Atopic dermatitis: an expanding therapeutic pipeline for a complex disease
Open accessAbstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathophysiology that underlies a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes. AD remains challenging to treat owing to the limited response to available therapies. However, recent advances in understanding of disease mechanisms have led to the discovery of novel potential therapeutic targets and drug candidates. In addition to regulatory approval for the IL-4Ra inhibitor dupilumab, the anti-IL-13 inhibitor tralokinumab and the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib in Europe, there are now more than 70 new compounds in development. This Review assesses the various strategies and novel agents currently being investigated for AD and highlights the potential for a precision medicine approach to enable prevention and more effective long-term control of this complex disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
94 of 276 cited sources checked · 40 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
S1P has been reported to be increased in various conditions, including multiple sclerosis, neurodegeneration, pneumonia, psoriasis, asthma, and more recently AD.
“S1P acts via gradients in circulatory fluids and has been reported to be increased in various conditions such as multiple sclerosis and neurodegeneration158, pneumonia159, psoriasis160, asthma161 and more recently in AD162.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 5 sources checked- cites [158] Alessenko, A. V. & Albi, E. Exploring sphingolipid implications in neurodegeneration. Front. Neurol. 11, 437 (2020). source
Citation 158 is attached to the multiple-sclerosis and neurodegeneration portion of the sentence, not to pneumonia, psoriasis, asthma, or AD. The Alzheimer's Disease section reports reduced S1P in a brain region of patients with AD, a neurodegenerative condition, rather than increased S1P. The Neurodegenerative Disorders section says sphingolipids change in these diseases but does not establish an S1P increase in multiple sclerosis (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.82)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [159] Hsu, S. C. et al. Circulating sphingosine-1-phosphate as a prognostic biomarker for community-acquired pneumonia. PLoS ONE 14, e0216963 (2019). source
- cites [160] Checa, A. et al. Circulating levels of sphingosine-1-phosphate are elevated in severe, but not mild psoriasis and are unresponsive to anti-TNF-alpha treatment. Sci. Rep. 5, 12017 (2015). source
Citation 160 is attached to psoriasis, not the other conditions listed. The Results report elevated circulating S1P in severe psoriasis compared with healthy controls, but no significant difference in mild psoriasis. The unqualified reference to psoriasis omits that limitation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [161] Kim, S. H. et al. Ceramide/sphingosine-1-phosphate imbalance is associated with distinct inflammatory phenotypes of uncontrolled asthma. Allergy 75, 1991–2004 (2020). source
- cites [162] Sakai, T. et al. Serum sphingosine-1-phosphate is elevated in atopic dermatitis and associated with the severity and inflammation. Allergy https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14826 (2021). source
- Premisecitation
Disease severity remains the basis for the treatment algorithm in current atopic dermatitis guidelines.
“For practical purposes, disease severity remains the basis for the treatment algorithm in the current guidelines31–35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 5 sources checked- cites [31] Wollenberg, A. et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 32, 657–682 (2018). source
- cites [32] Wollenberg, A. et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part II. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 32, 850–878 (2018). source
- cites [33] Katayama, I. et al. Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis 2017. Allergol. Int. 66, 230–247 (2017). source
- cites [34] Eichenfield, L. F. et al. Current guidelines for the evaluation and management of atopic dermatitis: a comparison of the Joint Task Force Practice Parameter and American Academy of Dermatology guidelines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 139, S49–S57 (2017). source
- cites [35] Wollenberg, A. et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema Task Force 2020 Position Paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 34, 2717–2744 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Baricitinib is a small molecule that interacts with multiple signal transduction pathways linked to several cytokine receptors and immune pathways.
“whereas baricitinib exemplifies a more wide-ranging approach using small molecules17 that interact with multiple signal transduction pathways linked to several cytokine receptors and immune pathways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Schwartz, D. M. et al. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 843–862 (2017). Excellent review on the mode of action of JAK inhibitors. source
- Premisecitation
The sequential and/or cumulative immunological events underlying the complex clinical phenotype are key to understanding the value of targeted therapies for distinct pathways such as TH2, TH17, and/or TH22.
“The sequential and/or cumulative immunological events that underlie the complex clinical phenotype are key to understanding the value of targeted therapies for distinct pathways such as TH2, TH17 and/or TH22 response124,125.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [124] Czarnowicki, T. et al. Evolution of pathologic T-cell subsets in patients with atopic dermatitis from infancy to adulthood. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 215–228 (2020). source
- cites [125] Renert-Yuval, Y. et al. The molecular features of normal and atopic dermatitis skin in infants, children, adolescents and adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 148, 148–163 (2021). source
The Results describe age-related differences in TH2, TH17 and TH22 markers, and the Discussion says these differences may inform the choice of targeted treatment. The paper does not establish sequential or cumulative immunological events underlying the clinical phenotype, or the value of therapies targeting each of the three pathways; it says the treatment implications require age-specific clinical trials. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Mutations or variants of genes such as SPINK5 favour the generation of allergen-independent, nonspecific inflammation, providing a pro-TH2 micromilieu via keratinocyte-derived alarmins such as TSLP, IL-33, and IL-25.
“Mutations or variants of genes such as SPINK5 favour the generation of allergen-independent, nonspecific inflammation, providing a pro-T helper 2 (TH2) micromilieu by virtue of keratinocyte-derived alarmins such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-33 and IL-25 (refs52,64).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [52] Briot, A. et al. Kallikrein 5 induces atopic dermatitis-like lesions through PAR2-mediated thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in Netherton syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 206, 1135–1147 (2009). source
The Discussion (Figure 8; page unavailable) describes SPINK5 deficiency as initiating inflammation independently of environmental factors and creating a pro-Th2 microenvironment through keratinocyte-derived TSLP. The cited paper does not identify IL-33 or IL-25 as mediators of that pathway, so it supports only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [64] Hammad, H. & Lambrecht, B. N. Barrier epithelial cells and the control of type 2 immunity. Immunity 43, 29–40 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
Etokimab inhibited direct and CXCR1-dependent neutrophil migration in vitro.
“Etokimab inhibited direct, as well as CXCR1-dependent, neutrophil migration in vitro.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Chen, Y. L. et al. Proof-of-concept clinical trial of etokimab shows a key role for IL-33 in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis. Sci. Transl Med. 11, eaax2945 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
The improvement after a single dose of etokimab lasted for up to 140 days.
“Interestingly, this improvement lasted for up to 140 days after the single dose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Chen, Y. L. et al. Proof-of-concept clinical trial of etokimab shows a key role for IL-33 in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis. Sci. Transl Med. 11, eaax2945 (2019). source
The Efficacy section reports that clinical improvement after a single dose was sustained through day 57, but does not report that it lasted to day 140. Day 140 appears in the Pharmacodynamics section for an IgE measurement, not a clinical improvement outcome. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
IL-1α has been considered a therapeutic target in atopic dermatitis.
“As one of the first and most important mediators in antigen presentation and induction of the inflammatory cascade, IL-1α has been considered as a therapeutic target in AD69.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Archer, N. K. et al. Injury, dysbiosis, and filaggrin deficiency drive skin inflammation through keratinocyte IL-1alpha release. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 143, 1426–1443 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
Tezepelumab has shown convincing results in patients with severe and uncontrolled allergic asthma.
“The anti-TSLP antibody tezepelumab (AMG 157) has shown convincing results in patients with severe and uncontrolled allergic asthma65,66.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [65] Menzies-Gow, A. et al. DESTINATION: a phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of tezepelumab in adults and adolescents with severe, uncontrolled asthma. Respir. Res. 21, 279 (2020). source
The Background (page unavailable) reports that tezepelumab significantly reduced exacerbations and improved other outcomes in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. It does not identify those patients as having allergic asthma or report results specifically for that subgroup. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [66] Mullard, A. Tezepelumab prepares to enter the asthma antibody fray. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20, 91 (2021). source
- Premisecitation
In a mouse model, colonization with Staphylococcus aureus induces IL-36R- and IL-1R-dependent inflammation.
“Interestingly, in a mouse model, colonization with S. aureus induces IL-36R- and IL-1R-dependent inflammation73.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Liu, H. et al. Staphylococcus aureus epicutaneous exposure drives skin inflammation via IL-36-mediated T cell responses. Cell Host Microbe 22, 653–666 (2017). Report on the direct impact of the microbiome on inflammation via the IL-36 pathway. source
In the Results section on IL-36R signaling (page unavailable), mice lacking IL-36R had substantially less skin inflammation after epicutaneous S. aureus exposure, supporting IL-36R dependence. The IL-1R-dependent part is not supported: mice lacking either IL-1α or IL-1β had inflammation measures similar to controls, and the paper distinguishes this epicutaneous response from the IL-1β response to intradermal infection. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In patients with severe AD (SCORAD >50), fezakinumab produced a significantly greater mean decline in SCORAD than placebo.
“encouraging results were seen in patients with severe forms (SCORAD >50) where the mean decline in SCORAD was significantly better than in the placebo group122.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. Efficacy and safety of fezakinumab (an IL-22 monoclonal antibody) in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by conventional treatments: a randomized, double-blind, phase 2a trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 78, 872–881 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
After re-randomization at week 16 and maintenance treatment, IGA 0/1 was reached by 51% in ECZTRA1 and 59% in ECZTRA2.
“after re-randomization at week 16 followed by maintenance treatment, the clinical response further improved, with IGA 0/1 being reached in 51% (ECZTRA1) and 59% (ECZTRA2) of the patients92.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] Wollenberg, A. et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). Br. J. Dermatol. 184, 437–449 (2020). source
The Results (Maintenance outcomes at week 52) report IGA 0 or 1 in 51% of ECZTRA 1 patients and 59% of ECZTRA 2 patients who continued tralokinumab every two weeks after rerandomization. These percentages describe maintenance of response among patients who had already achieved IGA 0 or 1 at week 16, not a further improvement among patients generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
There is increasing evidence that the IL-23-IL-17 axis and IL-36 may have a role in some AD subtypes, such as the intrinsic form and in Asian patients.
“there is increasing evidence that the IL-23–IL-17 axis as well as IL-36 (see above) may have a role, at least in some AD subtypes such as the so-called intrinsic form and in Asian patients73,103,117,123–125.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 6 sources checked- cites [73] Liu, H. et al. Staphylococcus aureus epicutaneous exposure drives skin inflammation via IL-36-mediated T cell responses. Cell Host Microbe 22, 653–666 (2017). Report on the direct impact of the microbiome on inflammation via the IL-36 pathway. source
The Discussion (page unavailable) links IL-36 signaling to IL-17-producing T-cell responses in a mouse model of S. aureus-induced skin inflammation and relates the findings to human atopic dermatitis. It does not establish a role for the IL-23–IL-17 axis or address intrinsic atopic dermatitis or Asian patients, so the subtype-specific claim is not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [103] Suarez-Farinas, M. et al. Intrinsic atopic dermatitis shows similar TH2 and higher TH17 immune activation compared with extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 132, 361–370 (2013). source
The Results and Discussion report stronger IL-17/Th17 and IL-23-related activity in intrinsic than extrinsic atopic dermatitis, supporting a possible role for that axis in the intrinsic subtype. The paper mentions IL-36 only in discussing a proposed mechanism drawn from psoriasis research; it does not establish a role for IL-36 in atopic dermatitis or address Asian patients. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [117] Esaki, H. et al. Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is TH2 but also TH17 polarized in skin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138, 1639–1651 (2016). source
- cites [123] Noda, S. et al. The Asian atopic dermatitis phenotype combines features of atopic dermatitis and psoriasis with increased TH17 polarization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 136, 1254–1264 (2015). The first report on TH17 immune polarization in Asian patients, questioning the dogma of the TH2 immune dominance in AD. source
- cites [124] Czarnowicki, T. et al. Evolution of pathologic T-cell subsets in patients with atopic dermatitis from infancy to adulthood. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 215–228 (2020). source
The Discussion reports an IL-17 signature in pediatric atopic dermatitis skin, providing limited support for a role for IL-17 in a subtype of the disease. It does not establish a role for the IL-23–IL-17 axis or IL-36, or address the intrinsic form or Asian patients; searches for those terms found no relevant passage. The cited copy provides no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [125] Renert-Yuval, Y. et al. The molecular features of normal and atopic dermatitis skin in infants, children, adolescents and adults. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 148, 148–163 (2021). source
The Results and Discussion report elevated IL-17 and other TH17-related markers in atopic dermatitis, particularly in infants, supporting a possible role for that pathway. The passages do not establish a role for IL-36 or address the specified intrinsic and Asian patient subtypes; searches for those terms did not find relevant passages. The cited paper studies age groups rather than those subtypes. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In the entire fezakinumab study population, there was no significant difference in change in SCORAD from baseline as the primary end point.
“When considering the entire study population, there was no significant difference in the change of SCORAD compared with baseline as the primary end point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. Efficacy and safety of fezakinumab (an IL-22 monoclonal antibody) in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by conventional treatments: a randomized, double-blind, phase 2a trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 78, 872–881 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
IL-4 appears more relevant for the central part of the TH2 pathway.
“Whereas IL-4 seems to be more relevant for the central part of the TH2 pathway87”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Bao, K. & Reinhardt, R. L. The differential expression of IL-4 and IL-13 and its impact on type-2 immunity. Cytokine 75, 25–37 (2015). Important paper explaining the different roles and impacts of IL-4 and IL-13 within the TH2 immune response and inflammation. source
- Premisecitation
IL-13 has been identified as the key TH2 cytokine mediating skin inflammation in AD.
“IL-13 has been identified as the key TH2 cytokine mediating the skin inflammation in AD88,89.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [88] Tsoi, L. C. et al. Atopic dermatitis is an IL-13-dominant disease with greater molecular heterogeneity compared to psoriasis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139, 1480–1489 (2019). source
- cites [89] Bieber, T. Interleukin-13: targeting an underestimated cytokine in atopic dermatitis. Allergy 75, 54–62 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
Clinical improvement was shown in a small series of patients treated with omalizumab and/or immunoadsorption.
“clinical improvement was shown in a small series of patients using omalizumab and/or immunoadsorption109–112.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [109] Zink, A. et al. Targeting IgE in severe atopic dermatitis with a combination of immunoadsorption and omalizumab. Acta Derm. Venereol. 96, 72–76 (2016). source
- cites [110] Hotze, M. et al. Increased efficacy of omalizumab in atopic dermatitis patients with wild-type filaggrin status and higher serum levels of phosphatidylcholines. Allergy 69, 132–135 (2014). source
- cites [111] Lane, J. E., Cheyney, J. M., Lane, T. N., Kent, D. E. & Cohen, D. J. Treatment of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis with omalizumab. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 54, 68–72 (2006). source
- cites [112] Holm, J. G., Agner, T., Sand, C. & Thomsen, S. F. Omalizumab for atopic dermatitis: case series and a systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Dermatol. 56, 18–26 (2017). source
- Premisecitation
In a phase IIb dose-finding study, lebrikizumab 250 mg gave the best primary-end-point response, with 72% improvement versus 41% with placebo.
“In a phase IIb dose-finding study, the best clinical response for the primary end point (percentage change in EASI) was obtained with 250 mg. In this group, 72% improvement was shown versus 41% in the placebo group96.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab, a high-affinity interleukin 13 inhibitor, in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 2b randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 156, 411–420 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
IL-22 is an important part of the transcriptomic signature in AD.
“IL-22 is an important part of the transcriptomic signature in AD116,117.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [116] Nograles, K. E. et al. IL-22-producing “T22” T cells account for upregulated IL-22 in atopic dermatitis despite reduced IL-17-producing TH17 T cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 123, 1244–1252 (2009). source
- cites [117] Esaki, H. et al. Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is TH2 but also TH17 polarized in skin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 138, 1639–1651 (2016). source
- Premisecitation
In vitro and animal-model evidence indicates that CRTH2 has an important role in TH2-mediated AD inflammation by directing migration into the skin.
“as shown in vitro and in animal models154,155, has an important role in TH2-mediated inflammation of AD by directing their migration into the skin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [154] Boehme, S. A. et al. A small molecule CRTH2 antagonist inhibits FITC-induced allergic cutaneous inflammation. Int. Immunol. 21, 81–93 (2008). source
- cites [155] He, R. et al. The prostaglandin D(2) receptor CRTH2 is important for allergic skin inflammation after epicutaneous antigen challenge. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 784–790 (2010). source
The Introduction reports CRTH2-mediated chemotaxis in vitro, and the Results section on acute OVA challenge reports reduced skin infiltration by CD4+ cells and eosinophils in CRTH2-deficient mice (page numbers unavailable). But the Results on repeated sensitization find no important role for CRTH2 in chronic skin inflammation. The evidence therefore supports migration-related inflammation in an acute mouse model, not an unqualified role in AD inflammation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A maximal-use phase II study in Japanese children and adolescents confirmed the good safety and tolerance profile of difamilast.
“A maximal-use phase II study in Japanese children and adolescents confirmed the good safety and tolerance profile of this compound135.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] Saeki, H., Baba, N., Oshiden, K., Abe, Y. & Tsubouchi, H. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OPA- 15406 (difamilast), a new topical selective phosphodiesterase type-4 inhibitor, in Japanese pediatric patients aged 2-14 years with atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. 47, 17–24 (2020). source
The Methods (Study design; page unavailable) describe a randomized, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study in Japan, not a maximal-use study. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports no serious treatment-emergent adverse events and suggests a favorable safety profile. The Introduction (page unavailable) attributes the maximal-use finding to a separate study conducted in the USA, so the claim conflates the two studies. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
PDE4 inhibitors have a wide spectrum of therapeutic effects related to downregulation of inflammatory cytokines in pulmonary, neurological, rheumatoid, gastrointestinal, and dermatological disorders.
“PDE4 inhibitors are known to have a wide spectrum of interesting therapeutic effects related to downregulation of inflammatory cytokines involved in pulmonary, neurological, rheumatoid, gastrointestinal and dermatological disorders128.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [128] Li, H., Zuo, J. & Tang, W. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 9, 1048 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
Pilot open-label studies of apremilast provided promising results.
“Pilot open-label studies of this PDE4 inhibitor provided promising results129,130.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [129] Samrao, A., Berry, T. M., Goreshi, R. & Simpson, E. L. A pilot study of an oral phosphodiesterase inhibitor (apremilast) for atopic dermatitis in adults. Arch. Dermatol. 148, 890–897 (2012). source
- cites [130] Volf, E. M., Au, S. C., Dumont, N., Scheinman, P. & Gottlieb, A. B. A phase 2, open-label, investigator-initiated study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apremilast in subjects with recalcitrant allergic contact or atopic dermatitis. J. Drugs Dermatol. 11, 341–346 (2012).
- Interpretationcitation
Because neurons express IL-4 and IL-13 receptors, the early itch improvement seen with dupilumab, tralokinumab, or lebrikizumab supports a direct effect of these drugs on nerve endings.
“As neurons express receptors for IL-4 and IL-13, the early improvement of itch upon targeted therapy with dupilumab, tralokinumab or lebrikizumab supports the assumption of a direct effect of these drugs on nerve endings92,96,183.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [92] Wollenberg, A. et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from two 52-week, randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase III trials (ECZTRA 1 and ECZTRA 2). Br. J. Dermatol. 184, 437–449 (2020). source
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that itch improved as early as week 1 with tralokinumab versus placebo. The paper does not establish neuronal IL-4 or IL-13 receptor expression or infer a direct effect on nerve endings; it also does not report early itch outcomes for dupilumab or lebrikizumab. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [96] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. Efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab, a high-affinity interleukin 13 inhibitor, in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 2b randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 156, 411–420 (2020). source
- cites [183] Simpson, E. L. et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 2335–2348 (2016). Reports on the pivotal studies that have led to the approval of dupilumab as the first-in-class biologic for the therapy of AD. source
The Measures of Pruritus section (p. 6) reports significantly better itching scores with dupilumab than placebo by week 2, and the Background (p. 2) says dupilumab inhibits IL-4 and IL-13 signaling. The paper does not establish that neurons express those receptors, assess tralokinumab or lebrikizumab, or propose a direct effect on nerve endings. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: Neurons express receptors for IL-4 and IL-13.
- Premisecitation
Substance P is involved in the initiation and transmission of itch through NK1R and MRGPRS expressed in the central nervous system and on various other cell types.
“Substance P is involved in the initiation and transmission of itch through the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R)195,196 and the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor (MRGPRS)197,198 expressed in the central nervous system and on various other cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [195] Steinhoff, M. S., von Mentzer, B., Geppetti, P., Pothoulakis, C. & Bunnett, N. W. Tachykinins and their receptors: contributions to physiological control and the mechanisms of disease. Physiol. Rev. 94, 265–301 (2014). source
The review’s “Dermatitis and pruritus” section (p. 20) identifies substance P as a mediator of itch in atopic dermatitis, and “Sensory Disorders of Pain and Pruritus” (p. 26) reports that NK1R antagonism reduced scratching or itch in the studies discussed. Its “NKR activation in DRG and spinal cord” section (p. 21) describes NK1R on spinal neurons, but the passages found do not support the claim that substance P acts through MRGPRs to initiate or transmit itch. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [196] Douglas, S. D. & Leeman, S. E. Neurokinin-1 receptor: functional significance in the immune system in reference to selected infections and inflammation. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1217, 83–95 (2011). source
The ‘Neurokinin 1 receptor’ section identifies NK1R as substance P’s preferred receptor and links their interaction to pain transmission. The ‘Substance P’ section reports substance P receptors on CNS cells. Neither passage establishes that the SP–NK1R pathway initiates or transmits itch; the separate MRGPRS citations are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [197] Azimi, E. et al. Dual action of neurokinin-1 antagonists on Mas-related GPCRs. JCI Insight 1, e89362 (2016). source
The Discussion (p. 5) reports that substance P–mediated scratching in mice correlates with Mrgpr activation, and that Mrgprs are expressed on sensory neurons and mast cells. The paper does not establish the claim that these receptors transmit itch in the central nervous system; its expression evidence concerns dorsal root ganglion neurons and mast cells. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
IL-31 signals through heterodimerization of IL-31Rα and OSMRβ.
“It signals through the heterodimerization of IL-31Rα and the oncostatin M receptor-β (OSMRβ)186,187.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [186] Jones, S. A. & Jenkins, B. J. Recent insights into targeting the IL-6 cytokine family in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18, 773–789 (2018). source
- cites [187] Hermanns, H. M. Oncostatin M and interleukin-31: cytokines, receptors, signal transduction and physiology. Cytokine Growth Factor. Rev. 26, 545–558 (2015). source
- Premisecitation
In a phase III study with 375 patients, the NK1R antagonist tradipitant missed the primary end point of reduction in pruritus.
“In a phase III study with 375 patients, another novel NK1R antagonist tradipitant (VLY-686) (EPIONE study), missed the primary end point of reduction in pruritus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [206] Welsh, S. E. et al. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist tradipitant has mixed effects on itch in atopic dermatitis: results from EPIONE, a randomized clinical trial. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35, e338–e340 (2021). source
- Premisecitation
After successful phase III studies, topical delgocitinib ointment was approved in 2020 for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in Japan.
