Breaking a species barrier by enabling hybrid recombination
Open accessAbstract
Hybrid sterility maintains reproductive isolation between species by preventing them from exchanging genetic material 1. Anti-recombination can contribute to hybrid sterility when different species' chromosome sequences are too diverged to cross over efficiently during hybrid meiosis, resulting in chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. The genome sequences of the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus have diverged by about 12% and their hybrids are sexually sterile: nearly all of their gametes are aneuploid and inviable. Previous methods to increase hybrid yeast fertility have targeted the anti-recombination machinery by enhancing meiotic crossing over. However, these methods also have counteracting detrimental effects on gamete viability due to increased mutagenesis 2 and ectopic recombination 3. Therefore, the role of anti-recombination has not been fully revealed, and it is often dismissed as a minor player in speciation 1. By repressing two genes, SGS1 and MSH2, specifically during meiosis whilst maintaining their mitotic expression, we were able to increase hybrid fertility 70-fold, to the level of non-hybrid crosses, confirming that anti-recombination is the principal cause of hybrid sterility. Breaking this species barrier allows us to generate, for the first time, viable euploid gametes containing recombinant hybrid genomes from these two highly diverged parent species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Confirmation that a gene participates in an incompatibility will ultimately require experimental validation.
“Confirmation that a gene participates in an incompatibility will ultimately require experimental validation (see, e.g., Bozdag et al. 2021)”
From Finding Hybrid Incompatibilities Using Genome Sequences from Hybrid Populations (2021) · cites this paper as Bozdag et al. 2021
Cites
Myung, K., Datta, A., Chen, C., & Kolodner, R. D. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/83673 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Zakharyevich, K., Tang, S.-M., Ma, Y.-M., & Hunter, N. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.023 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Self-citationThe mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid.
Hunter, N., Chambers, S. R., Louis, E. J., & Borts, R. H. (1996) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00518.x · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Self-citationSequence Diversity, Reproductive Isolation and Species Concepts in Saccharomyces
Liti, G., Barton, D. B. H., & Louis, E. J. (2006) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.106.062166 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Grandin, N., & Reed, S. I. (1993) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.13.4.2113 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces
Greig, D., Travisano, M., Louis, E. J., & Borts, R. H. (2003) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00546.x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citationChromosomal variation segregates within incipient species and correlates with reproductive isolation
Charron, G., Leducq, J., & Landry, C. R. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12864 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Understanding how mismatch repair proteins participate in the repair/anti-recombination decision
Chakraborty, U., & Alani, E. (2016) · FEMS Yeast Research · doi:10.1093/femsyr/fow071 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Kao, K. C., Schwartz, K., & Sherlock, G. J. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001038 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The genomic consequences of hybridization
Moran, B. M., Payne, C. Y., Langdon, Q. K., Powell, D. L., Brandvain, Y. J., & Schumer, M. E. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.69016 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Meiosis: Dances Between Homologs
Zickler, D., & Kleckner, N. E. (2023) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-061323-044915 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
The evolving species concepts used for yeasts: from phenotypes and genomes to speciation networks
Boekhout, T., Aime, M. C., Begerow, D., Gabaldón, T., Heitman, J., Kemler, M., Khayhan, K., Lachance, M., Louis, E. J., Sun, S., et al. (2021) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-021-00475-9 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Saccharomyces yeast hybrids on the rise
Bendixsen, D. P., Frazão, J. G. F. L., & Stelkens, R. B. (2021) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.3684 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Reifová, R., Ament‐Velásquez, S. L., Bourgeois, Y., Coughlan, J. M., Kulmuni, J., Lipinska, A. P., Okude, G., Stevison, L. S., Yoshida, K., & Kitano, J. (2023) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a041607 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The evolutionary and ecological potential of yeast hybrids
Stelkens, R. B., & Bendixsen, D. P. (2022) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2022.101958 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Sugar‐seeking insects as a source of diverse bread‐making yeasts with enhanced attributes
Madden, A. A., Lahue, C., Gordy, C. L., Little, J. L., Nichols, L. M., Calvert, M. D., Dunn, R. R., & Heil, C. S. (2021) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.3676 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Dluzewska, J., Dzięgielewski, W., Szymańska-Lejman, M., Gazecka, M., Henderson, I. R., Higgins, J. D., & Ziółkowski, P. A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42511-z · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Krogerus, K., Magalhães, F., Castillo, S., Gopalacharyulu, P. V., Vidgren, V., Chiara, M. D., Yue, J., Liti, G., & Gibson, B. R. (2021) · Frontiers in Fungal Biology · doi:10.3389/ffunb.2021.733655 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Meiotic Recognition of Evolutionarily Diverged Homologs: Chromosomal Hybrid Sterility Revisited
Forejt, J., & Jansa, P. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad083 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mismatch repair disturbs meiotic crossover control in S. cerevisiae
Harper, J. A., Cooper, T. J., Crawford, M. R., Hunt, L. J., Allison, R. M., Marsolier‐Kergoat, M., Llorente, B., & Neale, M. J. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf1136 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Genome-scale patterns in the loss of heterozygosity incidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Tutaj, H., Pirog, A., Tomala, K., & Korona, R. (2022) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyac032 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation
Bozdag, G. O., & Ono, J. (2022) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2022.101952 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationNeutralism versus selectionism: Chargaff's second parity rule, revisited
