Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges
Open accessAbstract
The increasing prevalence of diabetes, high avoidable morbidity and mortality due to diabetes and diabetic complications, and related substantial economic burden make diabetes a significant health challenge worldwide. A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Recent advancements in digital health technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI), provide a significant opportunity to achieve better efficiency in diabetes care, which may diminish the increase in diabetes-related health-care expenditures. Here, we review the recent progress in the application of AI in the management of diabetes and then discuss the opportunities and challenges of AI application in clinical practice. Furthermore, we explore the possibility of combining and expanding upon existing digital health technologies to develop an AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem that includes the prevention and management of diabetes.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review summarizes how AI and machine learning are being applied across diabetes prediction, screening, classification, comprehensive management, and complication detection, and argues they could shift care toward precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization. It also outlines persistent barriers—data quality, design, clinical integration, privacy, adherence, and regulation—and proposes an AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem.
Key findings
- AI has been applied across the diabetes care continuum: prediction of onset (e.g., ML-based logistic regression AUC 0.78 for 5-year new-onset diabetes; administrative-data model AUC 0.80; gradient-boosting model AUC 0.71 and overall accuracy 94.9%), screening/classification, management, and complication prediction/screening.
- In diabetic retinopathy screening, reported performance is high: DeepDR achieved internal-validation AUCs of 0.943, 0.955, 0.960, and 0.972 for mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative DR, with external-validation AUCs of 0.916–0.970; IDx-DR had sensitivity 87.2% and specificity 90.7%; EyeArt had 91.3% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity for referral-warranted DR.
- For glucose monitoring and dosing, a meta-analysis reported pooled sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.92 for predicting hypoglycemia, and pooled sensitivity 0.79 and specificity 0.80 for detecting hypoglycemia; a Ramadan-fasting model estimated normal glucose in 95.2% of readings, hyperglycemic events in 82.6%, but hypoglycemic events in only 27.9%.
- The review identifies opportunities in precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization, but lists challenges including data quality control, poor technology design, lack of clinical integration, privacy concerns, non-adherence, and imperfect laws/regulations; LLMs are promising but may produce inconsistent or misleading information.
Methods
- Narrative review of recent progress in AI applications in diabetes management, covering prediction and prevention, screening and classification, comprehensive management, diabetic complications, opportunities/challenges, and a proposed AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem.
- Synthesizes cited studies and includes Table 1 on AI methods, inputs, and performance for diabetic complications and Table 2 on challenges and mitigating strategies.
- No primary data collection, systematic search strategy, or meta-analysis is described in the paper.
Limitations
- The paper states limitations of AI in diabetes care: data quality and bias, poor technology design, lack of clinical integration, privacy/security risks, non-adherence, and imperfect laws/regulations; it also notes ML flaws such as data bias, overfitting, resource-intensive training, and limited transfer learning, and says LLMs may risk inconsistency or misleading information.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search, risk-of-bias assessment, or pooled analysis, and the cited performance metrics come from heterogeneous studies and settings, so they are not directly comparable or independently validated within the review.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
64 of 106 cited sources checked · 32 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Saleh et al. reported that a fuzzy RF using retinal images for DR screening yielded an accuracy of 77.32%, sensitivity of 76.89%, and specificity of 77.43% for detecting the presence of DR.
“the best results yielded an accuracy of 77.32%, sensitivity of 76.89% and specificity of 77.43% for detecting the presence of DR”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Saleh et al.109 Saleh E. Błaszczyński J. Moreno A. Valls A. Romero-Aroca P. de la Riva-Fernández S. Słowiński R. Learning ensemble classifiers for diabetic retinopathy assessment Artif. Intell. Med. 85 2018 50 63 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.09.006 28993124 source
Table 8 (Additional information; page not provided) assigns 77.32% accuracy, 76.89% sensitivity, and 77.43% specificity to DRSA, not the fuzzy random forest (FRF). It reports 80.29%, 80.67%, and 80.18%, respectively, for FRF. The Conclusions (page not provided) describe analysis of retinal photos as a later, still-in-progress stage rather than the input to these classifiers. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Several studies utilized risk factors (mainly from EHRs) to develop AI algorithms to predict various types of diabetes-related complications with favorable predictive performance.
“In the prediction of diabetic complications, several studies tried to utilize risk factors (mainly from EHRs) to develop AI algorithms to predict various types of diabetes-related complications with favorable predictive performance.94,95,96,97,98,99,100”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [94] Lagani V. Chiarugi F. Manousos D. Verma V. Fursse J. Marias K. Tsamardinos I. Realization of a service for the long-term risk assessment of diabetes-related complications J. Diabet. Complicat. 29 2015 691 698 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.011 25953402 source
- cites [95] Marini S. Trifoglio E. Barbarini N. Sambo F. Di Camillo B. Malovini A. Manfrini M. Cobelli C. Bellazzi R. A Dynamic Bayesian Network model for long-term simulation of clinical complications in type 1 diabetes J. Biomed. Inf. 57 2015 369 376 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.021 26325295 source
The Discussion reports that dynamic Bayesian networks modeled two type 1 diabetes complications, nephropathy and cardiovascular disease, with less than 10% error in population-state trajectories on independent test data. However, §2.1 identifies the data as coming from the DCCT and EDIC longitudinal studies, not EHRs, and the reported performance concerns cohort simulation rather than demonstrated individual-level complication prediction. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [96] Armengol E. Palaudàries A. Plaza E. Individual prognosis of diabetes long-term risks: a CBR approach Methods Inf. Med. 40 2001 46 51 11310159 source
- Premisecitation
The algorithms used in closed-loop systems primarily include model predictive control, proportional-integral-derivative, fuzzy logic, and learning algorithms.
“The algorithms used in closed-loop systems primarily include model predictive control, proportional-integral-derivative, fuzzy logic, and learning algorithms.86”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Rigla M. García-Sáez G. Pons B. Hernando M.E. Artificial Intelligence Methodologies and Their Application to Diabetes J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 12 2018 303 310 10.1177/1932296817710475 28539087 PMC5851211 source
- Premisecitation
Modifiable factors identified using AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.
“Modifiable factors identified using the AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.44,45,46”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [44] Wang C. Li L. Wang L. Ping Z. Flory M.T. Wang G. Xi Y. Li W. Evaluating the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial neural network: An effective classification approach Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 100 2013 111 118 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.023 23453177 source
- cites [45] Gholipour K. Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Iezadi S. Jannati A. Keshavarz S. Modelling the prevalence of diabetes mellitus risk factors based on artificial neural network and multiple regression East. Mediterr. Health J. 24 2018 770 777 10.26719/emhj.18.012 30328607 source
The Results (page unavailable) list BMI, current smoking, controlled and uncontrolled hypertension, and raised total cholesterol as predictors ranked by the artificial neural network. They do not list insufficient physical activity or poor diet as ANN-identified predictors. The paper evaluates prediction of existing type 2 diabetes, not whether each listed factor causes an increased risk of developing it. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [46] Zhang L. Shang X. Sreedharan S. Yan X. Liu J. Keel S. Wu J. Peng W. He M. Predicting the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Australian Cohort Using Machine-Learning Techniques: Longitudinal Survey Study JMIR Med. Inform. 8 2020 e16850 10.2196/16850 PMC7420582 32720912 source
The Results (Participant Characteristics; no page number in our copy) associate later diabetes with overweight or obesity, self-reported hypertension and dyslipidemia, smoking, less physical activity, and some dietary measures. However, the machine-learning Results explicitly identify BMI as a leading predictor; they do not establish that every listed factor was identified by the models as increasing risk. The observational associations also do not establish that those factors cause diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
One study used smartphone images to estimate the likelihood of healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers with an AUC of 0.73.
“and the other study used smartphone images to estimate the likelihood of healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (AUC = 0.73).115”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [115] Kim R.B. Gryak J. Mishra A. Cui C. Soroushmehr S.M.R. Najarian K. Wrobel J.S. Utilization of smartphone and tablet camera photographs to predict healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers Comput. Biol. Med. 126 2020 104042 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104042 PMC9058995 33059239 source
- Premisecitation
Many people in remote or low-income settings are not well supported by conventional health care.
“Many people in remote or low-income settings are not well supported by conventional health care.121”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] Graham G.N. Ostrowski M. Sabina A.B. Population health-based approaches to utilizing digital technology: a strategy for equity J. Publ. Health Pol. 37 2016 154 166 10.1057/s41271-016-0012-5 27899799 source
The Abstract (page not specified in our copy) says access to care depends on where a person lives and describes disparities in the use of health services. The section on Camden describes residents relying on inefficient emergency-department care rather than preventive care. These passages support the point for underserved, low-income communities, but do not specifically establish it for remote settings. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The reach of AI-based DHTs, coupled with the relative reduction in cost and increased capability of mobile communications, has led to its greater penetration into traditionally difficult-to-reach communities compared with robust conventional health care.
“The reach of AI-based DHTs, coupled with the relative reduction in cost and increased capability of mobile communications, has led to its greater penetration into traditionally difficult-to-reach communities compared with robust conventional health care.121”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] Graham G.N. Ostrowski M. Sabina A.B. Population health-based approaches to utilizing digital technology: a strategy for equity J. Publ. Health Pol. 37 2016 154 166 10.1057/s41271-016-0012-5 27899799 source
The “Digital Technology -Mobile Personal Engagement” section reports widespread smartphone ownership among low-income and underserved U.S. populations, and the Conclusion describes mobile technology’s potential to reach them. The paper does not establish that AI-based digital health tools have penetrated these communities more than conventional health care, or attribute such penetration to falling mobile-communication costs and increasing capabilities. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In a study of 11 commercially available mobile applications, participants could complete only 43% of the tasks without assistance.
“The results showed that participants could complete only 43% of the tasks without assistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] Sarkar U. Gourley G.I. Lyles C.R. Tieu L. Clarity C. Newmark L. Singh K. Bates D.W. Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients J. Gen. Intern. Med. 31 2016 1417 1426 27418347 PMC5130945 source
The Results report that participants completed 79 of 185 (43%) data-retrieval tasks across 11 apps without assistance. The claim omits that restriction and implies the figure covers all tasks; the Results separately report 51% for data-entry tasks. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Previous studies explored the development of AI systems to identify diabetic neuropathy based on EHRs or corneal confocal microscopy images, with AUCs ranging from 0.83 to 0.95.
“For neuropathy screening, previous studies explored the development of AI systems to identify diabetic neuropathy based on EHRs116 or corneal confocal microscopy images,117,118,119 with AUCs ranging from 0.83 to 0.95.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [116] Metsker O. Magoev K. Yakovlev A. Yanishevskiy S. Kopanitsa G. Kovalchuk S. Krzhizhanovskaya V.V. Identification of risk factors for patients with diabetes: diabetic polyneuropathy case study BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 20 2020 201 10.1186/s12911-020-01215-w PMC7444272 32831065 source
- cites [117] Williams B.M. Borroni D. Liu R. Zhao Y. Zhang J. Lim J. Ma B. Romano V. Qi H. Ferdousi M. An artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy: a development and validation study Diabetologia 63 2020 419 430 10.1007/s00125-019-05023-4 31720728 PMC6946763 source
- cites [118] Salahouddin T. Petropoulos I.N. Ferdousi M. Ponirakis G. Asghar O. Alam U. Kamran S. Mahfoud Z.R. Efron N. Malik R.A. Qidwai U.A. Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy From Corneal Confocal Microscopy Images Diabetes Care 44 2021 e151 e153 10.2337/dc20-2012 34083322 PMC8323170 source
The paper’s classification results report an AI system using corneal confocal microscopy images to identify diabetic peripheral neuropathy, with AUCs of 0.86 and 0.95 for two comparisons. It also reports an AUC of 1.0 for distinguishing affected patients from controls, so 0.95 does not capture the full range of results in this source. The EHR portion of the citing sentence is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Screening of DR using retinal images was studied well in multi-ethnic cohorts, with comparable accuracy compared with professional graders.
“In the screening and evaluation of diabetic complications, the screening of DR using retinal images was studied well in multi-ethnic cohorts, with comparable accuracy compared with professional graders (discussed in detail in the conclusion and perspective).103,104,105,106,107,108,109”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [103] Dai L. Wu L. Li H. Cai C. Wu Q. Kong H. Liu R. Wang X. Hou X. Liu Y. A deep learning system for detecting diabetic retinopathy across the disease spectrum Nat. Commun. 12 2021 3242 10.1038/s41467-021-23458-5 34050158 PMC8163820 source
The Results (External validation; page unavailable) report high DR-grading accuracy from retinal images in Chinese cohorts and the US EyePACS dataset. But the Discussion says DeepDR was developed using a single-ethnic cohort and that further multiethnic validation is needed. The Methods describe grading by certified ophthalmologists as the reference process, not a direct finding that DeepDR’s accuracy was comparable to theirs. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [104] Abràmoff M.D. Lou Y. Erginay A. Clarida W. Amelon R. Folk J.C. Niemeijer M. Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57 2016 5200 5206 10.1167/iovs.16-19964 27701631 source
- cites [105] Bhaskaranand M. Ramachandra C. Bhat S. Cuadros J. Nittala M.G. Sadda S.R. Solanki K. The Value of Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with the EyeArt System: A Study of More Than 100,000 Consecutive Encounters from People with Diabetes Diabetes Technol. Therapeut. 21 2019 635 643 10.1089/dia.2019.0164 PMC6812728 31335200 source
The Methods (Study design; page unavailable) say EyeArt’s retinal-image screening was evaluated against certified expert graders. The Results (page unavailable) report 91.3% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity against that reference standard. The paper describes a large cohort across many clinics but does not establish that it was multi-ethnic or report accuracy by ethnicity. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
For CKD and diabetic nephropathy screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.
“For CKD39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Zhang K. Liu X. Xu J. Yuan J. Cai W. Chen T. Wang K. Gao Y. Nie S. Xu X. Deep-learning models for the detection and incidence prediction of chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes from retinal fundus images Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 2021 533 545 10.1038/s41551-021-00745-6 34131321 source
- cites [110] Huang J. Huth C. Covic M. Troll M. Adam J. Zukunft S. Prehn C. Wang L. Nano J. Scheerer M.F. Machine Learning Approaches Reveal Metabolic Signatures of Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in Individuals With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes 69 2020 2756 2765 10.2337/db20-0586 33024004 source
- cites [111] Sabanayagam C. Xu D. Ting D.S.W. Nusinovici S. Banu R. Hamzah H. Lim C. Tham Y.-C. Cheung C.Y. Tai E.S. A deep learning algorithm to detect chronic kidney disease from retinal photographs in community-based populations Lancet. Digit. Health 2 2020 e295 e302 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30063-7 33328123 source
- Premisecitation
Retinal images were used to predict the incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease and diabetic retinopathy.
“Recently, retinal images were used to predict the incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD)39 and diabetic retinopathy (DR).101,102”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [39] Zhang K. Liu X. Xu J. Yuan J. Cai W. Chen T. Wang K. Gao Y. Nie S. Xu X. Deep-learning models for the detection and incidence prediction of chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes from retinal fundus images Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 2021 533 545 10.1038/s41551-021-00745-6 34131321 source
- cites [101] Arcadu F. Benmansour F. Maunz A. Willis J. Haskova Z. Prunotto M. Deep learning algorithm predicts diabetic retinopathy progression in individual patients NPJ Digit. Med. 2 2019 92 10.1038/s41746-019-0172-3 31552296 PMC6754451 source
The Abstract and Methods > Dataset describe using baseline retinal photographs to predict worsening of existing diabetic retinopathy. They do not establish prediction of new diabetic retinopathy incidence. The CKD portion of the citing sentence is attached to a different citation, not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [102] Bora A. Balasubramanian S. Babenko B. Virmani S. Venugopalan S. Mitani A. de Oliveira Marinho G. Cuadros J. Ruamviboonsuk P. Corrado G.S. Predicting the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy using deep learning Lancet. Digit. Health 3 2021 e10 e19 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30250-8 33735063 source
The Introduction (p. 5) says the system used color fundus photographs to predict whether eyes would develop diabetic retinopathy within two years, supporting the incidence part of the DR claim. It does not report predicting progression of existing DR; the Discussion (p. 11) describes progression prediction by another study. CKD is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence and is not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Swarm learning provides security measures to support data sovereignty, security, and confidentiality by recognizing the network participants.
