Developmental effects of decision-making on sensitivity to reward: An fMRI study
Open accessAbstract
Studies comparing neural correlates of reward processing across development yield inconsistent findings. This challenges theories characterizing adolescents as globally hypo- or hypersensitive to rewards. Developmental differences in reward sensitivity may fluctuate based on reward magnitude, and on whether rewards require decision-making. We examined whether these factors modulate developmental differences in neural response during reward anticipation and/or receipt in 26 adolescents (14.05±2.37 yrs) and 26 adults (31.25±8.23 yrs). Brain activity was assessed with fMRI during reward anticipation, when subjects made responses with-vs.-without decision-making, to obtain large-vs.-small rewards, and during reward receipt. When reward-receipt required decision-making, neural activity did not differ by age. However, when reward receipt did not require decision-making, neural activity varied by development, reward magnitude, and stage of the reward task. During anticipation, adolescents, but not adults, exhibited greater activity in the insula, extending into putamen, and cingulate gyrus for large-vs.-small incentives. During feedback, adults, but not adolescents, exhibited greater activity in the precuneus for large-vs.-small incentives. These data indicate that age-related differences in reward sensitivity cannot be characterized by global hypo- or hyper-responsivity. Instead, neural responding in striatum, prefrontal cortex and precuneus is influenced by both situational demands and developmental factors. This suggests nuanced maturational effects in adolescent reward sensitivity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several studies do not find age-related differences in anterior insular cortex during reward processing.
“We must acknowledge, however, that there are also several studies that do not find age-related differences in this region [90, 92, 95, 96, 100].”
From The role of the anterior insula in adolescent decision making (2014) · cites this paper as [95]
Jarcho et al. (2012) found that neural activity differed by age when reward receipt was prescribed by the task (no-choice condition), but was not influenced by age when decision-making was required (choice condition).
“This study found that neural activity differed by age when the reward-receipt was prescribed by the task (no-choice condition), but was not influenced by age when decision-making was required (choice condition).”
From A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: The impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment (2013) · cites this paper as Jarcho et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW SCID-I/NP (for DSM-IV) Non-patient Edition 2002
- Authors
- Jarcho, J. M., Benson, B. E., Plate, R. C., Guyer, A. E., Detloff, A. M., Pine, D. S., Leibenluft, E., & Ernst, M.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- National Institute of Mental Health (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jarcho, Johanna M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-447
- ISSN
- 1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3427023
- OpenAlex
- W2037982134
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 3.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Health, National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- reward sensitivity, decision-making, reward anticipation, adolescent development, brain maturation, insula, putamen, cingulate gyrus, precuneus, striatum, prefrontal cortex, reward magnitude, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review