“After successful phase III studies224,225, topical delgocitinib ointment was approved in 2020 for moderate to severe AD in Japan226.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [224] Nakagawa, H. et al. Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and an open-label, long-term extension study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 82, 823–831 (2020). source
- cites [225] Nakagawa, H. et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. 47, 114–120 (2020). source
Citation 226 is attached to the approval claim, not the preceding phase III results. The Introduction and Discussion describe Japanese delgocitinib studies and their efficacy, but our copy does not state that the ointment was approved in 2020 or specify an approved indication; searches for approval and 2020 found no such passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [226] Dhillon, S. Delgocitinib: first approval. Drugs 80, 609–615 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
Abrocitinib showed similar significant results in phase III studies.
“The other JAK1-selective JAKi abrocitinib showed similar significant results in phase III238 studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [238] Simpson, E. L. et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 396, 255–266 (2020). Report on a pivotal study showing the good results obtained with the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib in AD. source
- Premisecitation
SYK is a crucial signalling molecule for the high-affinity IgE receptor expressed on epidermal Langerhans cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells.
“Besides T cell activation, SYK is a crucial signalling molecule for the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcεRI) expressed on epidermal Langerhans cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells229–231.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [229] Bieber, T. et al. Human epidermal Langerhans cells express the high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E (Fc epsilon RI). J. Exp. Med. 175, 1285–1290 (1992). source
The Summary (p. 1285) states that epidermal Langerhans cells express FcεRI, and the results (p. 1286) identify FcεRI-positive epidermal dendritic cells as Langerhans cells. The cited paper does not establish SYK’s signalling role or address inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [230] Jurgens, M., Wollenberg, A., Hanau, D., de la Salle, H. & Bieber, T. Activation of human epidermal Langerhans cells by engagement of the high affinity receptor for IgE, Fc epsilon RI. J. Immunol. 155, 5184–5189 (1995). source
- cites [231] Klaeschen, A. S. et al. JAK1/2 inhibition impairs the development and function of inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 147, 2202–2212.e8 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In that phase III study, a 50% reduction in SCORAD from baseline was noticed in mild forms of atopic dermatitis.
“However, reduction of 50% in SCORAD from baseline was noticed in mild forms of AD206.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [206] Welsh, S. E. et al. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist tradipitant has mixed effects on itch in atopic dermatitis: results from EPIONE, a randomized clinical trial. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35, e338–e340 (2021). source
The Figure 2 caption reports that a greater proportion of patients with mild atopic dermatitis achieved at least 50% improvement on SCORAD; it does not report a 50% reduction for the mild subgroup overall. The discussion also says there was no significant SCORAD index improvement in the early weeks. Our copy provides no page number for either passage. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Depending on their dose-dependent selectivity for one or several JAKs, JAK inhibitors exert a broad immunopharmacological impact by blocking signal transduction pathways of multiple type I and type II cytokine receptors.
“Depending on their dose-dependent selectivity for one or several JAKs, the JAK inhibitors (JAKi) exert a broad immunopharmacological impact because they block the signal transduction pathways of multiple type I (haematopoietic family) and type II (interferon) cytokine receptors17,214.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Schwartz, D. M. et al. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 843–862 (2017). Excellent review on the mode of action of JAK inhibitors. source
- cites [214] Spangler, J. B., Moraga, I., Mendoza, J. L. & Garcia, K. C. Insights into cytokine-receptor interactions from cytokine engineering. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 33, 139–167 (2015). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says cytokine–receptor complexes activate associated JAKs, and the type I interferon section identifies JAK1 and TYK2 in interferon-receptor signaling. The paper does not establish the claimed dose-dependent selectivity of JAK inhibitors or their broad blocking effects across type I and type II cytokine receptors. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In the pivotal monotherapy studies JADE-MONO-1 and JADE-MONO-2, the primary end point IGA 0/1 was reached with abrocitinib.
“In the pivotal monotherapy studies (JADE-MONO-1 and JADE-MONO-2), the primary end point IGA 0/1 was reached.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [238] Simpson, E. L. et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 396, 255–266 (2020). Report on a pivotal study showing the good results obtained with the JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib in AD. source
The Summary (p. 2) identifies IGA 0/1, with at least a two-grade improvement, as a coprimary endpoint of JADE MONO-1 and reports significantly higher response rates with both abrocitinib doses than with placebo. This paper reports JADE MONO-1, not JADE MONO-2, so it does not establish the claimed result for both studies. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Petrolatum has been shown to modulate antimicrobial and epidermal barrier function.
“In line with this concept, even a simple product such as petrolatum has been shown to modulate the antimicrobial and epidermal barrier function47.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Czarnowicki, T. et al. Petrolatum: barrier repair and antimicrobial responses underlying this “inert” moisturizer. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 137, 1091–1102 (2016). source
- Interpretationnone given
The main cellular and soluble components involved in atopic dermatitis pathophysiology are key targets of current pharmacological intervention.
“The main cellular and soluble components involved in the pathophysiology of AD represent the key targets of current efforts in pharmacological intervention (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a phase IIa randomized controlled trial in adults, B244 given as a spray induced a significant improvement of pruritus.
“In a phase IIa randomized controlled trial (RCT) in adults, B244 given as a spray induced a significant improvement of the pruritus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites AOBiome press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A similar effect on itching was reported in an open-label phase Ib paediatric trial of B244.
“A similar effect on itching was reported in an open-label phase Ib paediatric trial (see the press release from AOBiome in Related links).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites AOBiome press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The mechanism by which Langerhans cells educate the adaptive immune system is defective in atopic dermatitis.
“The latter mechanism is defective in AD250.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [250] Iwamoto, K. et al. Langerhans and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells in atopic dermatitis are tolerized toward TLR2 activation. Allergy 73, 2205–2213 (2018). The first report that epidermal DCs isolated from AD skin are tolerant to S. aureus-derived signals. source
- Premisecitation
Dupilumab and tralokinumab are targeted biologic therapies that specifically address a distinct immune pathway and its cytokines or receptors.
“Dupilumab and tralokinumab are examples of targeted biologic therapies that specifically address a distinct immune pathway and its cytokines or receptors16,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Wu, J. & Guttman-Yassky, E. Efficacy of biologics in atopic dermatitis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 20, 525–538 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In the past two decades, progress in understanding the phenotype and mechanisms of atopic dermatitis has offered multiple new potential targets for pharmacological intervention.
“In the past two decades, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the complex phenotype and mechanisms that underlie AD18, offering multiple new potential targets for pharmacological intervention19.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K. & Irvine, A. D. Atopic dermatitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 1 (2018). A key review paper on the current understanding of the pathophysiology of AD. source
- cites [19] Paller, A. S., Kabashima, K. & Bieber, T. Therapeutic pipeline for atopic dermatitis: end of the drought? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140, 633–643 (2017). source
- Premisecitation
In a phase IIa trial, a low-dose KY1005 regimen produced a mean EASI percentage change from baseline of 80.1%, compared with 49.4% for placebo.
“A low-dose regimen resulted in a mean percentage change of EASI from baseline of 80.1% versus 49.4% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kymab press bulletin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In a phase IIa study in patients with atopic dermatitis, 64.7% of patients reached EASI50 versus 48.2% in the placebo group.
“By contrast, a phase IIa study in patients with AD showed 64.7% of patients reaching the EASI50 end point versus 48.2% in the placebo group67.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [67] Simpson, E. L. et al. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized phase 2a clinical trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 80, 1013–1021 (2019). source
- Premiseown data
No safety signals were reported for CBP-201.
“There were no safety signals reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Interpretation of the tezepelumab atopic dermatitis data is difficult because all patients were allowed to use topical corticosteroids.
“However, the interpretation of these data is difficult as all patients were allowed to use TCSs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
CBP-201 produced a mean EASI reduction from baseline of 74%, versus 33% with placebo.
“The mean reduction in EASI from baseline was 74% versus 33% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
After 4 weeks of CBP-201 therapy, IGA 0/1 was reached by up to 50% of patients, versus 13% with placebo.
“After only 4 weeks of therapy, IGA 0/1 was seen in up to 50% of patients receiving CBP-201 versus 13% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
These data suggest that tapinarof represents a promising new option for topical therapy of both atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.
“These data suggest that this compound represents a promising new option for topical therapy of both AD and psoriasis63, another chronic inflammatory skin disorder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Stein Gold, L., Bhatia, N., Tallman, A. M. & Rubenstein, D. S. A phase 2b, randomized clinical trial of tapinarof cream for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: secondary efficacy and patient-reported outcomes. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 84, 624–631 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In a larger phase IIa study (ATLAS) with 300 adult patients, the primary end point was not reached.
“However, in a larger phase IIa study (ATLAS study) with 300 adult patients, the primary end point was not reached (see the press release from AnaptysBio in Related links).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites AnaptysBio press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
IL-36 is upregulated in the skin of psoriasis as well as atopic dermatitis.
“IL-36 is another player in the innate immune system that is upregulated in the skin of psoriasis as well as AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Dupilumab binds IL-4Rα, the shared chain of the type I and type II receptors for IL-4 and IL-13.
“Dupilumab binds to IL-4Rα, the chain common to the type I (IL-4Rα/IL-2Rγ) and type II (IL-4Rα/IL-13Rα1) receptors for IL-4 and IL-13”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites refs81,82
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
CBP-201 appears to have a faster onset of action than dupilumab.
“Although the mode of action is theoretically similar to that of dupilumab, it seems to have a faster onset of action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
GBR 830 also improved the gene signatures in the skin.
“The antibody also improved the gene signatures in the skin78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. GBR 830, an anti-OX40, improves skin gene signatures and clinical scores in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 482–493 (2019). First report on the therapeutic potential of a targeted therapy aiming to impact antigen presentation. source
- Premisecitation
AhR exerts pro- and anti-inflammatory activities depending on the cell type, micromilieu, and ligand.
“It exerts pro- and anti-inflammatory activities, depending on the cell type, the micromilieu and the ligand, that is, exogenous and endogenous metabolites and agents58.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Trikha, P. & Lee, D. A. The role of AhR in transcriptional regulation of immune cell development and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1873, 188335 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
The underlying march of the adaptive immune system starts from antigen presentation and affects various pathways, ultimately offering distinct therapeutic options.
“The underlying ‘march of the adaptive immune system’ starts from antigen presentation and affects varrious pathways, ultimately offering distinct therapeutic options18,19,75–77.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked- cites [18] Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K. & Irvine, A. D. Atopic dermatitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 1 (2018). A key review paper on the current understanding of the pathophysiology of AD. source
- cites [19] Paller, A. S., Kabashima, K. & Bieber, T. Therapeutic pipeline for atopic dermatitis: end of the drought? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140, 633–643 (2017). source
- cites [75] Brunner, P. M. Early immunologic changes during the onset of atopic dermatitis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 123, 152–157 (2019). source
- cites [76] Brunner, P. M. et al. The blood proteomic signature of early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis shows systemic inflammation and is distinct from adult, longstanding disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 81, 510–519 (2019). source
- cites [77] Zhou, L. et al. Age-specific changes in the molecular phenotype of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 144–156 (2019). source
- Interpretationreasoning
The heterogeneity of the clinical phenotype of atopic dermatitis most probably reflects the highly complex pathophysiology.
“The heterogeneity of the clinical phenotype of AD most probably reflects the highly complex pathophysiology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because AhR is expressed in keratinocytes and resident epidermal dendritic cells, it represents an ideal target for a topical pharmacological approach.
“As it is expressed in keratinocytes and resident epidermal dendritic cells (DCs), AhR represents an ideal target for a topical pharmacological approach.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the KY1005 phase IIa trial, IGA 0/1 was achieved by 44% of KY1005 recipients and 8% of placebo recipients.
“IGA 0/1 was reached in 44% of those who received KY1005 versus 8% in the placebo group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kymab press bulletin
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The aryl-hydrocarbon receptor is a ligand-activated transcriptional factor with a Janus-faced role in physiology and pathophysiology of several skin disorders including atopic dermatitis.
“The aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-activated transcriptional factor with a Janus-faced role in physiology and the pathophysiology of several skin disorders including AD56,57.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Haarmann-Stemmann, T., Esser, C. & Krutmann, J. The Janus-faced role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling in the skin: consequences for prevention and treatment of skin disorders. J. Invest. Dermatol. 135, 2572–2576 (2015). source
- cites [57] Hidaka, T. et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR links atopic dermatitis and air pollution via induction of the neurotrophic factor artemin. Nat. Immunol. 18, 64–73 (2017). Important paper reporting on the role of the xenobiotic receptor AhR in sensing environmental factors to induce AD lesions in an animal model. source
- Interpretationreasoning
Limited efficacy observed in some studies targeting TSLP or IL-33 may not predict their efficacy in an early phase of atopic dermatitis, that is, in the paediatric population.
“As, for regulatory reasons, proof-of-concept studies are primarily performed in adults, the limited efficacy observed in some studies such as those targeting TSLP or IL-33 may not predict their efficacy in an early phase of the disease, that is, in the paediatric population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Alarmins are interesting therapeutic targets given their key role in initiation of the skin-derived immune response.
“Given their key role in initiation of the skin-derived immune response, alarmins are interesting therapeutic targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premiseown data
In the two tralokinumab phase III trials, EASI75 was reached by 25% and 33% of treated patients, versus 13% and 11% with placebo.
“Similarly, EASI75 was reached in 25% and 33% of patients receiving treatment in the two trials versus 13% and 11% receiving placebo, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the ADAPT study, weight-adapted omalizumab in children with high total serum IgE produced a significant difference in change from baseline in objective SCORAD versus placebo.
“using weight-adapted doses of omalizumab in children with high total serum IgE, there was a significant difference in the change from baseline for the objective SCORAD as primary end point compared with the placebo group114.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Chan, S., Cornelius, V., Cro, S., Harper, J. I. & Lack, G. Treatment effect of omalizumab on severe pediatric atopic dermatitis: the ADAPT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 174, 29–37 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
Omalizumab failed to show convincing results in proof-of-concept studies and single cases.
“strategies aimed at depleting IgE with the anti-IgE biologic omalizumab failed to show convincing results in proof-of-concept studies and single cases107,108.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [107] Heil, P. M., Maurer, D., Klein, B., Hultsch, T. & Stingl, G. Omalizumab therapy in atopic dermatitis: depletion of IgE does not improve the clinical course - a randomized, placebo-controlled and double blind pilot study. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 8, 990–998 (2010). source
- cites [108] Krathen, R. A. & Hsu, S. Failure of omalizumab for treatment of severe adult atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 53, 338–340 (2005). source
- Interpretationown data
Tralokinumab may reach its full potential at a later time point.
“This suggests that tralokinumab develops its full potential at a later time point.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
In ECZTRA1 and ECZTRA2 at week 16, the mean rate of eye disorders with tralokinumab was 7.6%, versus 3% with placebo.
“The mean rate of eye disorders for both ECZTRA1 and ECZTRA2 studies with tralokinumab at week 16 was 7.6% versus 3% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Similar results were obtained for the EASI score in the ADAPT study.
“Similar results were obtained for the EASI score.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Lebrikizumab impairs heterodimerization of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1, thereby inhibiting signal transduction.
“Lebrikizumab is another fully humanized anti-IL-13 antibody that does not block the binding of the cytokine to the receptor but instead impairs the heterodimerization of IL-4Rα and IL-13Rα1, thereby inhibiting signal transduction91,95.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
These observations imply a role for IgE-bearing antigen-presenting epidermal dendritic cells, such as Langerhans cells, in capturing and presenting allergens to T cells.
“These observations imply a role for IgE-bearing antigen-presenting epidermal DCs such as Langerhans cells in the capture and presentation of allergens to T cells106.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] Novak, N. et al. FcεRI engagement of Langerhans cell-like dendritic cells and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cell-like dendritic cells induces chemotactic signals and different T-cell phenotypes in vitro. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 113, 949–957 (2004). source
- Premisecitation
IL-22 is induced by staphylococcal exotoxins in numerous inflammatory cells, including TH1 and TH17 cells.
“This cytokine is induced by staphylococcal exotoxins118 in numerous inflammatory cells, including TH1 and TH17 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] Niebuhr, M., Scharonow, H., Gathmann, M., Mamerow, D. & Werfel, T. Staphylococcal exotoxins are strong inducers of IL-22: a potential role in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 126, 1176–1183 (2010). source
- Premiseown data
Lebrikizumab efficacy was accompanied by rapid improvement in the pruritus NRS.
“The efficacy was mirrored by a rapid improvement in the pruritus NRS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Targeting membrane IgE would lead to long-term reduction in IgE-mediated reactions in allergic individuals, including AD patients.
“This approach would lead to long-term reduction in IgE-mediated reactions in allergic individuals, including patients with AD115.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Liour, S. S., Tom, A., Chan, Y. H. & Chang, T. W. Treating IgE-mediated diseases via targeting IgE-expressing B cells using an anti-CεmX antibody. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 27, 446–451 (2016). Explains the strategy of depleting IgE-committed B cells by targeting membrane IgE. source
- Premisecitation
Provocation tests with food allergens or aeroallergens induce exacerbation in a subgroup of AD patients.
“provocation tests with food allergens as well as with aeroallergens induce exacerbation in a subgroup of AD patients104,105.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [104] Werfel, T. et al. Exacerbation of atopic dermatitis on grass pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 136, 96–103 (2015). Further evidence for a role of IgE-mediated allergy to aeroallergens in AD. source
- cites [105] Roerdink, E. M. et al. Association of food allergy and atopic dermatitis exacerbations. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 116, 334–338 (2016). source
- Premisecitation
Antigen-specific TH2 cells are a numerically important component of dermal and epidermal infiltrates in AD.
“Antigen-specific TH2 cells represent a numerically important component of the dermal and epidermal infiltrates in AD18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K. & Irvine, A. D. Atopic dermatitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 1 (2018). A key review paper on the current understanding of the pathophysiology of AD. source
- Premisecitation
Difamilast cream was effective in adolescents and adults in a phase IIa study.
“Difamilast (OPA-15406/MM36) administered as a cream has been shown to be effective in adolescents and adults in a phase IIa study134.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [134] Hanifin, J. M. et al. OPA-15406, a novel, topical, nonsteroidal, selective phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in the treatment of adult and adolescent patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD): a phase-II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 75, 297–305 (2016). source
- Premisereasoning
T cells contribute to a dynamic, disease-specific inflammatory micromilieu that strongly impacts epidermal barrier function.
“By the production of a large variety of mediators, T cells contribute to the generation of a dynamic and disease-specific inflammatory micromilieu with a strong impact on epidermal barrier function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The promising difamilast results were confirmed in two phase III pivotal trials completed in Japan.
“These promising results were confirmed in two phase III pivotal trials completed in Japan (see the press release in Related links).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In animal models, RPT193 activity was similar to that of an anti-IL-13 antibody.
“In these animal models, the activity was similar to that of an anti-IL-13 antibody”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rapt Therapeutics Form 8-K
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
CRTH2 is preferentially expressed on TH2 cells.
“CRTH2 is preferentially expressed on TH2 cells152,153”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [152] Cosmi, L. et al. CRTH2 is the most reliable marker for the detection of circulating human type 2Th and type 2 T cytotoxic cells in health and disease. Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 2972–2979 (2000). source
- cites [153] Iwasaki, M. et al. Association of a new-type prostaglandin D2 receptor CRTH2 with circulating T helper 2 cells in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 119, 609–616 (2002). source
- Premisecitation
Lotamilast in a cream showed promising results in Japanese adults and children.
“Promising results have been obtained initially with lotamilast (RVT-501/E6005) in a cream in Japanese adults and children132,133.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [132] Furue, M. et al. Safety and efficacy of topical E6005, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in Japanese adult patients with atopic dermatitis: results of a randomized, vehicle-controlled, multicenter clinical trial. J. Dermatol. 41, 577–585 (2014). source
- cites [133] Nemoto, O. et al. Effect of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor E6005 on Japanese children with atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized, vehicle-controlled exploratory trial. J. Dermatol. 43, 881–887 (2016). source
- Premisenone given
The CRTH2 antagonists fevipiprant and temapiprant failed to significantly improve AD in phase II studies.
“both CRTH2 antagonists fevipiprant (QAW039) and temapiprant (OC000459) failed to significantly improve AD in phase II studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In preclinical experiments, the small-molecule CCR4 antagonist RPT193 selectively blocks recruitment of TH2 cells in allergic diseases.
“In preclinical experiments, RPT193, a small-molecule CCR4 antagonist, selectively blocks the recruitment of TH2 cells in allergic diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rapt Therapeutics Form 8-K
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
Topical administration of PDE4 inhibitors avoids the typical gastrointestinal adverse events seen with systemic application.
“An alternative approach is the topical administration of PDE4 inhibitors, thereby avoiding the typical gastrointestinal adverse events observed with systemic application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In a phase I study, RPT193 caused no serious adverse events in 64 healthy subjects after single and multiple dosing.
“First reports from a phase I study showed no serious adverse events in 64 healthy subjects after single and multiple dosing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RAPT Therapeutics press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Prostaglandin D2 and its receptor play an important role in generating inflammation.
“Prostaglandin D2 and its receptor (PGDR2/CRTH2) play an important role in the generation of inflammation151.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Marone, G. et al. Prostaglandin D2 receptor antagonists in allergic disorders: safety, efficacy, and future perspectives. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 28, 73–84 (2019). Interesting review on the pharmacology of PGD2 receptor antagonists. source
- Premisereasoning
Etrasimod was overall well tolerated.
“Etrasimod was overall well tolerated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In a phase IIa study, the anti-IL-31Rα antibody nemolizumab significantly decreased the pruritus sensation.
“In a phase IIa study, the anti-IL-31Rα antibody nemolizumab led to a significant decrease in the pruritus sensation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] Ruzicka, T. et al. Anti-interleukin-31 receptor a antibody for atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 826–835 (2017). source
- Premisecitation
In the phase IIb ADVISE trial, etrasimod achieved the primary end point vIGA 0/1 in 36.8% of patients, versus 13% with placebo.
“In the phase IIb ADVISE trial, etrasimod achieved the primary end point validated IGA (vIGA) 0/1 in 36.8% versus 13% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites press statement
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductreasoning
Interpretation of the nemolizumab long-term extension is challenging because of concomitant topical corticosteroid use and the absence of a placebo arm.
“However, the concomitant use of TCSs and the lack of placebo arm in this extension study makes the interpretation challenging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premiseown data
Etrasimod did not induce cardiovascular toxicity commonly seen with this drug class.
“the drug did not induce adverse events such as cardiovascular toxicity commonly seen with this class of compound.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Nemolizumab generated promising results in prurigo nodularis, a highly pruritic skin disorder assumed to be related to atopic dermatitis.
“Of note, nemolizumab generated promising results in prurigo nodularis, a highly pruritic skin disorder assumed to be related to AD193.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [193] Stander, S. et al. Trial of nemolizumab in moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 706–716 (2020). Report on the efficacy of the anti-IL-31 biologic nemolizumab in prurigo nodularis. source
- The authors state this as an assumption: Prurigo nodularis is related to atopic dermatitis.
- Premisecitation
In the same long-term extension, clinical improvement was achieved in a dose-independent fashion.
“while achieving clinical improvement in a dose-independent fashion190.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [190] Kabashima, K. et al. Nemolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: randomized, phase II, long-term extension study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 142, 1121–1130 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
In the 52-week long-term extension of the nemolizumab study, efficacy against itching was confirmed.