“Swarm learning provides security measures to support data sovereignty, security, and confidentiality by recognizing the network participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] Warnat-Herresthal S. Schultze H. Shastry K.L. Manamohan S. Mukherjee S. Garg V. Sarveswara R. Händler K. Pickkers P. Aziz N.A. Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning Nature 594 2021 265 270 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 34040261 PMC8189907 source
- Premisecitation
IDx-DR facilitates DR screening, especially in rural communities where patients have difficulty accessing an ophthalmologist.
“This device facilitates DR screening, especially in rural communities where patients have difficulty accessing an ophthalmologist.143”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [143] Nomura A. Noguchi M. Kometani M. Furukawa K. Yoneda T. Artificial Intelligence in Current Diabetes Management and Prediction Curr. Diabetes Rep. 21 2021 61 10.1007/s11892-021-01423-2 PMC8668843 34902070 source
- Premisecitation
AI-enabled DHTs can amplify implicit bias and discrimination if trained on data that reflect the health-care disparities experienced by groups defined by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or geographic location.
“Moreover, AI-enabled DHTs can amplify implicit bias and discrimination if trained on data that reflect the health-care disparities experienced by groups defined by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status, or geographic location.126”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [126] Johnson-Mann C.N. Loftus T.J. Bihorac A. Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care JAMA Surg. 156 2021 509 510 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7208 33625504 PMC8273554 source
The “Artificial Intelligence can Propagate Disparities” section says algorithms trained on biased data produce biased results, and the Summary says surgical decision-support tools propagate disparities when source data and input features are biased. The paper discusses race, ethnicity, sex, gender, socioeconomic factors, and geography, but the supplied passages do not address sexual orientation; its discussion is also specific to surgical AI rather than AI-enabled digital health technologies generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
One study classified thermogram images based on the severity of diabetic foot complications with 95.08% accuracy.
“For evaluation of diabetic foot, one study classified thermogram images based on the severity of diabetic foot complications (95.08% accuracy)114”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] Khandakar A. Chowdhury M.E.H. Reaz M.B.I. Ali S.H.M. Kiranyaz S. Rahman T. Chowdhury M.H. Ayari M.A. Alfkey R. Bakar A.A.A. A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Severity Classification of Diabetic Foot Complications Using Thermogram Images Sensors 22 2022 4249 10.3390/s22114249 PMC9185274 35684870 source
- Premisecitation
Metsker et al. reported that ANN, SVM, DT, linear regression, and logistic regression using EHR for polyneuropathy screening achieved 0.80 precision, 0.82 recall, 0.81 F1 score, 0.83 accuracy, and 0.90 AUC.
“it could achieve 0.80 precision, 0.82 recall, 0.81 F1 score, 0.83 accuracy, and 0.90 AUC”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Metsker et al.116 Metsker O. Magoev K. Yakovlev A. Yanishevskiy S. Kopanitsa G. Kovalchuk S. Krzhizhanovskaya V.V. Identification of risk factors for patients with diabetes: diabetic polyneuropathy case study BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 20 2020 201 10.1186/s12911-020-01215-w PMC7444272 32831065 source
The Abstract (Results) reports the five quoted metrics, rounded from 79.82% precision, 81.52% recall, 80.64% F1, 82.61% accuracy, and 89.88% AUC. However, Table 6 (Results, Influence of comorbidities) assigns those values to the decision tree; it reports different results for ANN, SVM, linear regression, and logistic regression. The figures therefore do not describe the performance of all five classifiers. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Khandakar et al. reported that a CNN and k-means clustering technique using thermogram images to classify thermograms based on severity of diabetic foot complications found that VGG 19 CNN model showed accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and specificity of 95.08%, 95.08%, 95.09%, 95.08%, and 97.2%, respectively.
“it was found that the popular VGG 19 CNN model showed an accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and specificity of 95.08%, 95.08%, 95.09%, 95.08%, and 97.2%, respectively, in the stratification of severity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Khandakar et al.114 Khandakar A. Chowdhury M.E.H. Reaz M.B.I. Ali S.H.M. Kiranyaz S. Rahman T. Chowdhury M.H. Ayari M.A. Alfkey R. Bakar A.A.A. A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Severity Classification of Diabetic Foot Complications Using Thermogram Images Sensors 22 2022 4249 10.3390/s22114249 PMC9185274 35684870 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Arcadu et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images to predict future threat of significant diabetic retinopathy worsening at a patient level within 2 years achieved an AUC of 0.79 for prediction at month 12.
“the performance of one of these models (prediction at month 12) resulted in an AUC equal to 0.79”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Arcadu et al.101 Arcadu F. Benmansour F. Maunz A. Willis J. Haskova Z. Prunotto M. Deep learning algorithm predicts diabetic retinopathy progression in individual patients NPJ Digit. Med. 2 2019 92 10.1038/s41746-019-0172-3 31552296 PMC6754451 source
- Premisecitation
Salahouddin et al. reported that a CNN using corneal confocal microscopy images to identify diabetic peripheral neuropathy achieved an AUC of 0.95, sensitivity of 92%, and specificity of 80%.
“the AUC of the system was 0.95, sensitivity was 92%, and specificity was 80%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Salahouddin et al.118 Salahouddin T. Petropoulos I.N. Ferdousi M. Ponirakis G. Asghar O. Alam U. Kamran S. Mahfoud Z.R. Efron N. Malik R.A. Qidwai U.A. Artificial Intelligence-Based Classification of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy From Corneal Confocal Microscopy Images Diabetes Care 44 2021 e151 e153 10.2337/dc20-2012 34083322 PMC8323170 source
The paper reports an AUC of 0.95, 92% sensitivity, and 80% specificity specifically for distinguishing patients with diabetes who had DPN from those who did not. These are results for the ANFIS classifier using deep-learning-segmented corneal confocal microscopy images, not for a CNN alone or for DPN identification across all comparison groups. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Preston et al. reported that a CNN using corneal confocal microscopy images to identify diabetic peripheral neuropathy achieved recall of 0.83, precision of 1.0, and F1 score of 0.91.
“the system could achieve recall of 0.83, precision of 1.0, and F1 score of 0.91”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Preston et al.119 Preston F.G. Meng Y. Burgess J. Ferdousi M. Azmi S. Petropoulos I.N. Kaye S. Malik R.A. Zheng Y. Alam U. Artificial intelligence utilising corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy in diabetes mellitus and prediabetes Diabetologia 65 2022 457 466 10.1007/s00125-021-05617-x 34806115 PMC8803718 source
- Premisecitation
LLMs may have risks in terms of inconsistency or misleading information.
“However, LLMs may have risks in terms of inconsistency or misleading information.148”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] Ji Z. Lee N. Frieske R. Yu T. Su D. Xu Y. Ishii E. Bang Y.J. Madotto A. Fung P. Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation ACM Comput. Surv. 55 2023 1 38 10.1145/3571730 Article 248 source
- Premisecitation
Kim et al. reported that ANN, RF, and SVM using smartphone images to estimate likelihood of healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers achieved AUC of 0.734, accuracy of 0.811, precision of 0.828, recall of 0.923, and F1 score of 0.873.
“the model could achieve AUC of 0.734, accuracy of 0.811, precision of 0.828, recall of 0.923, and F1 score of 0.873”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kim et al.115 Kim R.B. Gryak J. Mishra A. Cui C. Soroushmehr S.M.R. Najarian K. Wrobel J.S. Utilization of smartphone and tablet camera photographs to predict healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers Comput. Biol. Med. 126 2020 104042 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104042 PMC9058995 33059239 source
The Discussion & conclusions reports an AUROC of 0.734 for models using all features. The Results says Table 2 reports accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores, but the passages in our copy do not establish the four quoted values. The Prediction models section identifies RF and SVM, not ANN, as the models built for this study. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Sabanayagam et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors for CKD screening achieved an AUC of 0.889 using fundus images only in participants with diabetes.
“in participants with diabetes, the system could achieve an AUC of 0.889 using fundus images only”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Sabanayagam et al.111 Sabanayagam C. Xu D. Ting D.S.W. Nusinovici S. Banu R. Hamzah H. Lim C. Tham Y.-C. Cheung C.Y. Tai E.S. A deep learning algorithm to detect chronic kidney disease from retinal photographs in community-based populations Lancet. Digit. Health 2 2020 e295 e302 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30063-7 33328123 source
- Premisecitation
Williams et al. reported that a CNN using corneal confocal microscopy images to identify diabetic peripheral neuropathy achieved an AUC of 0.83, sensitivity of 67.7%, and specificity of 86.7%.
“the AUC of the system was 0.83, sensitivity was 67.7%, and specificity was 86.7%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Williams et al.117 Williams B.M. Borroni D. Liu R. Zhao Y. Zhang J. Lim J. Ma B. Romano V. Qi H. Ferdousi M. An artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithm for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy using corneal confocal microscopy: a development and validation study Diabetologia 63 2020 419 430 10.1007/s00125-019-05023-4 31720728 PMC6946763 source
- Premisecitation
LLMs, which could accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs, have shown promise in various aspects of medical care.
“However, large language models (LLMs), which could accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs, have shown promise in various aspects145 of medical care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] OpenAI GPT-4 Technical Report Preprint at arXiv 2023 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774 source
The Introduction (p. 1) and Visual Inputs section (p. 8) confirm that GPT-4 accepts image and text inputs and produces text outputs. The Capabilities section (p. 5) reports a medical knowledge exam score, but the report does not establish promise across various aspects of medical care; exam performance is not evidence of performance in care settings. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Marini et al. reported that a BN using risk factors to estimate long-term development and progression of complications in T1D predicted the wrong state in below 10% of the population on both DDO-DBN and EI-DBN.
“the population predicted in the wrong state was below 10% on both DDO-DBN and EI-DBN”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Marini et al.95 Marini S. Trifoglio E. Barbarini N. Sambo F. Di Camillo B. Malovini A. Manfrini M. Cobelli C. Bellazzi R. A Dynamic Bayesian Network model for long-term simulation of clinical complications in type 1 diabetes J. Biomed. Inf. 57 2015 369 376 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.021 26325295 source
- Premisecitation
Zhang et al. reported that RF and SVM using clinical data to predict and differentiate DN and non-diabetic renal disease achieved AUCs of 0.953 and 0.947 in internal validation, and 0.920 and 0.911 in external validation.
“the AUCs for the RF and SVM methods were 0.953 and 0.947, respectively (internal validation); the AUCs for the external validation of the RF and SVM methods were 0.920 and 0.911, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al.113 Zhang W. Liu X. Dong Z. Wang Q. Pei Z. Chen Y. Zheng Y. Wang Y. Chen P. Feng Z. New Diagnostic Model for the Differentiation of Diabetic Nephropathy From Non-Diabetic Nephropathy in Chinese Patients Front. Endocrinol. 13 2022 913021 10.3389/fendo.2022.913021 PMC9279696 35846333 source
- Premisecitation
Huang et al. reported that ML classifiers using metabolic biomarkers for CKD screening identified two metabolites in combination with five clinical variables as the best set of predictors, with a mean AUC of 0.857.
“two metabolites in combination with five clinical variables were identified as the best set of predictors, and their predictive performance yielded a mean AUC of 0.857”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang et al.110 Huang J. Huth C. Covic M. Troll M. Adam J. Zukunft S. Prehn C. Wang L. Nano J. Scheerer M.F. Machine Learning Approaches Reveal Metabolic Signatures of Incident Chronic Kidney Disease in Individuals With Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes 69 2020 2756 2765 10.2337/db20-0586 33024004 source
- Premisecitation
LLMs, with advanced natural language processing abilities, offer a more comprehensive understanding of the medical literature, patient data, and individualized care requirements.
“LLMs, with advanced natural language processing abilities, offer a more comprehensive understanding of the medical literature, patient data, and individualized care requirements.146,147”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [146] Ali S.R. Dobbs T.D. Hutchings H.A. Whitaker I.S. Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters Lancet. Digit. Health 5 2023 e179 e181 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00048-1 36894409 source
In “Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters” (page not provided), the paper describes NLP’s ability to process language and tests ChatGPT letters generated from limited clinical input, including instructions involving national guidelines. It does not establish that LLMs have a more comprehensive understanding of medical literature, patient data, or individualized care requirements. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [147] Patel S.B. Lam K. ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries? Lancet. Digit. Health 5 2023 e107 e108 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3 36754724 source
- Premisecitation
Bhaskaranand et al. reported that EyeArt (CNN) using retinal images for DR screening achieved 91.3% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity for detecting referral-warranted DR (more than mild non-proliferative DR).
“the system could achieve 91.3% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity for detecting referral-warranted DR (more than mild non-proliferative DR)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bhaskaranand et al.105 Bhaskaranand M. Ramachandra C. Bhat S. Cuadros J. Nittala M.G. Sadda S.R. Solanki K. The Value of Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with the EyeArt System: A Study of More Than 100,000 Consecutive Encounters from People with Diabetes Diabetes Technol. Therapeut. 21 2019 635 643 10.1089/dia.2019.0164 PMC6812728 31335200 source
- Premisecitation
Reinforcement learning has been utilized to develop dynamic treatment regimens and provide a precise insulin dosage to react to the immediate needs of patients with diabetes.
“It has been utilized to develop dynamic treatment regimens and provide a precise insulin dosage to react to the immediate needs of patients with diabetes.23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Coronato A. Naeem M. De Pietro G. Paragliola G. Reinforcement learning for intelligent healthcare applications: A survey Artif. Intell. Med. 109 2020 101964 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964 34756216 source
- Premisecitation
Recent AI research has leveraged ML methods, which can account for complex interactions, to identify patterns from data.
“Hence, recent AI research has leveraged ML methods, which can account for complex interactions, to identify patterns from data.15”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Jordan M.I. Mitchell T.M. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects Science 349 2015 255 260 10.1126/science.aaa8415 26185243 source
- Interpretationnone given
Recent research has shown increasing accuracy in estimating energy intake based on food images.
“Recent research has shown increasing accuracy in estimating energy intake based on food images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Based on recognizable modifiable risk factors, precise interventions for preventing diabetes can be implemented in different individuals.
“Based on these recognizable modifiable risk factors, precise interventions for preventing diabetes can be implemented in different individuals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Several diet recommendation systems for patients with diabetes have been developed with an accuracy comparable to that of dietitians.
“Several diet recommendation systems for patients with diabetes have been developed with an accuracy comparable to that of dietitians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
ML is a promising tool that can maximize predictive performance compared with conventional statistical models.
“However, ML is a promising tool that can maximize predictive performance compared with conventional statistical models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The development of wide-ranging sensing technologies and generation of associated novel datasets are opening increasing avenues for AI screening for diabetes.
“Second, the development of wide-ranging sensing technologies and the generation of associated novel datasets are opening increasing avenues for AI screening for diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Prediction of BG levels is challenging because of the number of physiological factors involved, such as delays associated with absorption of food and insulin and lag associated with measurements in interstitial tissue.
“However, the prediction of BG levels is challenging, because of the number of physiological factors involved, such as delays associated with the absorption of food and insulin and the lag associated with measurements in the interstitial tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
AI has been broadly utilized for screening purposes because it enables the identification and use of predictors that lack apparent relationships with diabetes.
“First, AI has been broadly utilized for screening purposes because it enables the identification and use of predictors that lack apparent relationships with diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Information collected from new technologies such as CGM devices could lead to real-time prediction of future glucose levels.
