The DOI matches its Crossref record; 190 of the 198 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Human Face as a Dynamic Tool for Social Communication
Open accessAbstract
As a highly social species, humans frequently exchange social information to support almost all facets of life. One of the richest and most powerful tools in social communication is the face, from which observers can quickly and easily make a number of inferences - about identity, gender, sex, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, physical health, attractiveness, emotional state, personality traits, pain or physical pleasure, deception, and even social status. With the advent of the digital economy, increasing globalization and cultural integration, understanding precisely which face information supports social communication and which produces misunderstanding is central to the evolving needs of modern society (for example, in the design of socially interactive digital avatars and companion robots). Doing so is challenging, however, because the face can be thought of as comprising a high-dimensional, dynamic information space, and this impacts cognitive science and neuroimaging, and their broader applications in the digital economy. New opportunities to address this challenge are arising from the development of new methods and technologies, coupled with the emergence of a modern scientific culture that embraces cross-disciplinary approaches. Here, we briefly review one such approach that combines state-of-the-art computer graphics, psychophysics and vision science, cultural psychology and social cognition, and highlight the main knowledge advances it has generated. In the light of current developments, we provide a vision of the future directions in the field of human facial communication within and across cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The third one, the dynamics, play the most important role for emotion face analysis [44].”
From Survey on AI-Based Multimodal Methods for Emotion Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 50,387
(1967) · Cited by 23,719
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334 · cited 1×
“Yet, whether facial expressions are biologically hardwired or socially learned, or their recognition is based on two (for example, valence and arousal [58]) or many (for example, value, novelty, pleasantness or legitimacy [59–61]) appraisal dimensions, understanding the face as a social communication tool requires ide…”
BackgroundThe weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
The expression of the emotions in man and animals.
Darwin, C. D. (1872) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/10001-000 · Cited by 12,120
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind” ?
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8 · Cited by 8,599
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Ekman, P. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,345
Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813 · Cited by 4,273
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Perrett, 1998, Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness, Nature, 394, 884, 10.1038/29772 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–405 of 405
Recognition of individual angry versus happy faces in 6- and 9-month-old infants.
Quinn, P., Xiao, N.-Q. G., & Pascalis, O. (2026) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106644
Atlas of cell types and regulatory elements underlying human facial diversity
Erickson, A. G., Gershtein, Y., Galimullina, R., Waern, F., Riba, T., Tesařová, M., Schnyder, D., Li, L., Vaulin, N., Samuelsson, S., et al. (2026) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-026-02748-y
Neural processing of facial expressions: An ERP study in athletes and non-athletes
Wu, C., Li, X., & Astikainen, P. (2026) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2026.150574
Dynamic facial movements shape how confident speakers appear
Nölle, J., Wu, Y., Arias, P., Garrod, O., Schyns, P. G., & Jack, R. E. (2026) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2026.2044
Self-citationSatoh, S., & Matsui, H. (2026) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2026.101316
Metadata
- Authors
- Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Jack, Rachael E.
- Schyns, Philippe G.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- R621-R634
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1932659519
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 198
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council (ESRC/MRC-060-25-0010)
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K001973/1, ES/K00607X/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- facial expressions, facial communication, social communication, face perception, cross-cultural perception, social cognition, cultural psychology, avatars, companion robots, deception detection, emotion recognition
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Face, Female, Humans, Male
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review