Cited by 52Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Anomaly explanation: A review

Open access
Yepmo, Véronne, Smits, Grégory, Pivert, Olivier·2022·Data & Knowledge Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.datak.2021.101946

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yepmo, V., Smits, G., & Pivert, O.
Affiliations
Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (FR)
Corresponding author
Yepmo, Véronne
Venue
Data & Knowledge Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
137
Pages
101946
ISSN
0169-023X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214757078
Cited by
52
References
80
Citations by year
2025: 13 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Data & Knowledge Engineering (acceptedVersion)
Funders
DGA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
anomaly explanation, anomaly detection, explainable AI, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review