Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity

Park, Ho Bum, Kamcev, Jovan, Robeson, Lloyd M., Elimelech, Menachem, Freeman, Benny D.·2017·Science
DOI 10.1126/science.aab0530
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Filtering through to what's important: Membranes are widely used for gas and liquid separations. Historical analysis of a range of gas pair separations indicated that there was an upper bound on the trade-off between membrane permeability, which limits flow rates, and the selectivity, which limits the quality of the separation process. Park et al. review the advances that have been made in attempts to break past this upper bound. Some inspiration has come from biological membranes. The authors also highlight cases where the challenges lie in areas other than improved separation performance. Science , this issue p. eaab0530

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aab0530

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 115

  1. 10.1126/science.1200488 · DOI · Paper page
  2. M. A.Shannon, P. W.Bohn, M.Elimelech, J. G.Georgiadis, B. J.Mariñas, A. M.Mayes, Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452, 301–310 (2008). 10.1038/nature0659918354474 · DOI · Paper page
  3. R. W. Baker Membrane Technology and Applications (John Wiley & Sons Inc. ed. 3 Hoboken NJ 2012).
  4. 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.02.045 · DOI · Paper page
  5. H. Lutz Ultrafiltration for Bioprocessing: Development and Implementation of Robust Processes (Elsevier Amsterdam 2015).
  6. D. F.Stamatialis, B. J.Papenburg, M.Gironés, S.Saiful, S. N. M.Bettahalli, S.Schmitmeier, M.Wessling, Medical applications of membranes: Drug delivery, artificial organs and tissue engineering. J. Membr. Sci. 308, 1–34 (2008). 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.059 · DOI · Paper page
  7. K.-V. Peinemann S. P. Nunes L. Giorno Membrane Technology: Volume 3: Membranes for Food Applications (Wiley-VCH Weinheim Germany 2010). · doi:10.1002/9783527631384
  8. P.Arora, Z. J.Zhang, Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 104, 4419–4462 (2004). 10.1021/cr020738u15669158 · DOI · Paper page
  9. S. J.Peighambardoust, S.Rowshanzamir, M.Amjadi, Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35, 9349–9384 (2010). 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Y.Wang, K. S.Chen, J.Mishler, S. C.Cho, X. C.Adroher, A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Appl. Energy 88, 981–1007 (2011). 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030 · DOI · Paper page
  11. J. W.Post, H. V. M.Hamelers, C. J. N.Buisman, Energy recovery from controlled mixing salt and fresh water with a reverse electrodialysis system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5785–5790 (2008). 10.1021/es800431718754509 · DOI · Paper page
  12. B. E.Logan, M.Elimelech, Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 488, 313–319 (2012). 10.1038/nature1147722895336 · DOI · Paper page
  13. R. S.Kingsbury, K.Chu, O.Coronell, Energy storage by reversible electrodialysis: The concentration battery. J. Membr. Sci. 495, 502–516 (2015). 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.050 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.10.041 · DOI · Paper page
  15. L. M.Blaney, S.Cinar, A. K.SenGupta, Hybrid anion exchanger for trace phosphate removal from water and wastewater. Water Res. 41, 1603–1613 (2007). 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.00817306856 · DOI · Paper page
  16. L. S.White, Development of large-scale applications in organic solvent nanofiltration and pervaporation for chemical and refining processes. J. Membr. Sci. 286, 26–35 (2006). 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.006 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2006.09.006
  17. P.Marchetti, M. F.Jimenez Solomon, G.Szekely, A. G.Livingston, Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: A critical review. Chem. Rev. 114, 10735–10806 (2014). 10.1021/cr500006j25333504 · DOI · Paper page
  18. E.Curcio, E.Drioli, Membrane distillation and related operations: A review. Separ. Purif. Rev. 34, 35–86 (2005). 10.1081/SPM-200054951 · DOI · Paper page
  19. S. M.Joscelyne, G.Trägårdh, Membrane emulsification: A literature review. J. Membr. Sci. 169, 107–117 (2000). 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00334-8 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1021/ma9814548 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.030 · DOI · Paper page
  23. W.Song, P. J.Rossky, M.Maroncelli, Modeling alkane+perfluoroalkane interactions using all-atom potentials: Failure of the usual combining rules. J. Chem. Phys. 119, 9145–9162 (2003). 10.1063/1.1610435 · doi:10.1063/1.1610435
  24. T. C. Merkel I. Pinnau R. Prabhakar B. D. Freeman in Materials Science of Membranes Y. Yampolskii I. Pinnau B. D. Freeman Eds. (John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester UK 2006) pp. 251–270. · DOI
