The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing design creativity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Psychology of Creativity
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8 · Cited by 3,164
Lorenzen, M. (2009) · Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy · doi:10.4324/9780203880012-4a · Cited by 2,435
(1998) · Handbook of Creativity · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807916.002 · Cited by 2,212
The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1998) · Handbook of Creativity · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807916.003 · Cited by 2,030
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity
(2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511763205 · Cited by 1,291
Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness
Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00034-0 · Cited by 1,095
Product design: fundamentals and methods
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3343 · Cited by 913
Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius
Weisberg, R. W. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 862
Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler
Umeda, Y., Ishii, M., Yoshioka, M., Shimomura, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1996) · Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060400001621 · Cited by 481
A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas
CHAKRABARTI, A., SARKAR, P., LEELAVATHAMMA, B., & NATARAJU, B. S. (2005) · Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060405050109 · Cited by 411
Self-citation
Cited by
The effect of AI-based inspiration on human design ideation
Kim, J., & Maher, M. L. (2023) · International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation · doi:10.1080/21650349.2023.2167124 · Cited by 114
A computational tool for creative idea generation based on analogical reasoning and ontology
Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L., & Childs, P. R. N. (2018) · Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing · doi:10.1017/s0890060418000082 · Cited by 78
Exploring creativity in human-AI co-creation: a comparative study across design experience
Wang, N., Kim, H., Peng, J., & Wang, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2025.1672735 · Cited by 59
Liu, Y.-L. E., & Huang, Y.-M. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2311975 · Cited by 47
A review of design fixation: research directions and key factors
Alipour, L., Faizi, M., Moradi, A. M., & Akrami, G. (2018) · International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation · doi:10.1080/21650349.2017.1320232 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A.
- Venue
- Design Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 348-383
- ISSN
- 0142-694X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136807250
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 27.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing design creativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002
- The paper
- Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity. Design Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