“Thus, information collected from new technologies for diabetes management, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, could lead to the real-time prediction of future glucose levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Errors in CGM increase the difficulty of predicting BG values (approximately 9% of mean absolute relative difference for best sensors).
“Errors in CGM also increase the difficulty of predicting BG values (approximately 9% of the mean absolute relative difference for the best sensors70).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Bailey T.S. Chang A. Christiansen M. Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 9 2015 209 214 10.1177/1932296814559746 25370149 PMC4604574 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Premisenone given
According to product data, the accuracy of the alert was 98.5% only 30 min before the onset of hypoglycemia.
“According to the product data, the accuracy of the alert was 98.5% only 30 min before the onset of hypoglycemia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Non-adherence has been proposed as one of the leading causes of delays in adopting DHTs in clinical practice.
“Non-adherence has been proposed as one of the leading causes of delays in adopting DHTs in clinical practice.137”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] Solomon D.H. Rudin R.S. Digital health technologies: opportunities and challenges in rheumatology Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16 2020 525 535 10.1038/s41584-020-0461-x 32709998 source
- Premisecitation
Of 41 vendors assessed, 14 (34%) had not met the ONC certification requirement of stating their user-centered design process.
“Of 41 vendors assessed, 14 (34%) had not met the ONC certification requirement of stating their user-centered design process (ONC is short for the US Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [129] Ratwani R.M. Benda N.C. Hettinger A.Z. Fairbanks R.J. Electronic Health Record Vendor Adherence to Usability Certification Requirements and Testing Standards JAMA 314 2015 1070 1071 10.1001/jama.2015.8372 26348757 source
- Premisecitation
A previous study demonstrated that many EHR vendors did not follow basic usability principles.
“However, a previous study demonstrated that many EHR vendors did not follow basic usability principles.129”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [129] Ratwani R.M. Benda N.C. Hettinger A.Z. Fairbanks R.J. Electronic Health Record Vendor Adherence to Usability Certification Requirements and Testing Standards JAMA 314 2015 1070 1071 10.1001/jama.2015.8372 26348757 source
- Premisenone given
Several DL algorithms with high sensitivity have recently been developed for DR screening, predominantly focusing on identifying referable DR or vision-threatening DR.
“Several DL algorithms with high sensitivity have recently been developed for DR screening, predominantly focusing on identifying referable DR or vision-threatening DR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Automatic retinal screening, an AI technology that automatically interprets the presence of DR from fundus images, has been widely integrated into diabetes care worldwide.
“Automatic retinal screening, an AI technology that automatically interprets the presence of DR from fundus images, has been widely integrated into diabetes care worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Gulshan et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images for DR screening achieved an AUC of 0.991 for EyePACS-1 and 0.990 for Messidor-2 for detecting referable DR.
“for detecting referable DR, the algorithm had an AUC of 0.991 for EyePACS-1 and 0.990 for Messidor-2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gulshan et al.106 Gulshan V. Peng L. Coram M. Stumpe M.C. Wu D. Narayanaswamy A. Venugopalan S. Widner K. Madams T. Cuadros J. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs JAMA 316 2016 2402 2410 10.1001/jama.2016.17216 27898976 source
- Premisecitation
Yang et al. reported that LASSO regression using risk factors to estimate the risk of amputation in patients treated with canagliflozin produced the best prediction, yielding a C index of 0.81.
“LASSO produced the best prediction, yielding a C index of 0.81”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yang et al.100 Yang L. Gabriel N. Hernandez I. Winterstein A.G. Guo J. Using machine learning to identify diabetes patients with canagliflozin prescriptions at high-risk of lower extremity amputation using real-world data Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 30 2021 644 651 10.1002/pds.5206 33606340 source
- Premisecitation
Zhang et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors for CKD screening could identify CKD solely from fundus images or in combination with clinical metadata with AUCs of 0.85-0.93.
“the system could be used to identify CKD solely from fundus images or in combination with clinical metadata with AUCs of 0.85–0.93”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al.39 Zhang K. Liu X. Xu J. Yuan J. Cai W. Chen T. Wang K. Gao Y. Nie S. Xu X. Deep-learning models for the detection and incidence prediction of chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes from retinal fundus images Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 2021 533 545 10.1038/s41551-021-00745-6 34131321 source
- Premisecitation
Zhang et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors to predict development of chronic kidney disease achieved a C index of 0.845 on the internal test set and 0.719 on the external test set.
“the combined model could achieve a C index of 0.845 on the internal test set and 0.719 on the external test set”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhang et al.39 Zhang K. Liu X. Xu J. Yuan J. Cai W. Chen T. Wang K. Gao Y. Nie S. Xu X. Deep-learning models for the detection and incidence prediction of chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes from retinal fundus images Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5 2021 533 545 10.1038/s41551-021-00745-6 34131321 source
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
- May combine two claims. 59
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDiabetes is a significant health challenge worldwide due to increasing prevalence, high avoidable morbidity and mortality, and substantial economic burden.
“The increasing prevalence of diabetes, high avoidable morbidity and mortality due to diabetes and diabetic complications, and related substantial economic burden make diabetes a significant health challenge worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Jia W. Diabetes care in China: Innovations and implications J. Diabetes Investig. 13 2022 1795 1797 10.1111/jdi.13908 PMC9623513 36121277 source
The opening passage links rising prevalence, avoidable morbidity and mortality, and economic burden to a major health challenge in China. The citing sentence extends that conclusion to the world, which this passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias, overfitting, resource-intensive training, and limited transfer learning.
“Despite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias,27 overfitting,28 resource-intensive training,29 and limited transfer learning.30”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [27] Gianfrancesco M.A. Tamang S. Yazdany J. Schmajuk G. Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data JAMA Intern. Med. 178 2018 1544 1547 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 30128552 PMC6347576 source
- cites [28] Ying X. An Overview of Overfitting and its Solutions J. Phys, Conf. Ser. 1168 2019 022022 source
- cites [29] Gómez-Carmona O. Casado-Mansilla D. López-de-Ipiña D. García-Zubia J. Optimizing computational resources for edge intelligence through model cascade strategies IEEE Internet Things J. 9 2022 7404 7417 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA targeted and reasonable diet can control blood sugar and lipids and supplement protein and other nutrients.
“A targeted and reasonable diet can control blood sugar and lipids and supplement protein and other nutrients.65”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] Sami W. Ansari T. Butt N.S. Ab Hamid M.R. Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review Int J Health Sci-Ijh 11 2017 10.1002/dmrr.2515 PMC5426415 28539866
The sections “Relation between Dietary Practices and Diabetes Complications” and “Dietary Knowledge of Type 2 Diabetics” say that diet affects blood sugar and lipid levels and that nutrition therapy can help manage dyslipidemia. They do not support supplementing protein or other nutrients; the latter section instead notes that protein intake in one population exceeded recommendations. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationML methods enable the development of AI applications that facilitate the discovery of previously unrecognized patterns in the data without the need to specify decision rules for each specific task or to account for complex interactions among input features. Therefore, ML has become the preferred framework for building AI utilities.
“In summary, ML methods enable the development of AI applications that facilitate the discovery of previously unrecognized patterns in the data without the need to specify decision rules for each specific task or to account for complex interactions among input features. Therefore, ML has become the preferred framework for building AI utilities.34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Roberts K. Boland M.R. Pruinelli L. Dcruz J. Berry A. Georgsson M. Hazen R. Sarmiento R.F. Backonja U. Yu K.-H. Biomedical informatics advancing the national health agenda: the AMIA 2015 year-in-review in clinical and consumer informatics J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 24 2017 e185 e190 10.1093/jamia/ocw103 PMC6080724 27497798 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWith the inputs of SMBG and non-rapid insulin, Fong et al.'s work is worth discussing today because SMBG and non-rapid insulin formulations are still used in many parts of the world.
“With the inputs of SMBG and non-rapid insulin, this work is worth discussing today because SMBG and non-rapid insulin formulations are still used in many parts of the world.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] Fong S. Zhang Y. Fiaidhi J. Mohammed O. Mohammed S. Evaluation of stream mining classifiers for real-time clinical decision support system: A case study of blood glucose prediction in diabetes therapy BioMed Res. Int. 2013 2013 274193 10.1155/2013/274193 PMC3791638 24163813 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe prediction horizon range previously explored ranged between 5 and 180 min, with short-term predictions most frequently explored (most studies used prediction horizons below 60 min).
“The prediction horizon range previously explored ranged between 5 and 180 min. Short-term predictions were the most frequently explored, as most studies used prediction horizons below 60 min.71”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Contreras I. Vehi J. Artificial Intelligence for Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Literature Review J. Med. Internet Res. 20 2018 e10775 10.2196/10775 PMC6000484 29848472 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA proper diet is indispensable in managing diabetic patients by maintaining normal blood sugar levels and reducing the burden of pancreatic islet β cells.
“A proper diet is indispensable in managing diabetic patients by maintaining normal blood sugar levels and reducing the burden of pancreatic islet β cells.64”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] Kitagishi Y. Nakanishi A. Minami A. Asai Y. Yasui M. Iwaizako A. Suzuki M. Ono Y. Ogura Y. Matsuda S. Certain Diet and Lifestyle May Contribute to Islet beta-cells Protection in Type-2 Diabetes via the Modulation of Cellular PI3K/AKT Pathway Open Biochem. J. 8 2014 74 82 10.2174/1874091X01408010074 25400709 PMC4231374 source
The section “Certain Diet and Lifestyle May Contribute to Islet β-Cells Protection” (page unavailable) says oxidative damage can be reduced by controlling hyperglycemia and calorie intake, and discusses possible dietary contributions to β-cell protection. It does not establish that a proper diet is indispensable for diabetic patients, maintains normal blood sugar levels, or reduces β-cell burden by doing so. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior AI models in diabetes management offered several advantages, such as data analysis, pattern recognition, decision support, and patient education, but faced limitations in natural language understanding, personalized treatment, accuracy, and potential biases.
“Prior AI models in diabetes management offered several advantages, such as data analysis, pattern recognition, decision support, and patient education, but faced limitations in natural language understanding, personalized treatment, accuracy, and potential biases.71”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Contreras I. Vehi J. Artificial Intelligence for Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Literature Review J. Med. Internet Res. 20 2018 e10775 10.2196/10775 PMC6000484 29848472 source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUser adherence is crucial to the effectiveness of DHT applications in the real world, which can be affected by convenience, user experience, and true benefits brought by this technology.
“User adherence is crucial to the effectiveness of DHT applications in the real world, which can be affected by convenience, user experience, and true benefits brought by this technology (for example, helping them decide when to contact their provider, being more aware of their symptoms, and feeling more connected to their provider).138,139”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [138] Blakey J.D. Bender B.G. Dima A.L. Weinman J. Safioti G. Costello R.W. Digital technologies and adherence in respiratory diseases: the road ahead Eur. Respir. J. 52 2018 1801147 10.1183/13993003.01147-2018 PMC6364097 30409819 source
In ‘Considering the intended users of the interventions’ (page unavailable), the paper says sustained real-world use is critical to digital technologies’ success and discusses user experience, desirable features, and reasons patients disengage. It does not specifically identify convenience as a factor or substantiate the cited sentence’s examples of deciding when to contact a provider, becoming more aware of symptoms, or feeling more connected to a provider. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [139] Rudin R.S. Fanta C.H. Qureshi N. Duffy E. Edelen M.O. Dalal A.K. Bates D.W. A Clinically Integrated mHealth App and Practice Model for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes between Visits for Asthma Patients: Implementation and Feasibility Appl. Clin. Inf. 10 2019 783 793 10.1055/s-0039-1697597 PMC6795530 31618782 source
The Patient Themes section (page not available) reports that patients valued the app’s simplicity, symptom awareness, and connection to their provider; the discussion (p. 789) says its core features helped patients decide when to seek care. The Clinical Relevance Statement reports questionnaire adherence, but this single-app feasibility study does not establish that adherence is crucial to the real-world effectiveness of DHT applications generally, or that the listed benefits caused adherence. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFederated computing approaches have been developed, wherein dedicated parameter servers are responsible for aggregating and distributing local learning; however, a remainder of a central structure is kept.
“Federated computing approaches have further been developed, wherein dedicated parameter servers are responsible for aggregating and distributing local learning; however, a remainder of a central structure is kept.136”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] Warnat-Herresthal S. Schultze H. Shastry K.L. Manamohan S. Mukherjee S. Garg V. Sarveswara R. Händler K. Pickkers P. Aziz N.A. Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning Nature 594 2021 265 270 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 34040261 PMC8189907 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationParticipants had interest in having technology to support self-management, but reported a lack of confidence with technology, as well as frustration with design features and navigation.
“Although participants had interest in having technology to support self-management, they reported a lack of confidence with technology, as well as frustration with design features and navigation.130”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] Sarkar U. Gourley G.I. Lyles C.R. Tieu L. Clarity C. Newmark L. Singh K. Bates D.W. Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients J. Gen. Intern. Med. 31 2016 1417 1426 27418347 PMC5130945 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese individuals often have the poorest understanding of the disease, low use of maintenance medications, and poor health outcomes.
“These individuals often have the poorest understanding of the disease, low use of maintenance medications, and poor health outcomes.122”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] Himes B.E. Weitzman E.R. Innovations in health information technologies for chronic pulmonary diseases Respir. Res. 17 2016 38 10.1186/s12931-016-0354-3 27048618 PMC4822326 source
The Background’s health-disparities section (page not provided) identifies health literacy and medication non-adherence as factors in chronic pulmonary disease disparities. Another Background passage links poor adherence to adverse clinical outcomes. The paper does not establish that the unspecified individuals have the poorest disease understanding or specifically low use of maintenance medications. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationApplication of AI systems in the real world may lead to many unintended outcomes, including alert fatigue, additional burdens for clinicians, disruption of interpersonal communications, and generation of specific threats requiring increased vigilance to recognize.
“Application of AI systems in the real world may lead to many unintended outcomes, including alert fatigue,131 additional burdens for clinicians, disruption of interpersonal communications, and generation of specific threats requiring increased vigilance to recognize.132”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [131] Carspecken C.W. Sharek P.J. Longhurst C. Pageler N.M. A clinical case of electronic health record drug alert fatigue: consequences for patient outcome Pediatrics 131 2013 e1970 e1973 10.1542/peds.2012-3252 23713099 source
- cites [132] Ash J.S. Berg M. Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 11 2004 104 112 10.1197/jamia.M1471 PMC353015 14633936 source
The introduction (p. 1) says patient care information systems can add work tasks, disrupt communication routines, and create hazards requiring vigilance to detect. These points support the outcomes attached to citation 132, but the paper discusses patient care information systems rather than AI systems specifically. Alert fatigue is attached to citation 131, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWarnat-Herresthal et al. introduced a decentralized ML approach named swarm learning, which dispenses with a dedicated server, shares the parameters via the swarm network, and builds the models independently on private data at the individual sites.
“As an alternative, Warnat-Herresthal et al. introduced a decentralized ML approach named swarm learning,136 which dispenses with a dedicated server, shares the parameters via the swarm network, and builds the models independently on private data at the individual sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] Warnat-Herresthal S. Schultze H. Shastry K.L. Manamohan S. Mukherjee S. Garg V. Sarveswara R. Händler K. Pickkers P. Aziz N.A. Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning Nature 594 2021 265 270 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 34040261 PMC8189907 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDai et al. developed an automated, interpretable, and validated system (DeepDR) that performs real-time image quality feedback, retinal lesion detection, and early- to late-stage DR grading with high sensitivity and specificity.