Forsdyke, D. R. (2021) · Genetica · doi:10.1007/s10709-021-00119-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation revisited
Frayer, M. E., Robles, N. V., Rodríguez-Barrera, M. J., Coughlan, J. M., & Schumer, M. E. (2025) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2025.07.003 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Meiosis in allopolyploid Arabidopsis suecica
Nibau, C., Gonzalo, A., Evans, A., Sweet‐Jones, W., Phillips, D. W., & Lloyd, A. H. (2022) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.15879 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Patterns of Genomic Instability in Interspecific Yeast Hybrids With Diverse Ancestries
Bendixsen, D. P., Peris, D., & Stelkens, R. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Fungal Biology · doi:10.3389/ffunb.2021.742894 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Meiosis through three centuries
Jones, G., Kleckner, N. E., & Zickler, D. (2024) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-024-00822-0 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Kitano, J., & Okude, G. (2024) · Evolutionary Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/evolinnean/kzae022 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Enforcement of Postzygotic Species Boundaries in the Fungal Kingdom
Chou, J., Hsu, P., & Leu, J. (2022) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00098-22 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationFinding Hybrid Incompatibilities Using Genome Sequences from Hybrid Populations
Blanckaert, A., & Payseur, B. A. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab168 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Complementary Oligonucleotides Rendered Discordant by Single Base Mutations May Drive Speciation
Forsdyke, D. R. (2021) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1007/s13752-021-00380-z · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A microbial perspective on speciation
Stelkens, R. B. (2024) · Evolutionary Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/evolinnean/kzae023 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Antunovics, Z., Szabó, A. M., Heistinger, L., Mattanovich, D., & Sipiczki, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27693-2 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bendixsen, D. P., Gilchrist, C., Haberkorn, C., Persson, K. O., Geijer, C., Warringer, J., & Stelkens, R. B. (2025) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.70110 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Chriss, A., Börner, G. V., & Ryan, S. D. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011416 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Foe, V. E. (2022) · Integrative Organismal Biology · doi:10.1093/iob/obac008 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
de la Cerda, R., Thompson, G., Zhang, P., Hokamp, K., Roche, F. M., Carlin, S., Vrhovšek, U., & Bond, U. (2022) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.3815 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ren, L., Zeng, Y., Liu, Q., Tu, X., Chen, F., Wu, H., Wang, C., Wu, C., Luo, M., Tai, Y., et al. (2025) · Science China Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11427-024-2868-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Homologous recombination counteracts mismatch repair to promote fertility and genetic diversity
Wang, T., & Liao, J.-L. (2025) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2025.10.009 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pervasive weak incompatibilities shape phenotypic variation and genome evolution in yeast hybrids
Martínez, A. A., & Lang, G. I. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-77469-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Recruiting Distant Hybridization for Reshaping Meiotic Recombination
Rabbani, M. T., & Nayak, G. (2023) · Plant Breeding and Biotechnology · doi:10.9787/pbb.2023.11.3.168 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast
Schwarzkopf, E. J., Brandt, N. J., & Heil, C. S. (2025) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011585 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hung, Y.-L., Chuang, C.-N., Kim, H.-X., Liu, H.-C., Yao, J.-S., Jovanska, L., Hsueh, Y., Chen, R.-S., & Wang, T. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf847 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Haberkorn, C., Gettle, N., Elsen, J., Medina-Chávez, N. O., Sivigny, J., Baselga‐Cervera, B., Greig, D., Travisano, M., Saxer, G., & Stelkens, R. B. (2026) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpag108 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationOverton, M. S., & Kryazhimskiy, S. (2025) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyaf274 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mapping Species Birth Across the Recombination Landscapes of Marine Snails
Giles, E. C., Laso‐Jadart, R., Ortíz-Barrientos, D., Carimán, P., Delrieu‐Trottin, E., Guillemin, M., Mona, S., Pochon, X., & Saenz‐Agudelo, P. (2025) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.70108 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bateson’s Residue: Oligonucleotide Disharmony May Drive Speciation
Cock, A. G., & Forsdyke, D. R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-92099-9_29
Wang, J.-T. J., Ng, P. L. P., Powers, M. E., Rha, C. H., & Brem, R. B. (2025) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyaf233
LaPolice, T. M., Howe, C. N., Locatelli, N. S., & Huber, C. D. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.02.26.708281
Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Wang, C., & Liu, D. (2026) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2026.743969
Fusek, K., Jansa, P., & Forejt, J. (2026) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes17070795
- Authors
- Bozdag, G. O., Ono, J., Denton, J. A., Karakoc, E., Hunter, N., Leu, J.-Y., & Greig, D.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica (TW)
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ono, Jasmine
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- R180-R181
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3131052818
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2017-438)
- Royal Society (ALTF 265-2017)
- Max-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- hybrid sterility, hybrid fertility, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces paradoxus, meiotic crossover, Sgs1, MSH2, meiotic recombination, reproductive isolation, speciation, aneuploidy, chromosome missegregation
- MeSH terms
- Aneuploidy, Hybridization, Genetic, Meiosis, Recombination, Genetic, Saccharomyces, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chromosome Segregation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, MutS Homolog 2 Protein, RecQ Helicases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review