  25. P. M.Budd, N. B.McKeown, D.Fritsch, Free volume and intrinsic microporosity in polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 1977 (2005). 10.1039/b417402j · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1126/science.1146744 · DOI · Paper page
  27. L. M.Robeson, M. E.Dose, B. D.Freeman, D. R.Paul, Analysis of the transport properties of thermally rearranged (TR) polymers and polymers of intrinsic microporosity (PIM) relative to upper bound performance. J. Membr. Sci. 525, 18–24 (2017). 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.085 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.085
  28. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.058 · DOI
  29. D. F.Sanders, Z. P.Smith, R.Guo, L. M.Robeson, J. E.McGrath, D. R.Paul, B. D.Freeman, Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: A review. Polymer (Guildf.) 54, 4729–4761 (2013). 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.075 · DOI · Paper page
  30. I. K.Meier, M.Langsam, H. C.Klotz, Selectivity enhancement via photooxidative surface modification of polyimide air separation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 94, 195–212 (1994). 10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0174-I · doi:10.1016/0376-7388(93)e0174-i
  31. C. H.Park, S. Y.Lee, D. S.Hwang, D. W.Shin, D. H.Cho, K. H.Lee, T.-W.Kim, T.-W.Kim, M.Lee, D.-S.Kim, C. M.Doherty, A. W.Thornton, A. J.Hill, M. D.Guiver, Y. M.Lee, Nanocrack-regulated self-humidifying membranes. Nature 532, 480–483 (2016). 10.1038/nature1763427121841 · DOI · Paper page
  32. H.Nishide, T.Suzuki, H.Kawakami, E.Tsuchida, Cobalt porphyrin-mediated oxygen transport in a polymer membrane: effect of the cobalt porphyrin structure on the oxygen-binding reaction, oxygen-diffusion constants, and oxygen-transport efficiency. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 5084–5088 (1994). 10.1021/j100070a023 · doi:10.1021/j100070a023
  33. L. M.Robeson, Polymer blends in membrane transport processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 11859–11865 (2010). 10.1021/ie100153q · doi:10.1021/ie100153q
  34. 10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00194-4 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00430-1 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/aic.14105 · DOI
  37. S.Park, W. R.Kang, H. T.Kwon, S.Kim, M.Seo, J.Bang, S.Lee, H. K.Jeong, J. S.Lee, The polymeric upper bound for N2/NF3 separation and beyond; ZIF-8 containing mixed matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 486, 29–39 (2015). 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.030 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.030
  38. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.054 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.desal.2014.10.031 · DOI · Paper page
  40. N. Y.Yip, A.Tiraferri, W. A.Phillip, J. D.Schiffman, L. A.Hoover, Y. C.Kim, M.Elimelech, Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 4360–4369 (2011). 10.1021/es104325z21491936 · doi:10.1021/es104325z
  41. J.Wei, X.Liu, C.Qiu, R.Wang, C. Y.Tang, Influence of monomer concentrations on the performance of polyamide-based thin film composite forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 381, 110–117 (2011). 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.034 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.034
  42. A.Mehta, A. L.Zydney, Permeability and selectivity analysis for ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249, 245–249 (2005). 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.09.040 · DOI
  43. L.Robeson, H.Hwu, J.McGrath, Upper bound relationship for proton exchange membranes: Empirical relationship and relevance of phase separated blends. J. Membr. Sci. 302, 70–77 (2007). 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.06.029 · DOI
  44. C. P.Ribeiro, B. D.Freeman, D. S.Kalika, S.Kalakkunnath, Aromatic polyimide and polybenzoxazole membranes for the fractionation of aromatic/aliphatic hydrocarbons by pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 390-391, 182–193 (2012). 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.042 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.042
  45. G. M.Geise, M. A.Hickner, B. E.Logan, Ionic resistance and permselectivity tradeoffs in anion exchange membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10294–10301 (2013). 10.1021/am403207w24040962 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.035 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.035
  47. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.18 · DOI · Paper page
  48. X.Li, S.Chou, R.Wang, L.Shi, W.Fang, G.Chaitra, C. Y.Tang, J.Torres, X.Hu, A. G.Fane, Nature gives the best solution for desalination: Aquaporin-based hollow fiber composite membrane with superior performance. J. Membr. Sci. 494, 68–77 (2015). 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.040 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.07.040