“To overcome this issue, Dai et al. developed an automated, interpretable, and validated system (named DeepDR) that performs real-time image quality feedback, retinal lesion detection, and early- to late-stage DR grading with high sensitivity and specificity.103”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [103] Dai L. Wu L. Li H. Cai C. Wu Q. Kong H. Liu R. Wang X. Hou X. Liu Y. A deep learning system for detecting diabetic retinopathy across the disease spectrum Nat. Commun. 12 2021 3242 10.1038/s41467-021-23458-5 34050158 PMC8163820 source
- Rests on an assumption: Proper intervention at an early stage could significantly delay the progression of DR and even reverse mild non-proliferative DR to a DR-free stage.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo main barriers have been identified that may undermine clinicians' enthusiasm to integrate AI systems into clinical workflows: experts may struggle to develop trust because of numerous inputs and complex data integration; and some evidence suggests AI systems could be perceived as encroaching on clinicians' professional role.
“In addition, two main barriers have been identified that may undermine clinicians’ enthusiasm to integrate AI systems into clinical workflows.133 First, experts may struggle to develop trust with these systems because of the numerous inputs and complex data integration involved, which can make it challenging or impossible to convey the specific logic behind an alert or recommendation. Second, some”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [133] Henry K.E. Kornfield R. Sridharan A. Linton R.C. Groh C. Wang T. Wu A. Mutlu B. Saria S. Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system NPJ Digit. Med. 5 2022 97 10.1038/s41746-022-00597-7 35864312 PMC9304371 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrecision medicine is an emerging disease treatment and prevention approach that considers individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person.
“As described by the National Institutes of Health, precision medicine is an emerging disease treatment and prevention approach that considers individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] Mesko B. The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development 2 2017 239 241 10.1080/23808993.2017.1380516 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere exist inherent disadvantages in centralized solutions, including increased data traffic and concerns about data ownership, confidentiality, privacy, and security and creating data monopolies that favor data aggregators.
“There exist inherent disadvantages in centralized solutions, including increased data traffic and concerns about data ownership, confidentiality, privacy, and security and creating data monopolies that favor data aggregators.135”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [135] Kaissis G.A. Makowski M.R. Rückert D. Braren R.F. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging Nat. Mach. Intell. 2 2020 305 311 10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1 source
The section ‘Decentralized data and federated machine learning’ says keeping data with its owner addresses governance and ownership concerns, while the discussion of patient-data protection addresses privacy and confidentiality. Our copy does not say centralized solutions create data monopolies favoring aggregators. It also describes burdensome communication as a limitation of decentralized learning, not as increased traffic caused by centralization; no page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe first well-established device was IDx-DR, approved by the FDA in 2018 for its high diagnostic performance in clinical trials.
“The first well-established device was IDx-DR, approved by the FDA in 2018 for its high diagnostic performance in clinical trials.104,142”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [104] Abràmoff M.D. Lou Y. Erginay A. Clarida W. Amelon R. Folk J.C. Niemeijer M. Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57 2016 5200 5206 10.1167/iovs.16-19964 27701631 source
- cites [142] Abràmoff M.D. Lavin P.T. Birch M. Shah N. Folk J.C. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices NPJ Digit. Med. 1 2018 39 10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6 31304320 PMC6550188 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationDagliati et al. reported that RF, SVM, and LR models using risk factors to predict development of diabetes-related complications provided an accuracy up to 0.838.
“final models, tailored in accordance with the complications, provided an accuracy up to 0.838”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dagliati et al.97 Dagliati A. Marini S. Sacchi L. Cogni G. Teliti M. Tibollo V. De Cata P. Chiovato L. Bellazzi R. Machine Learning Methods to Predict Diabetes Complications J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 12 2018 295 302 10.1177/1932296817706375 28494618 PMC5851210 source
The Abstract (page not provided) reports complication-specific final models with accuracy up to 0.838 and lists the risk factors used. The Results (page not provided) clarify that the final retained models were LR models: RF and SVM were evaluated, but the paper does not attribute that final-model accuracy to all three methods. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDai et al. reported that DeepDR (CNN) using retinal images for DR screening achieved AUCs of 0.943, 0.955, 0.960, and 0.972 for grading DR as mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative, respectively, in internal validation, and AUCs from 0.916 to 0.970 in external validations.
“the grading of DR as mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative achieves AUCs of 0.943, 0.955, 0.960, and 0.972, respectively (internal validation); in external validations, AUCs for grading range from 0.916 to 0.970”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dai et al.103 Dai L. Wu L. Li H. Cai C. Wu Q. Kong H. Liu R. Wang X. Hou X. Liu Y. A deep learning system for detecting diabetic retinopathy across the disease spectrum Nat. Commun. 12 2021 3242 10.1038/s41467-021-23458-5 34050158 PMC8163820 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLjubic et al. reported that an RNN using hospitalization longitudinal data to predict development of 10 selected complications in T2D achieved prediction accuracy between 73% (myocardial infarction) and 83% (chronic ischemic heart disease), while traditional models achieved between 66% and 76%.
“the prediction accuracy was between 73% (myocardial infarction) and 83% (chronic ischemic heart disease), while the accuracy of traditional models was between 66% and 76%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ljubic et al.99 Ljubic B. Hai A.A. Stanojevic M. Diaz W. Polimac D. Pavlovski M. Obradovic Z. Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 27 2020 1343 1351 10.1093/jamia/ocaa120 PMC7647294 32869093 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuang et al. reported that DT, RF, SVM, and BN using clinical and genotyping data for diabetic nephropathy screening yielded accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of 85.27%, 83.32%, and 85.24% on internal testing, and 78.50%, 80.64%, and 81.40% on a separate testing dataset.
“the proposed method yielded accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of 85.27%, 83.32, and 85.24%, respectively (internal testing dataset); on a separate testing dataset, the classification accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 78.50%, 80.64, and 81.40%, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Huang et al.112 Huang G.M. Huang K.Y. Lee T.Y. Weng J. An interpretable rule-based diagnostic classification of diabetic nephropathy among type 2 diabetes patients BMC Bioinf. 16 Suppl 1 2015 S5 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S1-S5 PMC4331704 25707942 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs are built using natural language processing techniques and designed to recognize and understand the structure and meaning of human language, classify texts according to their content or purpose, and generate responses that are appropriate and coherent.
“LLMs are built using natural language processing techniques and designed to recognize and understand the structure and meaning of human language, classify texts according to their content or purpose, and generate responses that are appropriate and coherent.146”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] Ali S.R. Dobbs T.D. Hutchings H.A. Whitaker I.S. Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters Lancet. Digit. Health 5 2023 e179 e181 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00048-1 36894409 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTing et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images for DR screening achieved an AUC of 0.936, sensitivity of 90.5%, and specificity of 91.6% for referable DR; and for vision-threatening DR, AUC was 0.958, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 91.1%.
“the AUC of the system for referable DR was 0.936, sensitivity was 90.5%, and specificity was 91.6%; for vision-threatening DR, AUC was 0.958, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 91.1%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Ting et al.107 Ting D.S.W. Cheung C.Y.-L. Lim G. Tan G.S.W. Quang N.D. Gan A. Hamzah H. Garcia-Franco R. San Yeo I.Y. Lee S.Y. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes JAMA 318 2017 2211 2223 10.1001/jama.2017.18152 29234807 PMC5820739 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBora et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors to predict risk of developing DR within 2 years achieved an AUC of 0.79 in the internal validation set and 0.70 in the external validation set with one-field color fundus photographs.
“the three-field DL system had an AUC of 0.79 in the internal validation set; assessment of the external validation set, which contained only one-field color fundus photographs, with the one-field DL system gave an AUC of 0.70”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bora et al.102 Bora A. Balasubramanian S. Babenko B. Virmani S. Venugopalan S. Mitani A. de Oliveira Marinho G. Cuadros J. Ruamviboonsuk P. Corrado G.S. Predicting the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy using deep learning Lancet. Digit. Health 3 2021 e10 e19 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30250-8 33735063 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe emergence of DHTs, especially AI, may help address obstacles and alleviate disease burden of diabetes in the future because AI-based DHTs could help implement better prevention strategies, manage patients unable to attend appointments, deliver real-time health information, promote self-management, and save time and money.
“The emergence of digital health technologies (DHTs), especially artificial intelligence (AI), may help address these obstacles and alleviate the disease burden of diabetes in the future, because AI-based DHTs in diabetes care could help implement better prevention strategies for high-risk populations, manage diabetic patients who are unable to attend physician appointments in person, deliver real-”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Ashrafzadeh S. Hamdy O. Patient-Driven Diabetes Care of the Future in the Technology Era Cell Metabol. 29 2019 564 575 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.005 30269984 source
- Rests on an assumption: A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research, translational research, and clinical practice.
“The application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research,16 translational research,14 and clinical practice17 (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] Check Hayden E. The automated lab Nature 516 2014 131 132 10.1038/516131a 25471888 source
- cites [14] Yu K.-H. Beam A.L. Kohane I.S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2 2018 719 731 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z 31015651 source
- cites [17] Klonoff A.N. Andy Lee W.-A. Xu N.Y. Nguyen K.T. DuBord A. Kerr D. Six Digital Health Technologies That Will Transform Diabetes J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 17 2023 239 249 10.1177/19322968211043498 34558330 PMC9846384 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRecent advancements in digital health technologies, especially AI, provide a significant opportunity to achieve better efficiency in diabetes care, which may diminish the increase in diabetes-related health-care expenditures.
“Recent advancements in digital health technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI), provide a significant opportunity to achieve better efficiency in diabetes care, which may diminish the increase in diabetes-related health-care expenditures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRule-based systems are expensive to build and brittle, and it is challenging to encode higher-order interactions between different pieces of knowledge provided by different specialists, with system effectiveness restricted by comprehensiveness of pre-existing medical knowledge.
“However, rule-based systems are expensive to build and brittle. Furthermore, it is challenging to encode higher-order interactions between different pieces of knowledge provided by different specialists, with system effectiveness restricted by the comprehensiveness of pre-existing medical knowledge.12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Samuel A.L. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers (Reprinted from Journal of Research and Development, vol 3, 1959 IBM J. Res. Dev. 44 2000 206 226 10.1147/rd.441.0206 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI can predict the risk of diabetes onset and classify diabetes.
“AI can predict the risk of diabetes onset and classify diabetes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenOne explanation for the shortcomings of existing treatment strategies is that the diagnosis of diabetes is based on the measurement of only one metabolite, glucose; however, the disease is heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation and progression.
“One explanation for these shortcomings is that the diagnosis of diabetes is based on the measurement of only one metabolite, glucose; however, the disease is heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation and progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Existing treatment strategies for diabetes cannot stop the progressive course of the disease and prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAI algorithms could be quite useful in times when it is difficult to manage diabetes.
“Particularly, it is worth highlighting that AI algorithms could be quite useful in times when it is difficult to manage diabetes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI-based models are less invasive and highly accessible, which could effectively improve the willingness of the general population to screen and provide personalized screening plans for high-risk populations.
“These AI-based models are less invasive and highly accessible, which could effectively improve the willingness of the general population to screen and provide personalized screening plans for high-risk populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHealth education aims to empower diabetic patients with increased knowledge and awareness of diabetes, which can further facilitate better disease self-management.
“Health education aims to empower diabetic patients with increased knowledge and awareness of diabetes, which can further facilitate better disease self-management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA refined classification system could provide a powerful tool to individualize treatment regimens and identify individuals with an increased risk of complications at diagnosis.
“A refined classification system could provide a powerful tool to individualize treatment regimens and identify individuals with an increased risk of complications at diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPredicting near-future BG on a minute, hour, or overnight timescale enables better diabetes management and therefore remains an active research topic.
“Predicting near-future BG on a minute, hour, or overnight timescale enables better diabetes management and therefore remains an active research topic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarly stages of T2D are often asymptomatic, so individuals can carry the disease for years undiagnosed.
“Considering that the early stages of T2D are often asymptomatic, individuals can carry the disease for years undiagnosed.48”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2021 Diabetes Care 44 2021 S15 S33 33298413 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese limitations have motivated the use of AI-based diagnostics that have high classification accuracy and leverage large datasets that are not easily interpreted.
“These limitations have motivated the use of AI-based diagnostics that have high classification accuracy and leverage large datasets (including data from wearable and continuous monitoring devices) that are not easily interpreted.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnlike many other medications, insulin must be titrated, which complicates insulin dosing and requires providers to perform complex calculations to determine the best dose.
“Unlike many other medications, insulin must be titrated, which means that the dose will change in response to real-time indicators such as current BG or based on what the patient has recently eaten. This process complicates insulin dosing and requires providers to perform complex calculations to determine the best dose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Errors in insulin dosing can be dangerous, as incorrect dosages can lead to serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia, which can cause death.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt is often poorly implemented that a scientific, personalized, and quantitative exercise prescription can potentially be an essential therapeutic agent for patients with diabetes, as clinicians lack necessary knowledge and skills, while participants have low adherence due to design defects.
“However, it is often poorly implemented, as clinicians lack the necessary knowledge and skills, while participants have low adherence due to design defects (e.g., prescriptions fail to take individual willingness, the appeal of exercise, and complex physical conditions into account).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenClinicians provide therapeutic advice beyond insulin dosing guidance, as diabetes is often associated with multiple comorbidities, leading to complex guidelines for personalized treatment, with gaps often present in which no recommendations are available.
“Clinicians provide therapeutic advice beyond insulin dosing guidance (particularly T2D), as diabetes is often associated with multiple comorbidities, leading to complex guidelines for personalized treatment, with gaps often present in which no recommendations are available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenArtificial neural network approaches are the most widely applied methodology for BG prediction, but other ML methodologies such as random forest and support vector machine are being adopted with increasing frequency.
“Artificial neural network approaches are the most widely applied methodology, but other ML methodologies, such as random forest and support vector machine, are being adopted with increasing frequency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAI can classify different types of diabetes more accurately, but further algorithm upgrading is required to meet clinical treatment needs.
“Although AI can classify different types of diabetes more accurately,51,54,55 further algorithm upgrading is required to meet the clinical treatment needs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [51] Maniruzzaman M. Kumar N. Menhazul Abedin M. Shaykhul Islam M. Suri H.S. El-Baz A.S. Suri J.S. Comparative approaches for classification of diabetes mellitus data: Machine learning paradigm Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 152 2017 23 34 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.09.004 29054258 source
- cites [54] Barakat N.H. Bradley A.P. Barakat M.N.H. Intelligible Support Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Ieee T Inf Technol B 14 2010 1114 1120 10.1109/Titb.2009.2039485 20071261 source
- cites [55] Amit kumar D. Pragati A. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus Using Machine Learning Techniques Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2 2015
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe ability to anticipate BG excursions could provide an early warning regarding ineffective or poor treatment.
“The ability to anticipate BG excursions could provide an early warning regarding ineffective or poor treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: It is usual for people with diabetes to experience BG variation throughout the day owing to carbohydrate ingestion and insulin action.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe prediction of diabetes onset is a part of pre-emptive medicine, accurately identifying individuals highly likely to develop diabetes at the pre-illness stage. Thus, this technology could eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes by implementing medical interventions for these people at a very early stage.
“The prediction of diabetes onset is a part of pre-emptive medicine, accurately identifying individuals highly likely to develop diabetes at the pre-illness stage. Thus, this technology could eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes by implementing medical interventions for these people at a very early stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenPrevious studies have focused on optimizing the insulin dose for both patients and clinicians.
“Previous studies have focused on optimizing the insulin dose for both patients and clinicians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMost patients with diabetes do not utilize automated insulin delivery systems on account of personal preferences or relatively high costs.
“This treatment model is still worth discussing today, since most patients with diabetes do not utilize automated insulin delivery systems on account of personal preferences or relatively high costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEarly AI-enabled decision support systems were generally designed to assist clinicians who were authoritative in the insulin dosing strategies for their patients.
