Cited by 175Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringInfrared Thermography in MedicineEmotion and Mood Recognition

Interacting with human physiology

Pavlidis, I., Dowdall, J., Sun, N., Puri, C., Fei, J., Garbey, M.·2007·Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cviu.2006.11.018

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavlidis, I., Dowdall, J., Sun, N., Puri, C., Fei, J., & Garbey, M.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Pavlidis, I.
Venue
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
108
Issue
1-2
Pages
150-170
ISSN
1077-3142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023513210
Cited by
175
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Vision and Image Understanding (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Houston
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Infrared Thermography in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
physiological monitoring, human-machine interaction, infrared thermography, vital signs, respiration rate, health monitoring, collaborative interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review