“In the 52-week long-term extension of this study, the efficacy towards itching was confirmed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [190] Kabashima, K. et al. Nemolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: randomized, phase II, long-term extension study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 142, 1121–1130 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
In another phase II study, nemolizumab produced an early improvement in itching as measured by a decrease in PP-NRS of 69% versus 34%.
“In another phase II study, the expected early improvement in itching was captured by the decrease in PP-NRS (69% versus 34%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [191] Silverberg, J. I. et al. Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 173–182 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In the same phase IIa study, nemolizumab did not significantly improve overall clinical inflammation as measured by BSA, EASI and IGA at that time point.
“but the overall clinical inflammation as evaluated by the body surface area (BSA), EASI and IGA scorings did not improve significantly at this time point189.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] Ruzicka, T. et al. Anti-interleukin-31 receptor a antibody for atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 826–835 (2017). source
- Premisecitation
Targeting IL-31 and its receptor is a focus of strategies to better control itching.
“Targeting IL-31 and its receptor is a focus of strategies to better control itching188.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [188] Nakashima, C., Otsuka, A. & Kabashima, K. Interleukin-31 and interleukin-31 receptor: new therapeutic targets for atopic dermatitis. Exp. Dermatol. 27, 327–331 (2018). source
- Premisecitation
In a phase III study over 16 weeks, nemolizumab in combination with topical corticosteroids reduced pruritus by 43% versus 21% in the placebo group as measured by the visual analogue scale.
“The overall efficacy in pruritus in combination with TCSs was further confirmed in a phase III study over 16 weeks with a decrease of 43% versus 21% in the placebo group as measured by the visual analogue scale score.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [192] Kabashima, K., Matsumura, T., Komazaki, H. & Kawashima, M., Nemolizumab-JP01 Study Group. Trial of nemolizumab and topical agents for atopic dermatitis with pruritus. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 141–150 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
Topical fingolimod has been reported to reduce allergic inflammation in animal models of skin disorders.
“The topical application of the prototypical S1PR agonist fingolimod (mol. wt 343) has been reported to reduce allergic inflammation in animal models of skin disorders169–171.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [169] Tsuji, T. et al. Therapeutic approach to mite-induced intractable dermatitis using novel immunomodulator FTY720 ointment (fingolimod) in NC/Nga mice. Allergol. Int. 65, 172–179 (2016). source
- cites [170] Schaper, K. et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-inflammatory effects in mouse models of psoriasis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 71, 29–36 (2013). source
- cites [171] Park, S. J. & Im, D. S. Blockage of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 attenuates 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced atopic dermatitis in mice. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 41, 1487–1496 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In that phase III study, the EASI score showed a moderate improvement of 46% with nemolizumab versus 33% in the placebo group.
“The EASI score showed a moderate improvement of 46% with nemolizumab versus 33% in the placebo group192.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [192] Kabashima, K., Matsumura, T., Komazaki, H. & Kawashima, M., Nemolizumab-JP01 Study Group. Trial of nemolizumab and topical agents for atopic dermatitis with pruritus. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 141–150 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In that phase II study, IGA 0/1 was reached in 33% of nemolizumab-treated patients versus 12% in the placebo group at week 16.
“IGA 0/1 was reached in 33% of the patients versus 12% in the placebo group at week 16”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [191] Silverberg, J. I. et al. Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 173–182 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
Vixarelimab had no significant effect on EASI and SCORAD.
“However, there was no significant effect on EASI and SCORAD194.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] Mihak, Z. et al. KPL-716, anti-Oncostatin M receptor beta antibody, reduced pruritus in atopic dermatitis [abstract 560]. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139 (Suppl.), S96 (2019). source
- Interpretationnone given
Currently available data suggest that in atopic dermatitis, itching is a result of inflammation.
“Currently available data suggest that in AD, itching is a result of inflammation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the BREEZE-AD1 study, baricitinib achieved the primary end point IGA 0/1 in 17% of patients versus 5% for placebo.
“In this population, the primary end point IGA 0/1 was reached in 17% versus 5% for placebo (BREEZE-AD1 study)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [235] Simpson, E. L. et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomised monotherapy phase 3 trials. Br. J. Dermatol. 183, 242–255 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In a large phase II study (ATOMIK, 484 participants) in atopic dermatitis, serlopitant missed the primary end point of change in worst itch NRS from baseline.
“However, in another large phase II study (ATOMIK study; 484 participants) and in patients with AD, the drug missed the primary end point of change in worst itch NRS from baseline (NCT02975206).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT02975206
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The conclusion that itching results from inflammation may not be generalized to a number of itchy skin disorders such as prurigo nodularis, in which targeting itch remains promising.
“However, this conclusion may not be generalized for a number of itchy skin disorders such as prurigo nodularis in which targeting itch remains promising193,205,210–212.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [193] Stander, S. et al. Trial of nemolizumab in moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 706–716 (2020). Report on the efficacy of the anti-IL-31 biologic nemolizumab in prurigo nodularis. source
- cites [205] Stander, S. et al. Serlopitant reduced pruritus in patients with prurigo nodularis in a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 80, 1395–1402 (2019). source
- cites [210] Stander, S., Spellman, M. C., Kwon, P. & Yosipovitch, G. The NK1 receptor antagonist serlopitant for treatment of chronic pruritus. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 28, 659–666 (2019). source
- Premisecitation
In a pooled safety analysis of cumulative data from eight studies with 2,531 patients, there were no signals for serious or opportunistic infections with baricitinib.
“In a pooled safety analysis of the cumulative data from eight studies with 2,531 patients (2,247 patient-years with median duration of 310 days) there were no signals for serious or opportunistic infections236.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [236] Bieber, T. et al. Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35, 476–485 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
Serlopitant, an NK1R antagonist, has shown efficacy in reducing pruritus in a phase II study in patients with treatment-refractory prurigo nodularis.
“Serlopitant is a NK1R antagonist that has shown efficacy in reducing pruritus in a phase II study in patients with treatment-refractory prurigo nodularis205.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [205] Stander, S. et al. Serlopitant reduced pruritus in patients with prurigo nodularis in a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 80, 1395–1402 (2019). source
- Premisenone given
As a common feature of all JAK inhibitors, there was a rapid (within 36 hours) and sustained reduction in the itch sensation.
“As a common feature of all JAKi, there was a rapid (within 36 h) and sustained reduction in the itch sensation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Because receptors for TH2 and TH22 cytokines involve downstream JAK-STAT signalling, JAK inhibitors represent interesting compounds for the therapy of atopic dermatitis.
“As the receptors for TH2 and TH22 cytokines involve downstream JAK–STAT signalling, JAKi represent interesting compounds for the therapy of AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The substance P/NK1R signalling pathway could be pharmacologically targeted to control itching sensation and neurogenic inflammation.
“suggesting that this signalling pathway could be pharmacologically targeted to control itching sensation and neurogenic inflammation203,204.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Simultaneous targeting of JAKs and SYK by cerdulatinib appears to be an appealing strategy for topical pharmacological intervention in atopic dermatitis.
“Therefore, simultaneous targeting of JAKs and SYK by cerdulatinib appears to be an appealing strategy for topical pharmacological intervention in AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Overexpression of substance P and NK1R induces itching skin disorders including atopic dermatitis.
“Overexpression of substance P and NK1R induces itching skin disorders including AD199–202”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [199] Pincelli, C. et al. Neuropeptides in skin from patients with atopic dermatitis: an immunohistochemical study. Br. J. Dermatol. 122, 745–750 (1990). source
- cites [200] Tobin, D. et al. Increased number of immunoreactive nerve fibers in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 90, 613–622 (1992). source
- cites [201] Jarvikallio, A., Harvima, I. T. & Naukkarinen, A. Mast cells, nerves and neuropeptides in atopic dermatitis and nummular eczema. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 295, 2–7 (2003). source
- Premisecitation
Unlike selective JAK inhibitors, there was no increase in acne under baricitinib.
“Interestingly, unlike selective JAKi (see below), there was no increase in acne under baricitinib.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [236] Bieber, T. et al. Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35, 476–485 (2020). source
- Premisecitation
In the BREEZE-AD2 study, baricitinib achieved IGA 0/1 in 14% of patients versus 5% in the placebo group.
“and 14% versus 5% in the placebo group (BREEZE-AD2 study)235.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [235] Simpson, E. L. et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomised monotherapy phase 3 trials. Br. J. Dermatol. 183, 242–255 (2020). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Translational efforts to convert this knowledge into drug discovery have paved the way for an impressive number of preclinical and clinical development programmes.
“Translational efforts to convert this knowledge into drug discovery have paved the way for an impressive number of preclinical and clinical development programmes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Multiple factors contribute to the high heterogeneity of age of disease onset, variations in clinical phenotype (particularly in different ethnic backgrounds) and different risks for early development of an atopic march with atopic comorbidities, neuropsychiatric comorbidities or later non-atopic comorbidities.
“There are multiple factors that contribute to the high heterogeneity of the age of disease onset in patients with AD, the variations in the clinical phenotype (particularly in different ethnic backgrounds) and the different risks for early development of an ‘atopic march’ with atopic comorbidities (that is, allergic rhinitis and asthma), neuropsychiatric comorbidities (anxiety, depression) or”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
These factors, including diverse environmental influences, a complex genotype, microbiome-derived signals and a dynamic immune response, also underlie the highly variable therapeutic response and adverse events to established and new compounds for atopic dermatitis therapy.
“These factors, which include diverse environmental influences, a complex genotype, microbiome-derived signals and a dynamic immune response, also underlie the highly variable therapeutic response and adverse events to established and new compounds for AD therapy243.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [243] Agnihotri, G. & Lio, P. A. Revisiting therapies for atopic dermatitis that failed clinical trials. Clin. Drug Investig. 40, 421–431 (2020). source
- Interpretationreasoning
JAK inhibitors are not the 'one-size-fits-all' approach for atopic dermatitis, as is the case for rheumatoid arthritis.
“Clearly, as for rheumatoid arthritis, JAKi are not the ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach for AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Phase III trials with these compounds have highlighted the variability of clinical response.
“However, although patients expect that such new compounds provide full clinical response in a monotherapy regimen, the phase III trials with these compounds have highlighted the variability of the clinical response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For baricitinib, identification of the good-responder population is an unmet need.
“This is certainly the case for the JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor baricitinib, for which the identification of the good-responder population is an unmet need.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In an animal model of atopic dermatitis, HY209 reduced TH2 inflammation via inhibition of nuclear factor κB and p38 kinase.
“In an animal model of AD, HY209 reduced TH2 inflammation via inhibition of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and p38 kinase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [240] Ghaderpour, A., Kim, Y.-H., Lee, H.-C. & Seong, S.-Y. HY209 ameliorates atopic dermatitis through NF-KB and P38 inhibition. J. Immunol. 204 (Suppl. 1), 147.37 (2020). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Phase III data of the dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor baricitinib suggest lower efficacy than the more JAK1-specific inhibitors abrocitinib and upadacitinib.
“However, the phase III data of the dual JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor baricitinib suggest a lower efficacy than the more JAK1-specific inhibitors abrocitinib and upadacitinib.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Early precise determination of the genetic and/or environmental risk factors leading to the emergence of atopic dermatitis in infancy, as well as the risk of developing an atopic march, bears the potential of a disease-modifying prevention strategy early in life.
“An early precise determination of the genetic and/or environmental risk factors leading to the emergence of AD in infancy as well as the risk of developing an atopic march (that is, atopic comorbidities such as allergic asthma) bears the tremendous potential of a disease-modifying prevention strategy early in life244.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [244] Bieber, T., Cork, M. & Reitamo, S. Atopic dermatitis: a candidate for disease-modifying strategy. Allergy 67, 969–975 (2012). source
- Premisecitation
VTP-38543 did not significantly downregulate markers of inflammation.
“However, the compound did not significantly downregulate markers of inflammation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT02655679
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Consequently, there is now an expanding pipeline for the therapy of atopic dermatitis.
“Consequently, there is now an expanding pipeline for the therapy of this complex disorder.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Another approach to affect inflammation is to inhibit tropomyosin receptor kinases, which bind neurotrophins known to aggravate skin inflammation.
“Another approach to affect inflammation is to inhibit the tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs), which bind neurotrophins known to aggravate skin inflammation239.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [239] Peters, E. M. et al. Nerve growth factor partially recovers inflamed skin from stress-induced worsening in allergic inflammation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 735–743 (2011). source
- Premisecitation
The effects observed with VTP-38543 were not dose-dependent.
“Moreover, the effects observed were not dose-dependent (NCT02655679).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT02655679
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The steadily increasing number of new drugs in development for atopic dermatitis indicates the potential for precision medicine to generate an optimized benefit-risk ratio, particularly in paediatric and elderly patients.
“The steadily increasing number of new drugs in development for AD has indicated the potential for precision medicine to generate an optimized benefit–risk ratio, particularly in age ranges where safety issues are of crucial interest such as in paediatric patients, as well as in the elderly, where drug–drug interactions represent another potential threat.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 98
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe skin microbiome is regulated by quorum-sensing mechanisms between bacterial strains and by crosstalk between bacteria and the skin innate immune system and epidermal Langerhans cells that continuously educate the adaptive immune system.
“The skin microbiome is regulated on one hand by the quorum-sensing mechanisms between bacterial strains26 and on the other hand by the crosstalk between the bacteria and the skin innate immune system and epidermal Langerhans cells continuously educating the adaptive immune system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Williams, M. R. et al. Quorum sensing between bacterial species on the skin protects against epidermal injury in atopic dermatitis. Sci. Transl Med. 11, eaat8329 (2019). source
- cites [250] Iwamoto, K. et al. Langerhans and inflammatory dendritic epidermal cells in atopic dermatitis are tolerized toward TLR2 activation. Allergy 73, 2205–2213 (2018). The first report that epidermal DCs isolated from AD skin are tolerant to S. aureus-derived signals. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSkin from patients with atopic dermatitis has significant microbiome differences compared with healthy individuals, in whom Roseomonas mucosa is the most representative Gram-negative bacterium.
“Skin from patients with AD presents significant differences in the microbiome compared with healthy individuals, in whom Roseomonas mucosa was found to be the most representative Gram-negative bacteria41.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Paller, A. S. et al. The microbiome in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 143, 26–35 (2019). source
The “AD AND S AUREUS: EPIDEMIOLOGY” section reports reduced microbial diversity during AD flares and greater S aureus carriage than in healthy controls, supporting a difference in skin microbiomes. The “CAN COMMENSAL ORGANISMS BE USED AS THERAPY FOR AD?” section identifies Roseomonas mucosa as Gram-negative, but does not say it is the most representative Gram-negative bacterium in healthy individuals. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTH2 immune polarization is accompanied by IgE sensitization to environmental allergens and self proteins and has a key role in atopic disorders.
“T helper 2 (TH2) immune polarization is accompanied by IgE sensitization to environmental allergens and self proteins and has a key role in atopic disorders101,257.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [101] Tang, T. S., Bieber, T. & Williams, H. C. Does “autoreactivity” play a role in atopic dermatitis? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129, 1209–1215 (2012). Review paper analysing the evidence for autoimmunity in AD. source
The Figure 3 caption (Clinical and research implications; page unavailable) describes a proposed mechanism in atopic dermatitis in which a TH2 response accompanies IgE directed against self-proteins. The paper also discusses IgE responses to environmental allergens, but its Abstract says the role of autoreactivity is unclear and reports no IgE autoreactivity in subjects with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. It therefore does not establish the claimed key role of this combined sensitization across atopic disorders. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [257] Valenta, R. et al. Immunoglobulin E response to human proteins in atopic patients. J. Invest. Dermatol. 107, 203–208 (1996). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAfter initial promising results using emollients and moisturizers in prevention of atopic dermatitis in newborns at high risk, a more recent report has questioned this strategy.
“After initial promising results using such emollients and moisturizers in the prevention of AD in newborns at high risk48,49, a more recent report has questioned this strategy50,51.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [48] Simpson, E. L. et al. Emollient enhancement of the skin barrier from birth offers effective atopic dermatitis prevention. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 134, 818–823 (2014). source
- cites [49] Horimukai, K. et al. Application of moisturizer to neonates prevents development of atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 134, 824–830 (2014). Together with Simpson et al. (2014), first reported on the putative preventive value of simple skin care in newborns at risk of developing AD. source
- cites [50] Perrett, K. P. & Peters, R. L. Emollients for prevention of atopic dermatitis in infancy. Lancet 395, 923–924 (2020). source
- cites [51] Skjerven, H. O. et al. Skin emollient and early complementary feeding to prevent infant atopic dermatitis (PreventADALL): a factorial, multicentre, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 395, 951–961 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe role of the innate immune system in the early phase of atopic dermatitis was demonstrated using animal models and is likely of clinical relevance in infancy.
“The role of the innate immune system in the early phase of AD was demonstrated using animal models52–54 and is likely of clinical relevance in infancy55.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [52] Briot, A. et al. Kallikrein 5 induces atopic dermatitis-like lesions through PAR2-mediated thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression in Netherton syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 206, 1135–1147 (2009). source
- cites [53] Saunders, S. P. et al. Spontaneous atopic dermatitis is mediated by innate immunity, with the secondary lung inflammation of the atopic march requiring adaptive immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 137, 482–491 (2016). source
The Results section on cutaneous inflammation shows that filaggrin-deficient mice develop dermatitis without adaptive immunity, and the Discussion reports increased skin ILC2s in patients with atopic dermatitis and filaggrin mutations. The paper also describes atopic dermatitis as an early-life condition, but it does not establish that the innate-immune finding applies specifically to infants; clinical relevance in infancy remains an extrapolation. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [54] Chieosilapatham, P. et al. Keratinocytes: innate immune cells in atopic dermatitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 204, 296–309 (2021). source
- cites [55] Han, H., Roan, F. & Ziegler, S. F. The atopic march: current insights into skin barrier dysfunction and epithelial cell-derived cytokines. Immunol. Rev. 278, 116–130 (2017). source
The Introduction says atopic dermatitis often begins in infancy, and section 6.1 reports an epithelial-derived cytokine in human atopic-dermatitis lesions and its role in mouse models of skin inflammation. These passages make clinical relevance in infancy plausible, but the copy does not establish the role of innate immunity specifically in the early phase of infant atopic dermatitis. The animal-model demonstration is attached to other citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe itch-scratch reflex contributes to further disruption of epidermal barrier function, keratinocyte damage, and activation of local dendritic cells, which further activate the adaptive immune response and subsequent inflammatory reaction.
“The itch-scratching reflex contributes to further disruption of the epidermal barrier function, keratinocyte damage and activation of local dendritic cells, which in turn will further activate the adaptive immune response and subsequent inflammatory reaction29,181,182.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [29] Mack, M. R. & Kim, B. S. The itch-scratch cycle: a neuroimmune perspective. Trends Immunol. 39, 980–991 (2018). source
- cites [181] Erickson, S., Heul, A. V. & Kim, B. S. New and emerging treatments for inflammatory itch. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 126, 13–20 (2021). source
- cites [182] Yang, T. B. & Kim, B. S. Pruritus in allergy and immunology. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 353–360 (2019). source
The Prurigo Nodularis section (page not available) says itch is believed to drive rash development and describes chronic scratching, supporting a general link between itch and skin lesions. The Atopic Dermatitis section discusses barrier-derived cytokines and immune inflammation, but the copy does not establish that scratching damages keratinocytes or activates dendritic cells, which then amplify the adaptive immune response. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAtopic dermatitis has primarily been regarded as a skin disorder in which local anti-inflammatory therapy of flares should be first-line.
“So far, however, AD has primarily been considered as merely a skin disorder in which local anti-inflammatory therapy of the disease flares should be the first-line approach14,15.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [14] Vestergaard, C., Wollenberg, A. & Thyssen, J. P. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) Position Paper: treatment of parental atopic dermatitis during preconception, pregnancy and lactation period. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 34, 426–427 (2020). source
The available passage, under “Crisaborole ointment is not recommended for treatment of AD in pregnant women” (page unavailable), discusses medication safety during pregnancy and lactation. Searches for local anti-inflammatory treatment of flares and first-line topical therapy found no passage addressing whether AD has primarily been regarded as a skin disorder or whether such therapy should be first-line. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [15] Thyssen, J. P. et al. European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD): treatment targets and treatable traits in atopic dermatitis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 34, e839–e842 (2020). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema initiative has established a core outcome set of tools and end points to be used in clinical trials for atopic dermatitis.
“The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has established a core outcome set of tools and end points to be used in clinical trials258–261 and are discussed in detail elsewhere37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [258] Schmitt, J. et al. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement to assess clinical signs of atopic eczema in trials. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 134, 800–807 (2014). source
Step 2 identifies four core outcome domains for atopic eczema trials, and Step 3 reports that HOME selected EASI to measure clinical signs. But Step 3 says instruments for the other domains had not yet been agreed on, so the paper does not support the claim that a full set of tools had been established. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [259] Chalmers, J. R. et al. Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative). Br. J. Dermatol. 175, 69–79 (2016). source
The paper identifies four core outcome domains for atopic eczema trials and reports recommended instruments for clinician-reported signs and patient-reported symptoms (DOI section). But it says preferred instruments for quality of life and long-term control still require further work, so it does not support the implication that a complete set of tools had been established. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [260] Langan, S. M. et al. Measuring long-term disease control in patients with atopic dermatitis: a validation study of well-controlled weeks. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 140, 1580–1586 (2017). source
The References section cites HOME consensus work on core outcome measures for atopic dermatitis trials, supporting HOME’s role in harmonising trial outcomes. But the Clinical and research implications section says that how to measure long-term control remained a HOME research priority, and the paper does not say that a complete core set of tools and end points had been established. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [261] Thomas, K. S. et al. Recommended core outcome instruments for health-related quality of life, long-term control and itch intensity in atopic eczema trials: results of the HOME VII consensus meeting. Br. J. Dermatol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19673 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividually and empirically adapted skin care using emollients or moisturizers to complement control of inflammation remains the only approach to improve barrier function, dryness, and water loss, and is qualified as basis therapy.
“Therefore, individually and empirically adapted skin care using emollients or moisturizers to complement the control of inflammation still remains the only approach to improve barrier function, dryness and water loss and is qualified as basis therapy35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] Wollenberg, A. et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema Task Force 2020 Position Paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 34, 2717–2744 (2020). source
The Emollient therapy section (p. 7) recommends daily emollients and explains that their ingredients hydrate the skin and reduce evaporation; it also advises treating acute inflammation with anti-inflammatory topicals first. The paper places skincare under basic therapy (p. 5), but does not say that individually adapted emollient care is the only approach to improving barrier function, dryness, and water loss. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTapinarof is a natural AhR agonist that significantly reduces inflammatory responses in animal models and in human skin when used topically.
“Tapinarof (also known as benvitimod) is a natural AhR agonist60 that significantly reduces inflammatory responses both in animal models and in human skin when used topically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [60] Smith, S. H. et al. Tapinarof Is a natural AhR agonist that resolves skin inflammation in mice and humans. J. Invest. Dermatol. 137, 2110–2119 (2017). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIL-1α is a proinflammatory cytokine released by keratinocytes after injury and by skin dysbiosis.
