Pioglitazone prevents reactive hypoglycemia in impaired glucose tolerance
Abstract
A 42-year-old woman with hypoglycemic symptoms that occurred several hours after a meal visited our hospital. The hypoglycemic symptoms appeared when she was 37 years old, and her plasma glucose level had been assessed as less than 60 mg/dL when she experienced the symptoms. One year before, she had been diagnosed with reactive hypoglycemia by 75 g-oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), which showed a normal glucose tolerance (NGT) pattern, and had begun taking an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and nutritional treatment. A 75 g-OGTT on admission showed hypoglycemia at 240 min after glucose loading, excessive insulin secretion and an impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) pattern. A euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp study demonstrated decreased insulin sensitivity. Therefore, we suspected that she had reactive hypoglycemia associated with insulin resistance and treated her with 15 mg/day pioglitazone. Her hypoglycemic symptoms completely disappeared after treatment with pioglitazone; insulin sensitivity in a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp study improved. Another 75 g-OGTT revealed that the excessive insulin secretion and hypoglycemia at 240 min after glucose loading had disappeared, and glucose tolerance was normalized from an IGT pattern to an NGT pattern. Thus, we believe that pioglitazone is effective for reactive hypoglycemia and aggravated glycemic metabolism associated with insulin resistance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are very little data on the association between biochemical hypoglycemia during an OGTT and insulin resistance.
“So far, there are very little data considering the association between biochemical hypoglycemia during an OGTT and insulin resistance [4, 5].”
From Associated Factors with Biochemical Hypoglycemia during an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in a Chinese Population (2017) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Arii, K., Ota, K., Suehiro, T., Ikeda, Y., Nishimura, K., Kumon, Y., & Hashimoto, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Kochi (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Arii, Kaoru
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 305-308
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004519529
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- pioglitazone, reactive hypoglycemia, impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, thiazolidinediones, glucose tolerance, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp
- MeSH terms
- Pioglitazone, Insulin Secretion, Adult, Blood Glucose, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Glucose Intolerance, Thiazolidinediones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review