“For clinicians, early AI-enabled decision support systems were generally designed to assist clinicians who were authoritative in the insulin dosing strategies for their patients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe control algorithm acts as a 'brain' in the closed-loop system, analyzing data fed back by CGM and automatically adjusting insulin infusion rate; therefore, an accurate control algorithm is crucial for a closed-loop system.
“The control algorithm acts as a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAI could be employed in understanding risk factors for diabetes onset owing to human limitations and biases when dealing with large spaces of risk factors.
“AI could be employed in understanding risk factors for diabetes onset owing to human limitations and biases when dealing with large spaces of risk factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGlycemic episode detection encompasses a set of tools that address the complexity of effective BG control, enabling detection of glycemic episodes and opportunity to respond promptly.
“As with BG prediction, glycemic episode detection encompasses a set of tools that address the complexity of effective BG control. These tools enable us to detect the occurrence of glycemic episodes and provide us with the opportunity to respond promptly to their effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDietary monitoring is critical in patients with diabetes, especially as self-reporting of food intake is inaccurate and often impractical; therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated solution for dietary monitoring.
“Dietary monitoring is critical in patients with diabetes, especially as self-reporting of food intake is inaccurate and often impractical59; therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated solution for dietary monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Schoeller D.A. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report Metabolism 44 1995 18 22 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90204-x 7869932 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTreatment escalation of diabetes is another critical aspect of drug therapy strategies, required as a patient's disease progresses, and multiple studies have aimed to identify optimal escalation points as an aid to clinicians.
“Treatment escalation of diabetes is another critical aspect of drug therapy strategies, which is required as a patient’s disease progresses, and multiple studies have aimed to identify optimal escalation points as an aid to clinicians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMost reviewed studies on glycemic episode detection focus on detecting hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia in situations where it is not possible to monitor BG effectively, and most dealt with real-time approaches rather than predictions of future events.
“In contrast to BG prediction, most of the reviewed studies on this topic focus on detecting hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia in situations where it is not possible to monitor BG effectively. Therefore, most of these studies dealt with real-time approaches rather than predictions of future events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent diagnostic guidelines for diabetes are driven by invasive measurements in clinics, possibly influenced by behavioral and ethnic factors.
“Current diagnostic guidelines for diabetes47 are driven by invasive measurements in clinics, possibly influenced by behavioral and ethnic factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021 Diabetes Care 44 2021 S15 S33 10.2337/dc21-S002 33298413 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningA challenging aspect of measuring agreement between human expert- and AI-generated recommendations is that, even when they disagree, both can be correct, because humans often express a wide variety of priorities and risk preferences.
“A challenging aspect of measuring the agreement between human expert- and AI-generated recommendations is that, even when they disagree, both can be correct, because humans (including AI developers) often express a wide variety of priorities and risk preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn diabetes management, the prediction of the onset of diabetes and diabetic complications would eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes and diabetic complications by implementing appropriate medical interventions for those at high risk at a very early stage.
“In diabetes management, the prediction of the onset of diabetes and diabetic complications would eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes and diabetic complications by implementing appropriate medical interventions for those at high risk at a very early stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Guardian Connect System is an AI system based on CGM, has an accompanying smartphone application, and was certified by the FDA in 2018.
“The Guardian Connect System (manufactured by Medtronic) is an example of an AI system with this functionality. This system is based on CGM, has an accompanying smartphone application,144 and was certified by the FDA in 2018.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144] Soupal J. Haskova A. Prazny M. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial Diabetes Care 43 2021 2744 2750 10.2337/dci20-0078 PMC7576432 32859607 source
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe Guardian Connect System uses AI to predict a hypoglycemic attack an hour in advance based on CGM data and alerts the patient.
“It is characterized by using AI to predict a hypoglycemic attack an hour in advance based on the CGM data and alerts the patient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt is feasible to integrate retinal-image-based prediction algorithms into DR screening programs because retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into body homeostasis.
“Since retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into the homeostasis of the body, it is feasible for the integration of such algorithms into DR screening programs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into body homeostasis.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPrevious studies have shown that applying AI in diabetes management involves all aspects of disease control, including prediction, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.
“Previous studies have shown that applying AI in diabetes management involves all aspects of disease control, including prediction, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo important mechanisms of the AI domain can be used to develop decisional systems for medical predictions: a knowledge-based system that involves logic and a system based on probabilistic reasoning.
“Two important mechanisms of the AI domain can be used to develop decisional systems for medical predictions: a knowledge-based system that involves logic and a system based on probabilistic reasoning.125”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [125] Albu A. Stanciu L. Benefits of Using Artificial Intelligence in Medical Predictions 19–21 2015 IEEE 1 4 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI technology can increase the productivity of existing DR tele-ophthalmology screening programs and lower unit economic costs within the community.
“For example, with the growing burden of DR, AI technology can increase the productivity of existing DR tele-ophthalmology screening programs and lower unit economic costs within the community.123”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [123] Xie Y. Nguyen Q.D. Hamzah H. Lim G. Bellemo V. Gunasekeran D.V. Yip M.Y.T. Qi Lee X. Hsu W. Li Lee M. Artificial intelligence for teleophthalmology-based diabetic retinopathy screening in a national programme: an economic analysis modelling study Lancet. Digit. Health 2 2020 e240 e249 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30060-1 33328056 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationWith the deployment of automated AI for specific clinical tasks, the credentials needed for diagnostic, therapeutic, supportive, and paramedical tasks need to be updated, and the roles of health-care professionals will continue to evolve as various AI modules are incorporated into the standard of care.
“With the deployment of automated AI for specific clinical tasks, the credentials needed for diagnostic, therapeutic, supportive, and paramedical tasks need to be updated, and the roles of health-care professionals will continue to evolve as various AI modules are incorporated into the standard of care.14”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Yu K.-H. Beam A.L. Kohane I.S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2 2018 719 731 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z 31015651 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIntegrating AI into clinical practice care could shift diabetes care toward precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization.
“Integrating AI into clinical practice care could shift diabetes care toward precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSeveral obstacles remain in the research and application of AI in diabetes management, including data quality control, poor technology design, privacy concerns, lack of clinical integration, non-adherence, and the establishment of laws and regulations.
“However, several obstacles remain in the research and application of AI in diabetes management, including data quality control, poor technology design, privacy concerns, lack of clinical integration, non-adherence, and the establishment of laws and regulations (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Clinical AI systems' labels and data quality directly determine model performance.
- Rests on an assumption: AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationArmengol et al. reported that a case-based reasoning system using risk factors to estimate risk of complications was 100% correct in determining the kind of risk (progression or development) and the risk of stroke, 90% correct in determining amputation risk, and 72.45% correct in determining the global risk and the risk of infarct.
“the results were 100% correct in determining the kind of risk (progression or development) and the risk of stroke, 90% correct in determining amputation risk, and 72.45% correct in determining the global risk and the risk of infarct”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Armengol et al.96 Armengol E. Palaudàries A. Plaza E. Individual prognosis of diabetes long-term risks: a CBR approach Methods Inf. Med. 40 2001 46 51 11310159 source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationLagani et al. reported that an ANN using risk factors to predict diabetes-related complications achieved internal validation C index between 0.66 and 0.833 (all significantly different from 0.5, p ≤ 0.0001), and external validation in 49 T1D patients showed similarly high and statistically significant C indexes (p < 0.05 except hypoglycemia and CVD models with p = 0.0584 and 0.0932), with good T2D
“the results of the internal validation (T1D) reported a C index between 0.66 and 0.833, all statistically significantly different from 0.5 (p ≤ 0.0001); these results were further corroborated by the external validation (49 patients with T1D), where all models obtained similarly high and statistically significant C indexes (p < 0.05 except for the hypoglycemia and CVD model, with p = 0.0584 and 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lagani et al.94 Lagani V. Chiarugi F. Manousos D. Verma V. Fursse J. Marias K. Tsamardinos I. Realization of a service for the long-term risk assessment of diabetes-related complications J. Diabet. Complicat. 29 2015 691 698 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.011 25953402 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAbramoff et al. reported that IDx-DR (CNN) using retinal images for DR screening exceeded all pre-specified superiority endpoints with sensitivity of 87.2% (>85%), specificity of 90.7% (>82.5%), and imageability rate of 96.1% for detecting more than mild DR.
“the AI system exceeded all pre-specified superiority endpoints at sensitivity of 87.2% (>85%), specificity of 90.7% (>82.5%), and imageability rate of 96.1% for detecting the presence of more than mild DR”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abramoff et al.104 Abràmoff M.D. Lou Y. Erginay A. Clarida W. Amelon R. Folk J.C. Niemeijer M. Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57 2016 5200 5206 10.1167/iovs.16-19964 27701631 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBy addressing the challenges and capitalizing on the opportunities, AI could play a pivotal role in transforming diabetes care and improving the lives of millions of people worldwide.
“By addressing the challenges and capitalizing on the opportunities, AI could play a pivotal role in transforming diabetes care and improving the lives of millions of people worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDespite these risks, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize patient monitoring, treatment personalization, and patient education, leading to improved outcomes and better quality of life for patients with diabetes.
“Despite these risks, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize patient monitoring, treatment personalization, and patient education, leading to improved outcomes and better quality of life for patients with diabetes.149,150”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [149] Stokel-Walker C. Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science Nature 614 2023 214 216 10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 36747115 source
- cites [150] Howard A. Hope W. Gerada A. ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor? Lancet Infect. Dis. 23 2023 405 406 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00113-5 36822213 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAI has the potential to optimize diabetes care by providing personalized, precise, and data-driven support to patients and health-care professionals.
“In conclusion, AI has the potential to optimize diabetes care by providing personalized, precise, and data-driven support to patients and health-care professionals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAcharya et al. reported that a system using morphological image processing and SVM on retinal images could identify different stages of DR with an average accuracy of more than 85%, a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 86%.
“the system could identify different stages of DR with an average accuracy of more than 85%, a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 86%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Acharya et al.108 Acharya U.R. Lim C.M. Ng E.Y.K. Chee C. Tamura T. Computer-based detection of diabetes retinopathy stages using digital fundus images Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 223 2009 545 553 10.1243/09544119jeim486 19623908 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIntegrating AI-based DHTs will probably become increasingly feasible in the future as technology improves, and such integration will enable new models of diabetes care.
“Integrating AI-based DHTs will probably become increasingly feasible in the future as technology improves, and such integration will enable new models of diabetes care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
“A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.
“Unfortunately, late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Existing treatment strategies for diabetes cannot stop the progressive course of the disease and prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications.
“Existing treatment strategies for diabetes cannot stop the progressive course of the disease and prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is usual for people with diabetes to experience BG variation throughout the day owing to carbohydrate ingestion and insulin action.
“It is usual for people with diabetes to experience BG variation throughout the day owing to carbohydrate ingestion and insulin action.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Errors in insulin dosing can be dangerous, as incorrect dosages can lead to serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia, which can cause death.
“Errors in insulin dosing can be dangerous, as incorrect dosages can lead to serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia, which can cause death.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into body homeostasis.
“Since retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into the homeostasis of the body”
The paper relies on this without support.
Proper intervention at an early stage could significantly delay the progression of DR and even reverse mild non-proliferative DR to a DR-free stage.
“Evidence suggests that proper intervention at an early stage could significantly delay the progression of DR and even reverse mild non-proliferative DR to a DR-free stage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical AI systems' labels and data quality directly determine model performance.
“Since clinical AI systems are developed on a considerable amount of real-world health data, the corresponding labels and data quality will directly determine model performance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.
“AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Several challenges exist in managing diabetes in traditional face-to-face medical practices, such as ineffective prevention systems, uneven distribution of medical resources, and improper self-management.
“Several challenges exist in managing diabetes in traditional face-to-face medical practices, such as ineffective prevention systems, uneven distribution of medical resources, and improper self-management.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent advancements in AI, particularly predictive analytics, have significantly improved the ability to monitor and manage diabetes.
“However, recent advancements in AI, particularly through the development of predictive analytics, have significantly improved the ability to monitor and manage diabetes (31).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
The Blood glucose monitoring section says AI-based prediction can provide early warnings and that predicting near-future glucose levels enables better diabetes management. It reports predictive performance, but does not establish that these advances have already significantly improved diabetes monitoring and management in clinical practice. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLLMs can analyze patient data from a wide range of formats, including EHRs, clinical trial reports, genetic data, and patient-reported outcomes.
“LLMs can analyze patient data from a wide range of formats, including EHRs, clinical trial reports, genetic data, and even patient-reported outcomes (31,82).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
In Conclusion and perspective > Recommendations for future directions (page unavailable), the paper says LLMs can accept image and text inputs and offer a more comprehensive understanding of patient data. It does not say that LLMs analyze each of the listed sources—EHRs, clinical trial reports, genetic data, and patient-reported outcomes. Its separate mention of EHRs and patient-reported outcomes concerns digital-health adoption, not LLM analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis capability enhances the predictive accuracy of diabetes models by combining quantitative and qualitative data.
“This capability enhances the predictive accuracy of diabetes models by combining both quantitative and qualitative data, providing a more holistic view of the patient’s health (31).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
The sections on diabetes-onset prediction and diabetic complications describe models using retinal images alongside clinical risk factors or metadata, with reported predictive performance (page not specified). They do not establish that combining quantitative and qualitative data improves accuracy over using either alone, or that it provides a more holistic view of patient health. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGenerative AI models have demonstrated immense potential in the early detection and management of diabetes complications.
“Generative AI models have demonstrated immense potential in the early detection and management of diabetes complications (31).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
The section on predicting, screening, and managing diabetic complications reports promising results for AI systems and says their predictions could guide intensive management. But it does not identify those systems as generative models; the Introduction lists generative models as a class of AI without linking them to demonstrated detection or management of complications. The claim is supported for AI broadly, not for generative AI specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBy providing real-time predictions and personalized treatment recommendations, LLMs have the potential to drastically improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetes-related complications.
“By providing real-time predictions and personalized treatment recommendations, LLMs have the potential to drastically improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetes-related complications (31).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
The Conclusion and perspective section says LLMs have the potential to personalize treatment and improve outcomes for patients with diabetes. It does not attribute real-time predictions or a reduced burden of diabetes-related complications to LLMs; the complication-prediction examples in the paper concern other AI methods. It also does not characterize the potential improvement in outcomes as drastic. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches have demonstrated growing promise in diabetes risk prediction, complication detection and healthcare utilization forecasting.
“More recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches have demonstrated growing promise in diabetes risk prediction, complication detection and healthcare utilization forecasting [21–28].”
From Machine learning-driven risk prediction for post-hospitalization diabetes case management: Integrating clinical and social determinants of health (2026) · cites this paper as [23]
The sections on predicting diabetes onset and screening diabetic complications describe promising AI applications, including risk models and detection of diabetic retinopathy. The passages found do not describe forecasting healthcare utilization; using hospitalization records to predict complications is not the same thing. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAI's capacity to predict diabetes-related complications such as cardiovascular disease is particularly valuable given the difficulty in assessing individual patient risk using traditional methods alone.
“AI’s capacity to predict diabetes-related complications, such as CVD, is particularly valuable given the difficulty in assessing individual patient risk using traditional methods alone (31).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387 · cited 1× · see citing works
“30 In summary, ML methods enable the development of AI applications that facilitate the discovery of previously unrecognized patterns in the data without the need to specify decision rules for each specific task or to account for complex interactions among input features.”
MethodHigh-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450 · cited 1× · see citing works
“134 Moreover, there are potentially fatal risks for patients if certain types of AI algorithms are hacked, such as overdosing insulin for diabetic patients in closed-loop automated insulin-de-livery systems.”
BackgroundMachine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955 · cited 1× · see citing works
“15 The application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research, 16 translational research, 14 and clinical practice 17 (Figure 1).”