“IL-1α is a proinflammatory cytokine released by keratinocytes after injury and by skin dysbiosis69.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Archer, N. K. et al. Injury, dysbiosis, and filaggrin deficiency drive skin inflammation through keratinocyte IL-1alpha release. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 143, 1426–1443 (2019). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDupilumab is approved for AD in many countries, and real-world data support the phase III efficacy observed in adults.
“It is approved for AD in many countries and real-world data support the efficacy reported in the phase III programme in adults83–86.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [83] Faiz, S. et al. Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 81, 143–151 (2019). source
The Discussion reports that this real-life adult AD study found effectiveness similar to that observed in clinical trials, supporting the efficacy comparison. The Introduction calls dupilumab available for adult AD, but the cited passages do not establish approval in many countries. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [84] Abraham, S. et al. Implementation of dupilumab in routine care of atopic eczema. Results from the German national registry TREATgermany. Br. J. Dermatol. 183, 382–384 (2020). source
The Abstract reports real-world results in adults with atopic eczema and concludes that they show no major efficacy–effectiveness gap, largely confirming trial data. It says dupilumab was launched in Germany, but does not establish approval for AD in many countries. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [85] Deleuran, M. et al. Dupilumab shows long-term safety and efficacy in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis enrolled in a phase 3 open-label extension study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 82, 377–388 (2020). source
The introductory passage (page unavailable) reports dupilumab approvals for AD in the United States, Japan, and Europe and describes efficacy in phase 1–3 trials. The Methods and Discussion (pages unavailable) identify this paper as a clinical-trial open-label extension, not real-world data; it therefore does not support the real-world-data part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [86] Wang, C., Kraus, C. N., Patel, K. G., Ganesan, A. K. & Grando, S. A. Real-world experience of dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis in adults: a retrospective analysis of patients’ records. Int. J. Dermatol. 59, 253–256 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpesolimab has been successfully tested in a rare form of pustular psoriasis and has been explored for atopic dermatitis in a phase IIa study with 51 patients.
“Therefore, the anti-IL-36R antibody spesolimab, which has been successfully tested in a rare form of pustular psoriasis74, has been explored for AD in a phase IIa study with 51 patients, the results of which are expected by the end of 2021.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Bachelez, H. et al. Inhibition of the interleukin-36 pathway for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 981–983 (2019). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a proof-of-concept study with a single application of etokimab in 12 patients with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis, 33% reached EASI75 and 83% reached EASI50.
“In a proof-of-concept study with a single application of the anti-IL-33 antibody etokimab (ANB020) in 12 patients with moderate or severe AD, 33% of patients reached the primary end point EASI75 and 83% reached EASI50 (ref.68).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] Chen, Y. L. et al. Proof-of-concept clinical trial of etokimab shows a key role for IL-33 in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis. Sci. Transl Med. 11, eaax2945 (2019). source
The Study design section describes a single dose of etokimab in 12 adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, and Efficacy reports 33% reaching EASI75 and 83.3% reaching EASI50 at day 29. The citing sentence also calls EASI75 the primary endpoint, but Study design lists EASI scores among the main clinical endpoints and does not identify EASI75 as the primary endpoint. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn dupilumab pivotal studies, 11% of patients developed eye disorders, an adverse event attributed to IL-13 blocking activity.
“In the pivotal studies with dupilumab, 11% of the patients developed eye disorders (for example, conjunctivitis, keratoconjunctivitis and keratitis); this adverse event of special interest (AESI) has been attributed to its IL-13 blocking activity93.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] Akinlade, B. et al. Conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials. Br. J. Dermatol. 181, 459–473 (2019). source
The Incidence of conjunctivitis section reports increased conjunctivitis in dupilumab-treated patients with atopic dermatitis, but rates varied by trial (8.6%, 17.9%, and 22.1%); it does not report 11% of dupilumab patients developing eye disorders. The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) lists reduced IL-13-related mucus production among several proposed mechanisms and says the exact pathogenesis is unknown, so it does not establish IL-13 blockade as the cause. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationHigher rates of eye disorders were reported in long-term and real-world data for dupilumab, but not in asthma.
“Higher rates were described in long-term studies and in real-world reports83–86 but interestingly not in asthma94.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim4 of 5 sources checked- cites [83] Faiz, S. et al. Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 81, 143–151 (2019). source
- cites [84] Abraham, S. et al. Implementation of dupilumab in routine care of atopic eczema. Results from the German national registry TREATgermany. Br. J. Dermatol. 183, 382–384 (2020). source
- cites [85] Deleuran, M. et al. Dupilumab shows long-term safety and efficacy in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis enrolled in a phase 3 open-label extension study. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 82, 377–388 (2020). source
- cites [86] Wang, C., Kraus, C. N., Patel, K. G., Ganesan, A. K. & Grando, S. A. Real-world experience of dupilumab treatment for atopic dermatitis in adults: a retrospective analysis of patients’ records. Int. J. Dermatol. 59, 253–256 (2020). source
- cites [94] Bansal, A. et al. Conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials for adolescents with atopic dermatitis or asthma. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 22, 101–115 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn keratinocytes, IL-22 exerts multiple biological activities, including proliferation and downregulation of filaggrin expression.
“In keratinocytes, IL-22 exerts multiple biological activities, including their proliferation and downregulation of filaggrin expression120,121.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [120] Gutowska-Owsiak, D., Schaupp, A. L., Salimi, M., Taylor, S. & Ogg, G. S. Interleukin-22 downregulates filaggrin expression and affects expression of profilaggrin processing enzymes. Br. J. Dermatol. 165, 492–498 (2011). source
- cites [121] Eyerich, S. et al. Th22 cells represent a distinct human T cell subset involved in epidermal immunity and remodeling. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 3573–3585 (2009). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) states that IL-22 promotes keratinocyte proliferation and inhibits differentiation. It does not specifically state that IL-22 downregulates filaggrin expression; searches for filaggrin and FLG found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCirculating IL-22 correlates with AD severity and appears to be a key driver of the inflammatory reaction.
“Circulating IL-22 correlates with the severity of AD and appears as a key driver in the inflammatory reaction116,119.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [116] Nograles, K. E. et al. IL-22-producing “T22” T cells account for upregulated IL-22 in atopic dermatitis despite reduced IL-17-producing TH17 T cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 123, 1244–1252 (2009). source
The Results (page unavailable) correlate the frequency of IL-22-producing CD8+ T cells in AD lesions—not circulating IL-22—with disease severity. The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests an IL-22 contribution to skin changes, but does not establish it as a key driver of the inflammatory reaction. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [119] Gittler, J. K. et al. Progressive activation of T(H)2/T(H)22 cytokines and selective epidermal proteins characterizes acute and chronic atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 130, 1344–1354 (2012). source
The Results section on acute AD reports a positive correlation between lesional IL-22 mRNA and severity (SCORAD), but it was not statistically significant (r=0.55, P=0.132); it does not measure circulating IL-22. The Discussion proposes that IL-22 may contribute to epidermal changes, rather than establishing it as a key driver of inflammation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIgE responses against environmental allergens and self proteins correlate with cutaneous inflammation and overall AD severity.
“A significant part of the sensitization process leading to the generation of IgE responses against environmental allergens (including food allergens)100 as well as against self proteins101 correlates with cutaneous inflammation and overall severity102,103.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [100] Lack, G. Update on risk factors for food allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129, 1187–1197 (2012). source
- cites [101] Tang, T. S., Bieber, T. & Williams, H. C. Does “autoreactivity” play a role in atopic dermatitis? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129, 1209–1215 (2012). Review paper analysing the evidence for autoimmunity in AD. source
The ‘How common is autoreactivity in patients with AD?’ section reports correlations between autoreactivity and AD severity, although only two of five analyses found statistically significant correlations. The paper’s discussion of self-protein sensitization also links it to skin inflammation. It does not establish the same severity correlation for IgE responses to environmental allergens; the Abstract says their role in AD persistence is unclear. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [102] Laske, N. & Niggemann, B. Does the severity of atopic dermatitis correlate with serum IgE levels? Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 15, 86–88 (2004). source
- cites [103] Suarez-Farinas, M. et al. Intrinsic atopic dermatitis shows similar TH2 and higher TH17 immune activation compared with extrinsic atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 132, 361–370 (2013). source
The Results (page unavailable) report that total IgE levels correlated with AD severity measured by SCORAD in extrinsic AD, but not intrinsic AD. The Discussion (page unavailable) considers a possible effect of IgE on skin inflammation; it does not establish that effect or show that IgE responses to environmental allergens or self proteins correlate with inflammation or severity. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationT cells are recruited by locally produced chemotactic mediators, and inhibiting their migration is an appealing strategy.
“T cells are recruited by locally produced chemotactic mediators, and inhibition of their migration represents an appealing strategy18,54,149,150.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 4 sources checked- cites [18] Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K. & Irvine, A. D. Atopic dermatitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 1 (2018). A key review paper on the current understanding of the pathophysiology of AD. source
- cites [54] Chieosilapatham, P. et al. Keratinocytes: innate immune cells in atopic dermatitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 204, 296–309 (2021). source
- cites [149] Castan, L., Magnan, A. & Bouchaud, G. Chemokine receptors in allergic diseases. Allergy 72, 682–690 (2017). source
- cites [150] Abboud, D. & Hanson, J. Chemokine neutralization as an innovative therapeutic strategy for atopic dermatitis. Drug Discov. Today 22, 702–711 (2017). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese chemotactic mediators are produced in high amounts in AD and correlate with AD severity.
“These mediators are produced in high amounts in AD and correlate with the severity of AD156,157.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [156] Kataoka, Y. Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine as a clinical biomarker in atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. 41, 221–229 (2014). source
- cites [157] Renert-Yuval, Y. et al. Biomarkers in atopic dermatitis-a review on behalf of the International Eczema Council. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 147, 1174–1190 (2021). State of the art review paper in the field of biomarker discovery in AD. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA phase II RCT in AD showed significant improvement only for the high apremilast dose versus placebo, with a 32% EASI reduction versus 11%, but the study was discontinued because of adverse events.
“a phase II RCT in AD showed a significant improvement only for the high dose compared with placebo (32% reduction in EASI score versus 11% in the placebo group), but the study was discontinued owing to adverse events131.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [131] Simpson, E. L. et al. A phase 2 randomized trial of apremilast in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139, 1063–1072 (2019). source
The Clinical efficacy passage reports a 31.6% EASI reduction with apremilast 40 mg twice daily versus 11.0% with placebo at week 12; the 30 mg dose did not reach statistical significance. The Safety section says adverse events, including cellulitis, led to discontinuation of the 40 mg treatment arm—not the study as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUp to 40% of difamilast-treated patients reached IGA 0/1, versus 8% with placebo, with greater decreases in EASI, VAS pruritus, and POEM.
“up to 40% of patients reached the stringent clinical efficacy end point IGA 0/1, in contrast to only 8% in the placebo group, along with a greater decrease in the other secondary end points (EASI, visual analogue scale pruritus and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)) compared with placebo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] Saeki, H., Baba, N., Oshiden, K., Abe, Y. & Tsubouchi, H. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OPA- 15406 (difamilast), a new topical selective phosphodiesterase type-4 inhibitor, in Japanese pediatric patients aged 2-14 years with atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. 47, 17–24 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIL-31 is a pruritogenic cytokine produced by TH2 cells infiltrating atopic dermatitis skin, and its levels correlate with disease severity.
“IL-31 is a prominent pruritogenic cytokine produced by infiltrating TH2 cells in AD and correlates with disease severity97,184,185.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [97] Byeon, J. H. et al. Correlation of serum interleukin-31 with pruritus and blood eosinophil markers in children with atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 41, 59–65 (2020). source
- cites [184] Furue, M., Yamamura, K., Kido-Nakahara, M., Nakahara, T. & Fukui, Y. Emerging role of interleukin-31 and interleukin-31 receptor in pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Allergy 73, 29–36 (2018). source
- cites [185] Raap, U. et al. Correlation of IL-31 serum levels with severity of atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 122, 421–423 (2008). source
In “Correlation of IL-31 serum levels with severity of atopic dermatitis” (page not provided), the authors report that serum IL-31 correlates with AD severity and describe evidence for a role in pruritus. They identify skin-infiltrating T cells as possible sources and report that IL31 mRNA correlates with TH2 cytokines, but do not establish that infiltrating TH2 cells produce IL-31 in AD skin. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDendritic cells express S1PR1, S1PR3, and S1PR4, while T cells display S1PR1 and S1PR4.
“Whereas DCs express S1PR1, S1PR3 and S1PR4, T cells display S1PR1 and S1PR4 (refs164–166)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [164] Bock, S., Pfalzgraff, A. & Weindl, G. Sphingosine 1-phospate differentially modulates maturation and function of human Langerhans-like cells. J. Dermatol. Sci. 82, 9–17 (2016). source
- cites [165] Japtok, L. et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate modulates antigen capture by murine Langerhans cells via the S1P2 receptor subtype. PLoS ONE 7, e49427 (2012). source
The Results section says the murine Langerhans-cell line XS52 expresses S1P1–S1P4, supporting S1PR1, S1PR3 and S1PR4 in that DC model, but not establishing this as a general DC expression profile. The Introduction discusses S1P signaling in T-cell movement, but does not say T cells express both S1PR1 and S1PR4. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [166] Blaho, V. A. & Hla, T. An update on the biology of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors. J. Lipid Res. 55, 1596–1608 (2014). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationItch mechanisms are complex, involving multiple mediators that activate peripheral sensory neurons, and they offer several pharmacological targets.
“The mechanisms that underlie itching sensation are complex, involving multiple mediators that initiate the activation of peripheral sensory neurons. They offer a number of potential targets for pharmacological intervention29,180–182.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [29] Mack, M. R. & Kim, B. S. The itch-scratch cycle: a neuroimmune perspective. Trends Immunol. 39, 980–991 (2018). source
- cites [180] Oetjen, L. K. et al. Sensory neurons co-opt classical immune signaling pathways to mediate chronic Itch. Cell 171, 217–228 (2017). Key paper on how immune mediators interact with sensory neurons to induce itching sensation. source
- cites [181] Erickson, S., Heul, A. V. & Kim, B. S. New and emerging treatments for inflammatory itch. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 126, 13–20 (2021). source
- cites [182] Yang, T. B. & Kim, B. S. Pruritus in allergy and immunology. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 353–360 (2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFingolimod and siponimod are approved for multiple sclerosis.
“This strategy has been successfully developed with the S1PR1,3–5 agonist fingolimod167 and the S1PR1,5 agonist siponimod168, which are both approved for the therapy of multiple sclerosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [167] Chun, J., Kihara, Y., Jonnalagadda, D. & Blaho, V. A. Fingolimod: lessons learned and new opportunities for treating multiple sclerosis and other disorders. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 59, 149–170 (2019). source
The “Fingolimod (Gilenya) for Multiple Sclerosis” section states that fingolimod received FDA approval for relapsing MS. The “Next-Generation Lysophospholipid Receptor Modulators and Diseases” section describes siponimod as having entered clinical trials and reports positive phase III results, but does not say it was approved. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [168] Gajofatto, A. & Turatti, M. Siponimod to treat secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Drugs Today 56, 37–46 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe quest for JAK1-selective compounds resulted in the development of second-generation inhibitors such as upadacitinib and abrocitinib, for which regulatory approvals were expected before the end of 2021.
“Thus, the quest for JAK1-selective compounds resulted in the development of second-generation inhibitors such as upadacitinib and abrocitinib17, for which the regulatory approvals are expected before the end of 2021.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Schwartz, D. M. et al. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 843–862 (2017). Excellent review on the mode of action of JAK inhibitors. source
The Figure 3 caption identifies upadacitinib as a newer JAK1-targeting inhibitor, and Table 3 lists it in Phase III trials (page numbers unavailable). Our copy does not name abrocitinib or predict regulatory approvals before the end of 2021, so those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMore than 90 patented JAK inhibitors exist, many of which are in clinical development for various indications such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases.
“Currently, there are more than 90 patented JAKi, many of which are in clinical development for various indications such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel diseases17,215,216.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [17] Schwartz, D. M. et al. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 843–862 (2017). Excellent review on the mode of action of JAK inhibitors. source
Table 3 lists JAK inhibitors in clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, supporting the clinical-development portion of the claim. The passages from our copy do not establish that more than 90 JAK inhibitors have been patented. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [215] Schwartz, D. M., Bonelli, M., Gadina, M. & O’Shea, J. J. Type I/II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12, 25–36 (2016). Key review on the link between cytokine receptors and the JAK pathways in autoimmune disorders. source
- cites [216] Villarino, A. V., Gadina, M., O’Shea, J. J. & Kanno, Y. SnapShot: Jak-STAT signaling II. Cell 181, 1696–1696 (2020). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationJAK inhibitors were recently used successfully in treating the cytokine storm generated by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
“Recently, JAKi were used successfully in treating the cytokine storm generated by the SARS-CoV-2 virus217.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [217] Walz, L. et al. JAK-inhibitor and type I interferon ability to produce favorable clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 21, 47 (2021). source
The Background (page unavailable) says small studies reinforced the hypothesis that JAK inhibitors could combat high cytokine expression in SARS-CoV-2 infection. The clinical-outcomes section reports lower mortality and ICU admission among treated COVID-19 patients, but the paper does not establish that JAK inhibitors successfully treated cytokine storm itself. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCerdulatinib has activity against all JAKs and spleen tyrosine kinase and was initially developed as a systemic therapy for haematological malignancies.
“Owing to its particular activity against all JAKs and the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), cerdulatinib was initially developed as a systemic therapy for haematological malignancies228.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [228] Guo, A. et al. Dual SYK/JAK inhibition overcomes ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: cerdulatinib, but not ibrutinib, induces apoptosis of tumor cells protected by the microenvironment. Oncotarget 8, 12953–12967 (2017). source
The Research Paper section describes cerdulatinib as an orally available inhibitor of SYK and JAK kinases, and the Discussion reports a clinical trial in patients with CLL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (page numbers unavailable). The copy supports its activity and investigation as a systemic treatment for haematological malignancies, but does not establish that it inhibits every JAK family member or that this was its initial development purpose. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDelgocitinib is a first-generation non-selective JAK inhibitor that, upon topical and oral application, improved allergic contact sensitization and AD-like inflammation in animal models.
“Delgocitinib (JTE-052/LEO 242549) is a first-generation, non-selective JAK inhibitor that, upon topical and oral application, was shown to improve allergic contact sensitization and AD-like inflammation in animal models221–223.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [221] Amano, W. et al. The Janus kinase inhibitor JTE-052 improves skin barrier function through suppressing signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 136, 667–677 (2015). source
- cites [222] Tanimoto, A. et al. Pharmacological properties of JTE-052: a novel potent JAK inhibitor that suppresses various inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo. Inflamm. Res. 64, 41–51 (2015). source
The Results section reports that JTE-052 inhibits all four JAK subtypes, supporting its description as a non-selective JAK inhibitor. The paper reports oral effects in mouse cytokine and rat arthritis models, but does not report topical treatment or improvement of allergic contact sensitization or AD-like inflammation; it also does not classify JTE-052 as first-generation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [223] Yamamoto, Y. et al. Janus kinase inhibitor delgocitinib suppresses pruritus and nerve elongation in an atopic dermatitis murine model. J. Dermatol. Sci. 97, 161–164 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase Ib study with cerdulatinib gel in mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, the compound significantly reduced epidermal thickness, decreased inflammatory dendritic cells and strongly impacted the inflammatory signature in transcriptomic analysis.
“In a phase Ib study with cerdulatinib gel in mild to moderate AD, the compound significantly reduced epidermal thickness, decreased inflammatory DCs and strongly impacted on the inflammatory signature in the transcriptomic analysis232.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [232] Piscitelli, S. C. et al. A Phase 1b, randomized, single-center trial of topical cerdulatinib (DMVT-502) in patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 141, 1847–1851 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationP2X purinoreceptors 3 are cation channels expressed in sensory neurons, activated by extracellular ATP, and play an important role in peripheral irritation, pain, coughing and potentially itch.
“The P2X purinoreceptors 3 (P2XR3) are cation channels expressed in sensory neurons that are activated by extracellular ATP and exert an important role in peripheral irritation, pain sensation, coughing but potentially also in itch207–209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [207] Dicpinigaitis, P. V., McGarvey, L. P. & Canning, B. J. P2X3-receptor antagonists as potential antitussives: summary of current clinical trials in chronic cough. Lung 198, 609–616 (2020). source
- cites [208] Inoue, K. & Tsuda, M. Nociceptive signaling mediated by P2X3, P2X4 and P2X7 receptors. Biochem. Pharmacol. 187, 114309 (2020). source
- cites [209] Ford, A. P. & Undem, B. J. The therapeutic promise of ATP antagonism at P2X3 receptors in respiratory and urological disorders. Front. Cell Neurosci. 7, 267v (2013). source
The Introduction and Abstract describe ATP activation of P2X3-containing receptors on sensory neurons and their role in peripheral irritation and pain. The sensitizing-property section calls them cation channels, and the clinical section reports reduced cough frequency with a P2X3 antagonist. Our copy does not link P2X3 receptors to itch; the only itch mention found is in a reference title. Page numbers are not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAtopic dermatitis is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease.
“Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease1,2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe clinical phenotype of atopic dermatitis varies with age, severity, and ethnic background.
“The heterogeneous clinical phenotype varies by age, severity and ethnic background5.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Yew, Y. W., Thyssen, J. P. & Silverberg, J. I. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the regional and age-related differences in atopic dermatitis clinical characteristics. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 80, 390–401 (2019). State of the art review on the heterogeneity of the phenotype depending on the ethnic and regional background. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAtopic dermatitis belongs to the atopic disorders, including food allergy, allergic asthma, and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, which are relevant comorbidities.
“AD belongs to the spectrum of the atopic disorders, including food allergy, allergic asthma and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis, which are relevant comorbidities10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Silverberg, J. I. Comorbidities and the impact of atopic dermatitis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 123, 144–151 (2019). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe complexity of immune pathways in atopic dermatitis offers an opportunity to explore bispecific or trispecific antibodies.
“Moreover, the complexity of the immune pathways that operate in AD offers the opportunity to explore the potential of bispecific or trispecific antibodies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThe long-term safety profile is a key aspect of any new compound in a clinical development programme for atopic dermatitis.
“Thus, besides efficacy, the long-term safety profile is a key aspect of any new compound in a clinical development programme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The long-term safety profile is a key aspect of any new compound in a clinical development programme for atopic dermatitis.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenA dynamic immune response is a hallmark of atopic dermatitis.
“A dynamic immune response is the hallmark in AD,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase I/IIa study of FB-401 in 30 patients (10 adults and 20 children), 60% of adults showed 50% reduction in SCORAD, while 90% of paediatric patients achieved EASI50 and 30% achieved EASI90.
“In a phase I/IIa study in 30 patients (10 adults and 20 children), 60% of the adult patients showed 50% reduction in the Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), while 90% of the paediatric patients achieved Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) 50 and 30% achieved EASI90 (see the press release from Forte Bioscience in Related links).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Forte Bioscience press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase II trial, a 2% cream formulation of ATx201 showed significant histological and transcriptional modifications, suggesting a dual impact on barrier function and inflammatory reaction.
