The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Revision of Symbiodiniaceae Highlights the Antiquity and Diversity of Coral Endosymbionts
Open accessAbstract
The advent of molecular data has transformed the science of organizing and studying life on Earth. Genetics-based evidence provides fundamental insights into the diversity, ecology, and origins of many biological systems, including the mutualisms between metazoan hosts and their micro-algal partners. A well-known example is the dinoflagellate endosymbionts ("zooxanthellae") that power the growth of stony corals and coral reef ecosystems. Once assumed to encompass a single panmictic species, genetic evidence has revealed a divergent and rich diversity within the zooxanthella genus Symbiodinium. Despite decades of reporting on the significance of this diversity, the formal systematics of these eukaryotic microbes have not kept pace, and a major revision is long overdue. With the consideration of molecular, morphological, physiological, and ecological data, we propose that evolutionarily divergent Symbiodinium "clades" are equivalent to genera in the family Symbiodiniaceae, and we provide formal descriptions for seven of them. Additionally, we recalibrate the molecular clock for the group and amend the date for the earliest diversification of this family to the middle of the Mesozoic Era (∼160 mya). This timing corresponds with the adaptive radiation of analogs to modern shallow-water stony corals during the Jurassic Period and connects the rise of these symbiotic dinoflagellates with the emergence and evolutionary success of reef-building corals. This improved framework acknowledges the Symbiodiniaceae's long evolutionary history while filling a pronounced taxonomic gap. Its adoption will facilitate scientific dialog and future research on the physiology, ecology, and evolution of these important micro-algae.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guindon, S., Dufayard, J.-F., Lefort, V., Anisimova, M., Hordijk, W., & Gascuel, O. (2010) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · Cited by 18,376
BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis
Bouckaert, R., Heled, J., Kühnert, D., Vaughan, T., Wu, C.-H., Xie, D., Suchard, M. A., Rambaut, A., & Drummond, A. J. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537 · Cited by 6,527
Dating the Time of Origin of Major Clades: Molecular Clocks and the Fossil Record
Smith, A. B., & Peterson, K. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.30.091201.140057 · Cited by 193 · cited 1×
“The reliability of molecular dating is not only dependent on accurate calibration points but also on a relatively robust phylogeny [44].”
Background
Cited by
A widespread coral-infecting apicomplexan with chlorophyll biosynthesis genes
Kwong, W. K., del Campo, J., Mathur, V., Vermeij, M. J. A., & Keeling, P. J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1072-z · Cited by 145
Lesser, M. P. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab101 · Cited by 66
Kumar, L., Brenner, N., Sledzieski, S., Olaosebikan, M., Roger, L. M., Lynn-Goin, M., Klein-Seetharaman, R., Berger, B., Putnam, H., Yang, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270965 · Cited by 11
Ishii, Y., Kanamori, S., Deguchi, R., Kawata, M., Maruyama, S., Yoshida, T., & Kamikawa, R. (2025) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaf133 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- LaJeunesse, T. C., Parkinson, J. E., Gabrielson, P. W., Jeong, H. J., Reimer, J. D., Voolstra, C. R., & Santos, S. R.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2570-2580.e6
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887754912
- Cited by
- 1,658
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 60.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.