BackgroundGulshan, V., Peng, L., Coram, M., Stumpe, M. C., Wu, D., Narayanaswamy, A., Venugopalan, S., Widner, K., Madams, T., Cuadros, J., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17216 · Cited by 7,697 · see citing works
Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3571730 · Cited by 5,025 · cited 1× · see citing works
“148 Despite these risks, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize patient monitoring, treatment personalization, and patient education, leading to improved outcomes and better quality of life for patients with diabetes.”
BackgroundDeo, R. C. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.115.001593 · Cited by 3,466 · cited 1× · see citing works
“18 Supervised ML methods involve collecting several ‘‘training’’ cases, which contain inputs (e.g., fundus photographs) and the desired output labels (e.g., the presence or absence of diabetic retinopathy).”
Method2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: <i>Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021</i>
American Diabetes Association (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc21-s002 · Cited by 3,116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“48 Unfortunately, late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.”
BackgroundThe Epidemiology of Obesity: A Big Picture
Hruby, A., & Hu, F. B. (2014) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0243-x · Cited by 3,006 · see citing works
Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses
Zeevi, D., Korem, T., Zmora, N., Israeli, D., Rothschild, D., Weinberger, A., Ben-Yacov, O., Lador, D., Avnit-Sagi, T., Lotan-Pompan, M., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001 · Cited by 2,929 · cited 1× · see citing works
“67 Physical therapy A scientific, personalized, and quantitative exercise prescription that can potentially be an essential therapeutic agent for patients with diabetes is highly recommended.”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence in healthcare
Yu, K.-H., Beam, A. L., & Kohane, I. S. (2018) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z · Cited by 2,817 · see citing works
A survey on semi-supervised learning
van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 · Cited by 2,666 · cited 2× · see citing works
“23,24 Semi-supervised learning is a branch of ML that uses labeled and unlabeled data to perform certain learning tasks 22 and permits the harnessing of large amounts of unlabeled data available in combination with typically smaller sets of labeled data.”
BackgroundTing, D. S. W., Cheung, C. Y.-L., Lim, G., Tan, G. S. W., Quang, N. D., Gan, A., Hamzah, H., Garcia-Franco, R., San Yeo, I. Y., Lee, S. Y., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18152 · Cited by 2,402 · see citing works
An Overview of Overfitting and its Solutions
Ying, X. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022022 · Cited by 2,352 · see citing works
Ahlqvist, E., Storm, P., Käräjämäki, A., Martinell, M., Dorkhan, M., Carlsson, A., Vikman, P., Prasad, R. B., Aly, D. M., Almgren, P., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30051-2 · Cited by 2,335 · cited 1× · see citing works
“19 Unsupervised ML methods infer the underlying patterns in unlabeled data to find subclusters of the original data (e.g., subclusters of diabetes 20,21 ), identify outliers in the data, produce low-dimensional representations of the data, or represent images and videos.”
BackgroundSelf-Supervised Visual Feature Learning With Deep Neural Networks: A Survey
Jing, L., & Tian, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.2992393 · Cited by 2,036 · see citing works
A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955
McCarthy, J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., et al. (2006) · The AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904 · Cited by 2,029
Blundell, J. E., Baker, J. L., Boyland, E. J., Blaak, E. E., Charzewska, J., Henauw, S. D., Frühbeck, G., González‐Gross, M., Hebebrand, J., Holm, L., et al. (2017) · Obesity Facts · doi:10.1159/000455952 · Cited by 1,980 · see citing works
Ash, J. S. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1471 · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Abràmoff, M. D., Lavin, P. T., Birch, M., Shah, N., & Folk, J. C. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6 · Cited by 1,638 · cited 1× · see citing works
“104,142 This device facilitates DR screening, especially in rural communities where patients have difficulty accessing an ophthalmologist.”
BackgroundSecure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging
Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers
Samuel, A. L. (2000) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/rd.441.0206 · Cited by 1,439 · see citing works
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 · Cited by 1,395 · cited 1× · see citing works
“23 Despite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias, 27 overfitting, 28 resource-intensive training, 29 and limited transfer learning.”
MethodArtificial intelligence in cardiology
Johnson, K. W., Torres Soto, J., Glicksberg, B. S., Shameer, K., Miotto, R., Ali, M., Ashley, E., & Dudley, J. T. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.521 · Cited by 1,202 · see citing works
Abràmoff, M. D., Lou, Y., Erginay, A., Clarida, W., Amelon, R., Folk, J. C., & Niemeijer, M. (2016) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-19964 · Cited by 1,101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“104,142 This device facilitates DR screening, especially in rural communities where patients have difficulty accessing an ophthalmologist.”
BackgroundSwarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning
Warnat-Herresthal, S., Schultze, H., Shastry, K. L., Manamohan, S., Mukherjee, S., Garg, V., Sarveswara, R., Händler, K., Pickkers, P., Aziz, N. A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 · Cited by 884 · cited 1× · see citing works
“136 As an alternative, Warnat-Herresthal et al. introduced a decentralized ML approach named swarm learning, 136 which dispenses with a dedicated server, shares the parameters via the swarm network, and builds the models independently on private data at the individual sites.”
MethodWhat ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 · Cited by 828 · cited 1× · see citing works
“149,150 Construction of an AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem for diabetes management Integrating AI-based DHTs will probably become increasingly feasible in the future as technology improves, and such integration will enable new models of diabetes care.”
BackgroundChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries?
Patel, S. B., & Lam, K. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00021-3 · Cited by 728 · cited 1× · see citing works
“146,147 However, LLMs may have risks in terms of inconsistency or misleading information.”
BackgroundEffect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review
Khazrai, Y. M., Defeudis, G., & Pozzilli, P. (2013) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2515 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
A deep learning system for detecting diabetic retinopathy across the disease spectrum
Dai, L., Wu, L., Li, H., Cai, C., Wu, Q., Kong, H., Liu, R., Wang, X., Hou, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23458-5 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial Pancreas: Past, Present, Future
Cobelli, C., Renard, E., & Kovatchev, B. (2011) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db11-0654 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps)
Schnall, R., Rojas, M., Bakken, S., Brown, W., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Carry, M., Gelaude, D., Mosley, J. P., & Travers, J. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002 · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence for diabetes management and decision support: Literature review
Contreras, I., & Vehi, J. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10775 · Cited by 560 · cited 2× · see citing works
“71 However, large language models (LLMs), which could accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs, have shown promise in various aspects 145 of medical care.”
BackgroundMethodDigital health: a path to validation
Mathews, S. C., McShea, M. J., Hanley, C. L., Ravitz, A., Labrique, A. B., & Cohen, A. B. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0111-3 · Cited by 508 · cited 1× · see citing works
“10 AI is a broad branch of computer science that develops theories, methods, technologies, and application systems to simulate, extend, and expand human intelligence in machines.”
BackgroundLimitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report
Schoeller, D. A. (1995) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/0026-0495(95)90204-x · Cited by 496 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Dietary monitoring is critical in patients with diabetes, especially as self-reporting of food intake is inaccurate and often impractical 59 ; therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated solu-tion for dietary monitoring.”
BackgroundNocturnal Glucose Control with an Artificial Pancreas at a Diabetes Camp
Phillip, M., Battelino, T., Atlas, E., Kordonouri, O., Bratina, N., Miller, S., Biester, T., Stefanija, M. A., Muller, I., Nimri, R., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1206881 · Cited by 431 · cited 2× · see citing works
“87 Phillip et al. found that patients with T1D at a diabetes camp treated with an artificial pancreas system based on MD Logic had less nocturnal hypoglycemia and tighter glucose control than those treated with a sensor-augmented insulin pump.”
BackgroundMethodMachine Learning Methods to Predict Diabetes Complications
Dagliati, A., Marini, S., Sacchi, L., Cogni, G., Teliti, M., Tibollo, V., De Cata, P., Chiovato, L., & Bellazzi, R. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817706375 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Guidelines for reinforcement learning in healthcare
Gottesman, O., Johansson, F., Komorowski, M., Faisal, A., Sontag, D., Doshi-Velez, F., & Celi, L. A. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0310-5 · Cited by 395 · cited 2× · see citing works
“24 It has been utilized to develop dynamic treatment regimens and provide a precise insulin dosage to react to the immediate needs of patients with diabetes.”
BackgroundMethodUsing ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters
Ali, S. R., Dobbs, T. D., Hutchings, H. A., & Whitaker, I. S. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00048-1 · Cited by 375 · cited 2× · see citing works
“146 The transition from previous AI technology to the current LLMs in diabetes management represents a significant leap in the capabilities of AI-driven health-care solutions.”
BackgroundIntelligible Support Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Barakat, N., Bradley, A. P., & Barakat, M. N. H. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine · doi:10.1109/titb.2009.2039485 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s005 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine
Mesko, B. (2017) · Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development · doi:10.1080/23808993.2017.1380516 · Cited by 343 · cited 1× · see citing works
“120 It requires significant computing power (supercomputers), algorithms that can learn by themselves at an unprecedented rate (DL), and, generally, an approach that uses the cognitive capabilities of physicians on a new scale (AI).”
BackgroundZhang, K., Liu, X., Xu, J., Yuan, J., Cai, W., Chen, T., Wang, K., Gao, Y., Nie, S., Xu, X., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00745-6 · Cited by 324 · cited 3× · see citing works
“39 Management of modifiable risk factors for diabetes AI could be employed in understanding risk factors for diabetes onset owing to human limitations and biases when dealing with large spaces of risk factors.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAbbasi, A., Peelen, L. M., Corpeleijn, E., van der Schouw, Y. T., Stolk, R. P., Spijkerman, A. M. W., van der A, D. L., Moons, K. G. M., Navis, G., Bakker, S. J. L., et al. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e5900 · Cited by 321 · cited 1× · see citing works
“35 However, ML is a promising tool that can maximize predictive performance compared with conventional statistical models.”
MethodComputer Programs to Support Clinical Decision Making
Shortliffe, E. H. (1987) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400010065029 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Reinforcement learning for intelligent healthcare applications: A survey
Coronato, A., Naeem, M., De Pietro, G., & Paragliola, G. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101964 · Cited by 320 · cited 2× · see citing works
“23 Despite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias, 27 overfitting, 28 resource-intensive training, 29 and limited transfer learning.”
BackgroundMethodQi, G.-J., & Luo, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3031898 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Deep learning algorithm predicts diabetic retinopathy progression in individual patients
Arcadu, F., Benmansour, F., Maunz, A., Willis, J., Haskova, Z., & Prunotto, M. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0172-3 · Cited by 305 · cited 1× · see citing works
“101,102 Since retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into the homeostasis of the body, it is feasible for the integration of such algorithms into DR screening programs.”
BackgroundXie, Y., Nguyen, Q. D., Hamzah, H., Lim, G., Bellemo, V., Gunasekeran, D. V., Yip, M. Y. T., Qi Lee, X., Hsu, W., Li Lee, M., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30060-1 · Cited by 288 · cited 1× · see citing works
“123 This will enable providers to project expertise to geographically remote locations, improve the productivity of existing resources, and optimize the flow of patients within entire health systems.”
BackgroundSabanayagam, C., Xu, D., Ting, D. S. W., Nusinovici, S., Banu, R., Hamzah, H., Lim, C., Tham, Y.-C., Cheung, C. Y., Tai, E. S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30063-7 · Cited by 279 · cited 1× · see citing works
“109 For CKD 39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy 112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
MethodInfluentialComparative approaches for classification of diabetes mellitus data: Machine learning paradigm
Maniruzzaman, M., Kumar, N., Menhazul Abedin, M., Shaykhul Islam, M., Suri, H. S., El-Baz, A. S., & Suri, J. S. (2017) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.09.004 · Cited by 270 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Although AI can classify different types of diabetes more accurately, 51,54,55 further algorithm upgrading is required to meet the clinical treatment needs.”
BackgroundMethodPredicting the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy using deep learning
Bora, A., Balasubramanian, S., Babenko, B., Virmani, S., Venugopalan, S., Mitani, A., de Oliveira Marinho, G., Cuadros, J., Ruamviboonsuk, P., Corrado, G. S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30250-8 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationNovel subgroups of patients with adult-onset diabetes in Chinese and US populations
Zou, X., Zhou, X., Zhu, Z., & Ji, L. (2018) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30316-4 · Cited by 266 · cited 1× · see citing works
“19 Unsupervised ML methods infer the underlying patterns in unlabeled data to find subclusters of the original data (e.g., subclusters of diabetes 20,21 ), identify outliers in the data, produce low-dimensional representations of the data, or represent images and videos.”
BackgroundUsability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients
Sarkar, U., Gourley, G. I., Lyles, C. R., Tieu, L., Clarity, C., Newmark, L., Singh, K., & Bates, D. W. (2016) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Digital health technologies: opportunities and challenges in rheumatology
Solomon, D. H., & Rudin, R. S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/s41584-020-0461-x · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“137 User adherence is crucial to the effectiveness of DHT applications in the real world, which can be affected by convenience, user experience, and true benefits brought by this technology (for example, helping them decide when to contact their provider, being more aware of their symptoms, and…”
BackgroundEffect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review.
(2017) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Computer-based detection of diabetes retinopathy stages using digital fundus images
Acharya, U. R., Lim, C. M., Ng, E. Y. K., Chee, C., & Tamura, T. (2009) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine · doi:10.1243/09544119jeim486 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Bhaskaranand, M., Ramachandra, C., Bhat, S., Cuadros, J., Nittala, M. G., Sadda, S. R., & Solanki, K. (2019) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0164 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Henry, K. E., Kornfield, R., Sridharan, A., Linton, R. C., Groh, C., Wang, T., Wu, A., Mutlu, B., & Saria, S. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00597-7 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor?
Howard, A., Hope, W., & Gerada, A. (2023) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00113-5 · Cited by 202 · cited 1× · see citing works
“149,150 Construction of an AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem for diabetes management Integrating AI-based DHTs will probably become increasingly feasible in the future as technology improves, and such integration will enable new models of diabetes care.”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence in Current Diabetes Management and Prediction
Nomura, A., Noguchi, M., Kometani, M., Furukawa, K., & Yoneda, T. (2021) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-021-01423-2 · Cited by 183 · cited 1× · see citing works
“143 Several DL algorithms with high sensitivity have recently been developed for DR screening, predominantly focusing on identifying referable DR or vision-threatening DR.”
BackgroundThe use of sequential pattern mining to predict next prescribed medications
Wright, A. P., Wright, A. T., McCoy, A. B., & Sittig, D. F. (2014) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.09.003 · Cited by 173 · cited 1× · see citing works
“90 Treatment escalation of diabetes is another critical aspect of drug therapy strategies, which is required as a patient’s disease progresses, and multiple studies have aimed to identify optimal escalation points as an aid to clinicians.”
BackgroundAn artificial intelligence decision support system for the management of type 1 diabetes
Tyler, N. S., MOSQUERA-LOPEZ, C. M., Wilson, L. M., Dodier, R. H., Branigan, D. L., Gabo, V. B., Guillot, F. H., Hilts, W. W., Youssef, J. E., Castle, J. R., et al. (2020) · Nature Metabolism · doi:10.1038/s42255-020-0212-y · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Clinical accuracy of a continuous glucose monitoring system with an advanced algorithm
Bailey, T. S., Chang, A., & Christiansen, M. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296814559746 · Cited by 168 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Errors in CGM also increase the difficulty of predicting BG values (approximately 9% of the mean absolute relative difference for the best sensors 70 ).”
