The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creativity in context
Abstract
This chapter describes theoretical literatures with empirical literature on the film industry, in order to analyze creativity at the industry level. It provides an analytical framework that may be used for understanding different models of filmmaking in future comparative work on the film industry, but also serves as inspiration for other work on cultural industries. The chapter presents the film industry, and outlines how different film clusters of the world perform very differently in economic terms. It introduces the problems of organization and of creativity in context, in order to understand these persistent performance differences of the film industry. The chapter explores the first part of the analysis of what drives organization in the film industry: the balancing of creativity by concerns of cost. It discusses how creativity is also balanced by concerns of compensating for chance elements in the demand for films and analyses the balance of creativity by concerns of collection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Andersen, B, R Kozul-Wright and Z Kozul-Wright (2007), Rents, rights n'rhythm: cooperation, conflict and capabilities in the music industry, Industry and Innovation, 14(5): 513-540. · doi:10.1080/13662710701524106
Cited by
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance
Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J., Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0428 · Cited by 2,224
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100611418056 · Cited by 1,269
Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 · Cited by 1,173
From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462 · Cited by 1,121
Metadata
- Authors
- Lorenzen, M.
- Venue
- Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2009-03-09
- Pages
- 93-118
- OpenAlex
- W2916910435
- Cited by
- 2,435
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 841.70
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creativity in context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203880012-4a
- The paper
- Lorenzen, M. (2009). Creativity in context. Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880012-4a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
