The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox
Open accessAbstract
Smallpox holds a unique position in the history of medicine. It was the first disease for which a vaccine was developed and remains the only human disease eradicated by vaccination. Although there have been claims of smallpox in Egypt, India, and China dating back millennia [1–4], the timescale of emergence of the causative agent, variola virus (VARV), and how it evolved in the context of increasingly widespread immunization, have proven controversial [4–9]. In particular, some molecular-clock-based studies have suggested that key events in VARV evolution only occurred during the last two centuries [4–6] and hence in apparent conflict with anecdotal historical reports, although it is difficult to distinguish smallpox from other pustular rashes by description alone. To address these issues, we captured, sequenced, and reconstructed a draft genome of an ancient strain of VARV, sampled from a Lithuanian child mummy dating between 1643 and 1665 and close to the time of several documented European epidemics [1, 2, 10]. When compared to vaccinia virus, this archival strain contained the same pattern of gene degradation as 20 th century VARVs, indicating that such loss of gene function had occurred before ca. 1650. Strikingly, the mummy sequence fell basal to all currently sequenced strains of VARV on phylogenetic trees. Molecular-clock analyses revealed a strong clock-like structure and that the timescale of smallpox evolution is more recent than often supposed, with the diversification of major viral lineages only occurring within the 18 th and 19 th centuries, concomitant with the development of modern vaccination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., et al. (2010) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110 · Cited by 27,895
Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics
Krzywinski, M., Schein, J., Birol, İ., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S. J., & Marra, M. A. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109 · Cited by 10,964
(1988) · World Health Organization eBooks · Cited by 1,574
Elwood, J. M. (1989) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.43.1.92 · Cited by 1,412
Sonnhammer, E. L. L., & Durbin, R. (1995) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(95)00714-8 · Cited by 777
McNeill, W. H. (1977) · Health Care Management Review · doi:10.1097/00004010-197700220-00022 · Cited by 441
Using Time-Structured Data to Estimate Evolutionary Rates of Double-Stranded DNA Viruses
Firth, C., Kitchen, A., Shapiro, B., Suchard, M. A., Holmes, E. C., & Rambaut, A. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq088 · Cited by 327
Self-citationScheuer, L., Black, S. M., Liversidge, H. M., & Christie, A. (2011) · Cited by 275
Sahl, J. W., Lemmer, D., Travis, J., Schupp, J. M., Gillece, J. D., Aziz, M., Driebe, E. M., Drees, K. P., Hicks, N. D., Williamson, C. H. D., et al. (2016) · Microbial Genomics · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.000074 · Cited by 268
Self-citationOn the origin of smallpox: Correlating variola phylogenics with historical smallpox records
Li, Y., Carroll, D. S., Gardner, S. N., Walsh, M. C., Vitalis, E. A., & Damon, I. K. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609268104 · Cited by 220
Cited by
Ancient pathogen genomics as an emerging tool for infectious disease research
Spyrou, M. A., Bos, K. I., Herbig, A., & Krause, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0119-1 · Cited by 285
Mining Metagenomic Data Sets for Ancient DNA: Recommended Protocols for Authentication
Key, F. M., Posth, C., Krause, J., Herbig, A., & Bos, K. I. (2017) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2017.05.005 · Cited by 118
Efficient DNA sequence compression with neural networks
Silva, M., Pratas, D., & Pinho, A. J. (2020) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa119 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Duggan, A. T., Perdomo, M. F., Piombino-Mascali, D., Marciniak, S., Poinar, D., Emery, M. V., Buchmann, J. P., Duchêne, S., Jankauskas, R., Humphreys, M., Golding, G. B., Southon, J., Devault, A., Rouillard, J.-M., Sahl, J. W., Dutour, O., Hedman, K., Sajantila, A., Smith, G. L., Holmes, E. C., & Poinar, H. N.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 3407-3412
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2560352004
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061
- The paper
- Duggan, A. T., Perdomo, M. F., Piombino-Mascali, D., Marciniak, S., Poinar, D., Emery, M. V., Buchmann, J. P., Duchêne, S., Jankauskas, R., Humphreys, M., Golding, G. B., Southon, J., Devault, A., Rouillard, J.-M., Sahl, J. W., Dutour, O., Hedman, K., Sajantila, A., Smith, G. L., . . . Poinar, H. N. (2016). 17th Century Variola Virus Reveals the Recent History of Smallpox. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.