The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The diagnostic performance of neurofilament light chain in CSF and blood for Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis was performed regarding the diagnostic performance of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in CSF and blood. Methods: A database search was conducted for NfL biomarker studies in the context of Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared with controls (i.e., cognitively unimpaired, mild cognitive impairment, or disease mimics). Results: In groups with a sufficient number of studies, the performance of NfL in blood and CSF was similar. Compared with disease mimics, we observed that CSF NfL had strong discriminatory power for ALS, modest discriminatory power for FTD, and no discriminatory power for AD. NfL provided the greatest separation between ALS and cognitively unimpaired controls in both the blood and CSF, followed by FTD (CSF and blood), then AD (blood and CSF). Discussion: Comparable performance of CSF and blood NfL in many groups demonstrates the promise of NfL as a noninvasive biomarker of neurodegeneration; however, its utility in clinically meaningful scenarios requires greater scrutiny. Toward clinical implementation, a more comprehensive understanding of NfL concentrations in disease subtypes with overlapping phenotypes and at defined stages of disease, and the development of a harmonization program, are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures





Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similar to what was observed in CSF, serum and plasma NfL are elevated in FTD compared to AD, but with limited utility in discriminating FTD from AD.”
From New developments of biofluid‐based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
Hozo, S. P., Djulbegovic, B., & Hozo, I. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 · Cited by 9,062
Brown, R. H., & Al‐Chalabi, A. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1603471 · Cited by 2,580
IntHout, J., Ioannidis, J. P., & Borm, G. F. (2014) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-25 · Cited by 2,419
Olsson, B., Lautner, R., Andreasson, U., Öhrfelt, A., Portelius, E., Bjerke, M., Hölttä, M., Rosén, C., Olsson, C., Strobel, G., et al. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(16)00070-3 · Cited by 2,049
A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Feldman, H. H., Frisoni, G. B., Hampel, H., Jagust, W. J., Johnson, K. A., Knopman, D. S., et al. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002923 · Cited by 1,864
Serum neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis
Disanto, G., Barro, C., Benkert, P., Naegelin, Y., Schädelin, S., Giardiello, A., Zecca, C., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Leppert, D., et al. (2017) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24954 · Cited by 1,164
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schwarzer G., 2007, meta: an R package for meta‐analysis, R News, 7, 40
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mead, R. J., Shan, N., Reiser, H. J., Marshall, F., & Shaw, P. J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00612-2 · Cited by 505
Pathogenesis, diagnostics, and therapeutics for Alzheimer's disease: Breaking the memory barrier
Tryphena, K. P., Shukla, R., Khatri, D. K., & Vora, L. K. (2024) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102481 · Cited by 438
Moscoso, A., Grothe, M. J., Ashton, N. J., Karikari, T. K., Lantero‐Rodriguez, J., Snellman, A., Suárez‐Calvet, M., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Schöll, M., et al. (2021) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4986 · Cited by 314
Baiardi, S., Quadalti, C., Mammana, A., Dellavalle, S., Zenesini, C., Sambati, L., Pantieri, R., Polischi, B., Romano, L., Suffritti, M., et al. (2022) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-022-01093-6 · Cited by 193
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration
Grossman, M., Seeley, W. W., Boxer, A. L., Hillis, A. E., Knopman, D. S., Ljubenov, P. A., Miller, B., Piguet, O., Rademakers, R., Whitwell, J. L., et al. (2023) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00447-0 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Forgrave, L. M., Ma, M., Best, J. R., & DeMarco, M. L.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Providence Health Care (CA)
- Corresponding author
- DeMarco, Mari L.
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 730-743
- ISSN
- 2352-8729 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6939029
- OpenAlex
- W2984229501
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Keywords
- neurofilament light chain, Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, blood biomarkers, diagnostic accuracy, neurodegeneration, mild cognitive impairment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review