“In a phase II trial, a 2% cream formulation showed significant histological and transcriptional modifications, suggesting a dual impact on the barrier function and the inflammatory reaction44.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. ATx201 modulates biomarkers of skin barrier function and cutaneous inflammation in patients with moderate atopic dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 140, S77 (2020). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningManagement of atopic dermatitis has two main goals: rapid and efficacious treatment of acute flares and long-term control of the disease.
“Depending on the individual patient’s natural and unpredictable course of the disorder, its management has two main goals: the rapid and efficacious treatment of acute flares and the far more challenging control of the disease in the long term.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dry, sensitive, and highly permeable skin in atopic dermatitis is due to disturbance of epidermal barrier function via a dual mechanism: genetic mutations in genes such as FLG and an inflammatory origin with mediators such as IL-13 negatively impacting barrier function.
“One of the clinical hallmarks of AD is dry, sensitive and highly permeable skin. This phenotypic characteristic is due to disturbance of epidermal barrier function (Box 1) owing to a dual mechanism1,2,18: first, a genetic origin with mutations in genes encoding functionally important structures such as filaggrin (FLG); and second, an inflammatory origin with key mediators such as IL-13 negatively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] Weidinger, S. & Novak, N. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet 387, 1109–1122 (2016). source
- cites [2] Bieber, T. Atopic dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 1483–1494 (2008). source
- cites [18] Weidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K. & Irvine, A. D. Atopic dermatitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 4, 1 (2018). A key review paper on the current understanding of the pathophysiology of AD. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTopical application of ShA9 kills Staphylococcus aureus and inhibits production of S. aureus-derived toxins, allowing the microbiome to recover.
“Following the same strategy of bacteriotherapy, topical application of a lyophilized strain of Staphylococcus hominis A9 (ShA9) with the dual activity of killing Staphylococcus aureus and inhibiting the production of S. aureus-derived toxins, allowed the microbiome to recover.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Nakatsuji, T. et al. Development of a human skin commensal microbe for bacteriotherapy of atopic dermatitis and use in a phase 1 randomized clinical trial. Nat. Med. 27, 700–709 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFB-401 combines three strains of R. mucosa, and its therapeutic activity likely consists of activation of tissue repair and anti-inflammatory activity via TLR5 and TNFR.
“A product combining three strains of R. mucosa (FB-401) has been developed and explored, with its therapeutic activity likely consisting of activation of tissue repair and anti-inflammatory activity via Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) and tumour necrosis factor receptor (TNFR)42.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Myles, I. A. et al. Therapeutic responses to Roseomonas mucosa in atopic dermatitis may involve lipid-mediated TNF-related epithelial repair. Sci. Transl Med. 12, eaaz8631 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEpidermal barrier function is subject to dual regulation: an intrinsic genetic mechanism involving genes such as FLG and an underlying inflammation that modulates epidermal structural components and aggravates barrier dysfunction.
“The epidermal barrier function is subjected to dual regulation57,252: first, an intrinsic genetic mechanism whereby genes encoding structural elements such as filaggrin (FLG) are subjected to mutations or variants252 and, second, an underlying inflammation that modulates the expression of epidermal structural components253–256 and thereby further aggravates the barrier dysfunction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [57] Hidaka, T. et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR links atopic dermatitis and air pollution via induction of the neurotrophic factor artemin. Nat. Immunol. 18, 64–73 (2017). Important paper reporting on the role of the xenobiotic receptor AhR in sensing environmental factors to induce AD lesions in an animal model. source
- cites [252] Irvine, A. D., McLean, W. H. & Leung, D. Y. Filaggrin mutations associated with skin and allergic diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1315–1327 (2011). source
- cites [253] Howell, M. D. et al. Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 120, 150–155 (2007). Shows how the inflammatory reaction impacts on the function of the epidermal barrier in AD. source
- cites [254] Kim, B. E., Leung, D. Y., Boguniewicz, M. & Howell, M. D. Loricrin and involucrin expression is down-regulated by Th2 cytokines through STAT-6. Clin. Immunol. 126, 332–337 (2008). source
- cites [255] Howell, M. D. et al. Th2 cytokines act on S100/A11 to downregulate keratinocyte differentiation. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 2248–2258 (2008). source
- cites [256] Berdyshev, E. et al. Lipid abnormalities in atopic skin are driven by type 2 cytokines. JCI Insight 3, e98006 (2018). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationShA9 was well tolerated and induced a modest improvement of skin lesions as measured by EASI and SCORAD.
“While well tolerated, ShA9 also induced a modest improvement of skin lesions as measured by EASI and SCORAD43.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Nakatsuji, T. et al. Development of a human skin commensal microbe for bacteriotherapy of atopic dermatitis and use in a phase 1 randomized clinical trial. Nat. Med. 27, 700–709 (2021). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAntigen presentation has a crucial role in the generation and maintenance of the various pathways of the adaptive immune response, ultimately leading to inflammation.
“Antigen presentation has a crucial role in the generation and maintenance of the various pathways of the adaptive immune response, ultimately leading to inflammation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDupilumab is approved for children aged 6 years and older in the USA and the EU.
“dupilumab is now approved for children aged 6 years and older”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase IIb trial, the best results for tapinarof were obtained with a 1% cream, with 53% of patients reaching IGA 0/1 versus 28% in the placebo group.
“In a phase IIb trial, the best results were obtained with a 1% cream61,62, with 53% of the patients reaching the primary end point of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 versus 28% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [61] Paller, A. S. et al. Efficacy and patient-reported outcomes from a phase 2b, randomized clinical trial of tapinarof cream for the treatment of adolescents and adults with atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 84, 632–638 (2020). source
- cites [62] Peppers, J. et al. A phase 2, randomized dose-finding study of tapinarof (GSK2894512 cream) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 80, 89–98 (2019). First report on the improvement of AD upon topical AhR antagonist treatment. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn an interim analysis of a phase Ib ASLAN004 study, the drug was well tolerated and 67% of patients achieved EASI75, versus 0% with placebo.
“An interim data analysis from a phase Ib study showed that the compound is well tolerated and provided promising efficacy data, with 67% of the patients achieving EASI75 versus 0% in the placebo group”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ASLAN press release
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCoal tar binds to AhR and restores filaggrin expression, as shown by immunohistochemistry and transcriptomic analysis.
“Interestingly, coal tar has been shown to bind to AhR and to restore the expression of filaggrin, as shown by immunohistochemistry and transcriptomic analysis59.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] van den Bogaard, E. H. et al. Coal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 917–927 (2013). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn an open-label phase IIa study in eight patients, bermekimab had an acceptable safety profile, and the highest dose indicated promising efficacy, with 39% of patients reaching IGA 0/1 and 68% improvement in pruritus NRS.
“In an open-label phase IIa study in eight patients, the safety profile of bermekimab was acceptable, and results for the highest dose indicated promising efficacy, with 39% of patients reaching the status of clear or almost clear (IGA 0/1) as well as a strong reduction in itching, with 68% improvement in the pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) (see results under NCT03496974).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT03496974
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOX40 is a costimulatory molecule and member of the TNF receptor family (TNFRS4).
“OX40 is a costimulatory molecule and member of the TNF receptor family (TNFRS4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOX40 is transiently expressed on T cells upon activation and contributes to clonal expansion, survival, and memory formation.
“It is transiently expressed on T cells upon activation and contributes to clonal expansion, survival and memory formation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase Ib trial, KHK4083 resulted in a 74% reduction in the EASI score, and IGA 0/1 was reached in 35% of patients.
“Similarly, in a phase Ib trial, KHK4083 resulted in a 74% reduction in the EASI score, and the IGA 0/1 was reached in 35% of the patients79.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] Nakagawa, H. et al. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of repeated intravenous infusions of KHK4083, a fully human anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody, in Japanese patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 99, 82–89 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase IIa trial, intravenous GBR 830 was well tolerated and significantly improved lesions, with EASI50 in 78% of patients who received the antibody versus 38% in the placebo group.
“In a phase IIa trial, intravenous GBR 830 was well tolerated and significantly improved the lesions with an EASI50 in 78% of patients who received the antibody, compared with 38% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. GBR 830, an anti-OX40, improves skin gene signatures and clinical scores in patients with atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 144, 482–493 (2019). First report on the therapeutic potential of a targeted therapy aiming to impact antigen presentation. source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe fezakinumab study was limited by a small sample size of 60 and a time point likely too early to capture clinical effects.
“The limitations of this study were small sample size (n = 60) and a time point likely too early to capture the clinical effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLebrikizumab does not affect IL-13 binding to IL-13Rα2, whose biological role remains unclear.
“Lebrikizumab does not affect the binding of IL-13 to the IL-13Rα2 receptor chain, the biological role of which remains unclear81.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [81] Gandhi, N. A. et al. Targeting key proximal drivers of type 2 inflammation in disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 15, 35–50 (2016). Key review paper on the targeted therapy aiming to alter the dominant TH2 pathways in allergic disorders. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTralokinumab is a fully humanized anti-IL-13 antibody that blocks IL-13 binding to both IL-13Rα1 and IL-13α2.
“Tralokinumab, which was recently backed by a positive opinion from the EMA (EMA/CHMP/202204/2021), is a fully humanized antibody targeting IL-13 that blocks its binding to both IL-13Rα1 and IL-13α2 receptor chains90,91.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [90] Popovic, B. et al. Structural characterisation reveals mechanism of IL-13-neutralising monoclonal antibody tralokinumab as inhibition of binding to IL-13ralpha1 and IL-13Ralpha2. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 208–219 (2017). source
- cites [91] May, R. D. & Fung, M. Strategies targeting the IL-4/IL-13 axes in disease. Cytokine 75, 89–116 (2015). source
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe omalizumab efficacy data were confirmed by reduced topical corticosteroid use and improved quality of life.
“These encouraging efficacy data were confirmed by reduced use of TCSs as well as improved quality of life in the omalizumab-treated group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a proof-of-concept study, mepolizumab significantly reduced eosinophilia but did not significantly decrease SCORAD, pruritus scoring, or TARC versus baseline.
“in a first proof-of-concept study of the anti-IL-5 antibody mepolizumab, although eosinophilia was significantly reduced99, the drug failed to demonstrate a significant decrease in the SCORAD, the pruritus scoring or the severity biomarker TARC when compared with baseline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Oldhoff, J. M. et al. Anti-IL-5 recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (mepolizumab) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Allergy 60, 693–696 (2005). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEosinophils and their degradation products are detectable in AD inflammatory infiltrate and correlate with disease severity.
“Eosinophils and their degradation products eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosinophil cationic protein are detectable in the inflammatory infiltrate of AD and correlate with disease severity97,98.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [97] Byeon, J. H. et al. Correlation of serum interleukin-31 with pruritus and blood eosinophil markers in children with atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 41, 59–65 (2020). source
- cites [98] Kim, H. S. et al. Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin as a biomarker for disease severity and relapse in recalcitrant atopic dermatitis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 119, 441–445 (2017). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenDupilumab is approved for atopic comorbidities including allergic asthma and nasal polyposis.
“Dupilumab is also approved for atopic comorbidities such as allergic asthma and nasal polyposis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataLebrikizumab had a low rate of conjunctivitis and was otherwise well tolerated.
“The rate of conjunctivitis was low and the drug was otherwise well tolerated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIncreased IgE serum level is a hallmark of a TH2 immune response, and specific IgE to at least one allergen is found in the vast majority of AD patients.
“Although increased IgE serum level is a hallmark of a TH2 immune response and specific IgE to at least one allergen can be found in the vast majority of AD patients”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIn phase III monotherapy trials at week 16, tralokinumab was superior to placebo, with IGA 0/1 reached by 16% in ECZTRA1 and 22% in ECZTRA2, versus 7% and 11% with placebo.
“In the phase III pivotal monotherapy studies, at week 16, tralokinumab showed superiority to placebo, with IGA 0/1 being reached in 16% (ECZTRA1) and 22% (ECZTRA2) of the patients receiving the antibody versus 7% and 11% in the respective placebo groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAnti-CεmX (FB825) targets membrane IgE and has been reported to deplete IgE-committed B cells and lymphoblasts by apoptosis.
“Anti-CεmX (FB825) is directed against mIgE and has been reported to deplete IgE-committed B cells and lymphoblasts by apoptosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Liour, S. S., Tom, A., Chan, Y. H. & Chang, T. W. Treating IgE-mediated diseases via targeting IgE-expressing B cells using an anti-CεmX antibody. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 27, 446–451 (2016). Explains the strategy of depleting IgE-committed B cells by targeting membrane IgE. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBenralizumab is approved for severe eosinophilic asthma, and a phase IIa AD maintenance study, HILLIER, is ongoing.
“The drug is already approved for severe forms of eosinophilic asthma and a phase IIa study in AD exploring its efficacy in a maintenance regimen (HILLIER study) is ongoing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenBenralizumab binds IL-5Rα on eosinophils and basophils and initiates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, leading to their depletion.
“benralizumab binds to the IL-5Rα chain expressed on eosinophils and basophils and initiates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, ultimately leading to their depletion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the early 1980s, increased PDE4 activity was described as one of the first candidate targets for therapy of allergic disorders, including AD.
“In the early 1980s, increased PDE4 activity was described as one of the first candidate targets for the therapy of allergic disorders including AD126,127.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [126] Ungar, B. et al. Phase 2 randomized, double-blind study of IL-17 targeting with secukinumab in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 147, 394–397 (2021). source
- cites [127] Grewe, S. R., Chan, S. C. & Hanifin, J. M. Elevated leukocyte cyclic AMP-phosphodiesterase in atopic disease: a possible mechanism for cyclic AMP-agonist hyporesponsiveness. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 70, 452–457 (1982). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor LEO 29102, the highest dose affected pruritus, but absolute EASI change from baseline was not significant versus placebo and was not superior to pimecrolimus.
“Although the highest dose showed an interesting effect on the pruritus score, the absolute change in EASI from baseline was not significant when compared with placebo and thereby not superior to pimecrolimus (NCT01037881).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT01037881
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationH4R antagonism alone reduces scratching in animal models of skin inflammation but improves inflammation only in combination with H1R antagonism.
“While H4R antagonism alone seems promising in reducing the scratching reaction in animal models of skin inflammation, it only improves inflammation in combination with H1R antagonism147.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147] Kochling, H. et al. Combined treatment with H1 and H4 receptor antagonists reduces inflammation in a mouse model of atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 87, 130–137 (2017). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSecukinumab did not show clinical efficacy in moderate-to-severe AD and did not significantly change epidermal thickness, cellular infiltrate composition, or transcriptomic signatures.
“this compound did not show clinical efficacy or induce any significant changes in several mechanistic investigations such as epidermal thickness, changes in the composition of the cellular infiltrate or analysis of the transcriptomic signatures126.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [126] Ungar, B. et al. Phase 2 randomized, double-blind study of IL-17 targeting with secukinumab in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 147, 394–397 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataRoflumilast cream failed to reach the primary end point of change in EASI from baseline and showed no safety signals.
“administration of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast (AQR-151) as a cream failed to reach the primary end point (change in EASI from baseline) and there were no safety signals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenH3R is localized in the central nervous system, where it regulates histamine synthesis.
“H3R is localized in the central nervous system, where it regulates the synthesis of histamine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFour histamine receptor types, H1R-H4R, have been described, all as G protein-coupled receptors.
“Four types of histamine receptor (H1R–H4R) have been described, all of which are G protein-coupled receptors137.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] Cataldi, M., Borriello, F., Granata, F., Annunziato, L. & Marone, G. Histamine receptors and antihistamines: from discovery to clinical applications. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 100, 214–226 (2014). source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenH4R exerts immunoregulatory activities on leukocytes and is an interesting target for immunomodulation.
“H4R exerts immunoregulatory activities on leukocytes and represents an interesting target for immunomodulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenA phase IIb dose-ranging study of adriforant was terminated and the programme was suspended.
“A phase IIb dose-ranging study with adriforant was terminated and the programme was suspended.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase IIa study, adriforant produced a modest but significant improvement in SCORAD, but the reduction in pruritus was not significant.
“a modest but significant improvement in the SCORAD was shown, but the reduction in pruritus was not significant148.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] Werfel, T., Asher, A., Tsianakas, A., Gupta, B. & Sarmiento, R. A phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial to evaluate ZPL-3893787 (ZPL-389), a potent, oral histamine H-4 receptor antagonist for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. Allergy 71, 95–95 (2016). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenH2R is mainly localized in the gastrointestinal tract and other organs, where it regulates smooth muscle relaxation.
“H2R is mainly localized in the gastrointestinal tract and other organs, where it regulates smooth muscle relaxation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenH1R in the brain is involved in internal clock modulation, while in skin it induces pruritus and has immunomodulatory activities.
“H1R in the brain is involved in internal clock modulation, while in the skin, it induces pruritus but also has immunomodulatory activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA strategy that enforces the Treg cell limb of the immune system would restore tolerance and repress chronic inflammation.
“A strategy aimed at enforcing the Treg cell limb of the immune system would restore tolerance and repress chronic inflammation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In allergic diseases such as AD, Treg cells do not properly exert their dampening activity, allowing immune polarization.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLY3471851 is designed to target the IL-2 receptor complex on T cells, leading to activation and proliferation of Treg cells.
“The pegylated recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2; LY3471851) has been designed to target the IL-2 receptor complex on T cells leading to activation and proliferation of Treg cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningApremilast is approved for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, while its development in AD has not progressed.
“the oral PDE4 inhibitor apremilast is already approved to treat moderate to severe forms of psoriasis while its development in AD fails to progress.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCCR4 is a hallmark of memory TH2 cells and binds RANTES, MCP1, CCL22/MDC, and CCL17/TARC.
“the C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4/CD194) is a hallmark of memory TH2 cells and binds to the chemokines RANTES, MCP1, CCL22/MDC and CCL17/TARC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationS1P biological activities are mediated by five distinct G protein-coupled receptors, S1PR1-5, which are expressed differently across tissues.
“The multiple biological activities of S1P are mediated by five distinct G protein-coupled receptors (S1PR1–5), which are differently expressed in various tissues163.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] Rivera, J., Proia, R. L. & Olivera, A. The alliance of sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 753–763 (2008). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe ADVISE trial included a high proportion of patients with moderate AD.
“Of note, the study included a high proportion of patients with a moderate form of AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy week 4, etrasimod produced significant changes in PP-NRS and the secondary end point EASI75.
“As soon as at week 4, significant changes in peak pruritus NRS (PP-NRS) and the secondary end point EASI75 were observed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites press statement
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningFingolimod and siponimod act initially as S1PR agonists but promote receptor internalization and become functional antagonists over the longer term.
“Although they act initially as S1PR agonists, they promote receptor internalization and so are functional antagonists in the longer term.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe phase I trial of AKP-11 generated promising results for psoriasis, but no reports are available for its use in AD.
“Although the phase I trial generated promising results for psoriasis, no reports are currently available with regard to its use in AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a repeated-single-dose phase Ib study over 12 weeks in atopic dermatitis, vixarelimab induced a rapid and sustained reduction in pruritus, with 53% of patients having a greater than 4-point reduction versus 26% in the placebo group.
“In a repeated-single-dose phase Ib study over 12 weeks in AD, vixarelimab induced a rapid and sustained reduction in pruritus with 53% of the patients having a >4-point reduction in the pruritus score versus 26% in the placebo group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [194] Mihak, Z. et al. KPL-716, anti-Oncostatin M receptor beta antibody, reduced pruritus in atopic dermatitis [abstract 560]. J. Invest. Dermatol. 139 (Suppl.), S96 (2019). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningModulating S1P receptors on immune cells can prevent lymphocyte migration from lymphatic tissue and reduce the peripheral lymphocyte pool able to enter inflammatory tissues without broad immunosuppression.
“represent ideal targets for compounds able to modulate their expression on immune cells and thereby prevent lymphocyte migration from lymphatic tissue and reduce the pool of peripheral lymphocytes able to migrate into inflammatory tissues without broad immunosuppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that phase II study, IGA 0/1 was not reached at later time points, presumably owing to large background consumption of topical corticosteroids.
“but not at later time points, presumably owing to large background consumption of TCSs191.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [191] Silverberg, J. I. et al. Phase 2B randomized study of nemolizumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and severe pruritus. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 173–182 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEtrasimod is a next-generation S1PR agonist that induces sustained internalization of S1PR1.
“Etrasimod (APD334) is a next-generation S1PR agonist that induces sustained internalization of the S1PR1 receptor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a phase II study, ruxolitinib provided a significant therapeutic benefit with a 72% change from baseline EASI (16% for placebo) and an IGA 0/1 of 38% versus 8% in the placebo group.
“In a phase II study, this compound provided a significant therapeutic benefit with 72% change (16% for placebo) from baseline of EASI and an IGA 0/1 of 38% versus 8% in the placebo group233.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [233] Kim, B. S. et al. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with ruxolitinib cream (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) or triamcinolone cream. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 572–582 (2020). source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe safety profile of upadacitinib was comparable to that seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with acne, upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis as the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.
“The safety profile was comparable to that seen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with this compound. Acne, upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [237] Reich, K. et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 397, 2169–2181 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn terms of efficacy, JAK inhibitors have the potential to become game changers in the standard of care for some patients with atopic dermatitis, and their benefit-risk ratio in the atopic dermatitis population seems acceptable.
“In terms of efficacy, JAKi have the potential to become game changers in the standard of care for some patients with AD, and their benefit–risk ratio in the AD population seems acceptable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe JAK family of tyrosine kinases includes four members: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and TYK2.
“The JAK family of tyrosine kinases includes four members: JAK1, JAK2, JAK3 and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)213.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [213] Villarino, A. V., Kanno, Y. & O’Shea, J. J. Mechanisms and consequences of Jak-STAT signaling in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 18, 374–384 (2017). Detailed review on the significance of the JAK–STAT pathway and how to interact with it. source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the monotherapy pivotal trials Measure Up 1 and 2, upadacitinib showed significant results at week 16 for the primary end point IGA 0/1, along with an early reduction in pruritus and improvement of 4 or more points in the PP-NRS score at week 16.
“In the monotherapy pivotal trials (Measure Up 1 and 2), upadacitinib showed significant results at week 16 for the primary end point IGA 0/1 (ref.237), along with an early reduction in pruritus and improvement of 4 or more points in the PP-NRS score at week 16.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [237] Reich, K. et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 397, 2169–2181 (2021). source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe mean change in EASI score and significantly decreased itch show that cerdulatinib could be a promising alternative to topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors.
“The mean change in EASI score as well as significantly decreased itch show that cerdulatinib could be a promising alternative to TCSs and topical calcineurin inhibitors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationViral infections such as herpes simplex and eczema herpeticum, as well as headache, were more frequent with baricitinib than with placebo, and only two venous thrombosis events were reported.
“Viral infections such as herpes simplex and eczema herpeticum as well as headache were more frequent than in the placebo group, and there were only two venous thrombosis events reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [236] Bieber, T. et al. Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35, 476–485 (2020). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAlternative approaches could rely on stratification of the atopic dermatitis population according to phenotypic information such as age, age of onset, duration of disease and ethnic background, as well as endotypic hallmarks provided by validated biomarkers.
“Besides considering solely the severity of disease, these alternative approaches could rely on stratification of the AD population according to other dimensions such as phenotypic information, for example, age, age of onset, duration of disease, ethnic background as well as endotypic hallmarks provided by validated biomarkers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUndertreatment of some individuals at high risk of developing atopic and non-atopic comorbidities, as well as the missed opportunity to prevent them by adequate pharmacological intervention, may be substantial.
