Cited by 94Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMachine Learning in Healthcare

Evaluating the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial neural network: An effective classification approach

Wang, Chongjian, Li, Linlin, Wang, Ling, Ping, Zhiguang, Flory, Muanda Tsobo, Wang, Gaoshuai, Xi, Yuanlin, Li, Wenjie·2013·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aim To develop and evaluate an effective classification approach without biochemical parameters to identify those at high risk of T2DM in rural adults. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Of 8640 subjects who met inclusion criteria, 75% (N1=6480) were randomly selected to provide training set for constructing artificial neural network (ANN) and multivariate logistic regression (MLR) models. The remaining 25% (N2=2160) were assigned to validation set for performance comparisons of the ANN and MLR models. Predictive performance of different models was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using the validation set. Results The prevalence rates of T2DM were 8.66% (n=561) and 9.21% (n=199) in training and validation sets, respectively. For ANN model, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for identifying T2DM were 86.93%, 79.14%, 31.86%, and 98.18%, respectively, while MLR model were only 60.80%, 75.48%, 21.78%, and 94.52%, respectively. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) value for identifying T2DM when using the ANN model was 0.891, showing more accurate predictive performance than the MLR model (AUC=0.744) (P=0.0001). Conclusion The ANN model is an effective classification approach for identifying those at high risk of T2DM based on demographic, lifestyle and anthropometric data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifiable factors identified using AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.

    “Modifiable factors identified using the AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.44,45,46”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, C., Li, L., Wang, L., Ping, Z., Flory, M. T., Wang, G., Xi, Y., & Li, W.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CA)
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Wenjie
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
111-118
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020502126
Cited by
94
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes risk prediction, artificial neural networks, multivariate logistic regression, rural adults, anthropometry, lifestyle factors, demographic factors, prediction accuracy, diabetes screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Rural Population, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Neural Networks, Computer, Risk Assessment, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review