Functional Profiles of Visual-, Auditory-, and Water Flow-Responsive Neurons in the Zebrafish Tectum
Open accessAbstract
The tectum has long been known as a hub of visual processing, and recent studies have elucidated many of the circuit-level mechanisms by which tectal neurons filter visual information. Here, we use population-scale imaging of tectal neurons expressing a genetically encoded calcium indicator to characterize tectal responses to non-visual stimuli in zebrafish. We identify ensembles of neurons responsive to stimuli for each of three sensory modalities: vision, audition, and water flow sensation. These ensembles display consistently represented response profiles to our stimuli, and each has a preferred stimulus and salient feature to which it is most responsive. Each sensory modality drives a unique spatial profile of activity in the tectal neuropil, suggesting that the neuropil's laminar structure functionally subserves multiple modalities. The positions of the responsive neurons in the periventricular layer are also distinct across modalities, and very few neurons are responsive to multiple modalities. The cells contributing to each ensemble are highly variable from trial to trial, but ensembles contain "cores" of reliably responsive cells, suggesting a mechanism whereby they could maintain consistency in reporting salient stimulus features while retaining flexibility to report on similar stimuli. Finally, we find that co-presentation of auditory or water flow stimuli suppress visual responses in the tectum.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The intermediate and deep layers of the optic tectum receive spatially ordered inputs from other sensory modalities, such as auditory, somatosensory, and lateral line information, in topographical correspondence with the superficial retinotopic visual map.
“The intermediate and deep layers of the optic tectum also receive spatially ordered inputs from other sensory modalities, such as auditory, somatosensory, and lateral line information, in topographical correspondence with the superficial retinotopic visual map”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [138]
Cites
Neural correlations, population coding and computation
Averbeck, B. B., Latham, P. E., & Pouget, A. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1888 · Cited by 1,743 · see citing works
Prey capture behavior evoked by simple visual stimuli in larval zebrafish
Bianco, I. H., Kampff, A. R., & Engert, F. (2011) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00101 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Muto, A., Ohkura, M., Abe, G., Nakai, J., & Kawakami, K. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.12.040 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Visuomotor Transformations Underlying Hunting Behavior in Zebrafish
Bianco, I. H., & Engert, F. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.042 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms
Rodríguez, F., Quintero, B., Amores, L., Madrid, D., Salas-Peña, C., & Salas, C. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082271 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Thompson, A. W., & Scott, E. K. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep34887 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thompson, A. W., Vanwalleghem, G. C., Heap, L. A., & Scott, E. K.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Scott, Ethan K.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 743-754
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2285139664
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- tectum, zebrafish, visual processing, auditory processing, trial-to-trial variability, calcium imaging, genetically encoded calcium indicators
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Calcium, Larva, Microscopy, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Superior Colliculi, Zebrafish, Animals, Genetically Modified
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review