Cited by 166Tea Polyphenols and EffectsCoffee research and impactsNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies

Effects of green tea consumption on inflammation, insulin resistance and pulse wave velocity in type 2 diabetes patients

Ryu, O.H., Lee, J., Lee, K.W., Kim, H.Y., Seo, J.A., Kim, S.G., Kim, N.H., Baik, S.H. +2 more·2006·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of green tea on inflammation and arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes patients. As results, inflammatory markers, such as hsCRP and IL-6, were unchanged after green tea consumption, and neither were blood glucose, lipid profiles, insulin resistance, or serum adiponectin levels. Furthermore, tea consumption did not improve baPWV. These results suggest that the above-described mechanisms are unlikely to explain the cardiovascular risk reduction by tea consumption observed in epidemiological studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2005.08.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, fitness is inversely associated with inflammation, independent of fatness.

    “Studies in patients with diabetes (237) or the metabolic syndrome (238,239) have consistently demonstrated inverse associations between fitness and inflammation, independently of fatness.”
  • Independent associations of fitness with inflammation are more prominent in metabolic syndrome patients than in healthy participants.

    “In one study, the independent associations of fitness were in fact more prominent among metabolic syndrome patients compared with healthy participants (238,239) .”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 7 · Cited by 166

Authors
Ryu, O. H., Lee, J., Lee, K. W., Kim, H. Y., Seo, J. A., Kim, S. G., Kim, N. H., Baik, S. H., Choi, D. S., & Choi, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Korea University Guro Hospital (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Choi, K.M.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
356-358
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120647674
Cited by
166
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Keywords
green tea, type 2 diabetes, inflammation, insulin resistance, arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, adiponectin, blood glucose, lipid profile, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Beverages, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Flavonoids, Humans, Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Pulse, Tea, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review