BackgroundHypoglycemia Prediction Using Machine Learning Models for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
Sudharsan, B., Peeples, M., & Shomali, M. E. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296814554260 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Allalou, A., Nalla, A., Prentice, K. J., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Dai, F. F., Ning, X., Osborne, L. R., Cox, B., Gunderson, E. P., et al. (2016) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db15-1720 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationWilliams, B. M., Borroni, D., Liu, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Lim, J., Ma, B., Romano, V., Qi, H., Ferdousi, M., et al. (2020) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-019-05023-4 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationHásková, A., Radovnická, L., Petruželková, L., Parkin, C. G., Grunberger, G., Horová, E., Navrátilová, V., Kádě, O., Matoulek, M., Prázný, M., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-0112 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
A Clinical Case of Electronic Health Record Drug Alert Fatigue: Consequences for Patient Outcome
Carspecken, C. W., Sharek, P. J., Longhurst, C., & Pageler, N. M. (2013) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3252 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Early metabolic markers identify potential targets for the prevention of type 2 diabetes
Gopalacharyulu, P. V., Cobb, J. E., Yengo, L., Froguel, P., Kravić, J., Balkau, B., Tuomilehto, J., Aittokallio, T. A., & Groop, L. (2017) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-017-4325-0 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Digital technologies and adherence in respiratory diseases: the road ahead
Blakey, J. D., Bender, B. G., Dima, A. L., Weinman, J., Safioti, G., & Costello, R. W. (2018) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01147-2018 · Cited by 136 · cited 1× · see citing works
“138,139 Thus, the potential ways to promote user adherence include smart design, visible EHRs, integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinics, and voice enablement.”
BackgroundZhang, W., Yu, Q., Siddiquie, B., Divakaran, A., & Sawhney, H. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296815582222 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“62 In this experiment, the accuracy of detecting 15 different foods was greater than 85%.”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence Methodologies and Their Application to Diabetes
Rigla, M., García-Sáez, G., Pons, B., & Hernando, M. E. (2018) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296817710475 · Cited by 131 · cited 1× · see citing works
“86 MD Logic is a wireless, fully automated, closed-loop system that uses an algorithm based on fuzzy-logic theory (a form of probabilistic logic), a learning algorithm, 16 and an alert module and personalized system setting.”
MethodA tongue features fusion approach to predicting prediabetes and diabetes with machine learning
Li, J., Yuan, P., Hu, X., Huang, J.-B., Cui, L., Cui, J. W., Ma, X., Jiang, T., Yao, X., Li, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103693 · Cited by 124 · cited 1× · see citing works
“53 The best performance of their model had an average accuracy of 0.821 and an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.924.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationComorbidity network for chronic disease: A novel approach to understand type 2 diabetes progression
Khan, A. M., Uddin, S., & Srinivasan, U. S. (2018) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.04.001 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Patient-Driven Diabetes Care of the Future in the Technology Era
Ashrafzadeh, S., & Hamdy, O. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.005 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence-enabled decision support in nephrology
Loftus, T. J., Shickel, B., Ozrazgat‐Baslanti, T., Ren, Y., Glicksberg, B. S., Cao, J., Singh, K., Chan, L., Nadkarni, G. N., & Bihorac, A. (2022) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-022-00562-3 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Omics Profiling in Precision Oncology
Yu, K., & Snyder, M. P. (2016) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.o116.059253 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Huang, G.-M., Huang, K.-Y., Lee, T.-Y., & Weng, J. T.-Y. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-16-s1-s5 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“109 For CKD 39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy 112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
MethodInfluentialEverett, E., Kane, B., Yoo, A., Dobs, A., & Mathioudakis, N. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9723 · Cited by 101 · cited 1× · see citing works
“68 Sun et al. investigated whether a year-long cloud platform-based and intelligent, personalized exercise prescription intervention could improve the health outcomes of Chinese middle-aged and older adult community dwellers.”
BackgroundThe Prevention of Diabetes Mellitus
(2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.17738 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Abhari, S., Kalhori, S. R. N., Ebrahimi, M., Hasannejadasl, H., & Garavand, A. (2019) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2019.25.4.248 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Learning ensemble classifiers for diabetic retinopathy assessment
Saleh, E., Błaszczyński, J., Moreno, A., Valls, A., Romero-Aroca, P., de la Riva-Fernández, S., & Słowiński, R. (2018) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.09.006 · Cited by 97 · cited 1× · see citing works
“109 For CKD 39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy 112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
MethodInfluentialWang, C., Li, L., Wang, L., Ping, Z., Flory, M. T., Wang, G., Xi, Y., & Li, W. (2013) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.023 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Fang, S., Shao, Z., Kerr, D. A., Boushey, C. J., & Zhu, F. M. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11040877 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“63 The mapping of a food image to its energy distribution is learned using a generative adversarial network architecture.”
BackgroundHermanns, N., Ehrmann, D., Shapira, A., Kulzer, B., SCHMITT, A. J., & Laffel, L. M. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-022-05685-7 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Digital Health Care—The Convergence of Health Care and the Internet
Frank, S. R. (2000) · Journal of Ambulatory Care Management · doi:10.1097/00004479-200004000-00003 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“8 First introduced in 2000 by Seth Frank, 9 digital health broadly encompasses internet-focused applications and media to improve medical content, commerce, and connectivity.”
BackgroundRatwani, R. M., Benda, N. C., Hettinger, A. Z., & Fairbanks, R. J. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8372 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
An image analysis system for dietary assessment and evaluation
Zhu, F. M., Bosch, M., Boushey, C. J., & Delp, E. J. (2010) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2010.5650848 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“60 Thus, a food image analysis system must solve several problems, including image segmentation, food recognition and classification, food volume estimation, and calorie intake conversion.”
BackgroundRavaut, M., Harish, V., Sadeghi, H., Leung, K. K., Volkovs, M., Kornas, K., Watson, T., Poutanen, T., & Rosella, L. C. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11315 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“37 Similarly, Nomura et al. developed an ML-based prediction model to identify diabetes signatures before the onset of diabetes using the gradient-boosting decision tree method, with an AUC and overall accuracy of 0.71 and 94.9%, respectively.”
MethodInfluentialChoi, B. G., Rha, S., Kim, S. W., Kang, J. H., Park, J. Y., & Noh, Y. (2019) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2019.60.2.191 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Bergenstal, R. M., Johnson, M., Passi, R., Bhargava, A., Young, N., Kruger, D. F., Bashan, E., Bisgaier, S. G., Isaman, D. J. M., & Hodish, I. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30368-x · Cited by 88 · cited 1× · see citing works
“81 For clinicians, early AI-enabled decision support systems were generally designed to assist clinicians who were authoritative in the insulin dosing strategies for their patients.”
BackgroundA Comparative Study on Carbohydrate Estimation: GoCARB vs. Dietitians
Vasiloglou, M. F., Mougiakakou, S. G., Aubry, E., Bokelmann, A., Fricker, R., Gomes, F., Guntermann, C., Meyer, A. L., Studerus, D., & Stanga, Z. G. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10060741 · Cited by 87 · cited 1× · see citing works
“61 No differences were found between the estimations of dietitians and those of GoCARB, regardless of the meal size.”
BackgroundTarumi, S., Takeuchi, W., Chalkidis, G., Rodriguez-Loya, S., Kuwata, J., Flynn, M., Turner, K. M., Sakaguchi, F. H., Weir, C., Kramer, H., et al. (2021) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0041-1728757 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Real-Data Comparison of Data Mining Methods in Prediction of Diabetes in Iran
Tapak, L., Mahjub, H., Hamidi, O., & Poorolajal, J. (2013) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2013.19.3.177 · Cited by 83 · cited 1× · see citing works
“50 Ten risk factors were used as predictors (blood glucose-related information was not included).”
MethodWang, Y., Fu, H., & Zeng, D. (2017) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1303386 · Cited by 79 · cited 1× · see citing works
“83 For both T1D and T2D, Nguyen et al. leveraged tree-based methods to predict whether patients would require more than 6 units of total daily dosing, which achieved an AUROC of 0.85.”
BackgroundInfluentialLópez, B., Torrent‐Fontbona, F., Viñas, R., & Fernández‐Real, J. M. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.09.005 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms
Ljubic, B., Hai, A. A., Stanojevic, M., Diaz, W., Polimac, D., Pavlovski, M., & Obradovic, Z. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa120 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Khandakar, A., Chowdhury, M. E. H., Reaz, M. B. I., Ali, S. H. M., Kiranyaz, S., Rahman, T., Chowdhury, M. H., Ayari, M. A., Alfkey, R., Bakar, A. A. A., et al. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22114249 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For evaluation of diabetic foot, one study classified thermogram images based on the severity of diabetic foot complications (95.08% accuracy) 114 and the other study used smartphone images to estimate the likelihood of healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (AUC = 0.73).”
MethodInfluentialCheck Hayden, E. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/516131a · Cited by 72 · cited 2× · see citing works
“15 The application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research, 16 translational research, 14 and clinical practice 17 (Figure 1).”
BackgroundMethodPreston, F. G., Meng, Y., Burgess, J., Ferdousi, M., Azmi, S., Petropoulos, I. N., Kaye, S., Malik, R. A., Zheng, Y., & Alam, U. (2022) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-021-05617-x · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“115 For neuropathy screening, previous studies explored the development of AI systems to identify diabetic neuropathy based on EHRs 116 or corneal confocal microscopy images, 117–119 with AUCs ranging from 0.83 to 0.95.”
BackgroundInfluentialGunasekeran, D. V., & Wong, T. Y. (2020) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/01.apo.0000656984.56467.2c · Cited by 65 · cited 1× · see citing works
“124 Prediction Two important mechanisms of the AI domain can be used to develop decisional systems for medical predictions: a knowledge-based system that involves logic and a system based on probabilistic reasoning.”
BackgroundElhadd, T. A., Mall, R., Bashir, M., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108388 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Toussi, M., Lamy, J.-B., Toumelin, P. L., & Alain Venot, A. (2009) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-28 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Classification of Diabetes Mellitus Using Machine Learning Techniques
Dewangan, A. K., & Agrawal, P. (2015) · International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS) · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Marini, S., Trifoglio, E., Barbarini, N., Sambo, F., Di Camillo, B., Malovini, A., Manfrini, M., Cobelli, C., & Bellazzi, R. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.021 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Huang, J., Huth, C., Covic, M., Troll, M., Adam, J., Zukunft, S., Prehn, C., Wang, L., Nano, J., Scheerer, M. F., et al. (2020) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db20-0586 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“109 For CKD 39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy 112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
MethodInfluentialA mobile diabetes management and educational system for type-2 diabetics in Saudi Arabia (SAED)
Alotaibi, M., Istepanian, R. S. H., & Philip, N. Y. (2016) · mHealth · doi:10.21037/mhealth.2016.08.01 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Alotaibi et al. designed an intelligent mobile diabetes management system (SAED), 56 whose pilot study showed that it could significantly decrease HbA1c levels and enhance the awareness of basic knowledge regarding diabetes among participants.”
BackgroundMachine learning for initial insulin estimation in hospitalized patients
Nguyen, M., Jankovic, I., Kalesinskas, L., Baiocchi, M., & Chen, J. H. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocab099 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Innovations in health information technologies for chronic pulmonary diseases
Himes, B. E., & Weitzman, E. R. (2016) · Respiratory Research · doi:10.1186/s12931-016-0354-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Kodama, S., Fujihara, K., Shiozaki, H., Horikawa, C., Yamada, M. H., Sato, T., Yaguchi, Y., Yamamoto, M., Kitazawa, M., Iwanaga, M., et al. (2021) · JMIR Diabetes · doi:10.2196/22458 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“72 In particular, the clinical applicability of these AI algorithms should be evaluated according to patients’ risk profiles, such as for hypoglycemia and its associated complications (e.g., arrhythmia and neuroglycopenia), as well as the average ability of the AI algorithms.”
BackgroundZhang, W., Liu, X., Dong, Z., Wang, Q., Pei, Z., Chen, Y., Zheng, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, P., Feng, Z., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.913021 · Cited by 49 · cited 1× · see citing works
“109 For CKD 39,110,111 and diabetic nephropathy 112,113 screening, studies utilized clinical data, metabolic biomarkers, genotyping data, and/or retinal images to achieve AUCs generally over 0.8.”
MethodInfluentialMobile Phone-Based Pattern Recognition and Data Analysis for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
Skrøvseth, S. O., Årsand, E., Godtliebsen, F., & Hartvigsen, G. (2012) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2012.0160 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Kim, R. B., Gryak, J., Mishra, A., Cui, C., Soroushmehr, S. M. R., Najarian, K., & Wrobel, J. S. (2020) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104042 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“115 For neuropathy screening, previous studies explored the development of AI systems to identify diabetic neuropathy based on EHRs 116 or corneal confocal microscopy images, 117–119 with AUCs ranging from 0.83 to 0.95.”
BackgroundInfluentialPopulation health-based approaches to utilizing digital technology: a strategy for equity
Graham, G. N., Ostrowski, M., & Sabina, A. B. (2016) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.1057/s41271-016-0012-5 · Cited by 46 · cited 2× · see citing works
“121 These individuals often have the poorest understanding of the disease, low use of maintenance medications, and poor health outcomes.”
BackgroundNavarro-Millán, I. Y., Zinski, A., Shurbaji, S., Johnson, B., Fraenkel, L., Willig, J. H., Danila, M. I., Yun, H., Curtis, J. R., & Safford, M. M. (2018) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.23580 · Cited by 46 · cited 1× · see citing works
“140 Imperfection of laws and regulations AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.”
BackgroundIndividual Prognosis of Diabetes Long-term Risks: A CBR Approach
Palaudàries, A., Plaza, E., & Armengol, E. (2001) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1634463 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Equity and Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Care
Johnson-Mann, C. N., Loftus, T. J., & Bihorac, A. (2021) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7208 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Salahouddin, T., Petropoulos, I. N., Ferdousi, M., Ponirakis, G., Asghar, O., Alam, U., Kamran, S., Mahfoud, Z. R., Efron, N., Malik, R. A., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc20-2012 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Six Digital Health Technologies That Will Transform Diabetes
Klonoff, A. N., Lee, W.-A. (., Xu, N. Y., Nguyen, K. T., DuBord, A., & Kerr, D. (2023) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968211043498 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“15 The application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research, 16 translational research, 14 and clinical practice 17 (Figure 1).”
BackgroundNimri, R., Bratina, N., Kordonouri, O., Stefanija, M. A., Fath, M., Biester, T., Muller, I., Atlas, E., Miller, S., Fogel, A., et al. (2016) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.12852 · Cited by 41 · cited 1× · see citing works
“88 Optimal strategy for anti-diabetic drug therapy Clinicians provide therapeutic advice beyond insulin dosing guidance (particularly T2D), as diabetes is often associated with multiple comorbidities, leading to complex guidelines for personalized treatment, with gaps often present in which no…”
BackgroundZhang, L., Shang, X., Sreedharan, S., Yan, X., Liu, J., Keel, S., Wu, J., Peng, W., & He, M. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/16850 · Cited by 40 · cited 1× · see citing works
“46”
Case-Based Reasoning for Insulin Bolus Advice
Pesl, P., Herrero, P., Reddy, M., Oliver, N. S., Johnston, D. G., Toumazou, C., & Georgiou, P. (2016) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296816629986 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“80 For patients with T2D, Bergenstal et al. demonstrated that the combination of automated insulin titration guidance with support from health-care professionals offers superior glycemic control compared with support from health-care professionals alone in a multi-center randomized controlled trial.”
BackgroundMurphree, D. H., Arabmakki, E., Ngufor, C. G., Storlie, C. B., & McCoy, R. G. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.10.017 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Rudin, R. S., Fanta, C. H., Qureshi, N., Duffy, E., Edelen, M. O., Dalal, A. K., & Bates, D. W. (2019) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1697597 · Cited by 37 · cited 1× · see citing works
“138,139 Thus, the potential ways to promote user adherence include smart design, visible EHRs, integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinics, and voice enablement.”
BackgroundIdentification of risk factors for patients with diabetes: diabetic polyneuropathy case study
Metsker, O., Magoev, K., Yakovlev, A., Yanishevskiy, S., Kopanitsa, G., Kovalchuk, S., & Krzhizhanovskaya, V. V. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01215-w · Cited by 35 · cited 2× · see citing works
“138,139 Thus, the potential ways to promote user adherence include smart design, visible EHRs, integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinics, and voice enablement.”
