The differential expression of IL-4 and IL-13 and its impact on type-2 immunity
Open accessAbstract
Allergic disease represents a significant global health burden, and disease incidence continues to rise in urban areas of the world. As such, a better understanding of the basic immune mechanisms underlying disease pathology are key to developing therapeutic interventions to both prevent disease onset as well as to ameliorate disease morbidity in those individuals already suffering from a disorder linked to type-2 inflammation. Two factors central to type-2 immunity are interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13, which have been linked to virtually all major hallmarks associated with type-2 inflammation. Therefore, IL-4 and IL-13 and their regulatory pathways represent ideal targets to suppress disease. Despite sharing many common regulatory pathways and receptors, these cytokines perform very distinct functions during a type-2 immune response. This review summarizes the literature surrounding the function and expression of IL-4 and IL-13 in CD4+ T cells and innate immune cells. It highlights recent findings in vivo regarding the differential expression and non-canonical regulation of IL-4 and IL-13 in various immune cells, which likely play important and underappreciated roles in type-2 immunity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IL-4 appears more relevant for the central part of the TH2 pathway.
“Whereas IL-4 seems to be more relevant for the central part of the TH2 pathway87”
From Atopic dermatitis: an expanding therapeutic pipeline for a complex disease (2022) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 243 · Cited by 316
- Authors
- Bao, K., & Reinhardt, R. L.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reinhardt, R. Lee
- Venue
- Cytokine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-37
- ISSN
- 1043-4666 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5118948
- OpenAlex
- W2216792268
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 243
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cytokine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI119004, T32AI052077)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- IL-4, IL-13, Th2 immune response, allergic diseases, CD4+ T cells, innate immune cells, cytokine regulation, type 2 inflammation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immune System, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Interleukin-4, Cytokines, Th2 Cells, Interleukin-13, STAT3 Transcription Factor, STAT6 Transcription Factor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review