Cited by 50Membrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesExtraction and Separation ProcessesMembrane Separation Technologies

Comparison of Two Electrodialysis Stacks Having Different Ion Exchange and Bipolar Membranes for Simultaneous Separation of Boron and Lithium from Aqueous Solution

Jarma, Yakubu A., Çermikli, Ezgi, İpekçi, Deniz, Altıok, Esra, Kabay, Nalan·2021·Desalination

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114850

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 50

Authors
Jarma, Y. A., Çermikli, E., İpekçi, D., Altıok, E., & Kabay, N.
Affiliations
  • Ege University (TR)
  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Kabay, Nalan
Venue
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
500
Pages
114850
ISSN
0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109150112
Cited by
50
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Desalination (publishedVersion)
Funders
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu (117M023)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
Keywords
electrodialysis, boron removal, lithium recovery, simultaneous separation, ion exchange membranes, bipolar membranes, boron trioxide, lithium hydroxide, electric potential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review