The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Capacitive deionization (CDI), which is based on the electrosorption of ions by porous electrodes, is an emerging technology for brackish water desalination. Understanding the key drivers of energy consumption in CDI and benchmarking CDI with reverse osmosis (RO), the current state-of-the-art for brackish and seawater desalination, is crucial to guide the future development of desalination technologies. In this study, we develop system-scale models to analyze the energy consumption and energy efficiency of CDI and RO over a wide range of material properties and operating conditions. Using our models, we explore how the energetic performance of CDI and RO compare as a function of feed salinity, water recovery, salt rejection, and average water flux, which is normalized by electrode and membrane area in CDI and RO, respectively. Our analysis shows that RO is significantly more energy efficient than CDI, particularly when targeting higher salinity feed streams and higher salt rejection values. For brackish water with a salt concentration of 2000 mg L−1, achieving 50% water recovery and 75% salt rejection, with an average water flux of 10 L m−2 h−1 using CDI requires a specific energy consumption of 0.85 kWh m−3, more than eight times that of RO (0.09 kWh m−3). Importantly, our results also indicate that current efforts to improve electrode materials can only marginally reduce the energy consumption of CDI. We conclude with a discussion highlighting other important factors, such as capital cost, electrode stability, and membrane fouling, which affect the efficacy of CDI and RO for low-salinity desalination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications
Bard, A. J., & Faulkner, L. R. (1980) · Cited by 22,435
Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades
Shannon, M. A., Bohn, P. W., Elimelech, M., Georgiadis, J. G., Mariñas, B. J., & Mayes, A. M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06599 · Cited by 8,465
Self-citationThe Future of Seawater Desalination: Energy, Technology, and the Environment
Elimelech, M., & Phillip, W. A. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200488 · Cited by 6,711
Self-citationFour billion people facing severe water scarcity
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500323 · Cited by 5,531
Electrochemical methods: Fundamentals and applications
Vondrák, J. (1983) · Surface Technology · doi:10.1016/0376-4583(83)90080-8 · Cited by 4,688
Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges
Greenlee, L. F., Lawler, D. F., Freeman, B. D., Marrot, B., & Moulin, P. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010 · Cited by 3,409
Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity
Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M., & Freeman, B. D. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab0530 · Cited by 3,344
Self-citationMembrane distillation: A comprehensive review
Alkhudhiri, A., Darwish, N., & Hilal, N. (2012) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.027 · Cited by 2,609
Review on the science and technology of water desalination by capacitive deionization
Porada, S., Zhao, R., van der Wal, A., Presser, V., & Biesheuvel, P. M. (2013) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.03.005 · Cited by 2,152
Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes
Petersen, R. J. (1993) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/0376-7388(93)80014-o · Cited by 1,743
Cited by
Intrapore energy barriers govern ion transport and selectivity of desalination membranes
Zhou, X., Wang, Z., Epsztein, R., Zhan, C., Li, W., Fortner, J. D., Pham, T. A., Kim, J.-H., & Elimelech, M. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd9045 · Cited by 367
Self-citationPatel, S. K., Ritt, C. L., Deshmukh, A., Wang, Z., Qin, M., Epsztein, R., & Elimelech, M. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee00341g · Cited by 336
Self-citationZhang, C., Ma, J., Wu, L., Sun, J., Wang, L., Li, T., & Waite, T. D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06552 · Cited by 323
Microscopic Simulations of Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors
Jeanmairet, G., Rotenberg, B., & Salanne, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00925 · Cited by 303
Energy Efficiency of Capacitive Deionization
Wang, L., Dykstra, J. E., & Lin, S. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04858 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, M., Deshmukh, A., Epsztein, R., Patel, S. K., Owoseni, O. M., Walker, W. S., & Elimelech, M.
- Venue
- Desalination
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 455
- Pages
- 100-114
- ISSN
- 0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2908577003
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 15.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.003
- The paper
- Qin, M., Deshmukh, A., Epsztein, R., Patel, S. K., Owoseni, O. M., Walker, W. S., & Elimelech, M. (2019). Comparison of energy consumption in desalination by capacitive deionization and reverse osmosis. Desalination. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.