“Thereby, undertreatment of some individuals at high risk of developing atopic and non-atopic comorbidities as well as the missed opportunity to prevent them by an adequate pharmacological intervention may be substantial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenFor systemic therapy, biologics with a slow but pathway-specific mode of action are now competing with small molecules such as JAK inhibitors with fast but broader activity.
“For systemic therapy, biologics with a slow but pathway-specific mode of action are now competing with small molecules such as JAKi with fast but broader activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiver X receptors LXRα and LXRβ are ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors involved in regulation of epidermal barrier function and exhibit suppressive effects on skin inflammation, making them potential targets for pharmacological intervention in atopic dermatitis.
“Interestingly, liver X receptors (LXRα and LXRβ) are ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors that are involved in the regulation of epidermal barrier function and exhibit suppressive effects on skin inflammation241,242, and are therefore potential targets for pharmacological intervention in AD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [241] Schmuth, M., Moosbrugger-Martinz, V., Blunder, S. & Dubrac, S. Role of PPAR, LXR, and PXR in epidermal homeostasis and inflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1841, 463–473 (2014). source
- cites [242] Hashimoto, S., Takanari, H., Compe, E. & Egly, J. M. Dysregulation of LXR responsive genes contribute to ichthyosis in trichothiodystrophy. J. Dermatol. Sci. 97, 201–207 (2020). source
- Rests on an assumption: Atopic dermatitis is characterized by a disturbed epidermal barrier and chronic inflammation.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIdentification of the window of opportunity according to patient age for intervention in the skin and gut microbiomes would allow a differential approach using the numerous compounds aimed at correcting the dysbiotic constellation in atopic dermatitis.
“Identification of the window of opportunity according to the age of the patients for intervention in the skin and gut microbiomes would allow a differential approach using the numerous compounds aimed at correcting the dysbiotic constellation in AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningPhenotype and/or endotype-based stratification for selection of potential treatment responders with an optimal risk-benefit ratio represents an attractive strategy for atopic dermatitis.
“This is probably relevant for AD243, in which phenotype and/or endotype-based stratification for selection of potential treatment responders with an optimal risk–benefit ratio represents an attractive strategy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [243] Agnihotri, G. & Lio, P. A. Revisiting therapies for atopic dermatitis that failed clinical trials. Clin. Drug Investig. 40, 421–431 (2020). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSticking to arbitrary cut-off points in severity scales to define whether a patient deserves systemic therapy may lead to underestimation of the overall systemic impact of inflammation in the skin and a driving force for comorbidities.
“Sticking to arbitrary cut-off points in the severity scales to define whether a patient deserves systemic therapy may lead to underestimation of the overall systemic impact of inflammation in the skin and a driving force for comorbidities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningEarly identification of patients at risk of developing non-atopic comorbidities such as cardiovascular or neuropsychiatric disorders offers unique opportunities for prevention and risk mitigation strategies.
“The same holds true for the early identification of patients at risk of developing non-atopic comorbidities such as cardiovascular or neuropsychiatric disorders, offering unique opportunities for prevention and risk mitigation strategies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAnother possible explanation for the discrepancy is inhibition of the biological activity of the JAK2-associated receptor for IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine and key mediator in tolerance induction.
“Another possible explanation for this discrepancy could be related to the inhibition of the biological activity of the JAK2-associated receptor for IL-10, a well-recognized cytokine with anti-inflammatory properties and a key mediator in tolerance induction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough VTP-38543 was well tolerated (primary end point reached), clinical improvement assessed by percentage change in body surface area, SCORAD and EASI was not promising.
“Although the drug was well tolerated (primary end point reached: number of patients with treatment-related adverse events), the results in terms of clinical improvement (secondary end points) assessed by percentage change in body surface area, percentage change in SCORAD and EASI, were not promising.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT02655679
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA better understanding of the biochemical and functional consequences of genetically driven epidermal barrier dysfunction would enable the design of new skin care products better adapted to individual patient needs, to correct and improve the sensitive and permeable skin in atopic dermatitis.
“A better understanding of the biochemical and functional consequences of the genetically driven epidermal barrier dysfunction would enable the design of new skin care products that are better adapted to address the individual needs of a patient, to correct and improve the sensitive and permeable skin in AD.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAlthough biologics may be more adapted for long-term control and potentially disease modification in atopic dermatitis, JAK inhibitors provide rapid relief in pruritus and inflammation but their benefit-risk ratio remains a significant issue for pharmacovigilance.
“Although biologics may be more adapted for long-term control and potentially disease modification in AD, JAKi provide rapid relief in pruritus and inflammation but, while well tolerated, their benefit–risk ratio remains a significant issue for pharmacovigilance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA better understanding of the mechanisms underlying atopic dermatitis has illuminated both the complexity and the systemic impact of this disorder and supported the development of a comprehensive pipeline of new compounds for disease management.
“In summary, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying AD has illuminated both the complexity and the systemic impact of this disorder and supported the development of a comprehensive pipeline of new compounds for disease management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA comparative transcriptomic analysis of skin biopsies from a phase I/II study using a topical cream with TranscutolP and the LXRβ agonist VTP-38543 in mild to moderate atopic dermatitis revealed increased mRNA expression of loricrin and filaggrin as well as improvement of epidermal hyperplasia.
“A comparative transcriptomic analysis of skin biopsy samples from a phase I/II study using a topical cream formulation including the penetration enhancer TranscutolP and the LXRβ agonist VTP-38543 (in patients with mild to moderate AD), revealed increased mRNA expression of important epidermal structural proteins (loricrin and filaggrin) as well as improvement of epidermal hyperplasia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCT02655679
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn that animal model, typical biomarkers of atopic dermatitis such as TSLP and CCL17/TARC were significantly decreased, as was serum IgE.
“Typical biomarkers of AD such as TSLP and CCL17/TARC were also significantly decreased, as was serum IgE240.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [240] Ghaderpour, A., Kim, Y.-H., Lee, H.-C. & Seong, S.-Y. HY209 ameliorates atopic dermatitis through NF-KB and P38 inhibition. J. Immunol. 204 (Suppl. 1), 147.37 (2020). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationnone givenCurrent drug discovery and development strategies still follow the dogma of prioritizing topical therapy for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis, which may neglect potential preventive and therapeutic approaches.
“However, the current drug discovery and development strategies still follow the above-mentioned dogma, which may neglect potential preventive and therapeutic approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Treatment guidelines historically prioritized topical anti-inflammatory therapy for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and reserved systemic approaches for moderate to severe cases.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf applied early in the natural course of atopic dermatitis, some of these products have the potential to be disease modifiers by impacting the atopic march and other comorbidities.
“If applied early in the natural course of the disorder, some of these products even have the potential to be disease modifiers in that they could impact on the atopic march and other comorbidities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCost-effectiveness and market access issues tend to become a new hurdle and threat for drug discovery by disincentivizing innovation and hampering patient access.
“Hence, cost-effectiveness and market access issues tend to become a new hurdle and threat for drug discovery by disincentivizing innovation and hampering patient access.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenProgress in understanding the manifold epithelial and immunological pathways leading to atopic dermatitis has contributed to the discovery of a remarkable number of therapeutically interesting pathways and targets.
“Progress in our understanding of the manifold epithelial and immunological pathways leading to AD has contributed to the discovery of a remarkable number of therapeutically interesting pathways and targets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenNew and broadly effective compounds such as JAK inhibitors have exhibited unprecedented efficacy.
“New and broadly effective compounds such as JAKi have exhibited unprecedented efficacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Atopic dermatitis remains challenging to treat because available therapies have limited response.
“AD remains challenging to treat owing to the limited response to available therapies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
More than 70 new compounds are in development for atopic dermatitis.
“there are now more than 70 new compounds in development.”
“More than 70 new compounds are in development and this Review will assess those that are being investigated in clinical trials.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The current therapeutic armamentarium for atopic dermatitis remains very limited and disease management still follows a one-size-fits-all paradigm.
“Despite these recent developments, the current therapeutic armamentarium remains very limited and disease management still follows a ‘one-size-fits-all’ paradigm.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High incidence of atopic dermatitis in the paediatric population, a fluctuating and unpredictable disease course, and a limited armamentarium of approved drugs with an adequate benefit-risk ratio are major challenges in the field.
“In particular, the high incidence of AD in the paediatric population, the highly fluctuating and unpredictable course of disease and the limited armamentarium of approved drugs with an adequate benefit–risk ratio represent major challenges in the field.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The long-term safety profile is a key aspect of any new compound in a clinical development programme for atopic dermatitis.
“Thus, besides efficacy, the long-term safety profile is a key aspect of any new compound in a clinical development programme.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Affecting the OX40–OX40L interaction influences not only the core TH2 response but also other T cell subsets.
“As it is assumed that affecting the OX40–OX40L interaction affects not only the core TH2 response but also other T cell subsets”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In allergic diseases such as AD, Treg cells do not properly exert their dampening activity, allowing immune polarization.
“Similar to autoimmune disorders, it is assumed that in allergic diseases such as AD, Treg cells do not properly exert their dampening activity, allowing immune polarization.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A TH2 immune response is the core pathway leading to cutaneous inflammation in AD.
“A TH2 immune response is considered the core pathway leading to cutaneous inflammation in AD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IL-22 binds IL-22R1, which heterodimerizes with IL-10R2; IL-22R1 also associates with IL-20R2 to bind IL-20 and IL-24.
“IL-22 binds to IL-22R1, which subsequently heterodimerizes with IL-10R2. IL-22R1 also associates with IL-20R2 to bind to IL-20 and IL-24”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neurons express receptors for IL-4 and IL-13.
“As neurons express receptors for IL-4 and IL-13”
The paper relies on this without support.
Atopic dermatitis is characterized by a disturbed epidermal barrier and chronic inflammation.
“AD is characterized by a disturbed epidermal barrier and chronic inflammation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Prurigo nodularis is related to atopic dermatitis.
“a highly pruritic skin disorder assumed to be related to AD193”
The authors state this as an assumption.
IL-13, IL-22, IL-5 and IL-31 are instrumental in atopic dermatitis.
“cytokines assumed to be instrumental in AD such as IL-13, IL-22, IL-5 and IL-31”
The paper relies on this without support.
Treatment guidelines historically prioritized topical anti-inflammatory therapy for mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and reserved systemic approaches for moderate to severe cases.
“treatment guidelines historically evolved following the established dogma that topical anti-inflammatory therapy is prioritized for mild to moderate forms of AD, while systemic approaches, potentially associated with a higher risk of adverse reactions, are reserved for moderate to severe cases.”
Cites
Williams, H. C., Leung, D. Y. M., Thestrup‐Pedersen, K., & David, T. J. (2000) · Cited by 4,597 · see citing works
Byrd, A. L., Belkaid, Y., & Segre, J. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157 · Cited by 2,806 · see citing works
Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis
Simpson, E. L., Bieber, T., Guttman-Yassky, E., Beck, L. A., Blauvelt, A., Cork, M. J., Silverberg, J. I., Deleuran, M., Kataoka, Y., Lacour, J.-P., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1610020 · Cited by 2,110 · see citing works
Self-citationWeidinger, S., & Novak, N. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00149-x · Cited by 1,908 · see citing works
Kong, H. H., Oh, J., Deming, C., Conlan, S., Grice, E. A., Beatson, M. A., Nomicos, E., Polley, E. C., Komarow, H. D., Program, N. C. S., et al. (2012) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.131029.111 · Cited by 1,808 · see citing works
Bieber, T. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra074081 · Cited by 1,780 · see citing works
Self-citationWeidinger, S., Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K., & Irvine, A. D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-018-0001-z · Cited by 1,549 · see citing works
Self-citationJAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases
Schwartz, D. M., Kanno, Y., Villarino, A., Ward, M., Gadina, M., & O'Shea, J. J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.201 · Cited by 1,266 · see citing works
Mechanisms and consequences of Jak–STAT signaling in the immune system
Villarino, A. V., Kanno, Y., & O'Shea, J. J. (2017) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3691 · Cited by 1,221 · see citing works
Filaggrin Mutations Associated with Skin and Allergic Diseases
Irvine, A. D., McLean, W. H. I., & Leung, D. Y. M. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1011040 · Cited by 1,217 · see citing works
Wollenberg, A., Barbarot, S., Bieber, T., Christen‐Zaech, S., Deleuran, M., Fink‐Wagner, A., Gieler, U., Girolomoni, G., Lau, S., Muraro, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14891 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent insights into targeting the IL-6 cytokine family in inflammatory diseases and cancer
Jones, S. A., & Jenkins, B. J. (2018) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-018-0066-7 · Cited by 1,102 · see citing works
Sensory Neurons Co-opt Classical Immune Signaling Pathways to Mediate Chronic Itch
Oetjen, L. K., Mack, M. R., Feng, J., Whelan, T. M., Niu, H., Guo, C. J., Chen, S., Trier, A. M., Xu, A. Z., Tripathi, S. V., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.006 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Cytokine modulation of atopic dermatitis filaggrin skin expression
Howell, M. D., Kim, B. E., Gao, P., Grant, A. V., Boguniewicz, M., DeBenedetto, A., Schneider, L., Beck, L. A., Barnes, K. C., & Leung, D. Y. M. (2007) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.031 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Th22 cells represent a distinct human T cell subset involved in epidermal immunity and remodeling
Eyerich, S., Eyerich, K., Pennino, D., Carbone, T., Nasorri, F., Pallotta, S., Cianfarani, F., Odorisio, T., Traidl-Hoffmann, C., Behrendt, H., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci40202 · Cited by 1,052 · see citing works
Gittler, J. K., Shemer, A., Suárez-Fariñas, M., Fuentes-Duculan, J., Gulewicz, K. J., Wang, C. Q. F., Mitsui, H., Cardinale, I., de Guzman Strong, C., Krueger, J. G., et al. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.012 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis in adults: Results from an international survey
Barbarot, S., Auzière, S., Gadkari, A., Girolomoni, G., Puig, L., Simpson, E. L., Margolis, D. J., de Bruin-Weller, M. S., & Eckert, L. (2018) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13401 · Cited by 890 · see citing works
Barrier Epithelial Cells and the Control of Type 2 Immunity
Hammad, H., & Lambrecht, B. N. (2015) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2015.07.007 · Cited by 847 · see citing works
Targeting key proximal drivers of type 2 inflammation in disease
Gandhi, N. A., Bennett, B. L., Graham, N. M. H., Pirozzi, G., Stahl, N., & Yancopoulos, G. D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4624 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Emollient enhancement of the skin barrier from birth offers effective atopic dermatitis prevention
Simpson, E. L., Chalmers, J. R., Hanifin, J. M., Thomas, K. S., Cork, M. J., McLean, W. H. I., Brown, S. J., Chen, Z., Chen, Y., & Williams, H. C. (2014) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.005 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
Wollenberg, A., Barbarot, S., Bieber, T., Christen‐Zaech, S., Deleuran, M., Fink‐Wagner, A., Gieler, U., Girolomoni, G., Lau, S., Muraro, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.14888 · Cited by 684 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure
Charman, C. R., Venn, A. J., & Williams, H. C. (2004) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.140.12.1513 · Cited by 660 · see citing works
Noda, S., Suárez-Fariñas, M., Ungar, B., Kim, S. J., de Guzman Strong, C., Xu, H., Peng, X., Estrada, Y. D., Nakajima, S., Honda, T., et al. (2015) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.015 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Atopic dermatitis endotypes and implications for targeted therapeutics
Czarnowicki, T., He, H., Krueger, J. G., & Guttman‐Yassky, E. (2019) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.10.032 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Type I/II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases
Schwartz, D. M., Bonelli, M., Gadina, M., & O'Shea, J. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2015.167 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Wollenberg, A., Blauvelt, A., Guttman‐Yassky, E., Worm, M., Lynde, C., Lacour, J. ‐., Spelman, L., Katoh, N., Saeki, H., Poulin, Y., et al. (2021) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.19574 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Steinhoff, M. S., von Mentzer, B., Geppetti, P., Pothoulakis, C., & Bunnett, N. W. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00031.2013 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Nograles, K. E., Zaba, L. C., Shemer, A., Fuentes-Duculan, J., Cardinale, I., Kikuchi, T., Ramon, M., Bergman, R., Krueger, J. G., & Guttman-Yassky, E. (2009) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.041 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
The alliance of sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors in immunity
Rivera, J., Proia, R. L., & Olivera, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2400 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Application of moisturizer to neonates prevents development of atopic dermatitis
Horimukai, K., Morita, K., Narita, M., Kondo, M., Kitazawa, H., Nozaki, M., Shigematsu, Y., Yoshida, K., Niizeki, H., Motomura, K.-I., et al. (2014) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.060 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Anti–Interleukin-31 Receptor A Antibody for Atopic Dermatitis
Ruzicka, T., Hanifin, J. M., Furue, M., Pulka, G., Mlynarczyk, I., Wollenberg, A., Galus, R., Etoh, T., Mihara, R., Yoshida, H., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1606490 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases
Li, H., Zuo, J., & Tang, W. (2018) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.01048 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Type 2 immunity in the skin and lungs
Akdiş, C. A., Arkwright, P. D., Brüggen, M., Busse, W. W., Gadina, M., Guttman‐Yassky, E., Kabashima, K., Mitamura, Y., Vian, L., Wu, J., et al. (2020) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.14318 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Loricrin and involucrin expression is down-regulated by Th2 cytokines through STAT-6
Kim, B. E., Leung, D. Y. M., Boguniewicz, M., & Howell, M. D. (2008) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2007.11.006 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
The microbiome in patients with atopic dermatitis
Paller, A. S., Kong, H. H., Seed, P., Naik, S., Scharschmidt, T. C., Gallo, R. L., Luger, T., & Irvine, A. D. (2019) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.015 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Simpson, E. L., Sinclair, R., Forman, S., Wollenberg, A., Aschoff, R., Cork, M., Bieber, T., Thyssen, J. P., Yosipovitch, G., Flohr, C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30732-7 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Self-citationAn update on the biology of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors
Blaho, V. A., & Hla, T. (2014) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r046300 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Briot, A., Deraison, C., Lacroix, M., Bonnart, C., Robin, A., Besson, C., Dubus, P., & Hovnanian, A. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20082242 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Commonality of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway in atopic diseases
Gandhi, N. A., Pirozzi, G., & Graham, N. M. H. (2017) · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1080/1744666x.2017.1298443 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Wollenberg, A., Christen‐Zäch, S., Taieb, A., Paul, C., Thyssen, J. P., de Bruin‐Weller, M., Vestergaard, C., Seneschal, J., Werfel, T., Cork, M. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.16892 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Suárez-Fariñas, M., Dhingra, N., Gittler, J., Shemer, A., Cardinale, I., de Guzman Strong, C., Krueger, J. G., & Guttman-Yassky, E. (2013) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.046 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Bieber, T., de la Salle, H., Wollenberg, A., Hakimi, J., Chizzonite, R., Ring, J., Hanau, D., & de la Salle, C. (1992) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.175.5.1285 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Self-citationTsoi, L. C., Rodriguez, E., Degenhardt, F., Baurecht, H., Wehkamp, U., Volks, N., Szymczak, S., Swindell, W. R., Sarkar, M. K., Raja, K., et al. (2019) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.12.018 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population
Silverberg, J. I., Barbarot, S., Gadkari, A. S., Simpson, E. L., Weidinger, S., Mina‐Osorio, P., Rossi, A. B., Brignoli, L., Saba, G., Guillemin, I., et al. (2021) · Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2020.12.020 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Update on risk factors for food allergy
Lack, G. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.036 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Conjunctivitis in dupilumab clinical trials
Akinlade, B., Guttman‐Yassky, E., Bruin‐Weller, M., Simpson, E. L., Blauvelt, A., Cork, M. J., Prens, E., Asbell, P., Akpek, E., Corren, J., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.17869 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Comorbidities and the impact of atopic dermatitis
Silverberg, J. I. (2019) · Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.020 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Early-onset pediatric atopic dermatitis is TH2 but also TH17 polarized in skin
Esaki, H., Brunner, P. M., Renert-Yuval, Y., Czarnowicki, T., Huynh, T., Tran, G., Lyon, S., Rodriguez, G., Immaneni, S., Johnson, D. B., et al. (2016) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.013 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Reich, K., Teixeira, H. D., de Bruin-Weller, M., Bieber, T., Soong, W., Kabashima, K., Werfel, T., Zeng, J., Huang, X., Hu, X., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00589-4 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Self-citationPublic Health Burden and Epidemiology of Atopic Dermatitis
Silverberg, J. I. (2017) · Dermatologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.det.2017.02.002 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Simpson, E. L., Lacour, J. ‐., Spelman, L., Galimberti, R., Eichenfield, L. F., Bissonnette, R., King, B. A., Thyssen, J. P., Silverberg, J. I., Bieber, T., et al. (2020) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18898 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Self-citationTapinarof is a natural AhR agonist that resolves skin inflammation in mice and humans.
Smith, S. H., Jayawickreme, C., Rickard, D. J., Nicodeme, E., Bui, T., Simmons, C., Coquery, C. M., Neil, J., Pryor, W. M., Mayhew, D., et al. (2017) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.004 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Interleukin‐13: Targeting an underestimated cytokine in atopic dermatitis
Bieber, T. (2020) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13954 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Self-citationCoal tar induces AHR-dependent skin barrier repair in atopic dermatitis
van den Bogaard, E. H., Bergboer, J. G. M., Vonk-Bergers, M., van Vlijmen-Willems, I. M. J. J., Hato, S. V., van der Valk, P. G. M., Schröder, J. M., Joosten, I., Zeeuwen, P. L. J. M., & Schalkwijk, J. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci65642 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Nakatsuji, T., Chen, T. H., Two, A. M., Chun, K., Narala, S., Geha, R. S., Hata, T. R., & Gallo, R. L. (2016) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2016.05.127 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Trial of Nemolizumab and Topical Agents for Atopic Dermatitis with Pruritus
Kabashima, K., Matsumura, T., Komazaki, H., & Kawashima, M. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1917006 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Biomarkers in atopic dermatitis—a review on behalf of the International Eczema Council
Renert-Yuval, Y., Thyssen, J. P., Bissonnette, R., Bieber, T., Kabashima, K., Hijnen, D., & Guttman-Yassky, E. (2021) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.013 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Self-citationGuttman-Yassky, E., Brunner, P. M., Neumann, A. U., Khattri, S., Pavel, A. B., Malik, K., Singer, G. K., Baum, D., Gilleaudeau, P., Sullivan-Whalen, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.016 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Guttman-Yassky, E., Blauvelt, A., Eichenfield, L. F., Paller, A. S., Armstrong, A. W., Drew, J., Gopalan, R., & Simpson, E. L. (2020) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0079 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Oldhoff, J. M., Darsow, U., Werfel, T., Katzer, K., Wulf, A., Laifaoui, J., Hijnen, D. J., Plötz, S., Knol, E. F., Kapp, A., et al. (2005) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00791.x · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Nakatsuji, T., Hata, T. R., Tong, Y., Cheng, J. Y., Shafiq, F., Butcher, A. M., Salem, S. S., Brinton, S. L., Rudman Spergel, A. K., Johnson, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01256-2 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Clinical phenotypes and endophenotypes of atopic dermatitis: Where are we, and where should we go?
