain areas. We speculate that distinct burst-firing motifs realize beta and gamma synchrony to trigger versus maintain functional network states during goal-directed behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The results suggest that modulation of interareal synchronization at distinct frequencies is a central mechanism in communicating specific predicted versus unpredicted information.
“They suggest that modulation of interareal synchronization at distinct frequencies is a central mechanism in communicating specific (predicted vs. unpredicted) information (65–68).”
From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Womelsdorf, T., Ardid, S., Everling, S., & Valiante, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- York University (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Womelsdorf, Thilo
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 2613-2621
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034951449
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- burst firing, anterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, attentional control, visual selective attention, beta oscillations, gamma oscillations, local field potentials, excitatory and inhibitory neurons, macaque
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Attention, Brain Mapping, Gyrus Cinguli, Macaca, Photic Stimulation, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review