Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox

Open access
Duggan, Ana T., Perdomo, Maria F., Piombino-Mascali, Dario, Marciniak, Stephanie, Poinar, Debi, Emery, Matthew V., Buchmann, Jan P., Duchêne, Sebastian, Jankauskas, Rimantas, Humphreys, Margaret, Golding, G. Brian, Southon, John, Devault, Alison, Rouillard, Jean-Marie, Sahl, Jason W., Dutour, Olivier, Hedman, Klaus, Sajantila, Antti, Smith, Geoffrey L., Holmes, Edward C., Poinar, Hendrik N.·2016·Current Biology

Abstract

Smallpox holds a unique position in the history of medicine. It was the first disease for which a vaccine was developed and remains the only human disease eradicated by vaccination. Although there have been claims of smallpox in Egypt, India, and China dating back millennia [1–4], the timescale of emergence of the causative agent, variola virus (VARV), and how it evolved in the context of increasingly widespread immunization, have proven controversial [4–9]. In particular, some molecular-clock-based studies have suggested that key events in VARV evolution only occurred during the last two centuries [4–6] and hence in apparent conflict with anecdotal historical reports, although it is difficult to distinguish smallpox from other pustular rashes by description alone. To address these issues, we captured, sequenced, and reconstructed a draft genome of an ancient strain of VARV, sampled from a Lithuanian child mummy dating between 1643 and 1665 and close to the time of several documented European epidemics [1, 2, 10]. When compared to vaccinia virus, this archival strain contained the same pattern of gene degradation as 20 th century VARVs, indicating that such loss of gene function had occurred before ca. 1650. Strikingly, the mummy sequence fell basal to all currently sequenced strains of VARV on phylogenetic trees. Molecular-clock analyses revealed a strong clock-like structure and that the timescale of smallpox evolution is more recent than often supposed, with the diversification of major viral lineages only occurring within the 18 th and 19 th centuries, concomitant with the development of modern vaccination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Duggan, A. T., Perdomo, M. F., Piombino-Mascali, D., Marciniak, S., Poinar, D., Emery, M. V., Buchmann, J. P., Duchêne, S., Jankauskas, R., Humphreys, M., Golding, G. B., Southon, J., Devault, A., Rouillard, J.-M., Sahl, J. W., Dutour, O., Hedman, K., Sajantila, A., Smith, G. L., Holmes, E. C., & Poinar, H. N.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
26
Issue
24
Pages
3407-3412
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560352004
Cited by
267
References
22
FWCI
12.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061
The paper
Duggan, A. T., Perdomo, M. F., Piombino-Mascali, D., Marciniak, S., Poinar, D., Emery, M. V., Buchmann, J. P., Duchêne, S., Jankauskas, R., Humphreys, M., Golding, G. B., Southon, J., Devault, A., Rouillard, J.-M., Sahl, J. W., Dutour, O., Hedman, K., Sajantila, A., Smith, G. L., . . . Poinar, H. N. (2016). 17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.