Bieber, T. R. M., D’Erme, A. M., Akdiş, C. A., Traidl‐Hoffmann, C., Lauener, R. P., Schäppi, G., & Schmid‐Grendelmeier, P. (2017) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.008 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Self-citationSimpson, E. L., Parnes, J. R., She, D., Crouch, S., Rees, W., Mo, M., & van der Merwe, R. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.059 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Schmitt, J., Spuls, P. I., Thomas, K. S., Simpson, E., Furue, M., Deckert, S., Dohil, M., Apfelbacher, C., Singh, J. A., Chalmers, J., et al. (2014) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.043 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
The differential expression of IL-4 and IL-13 and its impact on type-2 immunity
Bao, K., & Reinhardt, R. L. (2015) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.008 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Nattkemper, L. A., Tey, H. L., Valdés‐Rodríguez, R., Lee, H. Y., Mollanazar, N. K., Albornoz, C. A., Sanders, K. M., & Yosipovitch, G. (2018) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.12.029 · Cited by 310 · see citing works
Yew, Y. W., Thyssen, J. P., & Silverberg, J. I. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.035 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Insights into Cytokine–Receptor Interactions from Cytokine Engineering
Spangler, J. B., Moraga, I., Mendoza, J. L., & Garcia, K. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120211 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Correlation of IL-31 serum levels with severity of atopic dermatitis
Raap, U., Wichmann, K., Bruder, M., Ständer, S., Wedi, B., Kapp, A., & Werfel, T. (2008) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.05.047 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Leshem, Y. A., Hajar, T., Hanifin, J. M., & Simpson, E. L. (2015) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.13662 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Inhibition of the Interleukin-36 Pathway for the Treatment of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Bachelez, H., Choon, S.-E., Marrakchi, S., Burden, A. D., Tsai, T.-F., Morita, A., Turki, H., Hall, D. B., Shear, M., Baum, P., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc1811317 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Williams, M. R., Costa, S. K., Zaramela, L. S., Khalil, S., Todd, D. A., Winter, H. L., Sanford, J. A., O’Neill, A. M., Liggins, M. C., Nakatsuji, T., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aat8329 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Han, H., Roan, F., & Ziegler, S. F. (2017) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12546 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Muraro, A. M., Lemanske, R. F., Hellings, P. W., Akdiş, C. A., Bieber, T. R. M., Casale, T. B., Jutel, M., Ong, P. Y., Poulsen, L. K., Schmid‐Grendelmeier, P., et al. (2016) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.010 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Self-citationLipid abnormalities in atopic skin are driven by type 2 cytokines
Berdyshev, E., Goleva, E., Bronova, I., Dyjack, N., Rios, C., Jung, J., Taylor, P., Jeong, M., Hall, C. F., Richers, B. N., et al. (2018) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.98006 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Trial of Nemolizumab in Moderate-to-Severe Prurigo Nodularis
Ständer, S., Yosipovitch, G., Legat, F. J., Lacour, J.-P., Paul, C., Narbutt, J., Bieber, T., Misery, L., Wollenberg, A., Reich, A., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1908316 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationHidaka, T., Ogawa, E., Kobayashi, E. H., Suzuki, T., Funayama, R., Nagashima, T., Fujimura, T., Aiba, S., Nakayama, K., Okuyama, R., et al. (2017) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3614 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Silverberg, J. I., Pinter, A., Pulka, G., Poulin, Y., Bouaziz, J.-D., Wollenberg, A., Murrell, D. F., Alexis, A., Lindsey, L., Ahmad, F., et al. (2020) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.013 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Oncostatin M and interleukin-31: Cytokines, receptors, signal transduction and physiology
Hermanns, H. M. (2015) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2015.07.006 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Liu, H., Archer, N. K., Dillen, C. A., Wang, Y., Ashbaugh, A. G., Ortines, R. V., Kao, T., Lee, S. K., Cai, S. S., Miller, R. J., et al. (2017) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.006 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Amano, W., Nakajima, S., Kunugi, H., Numata, Y., Kitoh, A., Egawa, G., Dainichi, T., Honda, T., Otsuka, A., Kimoto, Y., et al. (2015) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.03.051 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
The Itch–Scratch Cycle: A Neuroimmune Perspective
Mack, M. R., & Kim, B. S. (2018) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2018.10.001 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Deleuran, M., Thaçi, D., Beck, L. A., de Bruin-Weller, M., Blauvelt, A., Forman, S., Bissonnette, R., Reich, K., Soong, W., Hussain, I., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.074 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Chen, Y.-L., Gutowska-Owsiak, D., Hardman, C. S., Westmoreland, M., MacKenzie, T., Cifuentes, L., Waithe, D., Lloyd-Lavery, A., Marquette, A., Londei, M., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aax2945 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Kabashima, K., Furue, M., Hanifin, J. M., Pulka, G., Wollenberg, A., Galus, R., Etoh, T., Mihara, R., Nakano, M., & Ruzicka, T. (2018) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.03.018 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Nakagawa, H., Nemoto, O., Igarashi, A., Saeki, H., Kaino, H., & Nagata, T. (2020) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.015 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Emerging role of interleukin‐31 and interleukin‐31 receptor in pruritus in atopic dermatitis
Furue, M., Yamamura, K., Kido‐Nakahara, M., Nakahara, T., & Fukui, Y. (2018) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13239 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Mast cells, nerves and neuropeptides in atopic dermatitis and nummular eczema
Järvikallio, A., Harvima, I. T., & Naukkarinen, A. (2003) · Archives of Dermatological Research · doi:10.1007/s00403-002-0378-z · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Skjerven, H. O., Rehbinder, E. M., Vettukattil, R., LeBlanc, M., Granum, B., Haugen, G., Hedlin, G., Landrø, L., Marsland, B. J., Rudi, K., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32983-6 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Grewe, S. R., Chan, S. C., & Hanifin, J. M. (1982) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(82)90008-2 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Treatment of atopic dermatitis with ruxolitinib cream (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) or triamcinolone cream
Kim, B. S., Howell, M. D., Sun, K., Papp, K., Nasir, A., & Kuligowski, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.042 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Th2 Cytokines Act on S100/A11 to Downregulate Keratinocyte Differentiation
Howell, M. D., Fairchild, H. R., Kim, B. E., Bin, L., Boguniewicz, M., Redzic, J. S., Hansen, K. C., & Leung, D. Y. M. (2008) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2008.74 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Guttman-Yassky, E., Pavel, A. B., Zhou, L., Estrada, Y. D., Zhang, N., Xu, H., Peng, X., Wen, H.-C., Govas, P., Gudi, G., et al. (2019) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.053 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
The histamine H4 receptor is functionally expressed on TH2 cells
Gutzmer, R., Mommert, S., Gschwandtner, M., Zwingmann, K., Stark, H., & Werfel, T. (2009) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.12.1110 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Keratinocytes: innate immune cells in atopic dermatitis
Chieosilapatham, P., Kiatsurayanon, C., Umehara, Y., Trujillo-Paez, J. V., Peng, G., Yue, H., Nguyen, L. T. H., & Niyonsaba, F. (2021) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/cei.13575 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
JAK Inhibitors for Atopic Dermatitis: An Update
He, H., & Guttman‐Yassky, E. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-018-0413-2 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Increased number of immunoreactive nerve fibers in atopic dermatitis
Tobin, D., Nabarro, G., de la Faute, H. B., van Vloten, W. A., van der Putte, S. C. J., & Schuurman, H.-J. (1992) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(92)90134-n · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Faiz, S., Giovannelli, J., Podevin, C., Jachiet, M., Bouaziz, J.-D., Reguiai, Z., Nosbaum, A., Lasek, A., Ferrier le Bouedec, M.-C., Du Thanh, A., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.053 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Eichenfield, L. F., Ahluwalia, J., Waldman, A., Borok, J., Udkoff, J., & Boguniewicz, M. (2017) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.009 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Commensal microbiota modulate gene expression in the skin
Meisel, J. S., Sfyroera, G., Bartow-McKenney, C., Gimblet, C., Bugayev, J., Horwinski, J., Kim, B., Brestoff, J. R., Tyldsley, A. S., Zheng, Q., et al. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0404-9 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Douglas, S. D., & Leeman, S. E. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05826.x · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Popovic, B., Breed, J., Rees, D. G., Gardener, M. J., Vinall, L. M. K., Kemp, B., Spooner, J., Keen, J., Minter, R., Uddin, F., et al. (2017) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2016.12.005 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Substance P activates Mas-related G protein–coupled receptors to induce itch
Azimi, E., Reddy, V. B., Pereira, P. J. S., Talbot, S., Woolf, C. J., & Lerner, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.12.980 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Heil, P. M., Maurer, D., Klein, B., Hultsch, T., & Stingl, G. (2010) · JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft · doi:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2010.07497.x · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Therapeutic pipeline for atopic dermatitis: End of the drought?
Paller, A. S., Kabashima, K., & Bieber, T. (2017) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.006 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Self-citationNovak, N., Valenta, R., Bohle, B., Laffer, S., Haberstok, J., Kraft, S., & Bieber, T. (2004) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.02.005 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationAtopic dermatitis 2.0: from the clinical phenotype to the molecular taxonomy and stratified medicine
Bieber, T. (2012) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12049 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationTreatment of recalcitrant atopic dermatitis with omalizumab
Lane, J. E., Cheyney, J. M., Lane, T. N., Kent, D. E., & Cohen, D. J. (2006) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.09.030 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Rerknimitr, P., Otsuka, A., Nakashima, C., & Kabashima, K. (2017) · Inflammation and Regeneration · doi:10.1186/s41232-017-0044-7 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
The exposome in atopic dermatitis
Stefanovic, N., Flohr, C., & Irvine, A. D. (2020) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13946 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Meta-analysis identifies seven susceptibility loci involved in the atopic march
Marenholz, I., Esparza-Gordillo, J., Rüschendorf, F., Bauerfeind, A., Strachan, D. P., Spycher, B. D., Baurecht, H., Margaritte‐Jeannin, P., Sääf, A. M., Kerkhof, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms9804 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Dual action of neurokinin-1 antagonists on Mas-related GPCRs
Azimi, E., Reddy, V. B., Shade, K.-T. C., Anthony, R. M., Talbot, S., Pereira, P. J. S., & Lerner, E. A. (2016) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.89362 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Structural Basis of Signaling Blockade by Anti-IL-13 Antibody Lebrikizumab
Ultsch, M., Bevers, J., Nakamura, G., Vandlen, R., Kelley, R. F., Wu, L. C., & Eigenbrot, C. (2013) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.01.024 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Failure of omalizumab for treatment of severe adult atopic dermatitis
Krathen, R. A., & Hsu, S. (2005) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2005.02.014 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Exacerbation of atopic dermatitis on grass pollen exposure in an environmental challenge chamber
Werfel, T., Heratizadeh, A., Niebuhr, M., Kapp, A., Roesner, L. M., Karch, A., Erpenbeck, V. J., Lösche, C., Jung, T., Krug, N., et al. (2015) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.015 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Gutowska-Owsiak, D., Schaupp, A. L., Salimi, M., Taylor, S., & Ogg, G. S. (2011) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10400.x · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Renert-Yuval, Y., Del Duca, E., Pavel, A. B., Fang, M., Lefferdink, R., Wu, J., Diaz, A., Estrada, Y. D., Canter, T., Zhang, N., et al. (2021) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.001 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Strategies targeting the IL-4/IL-13 axes in disease
May, R. D., & Fung, M. (2015) · Cytokine · doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.018 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
A Pilot Study of an Oral Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor (Apremilast) for Atopic Dermatitis in Adults
Samrao, A., Berry, T. M., Goreshi, R., & Simpson, E. L. (2012) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2012.812 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Peppers, J., Paller, A. S., Maeda-Chubachi, T., Wu, S., Robbins, K., Gallagher, K., & Kraus, J. E. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.047 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Petrolatum: Barrier repair and antimicrobial responses underlying this “inert” moisturizer
Czarnowicki, T., Malajian, D., Khattri, S., Correa da Rosa, J., Dutt, R., Finney, R., Dhingra, N., Xiangyu, P., Xu, H., Estrada, Y. D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.08.013 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
The skin microbiome is different in pediatric versus adult atopic dermatitis
Shi, B., Bangayan, N. J., Curd, E., Taylor, P. A., Gallo, R. L., Leung, D. Y. M., & Li, H. (2016) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.053 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Saunders, S. P., Moran, T., Floudas, A., Wurlod, F., Kaszlikowska, A., Salimi, M., Quinn, E. M., Oliphant, C. J., Núñez, G., McManus, R., et al. (2016) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.045 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Chalmers, J. R., Thomas, K. S., Apfelbacher, C., Williams, H. C., Prinsen, C. A. C., Spuls, P. I., Simpson, E., Gerbens, L. A. A., Boers, M., Barbarot, S., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.16543 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors and innate immunity
Bryan, A. M., & Poeta, M. D. (2018) · Cellular Microbiology · doi:10.1111/cmi.12836 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Does the severity of atopic dermatitis correlate with serum IgE levels?
Laske, N., & Niggemann, B. (2004) · Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · doi:10.1046/j.0905-6157.2003.00106.x · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Interleukin‐31 and interleukin‐31 receptor: New therapeutic targets for atopic dermatitis
Nakashima, C., Otsuka, A., & Kabashima, K. (2018) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/exd.13533 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Neuropeptides in skin from patients with atopic dermatitis: an immunohistochemical study
PINCELLI, C., FANTINI, F., MASSIMI, P., GIROLOMONI, G., SEIDENARI, S., & GIANNETTI, A. (1990) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1990.tb06261.x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Bieber, T., Thyssen, J. P., Reich, K., Simpson, E. L., Katoh, N., Torrelo, A., De Bruin‐Weller, M., Thaci, D., Bissonnette, R., Gooderham, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.16948 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationThymus and activation‐regulated chemokine as a clinical biomarker in atopic dermatitis
Kataoka, Y. (2014) · The Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1346-8138.12440 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis 2017
Katayama, I., Aihara, M., Ohya, Y., Saeki, H., Shimojo, N., Shoji, S., Taniguchi, M., & Yamada, H. (2017) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2016.12.003 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Does “autoreactivity” play a role in atopic dermatitis?
Tang, T. S., Bieber, T., & Williams, H. C. (2012) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.002 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationJürgens, M., Wollenberg, A., Hanau, D., de la Salle, H., & Bieber, T. (1995) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.155.11.5184 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationZhou, L., Leonard, A., Pavel, A. B., Malik, K., Raja, A., Glickman, J., Estrada, Y. D., Peng, X., del Duca, E., Sanz-Cabanillas, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.015 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Exploring Sphingolipid Implications in Neurodegeneration
Alessenko, A. V., & Albi, E. (2020) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00437 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Vestergaard, C., Wollenberg, A., Barbarot, S., Christen‐Zaech, S., Deleuran, M. S., Spuls, P. I., Flohr, C., Trzeciak, M., von Kobyletzki, L., Sénéschal, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.15709 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationMyles, I. A., Castillo, C. R., Barbian, K. D., Kanakabandi, K., Virtaneva, K., Fitzmeyer, E., Paneru, M., Otaizo-Carrasquero, F., Myers, T. G., Markowitz, T. E., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz8631 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Paller, A. S., Stein Gold, L., Soung, J., Tallman, A. M., Rubenstein, D. S., & Gooderham, M. (2021) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.135 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Immunoglobulin E Response to Human Proteins in Atopic Patients
Valenta, R., Steiner, R., Seiberler, S., Maurer, D., Sperr, W. R., Valent, P., Spitzauer, S., Kapiotis, S., Smolen, J., & Stingl, G. (1996) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12329617 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Atopic dermatitis: a candidate for disease‐modifying strategy
Bieber, T., Cork, M., & Reitamo, S. (2012) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2012.02845.x · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationChun, J., Kihara, Y., Jonnalagadda, D., & Blaho, V. A. (2019) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010818-021358 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Chan, S., Cornelius, V., Cro, S., Harper, J. I., & Lack, G. (2020) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4476 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Dhillon, S. (2020) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-020-01291-2 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Chalmers, J. R., Simpson, E., Apfelbacher, C. J., Thomas, K. S., Kobyletzki, L., Schmitt, J., Singh, J. A., Svensson, Å., Williams, H. C., Abuabara, K., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.14773 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Apremilast in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis
Simpson, E. L., Imafuku, S., Poulin, Y., Ungar, B., Zhou, L., Malik, K., Wen, H.-C., Xu, H., Estrada, Y. D., Peng, X., et al. (2019) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2018.10.043 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Phase 2 randomized, double-blind study of IL-17 targeting with secukinumab in atopic dermatitis
Ungar, B., Pavel, A. B., Li, R., Kimmel, G., Nia, J., Hashim, P., Kim, H. J., Chima, M., Vekaria, A. S., Estrada, Y., et al. (2021) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.055 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Karuppuchamy, T., Behrens, E.-H., Gonzalez‐Cabrera, P. J., et al. (2016) · Mucosal Immunology · doi:10.1038/mi.2016.35 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Ständer, S., Kwon, P., Hirman, J., Perlman, A. J., Weisshaar, E., Metz, M., & Luger, T. A. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.052 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Evolution of pathologic T-cell subsets in patients with atopic dermatitis from infancy to adulthood
Czarnowicki, T., He, H., Canter, T., Han, J., Lefferdink, R., Erickson, T., Rangel, S., Kameyama, N., Kim, H. J., Pavel, A. B., et al. (2020) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.09.031 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Impact of atopic dermatitis on quality of life in adults: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Birdi, G., Cooke, R., & Knibb, R. C. (2020) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.14763 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Epidermal Barrier in Atopic Dermatitis
Kim, B. E., & Leung, D. Y. (2012) · Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Research · doi:10.4168/aair.2012.4.1.12 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Hashimoto, T., Nattkemper, L. A., Kim, H. S., Kursewicz, C. D., Fowler, E., Shah, S. M., Nanda, S., Fayne, R. A., Paolini, J. F., Romanelli, P., et al. (2021) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/exd.14279 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Skin microbiome transplantation and manipulation: Current state of the art
Callewaert, C., Knödlseder, N., Karoglan, A., Güell, M., & Paetzold, B. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.001 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Haarmann-Stemmann, T., Esser, C., & Krutmann, J. (2015) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2015.285 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Eckert, L., Gupta, S., Gadkari, A., Mahajan, P., & Gelfand, J. M. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.037 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Pruritus in allergy and immunology
Yang, T.-L. B., & Kim, B. S. (2019) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.016 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Tanimoto, A., Ogawa, Y., Oki, C., Kimoto, Y., Nozawa, K., Amano, W., Noji, S., Shiozaki, M., Matsuo, A., Shinozaki, Y., et al. (2015) · Inflammation Research · doi:10.1007/s00011-014-0782-9 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Staphylococcal exotoxins are strong inducers of IL-22: A potential role in atopic dermatitis
Niebuhr, M., Scharonow, H., Gathmann, M., Mamerow, D., & Werfel, T. (2010) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.07.041 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Brunner, P. M., He, H., Pavel, A. B., Czarnowicki, T., Lefferdink, R., Erickson, T., Canter, T., Puar, N., Rangel, S. M., Malik, K., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.04.036 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Worm, M., Bauer, A., Elsner, P. U., Mahler, V., Molin, S., & Nielsen, T. S. S. (2019) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.18469 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Hotze, M., Baurecht, H., Rodríguez, E., Chapman‐Rothe, N., Ollert, M., Fölster‐Holst, R., Adamski, J., Illig, T., Ring, J., & Weidinger, S. (2014) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.12234 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Hanifin, J. M., Ellis, C. N., Frieden, I. J., Fölster-Holst, R., Stein Gold, L. F., Secci, A., Smith, A. J., Zhao, C., Kornyeyeva, E., & Eichenfield, L. F. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.04.001 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Nakagawa, H., Nemoto, O., Igarashi, A., Saeki, H., Murata, R., Kaino, H., & Nagata, T. (2020) · The Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1346-8138.15173 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Role of PPAR, LXR, and PXR in epidermal homeostasis and inflammation
Schmuth, M., Moosbrugger-Martinz, V., Blunder, S., & Dubrac, S. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids · doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.012 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Emerging therapies for atopic dermatitis: JAK inhibitors
Cotter, D. G., Schairer, D. O., & Eichenfield, L. (2017) · Journal of American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.019 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
The role of environmental factors in allergy: A critical reappraisal
Gilles, S., Akdis, C., Lauener, R., Schmid‐Grendelmeier, P., Bieber, T., Schäppi, G., & Traidl‐Hoffmann, C. (2018) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/exd.13769 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of AhR in transcriptional regulation of immune cell development and function
Trikha, P., & Lee, D. A. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.188335 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The therapeutic promise of ATP antagonism at P2X3 receptors in respiratory and urological disorders
Ford, A. P., & Undem, B. J. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00267 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Cowden, J. M., Riley, J. P., Jing, Y., Thurmond, R. L., & Dunford, P. J. (2010) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/1465-9921-11-86 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
The pathogenesis of Prurigo nodularis – ‘Super‐Itch’ in exploration
Zeidler, C., & Ständer, S. (2016) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.767 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Gottlieb, A. B., Natsis, N. E., Kerdel, F. A., Forman, S. B., Gonzalez, E., Jimenez, G., Hernández, L., Kaffenberger, J. A., Guido, G., Lucas, K. J., et al. (2020) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2019.10.024 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
(2012) · PubMed · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Iwasaki, M., Nagata, K., Takano, S., Takahashi, K., Ishii, N., & Ikezawa, Z. (2002) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01862.x · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Thomas, K. S., Apfelbacher, C., Chalmers, J. R., Simpson, E. L., Spuls, P. I., Gerbens, L. A. A., Williams, H. C., Schmitt, J. M., Gabes, M., Howells, L., et al. (2021) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.19751 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
SnapShot: Jak-STAT Signaling II
Villarino, A. V., Gadina, M., O’Shea, J. J., & Kanno, Y. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.052 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Archer, N. K., Jo, J.-H., Lee, S. K., Kim, D., Smith, B., Ortines, R. V., Wang, Y., Marchitto, M. C., Ravipati, A., Cai, S. S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.042 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Walz, L., Cohen, A. J., Rebaza, A. P., Vanchieri, J., Slade, M. D., Dela Cruz, C. S., & Sharma, L. (2021) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-020-05730-z · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Infections Using Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptides
Zapotoczna, M., Forde, É., Hogan, S., Humphreys, H., O’Gara, J. P., Fitzgerald‐Hughes, D., Devocelle, M. C., & O’Neill, E. (2017) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/infdis/jix062 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Chemokine receptors in allergic diseases
Castan, L., Magnan, A., & Bouchaud, G. (2017) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13089 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Ariëns, L., Nimwegen, K., Shams, M., Bruin, D., Schaft, J., Os-Medendorp, H., & Bruin-Weller, M. (2019) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-3212 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
New and emerging treatments for inflammatory itch
Erickson, S., Heul, A. V., & Kim, B. S. (2021) · Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2020.05.028 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Felding, J., Sørensen, M. D., Poulsen, T. D., Larsen, J., Andersson, C., Refer, P., Engell, K. M., Ladefoged, L. G., Thormann, T., Vinggaard, A. M., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm500378a · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Wang, C., Kraus, C. N., Patel, K. G., Ganesan, A. K., & Grando, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.14573 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Nociceptive signaling mediated by P2X3, P2X4 and P2X7 receptors