  49. 10.1002/adma.200501500 · DOI · Paper page
  50. K. V.Peinemann, V.Abetz, P. F.Simon, Asymmetric superstructure formed in a block copolymer via phase separation. Nat. Mater. 6, 992–996 (2007). 10.1038/nmat203817982467 · DOI · Paper page
  51. X.Qiu, H.Yu, M.Karunakaran, N.Pradeep, S. P.Nunes, K.-V.Peinemann, Selective separation of similarly sized proteins with tunable nanoporous block copolymer membranes. ACS Nano 7, 768–776 (2013). 10.1021/nn305073e23252799 · doi:10.1021/nn305073e
  52. H.Yu, X.Qiu, N.Moreno, Z.Ma, V. M.Calo, S. P.Nunes, K.-V.Peinemann, Self-assembled asymmetric block copolymer membranes: Bridging the gap from ultra- to nanofiltration. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 13937–13941 (2015). 10.1002/anie.20150566326388216 · doi:10.1002/anie.201505663
  53. V.Abetz, Isoporous block copolymer membranes. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 36, 10–22 (2015). 10.1002/marc.20140055625451792 · DOI · Paper page
  54. J. E.Bachman, Z. P.Smith, T.Li, T.Xu, J. R.Long, Enhanced ethylene separation and plasticization resistance in polymer membranes incorporating metal-organic framework nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 15, 845–849 (2016). 10.1038/nmat462127064528 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1126/science.1230444 · DOI · Paper page
  56. B. R.Pimentel, A.Parulkar, E. K.Zhou, N. A.Brunelli, R. P.Lively, Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks: Next-generation materials for energy-efficient gas separations. ChemSusChem 7, 3202–3240 (2014). 10.1002/cssc.20140264725363474 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1126/science.1251181 · DOI · Paper page
  58. D. S.Sholl, R. P.Lively, Defects in metal-organic frameworks: Challenge or opportunity?J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 3437–3444 (2015). 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0113526268796 · DOI · Paper page
  59. H. T.Kwon, H. K.Jeong, A. S.Lee, H. S.An, J. S.Lee, Heteroepitaxially grown zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes with unprecedented propylene/propane separation performances. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 12304–12311 (2015). 10.1021/jacs.5b0673026364888 · DOI · Paper page
  60. V.Singh, D.Joung, L.Zhai, S.Das, S. I.Khondaker, S.Seal, Graphene based materials: Past, present and future. Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 1178–1271 (2011). 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
  61. S. P.Koenig, L.Wang, J.Pellegrino, J. S.Bunch, Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 728–732 (2012). 10.1038/nnano.2012.16223042491 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1126/science.1236098 · DOI · Paper page
  63. S. P.Surwade, S. N.Smirnov, I. V.Vlassiouk, R. R.Unocic, G. M.Veith, S.Dai, S. M.Mahurin, Water desalination using nanoporous single-layer graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 459–464 (2015). 10.1038/nnano.2015.3725799521 · DOI · Paper page
  64. M.Grzelakowski, M. F.Cherenet, Y.Shen, M.Kumar, A framework for accurate evaluation of the promise of aquaporin based biomimetic membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 479, 223–231 (2015). 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.023 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.01.023
  65. D.Cohen-Tanugi, R. K.McGovern, S. H.Dave, J. H.Lienhard, J. C.Grossman, Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1134–1141 (2014). 10.1039/C3EE43221A · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1126/science.1245711 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1126/science.1211694 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1126/science.1126298 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1126/science.1236686 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1126/science.220.4592.11 · doi:10.1126/science.220.4592.11
  71. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82312-1 · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(00)82312-1
  72. S.Husain, W. J.Koros, Mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes made with modified HSSZ-13 zeolite in polyetherimide polymer matrix for gas separation. J. Membr. Sci. 288, 195–207 (2007). 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.11.016 · DOI · Paper page
  73. R. Adams et al . in Encyclopedia of Membrane Science and Technology E. M. V. Hoek V. V. Tarabara Eds. (John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hoboken NJ 2013).
  74. B.Seoane, J.Coronas, I.Gascon, M.Etxeberria Benavides, O.Karvan, J.Caro, F.Kapteijn, J.Gascon, Metal-organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: A solution for highly efficient CO2 capture?Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2421–2454 (2015). 10.1039/C4CS00437J25692487 · DOI · Paper page
