Cited by 139Neural dynamics and brain functionVisual perception and processing mechanismsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Visual Imagery and Perception Share Neural Representations in the Alpha Frequency Band

Open access
Xie, Siying, Kaiser, Daniel, Cichy, Radoslaw M.·2020·Current Biology

Abstract

To behave adaptively with sufficient flexibility, biological organisms must cognize beyond immediate reaction to a physically present stimulus. For this, humans use visual mental imagery [1, 2], the ability to conjure up a vivid internal experience from memory that stands in for the percept of the stimulus. Visually imagined contents subjectively mimic perceived contents, suggesting that imagery and perception share common neural mechanisms. Using multivariate pattern analysis on human electroencephalography (EEG) data, we compared the oscillatory time courses of mental imagery and perception of objects. We found that representations shared between imagery and perception emerged specifically in the alpha frequency band. These representations were present in posterior, but not anterior, electrodes, suggesting an origin in parieto-occipital cortex. Comparison of the shared representations to computational models using representational similarity analysis revealed a relationship to later layers of deep neural networks trained on object representations, but not auditory or semantic models, suggesting representations of complex visual features as the basis of commonality. Together, our results identify and characterize alpha oscillations as a cortical signature of representations shared between visual mental imagery and perception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.074

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stimulus specificity supports the view that oscillations can be modulated in a representationally specific way, rather than only in a nonspecific way across wide areas of cortex.

    “This supports the view that oscillations can be modulated in a representationally specific way (64), rather than only in a nonspecific way across wide areas of cortex.”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [64]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 139

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [71]Xu Y. Vaziri-Pashkam M. Limited correspondence in visual representation between the human brain and convolutional neural networks bioRxiv 2020 10.1101/2020.03.12.989376 · DOI

Authors
Xie, S., Kaiser, D., & Cichy, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Xie, Siying
  • Cichy, Radoslaw M.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
30
Issue
13
Pages
2621-2627.e5
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035521319
Cited by
139
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2020-08-03)
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
  • German Research Foundation (CI241/1-1, CI241/3-1, KA4683/2-1)
  • European Research Council (803370)
  • Chinese Scholarship Council (201706750004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
visual imagery, visual perception, shared neural representations, alpha oscillations, parieto-occipital cortex, representational similarity, deep neural network, object representation, multivariate pattern analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Occipital Lobe, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review