Cited by 140Design Education and PracticeInnovative Human-Technology InteractionInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

What is it that makes participation in design participatory design?

Luck, Rachael·2018·Design Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luck, R.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Luck, Rachael
Venue
Design Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
59
Pages
1-8
ISSN
0142-694X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898861013
Cited by
140
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Design Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
participatory design, user participation, co-design, design process

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review