  75. T. T.Moore, W. J.Koros, Non-ideal effects in organic–inorganic materials for gas separation membranes. J. Mol. Struct. 739, 87–98 (2005). 10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.05.043 · doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.05.043
  76. H.Ha, J.Park, K.Ha, B. D.Freeman, C. J.Ellison, Synthesis and gas permeability of highly elastic poly(dimethylsiloxane)/graphene oxide composite elastomers using telechelic polymers. Polymer (Guildf.) 93, 53–60 (2016). 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.04.016 · DOI
  77. H.Ha, J.Park, S.Ando, C. B.Kim, K.Nagai, B. D.Freeman, C. J.Ellison, Gas permeation and selectivity of poly(dimethylsiloxane)/graphene oxide composite elastomer membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 518, 131–140 (2016). 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.028 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2016.06.028
  78. G.Dong, H.Li, V.Chen, Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain. 1, 4610 (2013). 10.1039/c3ta00927k · DOI · Paper page
  79. A. A.Gusev, O.Guseva, Rapid mass transport in mixed matrix nanotube/polymer membranes. Adv. Mater. 19, 2672–2676 (2007). 10.1002/adma.200602018 · doi:10.1002/adma.200602018
  80. 10.1126/science.1254227 · DOI · Paper page
  81. T.Rodenas, I.Luz, G.Prieto, B.Seoane, H.Miro, A.Corma, F.Kapteijn, F. X.Llabrés i Xamena, J.Gascon, Metal-organic framework nanosheets in polymer composite materials for gas separation. Nat. Mater. 14, 48–55 (2015). 10.1038/nmat411325362353 · DOI · Paper page
  82. J.Shen, G.Liu, K.Huang, W.Jin, K. R.Lee, N.Xu, Membranes with fast and selective gas-transport channels of laminar graphene oxide for efficient CO2 capture. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 578–582 (2015). 25378197 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1126/science.280.5360.69 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  85. B. Hille Ion Channels of Excitable Membranes Third Edition (Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland MA 2001).
  86. G. M.Geise, H.-S.Lee, D. J.Miller, B. D.Freeman, J. E.McGrath, D. R.Paul, Water purification by membranes: The role of polymer science. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 48, 1685–1718 (2010). 10.1002/polb.22037 · DOI · Paper page
  87. P. N.Pintauro, D. N.Bennlon, Mass transport of electrolytes in membranes. 2. Determination of NaCl equilibrium and transport parameters for nafion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 23, 234–243 (1984).
  88. P.Agre, Aquaporin water channels (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 43, 4278–4290 (2004). 10.1002/anie.20046080415368374 · DOI · Paper page
  89. J. S.Jung, G. M.Preston, B. L.Smith, W. B.Guggino, P.Agre, Molecular structure of the water channel through aquaporin CHIP. The hourglass model. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14648–14654 (1994). 7514176 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1126/science.256.5055.385 · DOI · Paper page
  91. M.Kumar, M.Grzelakowski, J.Zilles, M.Clark, W.Meier, Highly permeable polymeric membranes based on the incorporation of the functional water channel protein Aquaporin Z. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 20719–20724 (2007). 10.1073/pnas.070876210418077364 · DOI · Paper page
  92. H.Wang, T.-S.Chung, Y. W.Tong, K.Jeyaseelan, A.Armugam, Z.Chen, M.Hong, W.Meier, Highly permeable and selective pore-spanning biomimetic membrane embedded with aquaporin Z. Small 8, 1185–1190, 1125 (2012). 10.1002/smll.20110212022378644 · DOI
  93. Y.Zhao, C.Qiu, X.Li, A.Vararattanavech, W.Shen, J.Torres, C.Hélix-Nielsen, R.Wang, X.Hu, A. G.Fane, C. Y.Tang, Synthesis of robust and high-performance aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes by interfacial polymerization-membrane preparation and RO performance characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 423-424, 422–428 (2012). 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.08.039 · DOI
  94. M.Kattula, K.Ponnuru, L.Zhu, W.Jia, H.Lin, E. P.Furlani, Designing ultrathin film composite membranes: The impact of a gutter layer. Sci. Rep. 5, 15016 (2015). 10.1038/srep1501626456377 · DOI
  95. X.Lu, L. H.Arias Chavez, S.Romero-Vargas Castrillón, J.Ma, M.Elimelech, Influence of active layer and support layer surface structures on organic fouling propensity of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 1436–1444 (2015). 10.1021/es504406225564877 · doi:10.1021/es5044062
  96. I.Pinnau, J. G.Wijmans, I.Blume, T.Kuroda, K.-V.Peinemann, Gas permeation through composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 37, 81–88 (1988). 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)85070-X · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(00)85070-x
  97. 10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00050 · DOI