Inoue, K., & Tsuda, M. (2021) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114309 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Furue, M., Kitahara, Y., Akama, H., Hojo, S., Hayashi, N., Nakagawa, H., & The JAPANESE E6005 Study Investigators (2014) · The Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1346-8138.12534 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Omalizumab for atopic dermatitis: case series and a systematic review of the literature
Holm, J. G., Agner, T., Sand, C., & Thomsen, S. F. (2017) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.13353 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Menzies-Gow, A., Ponnarambil, S., Downie, J., Bowen, K., Hellqvist, Å., & Colice, G. (2020) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-020-01541-7 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Schaper, K., Dickhaut, J., Japtok, L., Kietzmann, M., Mischke, R., Kleuser, B., & Bäumer, W. (2013) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.03.006 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Ständer, S., & Luger, T. A. (2015) · Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44605-8_14 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Targeting IgE in Severe Atopic Dermatitis with a Combination of Immunoadsorption and Omalizumab
Zink, A., Gensbaur, A., Zirbs, M., Seifert, F., Suarez, I., Mourantchanian, V, Weidinger, S., Mempel, M., Ring, J., & Ollert, M. (2016) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-2165 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Nakagawa, H., Iizuka, H., Nemoto, O., Shimabe, M., Furukawa, Y., Kikuta, N., & Ootaki, K. (2020) · Journal of Dermatological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2020.06.005 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Microbiome therapeutics go small molecule
Cully, M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/d41573-019-00122-8 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Comorbidities of Atopic Dermatitis: Beyond Rhinitis and Asthma
Andersen, Y. M. F., Egeberg, A., Skov, L., & Thyssen, J. P. (2017) · Current Dermatology Reports · doi:10.1007/s13671-017-0168-7 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Marone, G., Galdiero, M. R., Pecoraro, A., Pucino, V., Criscuolo, G., Triassi, M., & Varricchi, G. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1080/13543784.2019.1555237 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Iwamoto, K., Nümm, T. J., Koch, S., Herrmann, N., Leib, N., & Bieber, T. (2018) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.13460 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationA small molecule CRTH2 antagonist inhibits FITC-induced allergic cutaneous inflammation
Boehme, S. A., Franz-Bacon, K., Chen, E. P., Sasik, R., Sprague, L. J., Ly, T. W., Hardiman, G., & Bacon, K. B. (2009) · International Immunology · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxn127 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Kim, S., Jung, H., Kim, M., Moon, J., Ban, G., Kim, S. J., Yoo, H., & Park, H. (2020) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.14236 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Histamine Receptors and Antihistamines: From Discovery to Clinical Applications
Cataldi, M., Borriello, F., Granata, F., Annunziato, L., & Marone, G. (2014) · Chemical Immunology and Allergy · doi:10.1159/000358740 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Dicpinigaitis, P. V., McGarvey, L. P., & Canning, B. J. (2020) · Lung · doi:10.1007/s00408-020-00377-8 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Peters, E. M. J., Liezmann, C., Spatz, K., Daniltchenko, M., Joachim, R., Gimenez-Rivera, A., Hendrix, S., Botchkarev, V. A., Brandner, J. M., & Klapp, B. F. (2011) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2010.317 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pathogenesis of allergic diseases and implications for therapeutic interventions
Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, H., Hu, L., Liu, J., Wang, L., Wang, T., Zhang, H., Cong, L., & Wang, Q. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01344-4 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Guttman‐Yassky, E., Renert‐Yuval, Y., & Brunner, P. M. (2025) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02519-4 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Reich, K., Thyssen, J. P., Blauvelt, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01199-0 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Hu, Y., He, Z., Li, Z., Wang, Y., Wu, N., Sun, H., Zhou, Z., Hu, Q., & Cong, X. (2024) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-024-01682-2 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Neuroimmune communication regulating pruritus in atopic dermatitis
Steinhoff, M. S., Ahmad, F., Pandey, A. K., Datsi, A., AlHammadi, A., Al‐Khawaga, S., Al-Malki, A., Meng, J., Alam, M. A., & Buddenkotte, J. (2022) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.03.010 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Skin microbiome of atopic dermatitis
Koh, L. F., Ong, R. Y., & Common, J. (2021) · Allergology International · doi:10.1016/j.alit.2021.11.001 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Advances in the study of macrophage polarization in inflammatory immune skin diseases
Xia, T., Fu, S.-P., Yang, R., Kang, Y., Lei, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, Y., Jiang, Y. Y., Yu, L., et al. (2023) · Journal of Inflammation · doi:10.1186/s12950-023-00360-z · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases: targets, therapies and unmet needs
Kolkhir, P., Akdiş, C. A., Akdiş, M., Bachert, C., Bieber, T. R. M., Canonica, G. W., Guttman‐Yassky, E., Metz, M., Mullol, J., Palomares, Ó., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-023-00750-1 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationTreatment of atopic dermatitis: Recently approved drugs and advanced clinical development programs
Müller, S., Maintz, L., & Bieber, T. R. M. (2024) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.16009 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationBurden of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults and Adolescents: a Systematic Literature Review
Fasseeh, A. N., Elezbawy, B., Korra, N., Tannira, M., Dalle, H., Aderian, S., Abaza, S., & Kaló, Z. (2022) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-022-00819-6 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Fania, L., Moretta, G., Antonelli, F., Scala, E., Abeni, D., Albanesi, C., & Madonna, S. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23052684 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Stefanovic, N., & Irvine, A. D. (2023) · Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2023.09.009 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Berdyshev, E. V., Goleva, E., Bissonnette, R., Bronova, I. A., Bronoff, A. S., Richers, B. N., Garcia, S. L., Ramirez-Gama, M. A., Taylor, P. A., Praestgaard, A. H., et al. (2022) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.15432 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Mitamura, Y., Reiger, M., Kim, J., Xiao, Y., Zhakparov, D., Tan, G., Rückert, B., Rinaldi, A. O., Baerenfaller, K., Akdiş, M., et al. (2023) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.15781 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Disease modification in inflammatory skin disorders: opportunities and challenges
Bieber, T. R. M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-023-00735-0 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Self-citationWeidinger, S., Bieber, T. R. M., Cork, M. J., Reich, A., Wilson, R. J., Quaratino, S., Stebegg, M., Brennan, N., Gilbert, S., O’Malley, J. T., et al. (2023) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljad240 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationMendes‐Bastos, P., Brasileiro, A., Kolkhir, P., Frischbutter, S., Scheffel, J., Moñino‐Romero, S., & Maurer, M. (2022) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.15261 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Dupilumab-Associated Adverse Events During Treatment of Allergic Diseases
Kychygina, A., Cassagne, M., Tauber, M., Galiacy, S. D., Paul, C. F., Fournié, P., & Simon, M. (2022) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-022-08934-0 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Keratinocytes: An Enigmatic Factor in Atopic Dermatitis
Das, P., Mounika, P., Yellurkar, M. L., Prasanna, V. S., Sarkar, S., Ravichandiran, V., & Arumugam, S. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11101683 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Atopic dermatitis: pathomechanisms and lessons learned from novel systemic therapeutic options
Bieber, T. R. M., Paller, A. S., Kabashima, K., Feely, M. A., Rueda, M. J., Terres, J. A. R., & Wollenberg, A. (2022) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.18225 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationInflammation and aging-related disease: A transdisciplinary inflammaging framework
Andonian, B. J., Hippensteel, J. A., Abuabara, K., Boyle, E. M., Colbert, J. F., Devinney, M. J., Faye, A. S., Kochar, B. D., Lee, J., Litke, R. R., et al. (2024) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-024-01364-0 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Çetinarslan, T., Kümper, L., & Fölster‐Holst, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2023.1159404 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
OX40 in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis—A New Therapeutic Target
Croft, M., Esfandiari, E., Chong, C., Hsu, H., Kabashima, K., Kricorian, G., Warren, R. B., Wollenberg, A., & Guttman‐Yassky, E. (2024) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-023-00838-9 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Genetic and Immunological Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis
Schuler, C. F., IV, Tsoi, L. C., Billi, A. C., Harms, P. W., Weidinger, S., & Gudjonsson, J. E. (2023) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jid.2023.10.019 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Bieber, T. R. M., Reich, K., Paul, C. F., Tsunemi, Y., Augustin, M., Lacour, J. ‐., Ghislain, P., Dutronc, Y., Liao, R., Yang, F. E., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.21630 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent advances and future prospective of topical and transdermal delivery systems
Tapfumaneyi, P., Imran, M., Mohammed, Y., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Drug Delivery · doi:10.3389/fddev.2022.957732 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Atopic dermatitis: A global health perspective
Faye, O., Flohr, C., Kabashima, K., Ma, L., Paller, A. S., Rapelanoro, F. R., Steinhoff, M. S., Su, J. C., Takaoka, R., Wollenberg, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.19723 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Challenges and Future Trends in Atopic Dermatitis
Gatmaitan, J. G., & Lee, J. H. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241411380 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Zeng, H., Zhao, B., Zhang, D., Rui, X., Hou, X.-D., Chen, X., Zhang, B., Yuan, Y. F., Deng, H., & Ge, G. (2022) · Phytomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154228 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Exploring the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis and disease modification
Hülpüsch, C., Rohayem, R., Reiger, M., & Traidl‐Hoffmann, C. (2024) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2024.04.029 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Luís, J. P., Simões, C. J. V., & Brito, R. M. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23031731 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
What’s New in Topicals for Atopic Dermatitis?
Kleinman, E. P., Laborada, J., Metterle, L., & Eichenfield, L. F. (2022) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-022-00712-0 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Non-selective topical pan-JAKi approved for AD, or in clinical development, include delgocitinib (Japan Tobacco/ LEO), cerdulatinib (RVT/DMVT502, Dermavant), jaktinib (Suzhou Zeigen Biopharma), and CEE321 (Novartis) [15].”
BackgroundManipulating Microbiota to Treat Atopic Dermatitis: Functions and Therapies
Alam, J., Xie, L., Yap, Y. A., Marques, F. Z., & Robert, R. (2022) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens11060642 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Makowska, K., Nowaczyk, J., Blicharz, L., Waśkiel-Burnat, A., Czuwara, J., Olszewska, M., & Rudnicka, L. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24010781 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Conte, R., Luca, I. D., Valentino, A., et al. (2023) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb14020082 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Blood transcriptome profiling identifies 2 candidate endotypes of atopic dermatitis
Möbus, L., Rodríguez, E., Harder, I., et al. (2022) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.02.001 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
An Altered Skin and Gut Microbiota Are Involved in the Modulation of Itch in Atopic Dermatitis
Moniaga, C. S., Tominaga, M., & Takamori, K. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11233930 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Clinical phenotypes of adult atopic dermatitis and related therapies
Patruno, C., Potestio, L., & Napolitano, M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1097/aci.0000000000000837 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
The link between atopic dermatitis and asthma-immunological imbalance and beyond
Yaneva, M., & Darlenski, R. (2021) · Asthma Research and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40733-021-00082-0 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Beck, L. A., Bieber, T., Weidinger, S., Tauber, M., Saeki, H., Irvine, A. D., Eichenfield, L. F., Werfel, T., Arlert, P., Jiang, L., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.047 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationChuah, L., Loo, H. L., Goh, C. F., Fu, J., & Ng, S. (2023) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-023-01307-w · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Silverberg, J. I., Adam, D. N., Zirwas, M., Kalia, S., Gutermuth, J., Pinter, A., Pink, A., Chiricozzi, A., Barbarot, S., Mark, T., et al. (2022) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-022-00702-2 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Endotypes of atopic dermatitis
Fyhrquist, N., Yang, Y., Karisola, P., & Alenius, H. T. (2025) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2025.02.029 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Zhou, W., Cai, J., Li, Z., & Lin, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1132719 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Flare management in atopic dermatitis: from definition to treatment
Girolomoni, G., & Busà, V. M. (2022) · Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease · doi:10.1177/20406223211066728 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
New and Upcoming Topical Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: A Review of the Literature
Sideris, N., Paschou, E., Bakirtzi, K., Kiritsi, D., Papadimitriou, I., Tsentemeidou, A., Sotiriou, E., & Vakirlis, E. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm11174974 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Recent advancements in the atopic dermatitis mechanism
Savva, M., Papadopoulos, N. G., Gregoriou, S., Katsarou, S., Papapostolou, N., Makris, M., & Xepapadaki, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark · doi:10.31083/j.fbl2902084 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
The Role of a Novel Generation of Emollients, ‘Emollients Plus’, in Atopic Dermatitis
Araviiskaia, E., Pincelli, C., Sparavigna, A., & Luger, T. A. (2022) · Clinical Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology · doi:10.2147/ccid.s389697 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
The role of OX40 ligand/OX40 axis signalling in atopic dermatitis
Guttman‐Yassky, E., Croft, M., Geng, B., Rynkiewicz, N., Lucchesi, D., Peakman, M., van Krinks, C., Valdecantos, W. C., Xing, H., & Weidinger, S. (2024) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljae230 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Zhou, J., & Zhong, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.1049016 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Pareek, A., Kumari, L., Pareek, A., Chaudhary, S., Ratan, Y., Janmeda, P., Chuturgoon, S., & Chuturgoon, A. A. (2024) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells13050425 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems for inflammatory skin conditions
Gade, L., Boyd, B. J., Malmsten, M., & Heinz, A. (2024) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.037 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Biomarkers for phenotype-endotype relationship in atopic dermatitis: a critical review
Park, C. O., Kim, S. M., Lee, K. H., & Bieber, T. R. M. (2024) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105121 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationMaintz, L., Bieber, T., Simpson, H., & Demessant-Flavigny, A. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12060893 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficacy and Safety of JAK1 Inhibitor Abrocitinib in Atopic Dermatitis
Iznardo, H., Roé, E., Serra‐Baldrich, E., & Puig, L. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15020385 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Silverberg, J. I., Rosmarin, D. M., Chovatiya, R., Bieber, T. R. M., Schleicher, S., Beck, L. A., Gooderham, M., Chaudhry, S., Fanton, C. P., Yu, D., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53384-1 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationNew Topical Therapies in Development for Atopic Dermatitis
Freitas, E., Gooderham, M., & Torres, T. R. (2022) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-022-01722-2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Ren, J., Liu, T., Bi, B., Sohail, S., & Din, F. U. (2023) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2023.10.033 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Immunopathology and Immunotherapy of Inflammatory Skin Diseases
Song, A., Lee, S. E., & Kim, J. H. (2022) · Immune Network · doi:10.4110/in.2022.22.e7 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Liu, X., Qin, Y., Dong, L., Han, Z., Liu, T., Tang, Y., Yu, Y., Ye, J., Tao, J., Zeng, X., et al. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.08.019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Silverberg, J. I., Lio, P., Simpson, E. L., Li, C., Brownell, D. R., Gryllos, I., Ng-Cashin, J., Krueger, T. S., Swaidan, V. R., Bliss, R., et al. (2023) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102002 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Mapping the immune cell landscape of severe atopic dermatitis by single‐cell RNA ‐seq
Jin, S., Lee, K., Bang, Y. J., Jeon, Y., Jung, S.-Y., Choi, S., Lee, J. S., Kim, J., Guttman‐Yassky, E., Park, C., et al. (2024) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.16121 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Atopic dermatitis: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention
Yue, C., Zhou, H., Wang, X., Yu, J., Hu, Y., Zhou, P., Zhao, F., Zeng, F., Li, G., Li, Y., et al. (2024) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70029 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Takeuchi, T. (2022) · Inflammation and Regeneration · doi:10.1186/s41232-022-00221-x · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Simpson, E. L., Guttman‐Yassky, E., Eichenfield, L. F., Boguniewicz, M., Bieber, T. R. M., Schneider, S. K. R., Guana, A., & Silverberg, J. I. (2023) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.15811 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationPrurigo Nodularis: Pathogenesis and the Horizon of Potential Therapeutics
Yook, H. J., & Lee, J. H. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25105164 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Pharmacology of orismilast, a potent and selective PDE4 inhibitor
Silverberg, J. I., French, L. E., Warren, R. B., Strober, B. E., Kjøller, K., Sommer, M. O. A., Andrès, P., Felding, J., Weiss, A., Tutkunkardas, D., et al. (2022) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.18818 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Guttman‐Yassky, E., Silverberg, J. I., Thaçi, D., Papp, K. A., Ständer, S., Beck, L. A., Kim, B., Hu, X., Liu, J., Calimlim, B., et al. (2023) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.19391 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Effect of abrocitinib on skin biomarkers in patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis
Guttman‐Yassky, E., Facheris, P., Gómez‐Arias, P. J., DUCA, E. D., da Rosa, J. C., Weidinger, S., Bissonnette, R., Armstrong, A. W., Sénéschal, J., Eyerich, K., et al. (2023) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.15969 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Silvestrini, A. V. P., Morais, M. F., Debiasi, B. W., Praça, F. S. G., & Bentley, M. V. L. B. (2024) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2024.115198 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Exploring Mast Cell–CD8 T Cell Interactions in Inflammatory Skin Diseases
Chen, Y., Griffiths, C., & Bulfone-Paus, S. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24021564 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Kakkar, V., Saini, K., & Singh, K. K. (2023) · Pharmacological Reports · doi:10.1007/s43440-023-00510-3 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2024.07.1447 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Microneedles as an Emerging Platform for Transdermal Delivery of Phytochemicals
Gowda, B. H. J., Ahmed, M. G., Thakur, R., Donnelly, R., & Vora, L. K. (2024) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00894 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
An inflammation-responsive double-layer microneedle patch for recurrent atopic dermatitis therapy
Song, L., Chi, J., Li, Z., Tao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhou, Q., Lu, S., Huang, S., Huang, S., Lu, X., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123215 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Extracellular vesicles from IFN-γ-primed mesenchymal stem cells repress atopic dermatitis in mice
Kim, J., Lee, S., Jung, M.-H., Jeong, S.-Y., You, H.-Y., Won, J.-Y., Han, S.-D., Cho, H., Park, S., Park, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01728-8 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Zheng, C., Cao, T., Ye, C., & Zou, Y. (2023) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2023.109805 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Extracellular vesicles in skin health, diseases, and aging
Wang, J., Yuan, S., Tu, Y., Lv, Z., Hua, C., & Ding, X. (2024) · Interdisciplinary medicine · doi:10.1002/inmd.20240011 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The Role of the Cutaneous Mycobiome in Atopic Dermatitis
Szczepańska, M., Blicharz, L., Nowaczyk, J., Makowska, K., Goldust, M., Waśkiel‐Burnat, A., Czuwara, J., Samochocki, Z., & Rudnicka, L. (2022) · Journal of Fungi · doi:10.3390/jof8111153 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Priya, S., Tomar, Y., Desai, V. M., & Singhvi, G. (2023) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2023.2190095 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
McDonald, V. M., Hamada, Y., Agustí, A. G. N., & Gibson, P. G. (2024) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2024.01.020 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Staphylococcus aureus proteases trigger eosinophil-mediated skin inflammation
Nolan, S. J., Orlando, N., Lee, A. J., Wu, M.-C., Zhang, J., Youn, C., Feller, L., Pontaza, C., Dikeman, D. A., Limjunyawong, N., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2309243121 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Immunological pathomechanisms of spongiotic dermatitis in skin lesions of atopic dermatitis
Tanei, R., & Hasegawa, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23126682 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Emerging Systemic Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis
Ferrucci, S. M., Tavecchio, S., Marzano, A. V., & Buffon, S. (2023) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-023-00920-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Maintz, L., Welchowski, T., Herrmann, N., Brauer, J., Traidl‐Hoffmann, C., Havenith, R., Müller, S., Rhyner, C., Dreher, A., CK‐CARE study group, et al. (2023) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.15647 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationJAK inhibitors and black box warnings: what is the future for JAK inhibitors?
Tokareva, Y., Reid, P. D., Yang, V., et al. (2023) · Expert Review of Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1080/1744666x.2023.2249237 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Insight into IL-5 as a Potential Target for the Treatment of Allergic Diseases
Antosz, K., Batko, J., Błażejewska, M., Gawor, A., Sleziak, J., & Gomułka, K. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines12071531 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Traidl‐Hoffmann, C., Afghani, J., Akdiş, C. A., Akdis, M., Aydin, H., Baerenfaller, K., Behrendt, H., Bieber, T. R. M., Bigliardi, P. L., Bigliardi‐Qi, M., et al. (2024) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.16247 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationZhao, Y. P., Zhang, L., Wu, L., Yang, B., Wang, J., Li, Y., Li, J., Diao, Q., Sun, Q., Zhu, X., et al. (2024) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.16368 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Insights into atopic dermatitis pathogenesis lead to newly approved systemic therapies
Trier, A. M., & Kim, B. (2022) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1093/bjd/ljac016 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Habbas, A. H., Abu-Raghif, A. R., Salman, H., et al. (2025) · Archives of Dermatological Research · doi:10.1007/s00403-025-03955-z · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Katoh, N., Ohya, Y., Murota, H., et al. (2022) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-022-00842-7 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Pu, W., Wang, S., Wang, D., Li, Y., Yip, R. C. S., & Chen, H. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133195 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Koszorú, K., Hajdu, K., Brodszky, V., Bató, A., Gergely, L. H., Kovács, A., Beretzky, Z., Sárdy, M., Szegedi, A., & Rencz, F. (2022) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01460-y · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Gut microbiota and atopic dermatitis in children: a scoping review
Liu, Y., Du, X., Zhai, S., Tang, X., Liu, C., & Li, W. (2022) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-022-03390-3 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chen, X., Zhang, Y., Pei, J., Zeng, X., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, F., & Deng, Y. (2022) · International Immunopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109270 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Trained immunity–based vaccines for infections and allergic diseases
Martín‐Cruz, L., Benito‐Villalvilla, C., Angelina, A., Subiza, J. L., & Palomares, Ó. (2024) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2024.09.009 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
The NLRP3 inflammasome in allergic diseases: mechanisms and therapeutic implications
Zhou, H., Wang, L., Lv, W., & Yu, H. (2024) · Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10238-024-01492-z · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Neuronal regulation of innate lymphoid cell responses
Yano, H., & Artis, D. (2022) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2022.102205 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Tsai, Y., Chang, H.-H., Chou, S.-C., Chu, T. W., Hsu, Y.-J., Hsiao, C., Lo, Y., Wu, N., Chang, D., & Hung, C. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23179863 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bieber, T.
- Affiliations
- University Hospital Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Bieber, Thomas
- ORCID
- Bieber, Thomas
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
- Published
- 2021-08-20
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-40
- ISSN
- 1474-1776 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-1784
- PMC
- PMC8377708
- OpenAlex
- W3195786665
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 269
- Citations by year
- 2026: 106 · 2025: 131 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Christine Kühne – Center for Allergy Research and Education
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- atopic dermatitis, drug development, dupilumab, tralokinumab, IL-13, JAK1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib, precision medicine, disease mechanisms, clinical phenotype, chronic inflammatory skin disease
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dermatitis, Atopic, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Precision Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review