Evaluating the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial neural network: An effective classification approach
Abstract
Aim To develop and evaluate an effective classification approach without biochemical parameters to identify those at high risk of T2DM in rural adults. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Of 8640 subjects who met inclusion criteria, 75% (N1=6480) were randomly selected to provide training set for constructing artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) models. The remaining 25% (N2=2160) were assigned to validation set for performance comparisons of the ANN and MLR models. Predictive performance of different models was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using the validation set. Results The prevalence rates of T2DM were 8.66% (n=561) and 9.21% (n=199) in training and validation sets, respectively. For ANN model, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for identifying T2DM were 86.93%, 79.14%, 31.86%, and 98.18%, respectively, while MLR model were only 60.80%, 75.48%, 21.78%, and 94.52%, respectively. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) value for identifying T2DM when using the ANN model was 0.891, showing more accurate predictive performance than the MLR model (AUC=0.744) (P=0.0001). Conclusion The ANN model is an effective classification approach for identifying those at high risk of T2DM based on demographic, lifestyle and anthropometric data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modifiable factors identified using AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.
“Modifiable factors identified using the AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.44,45,46”
From Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Intelligible Support Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Barakat, N., Bradley, A. P., & Barakat, M. N. H. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2009.2039485 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Screening for Type 2 Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Metabolism
Colagiuri, S., Hussain, Z., Zimmet, P., Cameron, A., & Shaw, J. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.367 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Prediction of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma using artificial neural networks
Sato, F., Shimada, Y., Selaru, F. M., Shibata, D., Maeda, M., Watanabe, G., Mori, Y., Stass, S. A., Imamura, M., & Meltzer, S. J. (2005) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20938 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges
Guan, Z., Li, H., Liu, R., Cai, C., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., Huang, S., Wu, L., Liu, D., et al. (2023) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101213 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Development of various diabetes prediction models using machine learning techniques
Shin, J., Kim, J., Lee, C., Yoon, J. Y., Kim, S., Song, S., & Kim, H.-S. (2022) · Diabetes & Metabolism Journal · doi:10.4093/dmj.2021.0115 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, C., Li, L., Wang, L., Ping, Z., Flory, M. T., Wang, G., Xi, Y., & Li, W.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Wenjie
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020502126
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes risk prediction, artificial neural networks, multivariate logistic regression, rural adults, anthropometry, lifestyle factors, demographic factors, prediction accuracy, diabetes screening
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Rural Population, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Neural Networks, Computer, Risk Assessment, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review