  98. D. J.Miller, S.Kasemset, D. R.Paul, B. D.Freeman, Comparison of membrane fouling at constant flux and constant transmembrane pressure conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 454, 505–515 (2014). 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.12.027 · DOI · Paper page
  99. R.Zhang, Y.Liu, M.He, Y.Su, X.Zhao, M.Elimelech, Z.Jiang, Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: Strategies and mechanisms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 5888–5924 (2016). 10.1039/C5CS00579E27494001 · DOI · Paper page
  100. S. A.Snyder, S.Adham, A. M.Redding, F. S.Cannon, J.DeCarolis, J.Oppenheimer, E. C.Wert, Y.Yoon, Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination 202, 156–181 (2007). 10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.052 · DOI · Paper page
  101. Y.Huang, T. C.Merkel, R. W.Baker, Pressure ratio and its impact on membrane gas separation processes. J. Membr. Sci. 463, 33–40 (2014). 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.016 · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.016
  102. B.Ohs, J.Lohaus, M.Wessling, Optimization of membrane based nitrogen removal from natural gas. J. Membr. Sci. 498, 291–301 (2016). 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.007 · DOI
  103. A. P.Straub, A.Deshmukh, M.Elimelech, Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: Is it viable?Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 31–48 (2016). 10.1039/C5EE02985F · DOI · Paper page
  104. H. B.Park, B. D.Freeman, Z. B.Zhang, M.Sankir, J. E.McGrath, Highly chlorine-tolerant polymers for desalination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 6019–6024 (2008). 10.1002/anie.20080045418604786 · DOI
  105. T. C.Merkel, M.Zhou, R. W.Baker, Carbon dioxide capture with membranes at an IGCC power plant. J. Membr. Sci. 389, 441–450 (2012). 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.012 · DOI
  106. J.Kamcev, M.Galizia, F. M.Benedetti, E.-S.Jang, D. R.Paul, B. D.Freeman, G. S.Manning, Partitioning of mobile ions between ion exchange polymers and aqueous salt solutions: Importance of counter-ion condensation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 6021–6031 (2016). 10.1039/C5CP06747B26840776 · DOI · Paper page
  107. J.Kamcev, D. R.Paul, G. S.Manning, B. D.Freeman, Predicting salt permeability coefficients in highly swollen, highly charged ion exchange membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 4044–4056 (2017). 10.1021/acsami.6b1490228072514 · DOI
  108. M. L.Greenfield, D. N.Theodorou, Geometric analysis of diffusion pathways in glassy and melt atactic polypropylene. Macromolecules 26, 5461–5472 (1993). 10.1021/ma00072a026 · DOI
  109. S. R.Wickramasinghe, S. E.Bower, Z.Chen, A.Mukherjee, S. M.Husson, Relating the pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes to dextran rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 340, 1–8 (2009). 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.056 · DOI
  110. J.Bai, X.Zhong, S.Jiang, Y.Huang, X.Duan, Graphene nanomesh. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 190–194 (2010). 10.1038/nnano.2010.820154685 · DOI · Paper page
  111. J. H.Morais-Cabral, Y.Zhou, R.MacKinnon, Energetic optimization of ion conduction rate by the K+ selectivity filter. Nature 414, 37–42 (2001). 10.1038/3510200011689935 · DOI · Paper page
  112. S.Gravelle, L.Joly, F.Detcheverry, C.Ybert, C.Cottin-Bizonne, L.Bocquet, Optimizing water permeability through the hourglass shape of aquaporins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 16367–16372 (2013). 10.1073/pnas.130644711024067650 · DOI · Paper page
  113. L.Liu, E. S.Sanders, S. S.Kulkarni, D. J.Hasse, W. J.Koros, Sub-ambient temperature flue gas carbon dioxide capture via Matrimid® hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 465, 49–55 (2014). 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.060 · DOI
  114. 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00102-I · DOI · Paper page
  115. 10.1016/j.memsci.2004.05.026 · DOI

Cited by

See all 3,344

Metadata

Authors
Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M., & Freeman, B. D.
Venue
Science
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Published
2017-06-16
Volume
356
Issue
6343
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
DOI
10.1126/science.aab0530
OpenAlex
W2625153997
Cited by
3,344
References
1
FWCI
174.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (award305721, CBET 1437630, award305722, DGE-1110007, award305720, ERC-1449500)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (award297756, DEFG02- 02ER15362)
  • Korea Carbon Capture & Sequestration R&D Center (award297758, KCRC-2014M1A8A1049307)
  • International Institute for Carbon Neutral Energy Research (award297760)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aab0530
The paper
Park, H. B., Kamcev, J., Robeson, L. M., Elimelech, M., & Freeman, B. D. (2017). Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0530

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.