BackgroundInfluentialRealization of a service for the long-term risk assessment of diabetes-related complications
Lagani, V., Chiarugi, F., Manousos, D., Verma, V., Fursse, J., Marias, K., & Tsamardinos, I. (2015) · Journal of Diabetes and its Complications · doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.011 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Shu, T., Zhang, B., & Tang, Y. Y. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.02.005 · Cited by 34 · cited 1× · see citing works
“52 The best texture feature extractor for diabetes mellitus detection could achieve an accuracy of 99.02%, a sensitivity of 99.64%, and a specificity of 98.26% using support vector machine.”
MethodInfluentialSun, T., Xu, Y., Xie, H., Ma, Z., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/28221 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“69 These observations suggest that this exercise prescription intervention program might promote certain health outcomes, such as cardiovascular function and body composition, in middle-aged and older adult Chinese community dwellers.”
BackgroundNon-invasive blood glucose detection system based on conservation of energy method
Zhang, Y., Zhu, J., Liang, Y., Chen, H., Yin, S.-M., & Chen, Z. (2017) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aa50cf · Cited by 32 · cited 1× · see citing works
“78 For detecting hypoglycemia, Kodama et al. summarized that the pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 0.79, 0.80, 8.05, and 0.18, respectively.”
BackgroundInfluentialGholipour, K., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M., Iezadi, S., Jannati, A., & Keshavarz, S. (2018) · Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal · doi:10.26719/emhj.18.012 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Lin, H.-C., Su, C., & Wang, P. (2009) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-009-9364-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Diabetes care in China: Innovations and implications
Jia, W. (2022) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/jdi.13908 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationDetection of nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes using EEG signals
Nguyen, H. T., & Jones, T. W. (2010) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2010.5627233 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Fong, S., Zhang, Y., Fiaidhi, J., Mohammed, O., & Mohammed, S. (2013) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2013/274193 · Cited by 26 · cited 1× · see citing works
“82 With the inputs of SMBG and non-rapid insulin, this work is worth discussing today because SMBG and non-rapid insulin formulations are still used in many parts of the world.”
BackgroundBenefits of using artificial intelligence in medical predictions
Albu, A., & Stanciu, L. (2015) · 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB) · doi:10.1109/ehb.2015.7391610 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Roberts, K., Boland, M. R., Pruinelli, L., Dcruz, J., Berry, A., Georgsson, M., Hazen, R., Sarmiento, R. F., Backonja, U., Yu, K.-H., et al. (2017) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw103 · Cited by 25 · cited 1× · see citing works
“34 Based on the present background, we review the recent advancements in the application of AI in the clinical practice of diabetes management and then discuss the opportunities and challenges of AI applications.”
Improving knowledge of patient skills thanks to automatic analysis of online discussions
Thierry Hamon, C., & Gagnayre, R. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.012 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“57 Recently, Chen et al. evaluated the effect of an intelligent mobile health technology-based diabetes education program on glucose control in patients with T2D initiating a pre-mixed insulin.”
BackgroundOptimizing computational resources for edge intelligence through model cascade strategies
Gomez-Carmona, O., Casado-Mansilla, D., Lopez-de-Ipina, D., & Garcia-Zubia, J. (2022) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3118845 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“23 Despite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias, 27 overfitting, 28 resource-intensive training, 29 and limited transfer learning.”
MethodCai, C., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Shi, Y., Zou, H., Bao, Y., Shen, Y., Cui, X., Fu, C., Jia, W., et al. (2021) · Frontiers of Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11684-021-0897-7 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationFiorini, S., Hajati, F., Barla, A., et al. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211844 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“92 Recently, Tarumi et al. deployed an EHR-in-tegrated system for predicting changes in HbA1c associated with alternative treatment options in T2D, demonstrating the feasibility of AI-based tools in clinical practice.”
MethodYang, L., Gabriel, N., Hernandez, I., Winterstein, A. G., & Guo, J. (2021) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.5206 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Semi-supervised learning methods for large scale healthcare data analysis
Zhang, G., Ou, S., Huang, Y. H., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computers in Healthcare · doi:10.1504/ijcih.2015.069788 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“25,26 Reinforcement learning is a process that can be used to learn optimal actions from data and is designed to learn an optimal strategy that maximizes the overall rewards.”
BackgroundNomura, A., Yamamoto, S., Hayakawa, Y., et al. (2020) · Journal of the Endocrine Society · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.2194 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“38 Recently, a DL system developed by Zhang et al. could predict disease development and perform risk stratification for type 2 diabetes (T2D) using retinal images and clinical risk factors.”
Kitagishi, Y., Nakanishi, A., Minami, A., Asai, Y., Yasui, M., Iwaizako, A., Suzuki, M., Ono, Y., Ogura, Y., & Matsuda, S. (2014) · The Open Biochemistry Journal · doi:10.2174/1874091x01408010074 · Cited by 12 · cited 1× · see citing works
“64 A targeted and reasonable diet can control blood sugar and lipids and supplement protein and other nutrients.”
BackgroundChen, S., Lu, J., Peng, D., Liu, F., Lu, W., Zhu, W., Zhou, J., & Jia, W. (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-0510 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“58 The 12-week education program and the initiation of insulin therapy significantly decreased the HbA1c levels in patients with T2D.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDeep semi-supervised and self-supervised learning for diabetic retinopathy detection
Arrieta, J., Perdómo, O., & Gonzalez, F. A. (2023) · International Symposium on Medical Information Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM) · doi:10.1117/12.2669723 · Cited by 11 · cited 1× · see citing works
“25,26 Reinforcement learning is a process that can be used to learn optimal actions from data and is designed to learn an optimal strategy that maximizes the overall rewards.”
BackgroundEvaluation of the Utility of a Glycemic Pattern Identification System
Otto, E., & Tannan, V. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296814532210 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Computer Programs to Support Clinical Decision Making
Norman, L. A. (1987) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1987.03400170060013 · Cited by 9 · cited 1× · see citing works
“141 Medical professional malpractice insurance must be clear about coverage when health-care decisions are made in part by an AI system.”
BackgroundDeep Semi-Supervised and Self-Supervised Learning for Diabetic Retinopathy DetectionPreprint
Ramos, J. M. A., Perdómo, O., & Gonzalez, F. A. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.02408 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
SOUPAL, J., HÁSKOVÁ, A., GRUNBERGER, G., PETRUZELKOVA, L., PARKIN, C., SKRHA, J., RADOVNICKÁ, L., HOROVA, E., & PRAZNY, M. (2020) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db20-852-p
OpenAI, Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F. L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2303.08774 · cited 1×
“71 However, large language models (LLMs), which could accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs, have shown promise in various aspects 145 of medical care.”
BackgroundArtificial Intelligence for Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Literature Review (Preprint)
Contreras, I., & Vehi, J. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.10775
Flagged first, then by citations
8 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2021, 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2021, Diabetes Care, 44, S15, 10.2337/dc21-S002 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of AI in Hospitals and Clinics: Transforming Healthcare in the 21st Century
Varnosfaderani, S. M., & Forouzanfar, M. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11040337 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
“This is particularly important in chronic diseases like diabetes, where AI can predict potential risks, such as kidney failure or vision loss, by analyzing blood sugar levels, lifestyle factors, and treatment responses over time [17].”
BackgroundA deep learning system for predicting time to progression of diabetic retinopathy
Dai, L., Sheng, B., Chen, T., Wu, Q., Liu, R., Cai, C., Wu, L., Yang, D., Hamzah, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02702-z · Cited by 339 · see citing works
“Furthermore, we can allocate more intensive DR management strategies to those at high risk, which could help prevent the progression of DR. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been playing an increasingly important role in medicine 2,16 .”
Self-citationIntegrated image-based deep learning and language models for primary diabetes care
Li, J., Guan, Z., Wang, J., Cheung, C. Y., Zheng, Y., Lim, L.-L., Lim, C. C., Ruamviboonsuk, P., Raman, R., Corsino, L., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03139-8 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
“…gaps in diabetes care and DR screening, including telemedicine 18–20 , artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted glucose monitoring and prediction 21 , retinal image-based deep learning (DL) models 22–24 and the development of LLM that used 371,763 real-world management recommendations from…”
Self-citationArtificial Intelligence for Clinical Prediction: Exploring Key Domains and Essential Functions
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update · doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100148 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
“Similarly, in diabetes management, AI models can analyse blood sugar levels, lifestyle factors, and treatment responses to predict potential complications and guide adjustments in treatment plans [111,112].”
BackgroundSingh, A. P., Shadangi, S., Gupta, P. K., & Rana, S. (2025) · Comprehensive physiology · doi:10.1002/cph4.70003 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“AI-powered algorithms have demonstrated exceptional accuracy in predicting blood glucose fluctuations, enabling proactive insulin adjustments and personalized treatment plans (Guan et al. 2023).”
Ramadan, O. M. E., Alruwaili, M. M., Alruwaili, A. N., Elsehrawy, M. G., & Alanazi, S. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-024-02571-y · Cited by 139 · see citing works
AI-Driven Wearable Bioelectronics in Digital Healthcare
Huang, G., Chen, X., & Liao, C. (2025) · Biosensors · doi:10.3390/bios15070410 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Reinforcement learning (RL) is another powerful AI technique that enables adaptive decision-making in dynamic environments [148,149].”
Artificial intelligence for diabetes care: current and future prospects
Sheng, B., Pushpanathan, K., Guan, Z., Lim, Q. H., Lim, Z. W., Yew, S. M. E., Goh, J. H. L., Bee, Y. M., Sabanayagam, C., Sevdalis, N., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00154-2 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence for diabetes: Enhancing prevention, diagnosis, and effective management
Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update · doi:10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100141 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Qian, B., Chen, H., Wang, X., Guan, Z., Li, T., Jin, Y., Wu, Y.-L., Wen, Y., Che, H., Kwon, G., et al. (2024) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100929 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvanced glycation end products mediate biomineralization disorder in diabetic bone disease
Gao, Q., Jiang, Y., Zhou, D., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101694 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Yuan, M., Bao, P., Yuan, J., Shen, Y., Chen, Z., Xie, Y., Zhao, J., Li, Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2024) · Medicine Plus · doi:10.1016/j.medp.2024.100030 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Large language models for diabetes care: Potentials and prospects
Sheng, B., Guan, Z., Lim, L., Jiang, Z., Mathioudakis, N. N., Li, J., Liu, R., Bao, Y., Bee, Y. M., Wang, Y. X., et al. (2024) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2024.01.004 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence to improve cardiovascular population health
Meder, B., Asselbergs, F. W., & Ashley, E. A. (2025) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf125 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“33”
Ji, C., Jiang, T., Liu, L., Zhang, J., & You, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1571362 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Yu, J., Chen, T., Wen, X., et al. (2024) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2024.116169 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
A deep learning system for detecting silent brain infarction and predicting stroke risk
Jiang, N., Ji, H., Guan, Z., Pan, Y., Deng, C., Guo, Y., Liu, D., Chen, T., Wang, S., Wu, Y.-L., et al. (2025) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01413-9 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationMeng, Z., Guan, Z., Yu, S., Wu, Y.-L., Zhao, Y., Shen, J., Lim, C. C., Chen, T., Yang, D., Ran, A. R., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/j.landig.2025.02.008 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in the clinical laboratory
Hou, H., Zhang, R., & Li, J. (2024) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.119724 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationA Competition for the Diagnosis of Myopic Maculopathy by Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Qian, B., Sheng, B., Chen, H., Wang, X., Li, T., Jin, Y., Guan, Z., Jiang, Z., Wu, Y.-L., Wang, J., et al. (2024) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3707 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent research and future strategies for the management of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy
Li, H., Jia, W., Vujosevic, S., Sabanayagam, C., Grauslund, J., Sivaprasad, S., & Wong, T. Y. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100109 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationAI Applications for Chronic Condition Self-Management: Scoping Review
Hwang, M., Zheng, Y., Cho, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/59632 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Therefore, further research using user-centered design principles in the system development phase is necessary to ensure that AI-supported self-management components align with patients’ needs and preferences, addressing potential issues of nonadoption or low adherence [94].”
Hu, S., Song, D., Wan, S., Zhang, S., Luo, C., Li, N., Liu, G., Vasconcelos, J. D. G. E. S., de Carvalho, L. L. C., Neobísi, E., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1646802 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Bidirectional relationship between diabetes mellitus and depression: Mechanisms and epidemiology
Liu, Y., Huang, S.-Y., Liu, D.-L., Zeng, X.-X., Pan, X.-R., & Peng, J. (2024) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v14.i10.1429 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationAI-assisted facial analysis in healthcare: From disease detection to comprehensive management
Lei, C., Dang, K., Song, S., Wang, Z., Chew, S. P., Bian, R., Yang, X., Guan, Z., Lopes, C. I. M. D. A., Wang, M. H., et al. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101175 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence for medicine 2025: Navigating the endless frontier
Dai, J., Xu, H., Chen, T., Huang, T., Liang, W., Zhang, R., Xu, G.-X., Zhang, Z., Xue, L., Gao, Y. Q., et al. (2025) · The Innovation Medicine · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-med.2025.100120 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Wang, X., Si, J., Li, Y., Tse, P., Zhang, G., Wang, X., Ren, J., Xu, J., Sun, J., & Yao, X. (2025) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-025-01819-0 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, Z., Hao, J., Sun, H., Li, M., Zhang, Y., & Qian, Q. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02870-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Large language models for diabetes training: a prospective study
Li, H., Jiang, Z., Guan, Z., Bao, Y., Liu, Y., Hu, T., Li, J., Liu, R., Wu, L., Cheng, D., et al. (2025) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2025.01.034 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationVargas-Santiago, M., León-Velasco, D. A., Maldonado-Sifuentes, C. E., & Chanona-Hernández, L. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14040143 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Wang, B., Zheng, Y., Han, X., Kong, L., Xiao, G., Xiao, Z., & Chen, S. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01715-x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Gases and gas-releasing materials for the treatment of chronic diabetic wounds
Ye, S., Jin, N., Liu, N., Cheng, F., Hu, L., Zhang, G., Li, Q., & Jing, J. (2024) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d4bm00351a · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in polycystic ovarian syndrome management: past, present, and future
Wang, J., Chen, R., Long, H., He, J., Tang, M., Su, M., Deng, R., Chen, Y., Ni, R., Zhao, S., et al. (2025) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-025-02032-9 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“…AI-mediated methodology is predicting the prevalence likelihood of complications, as well as identifying potential shared diagnostic genes between spontaneous complications and their risk factors, which allows healthcare professionals to further facilitate better disease systematic management [34].”
The leading global health challenges in the artificial intelligence era
Zaidan, A. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1328918 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Rancati, S., Bosoni, P., Schiaffini, R., Deodati, A., Mongini, P. A., Sacchi, L., Toffanin, C., & Bellazzi, R. (2024) · Diabetology · doi:10.3390/diabetology5060042 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Aly, M., Ghallab, A. S. N., & Fathi, I. S. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3513235 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Digital Health in Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease
Avoke, D., Elshafeey, A., Weinstein, R. A., Kim, C. H., & Martin, S. S. (2024) · Endocrine Research · doi:10.1080/07435800.2024.2341146 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Reuben, J. S., Meiri, H., & Arien‐Zakay, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1458811 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Diabetes Care: Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities Ahead
Parab, R., Feeley, J. M., Valero, M., Chadalawada, L., Garcia, G. P., Kar, S. S., Madabhushi, A., Breton, M. D., Li, J., Shao, H., et al. (2025) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2025.07.008 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationGardner, D. S.-L., Saboo, B., Kesavadev, J., Mustafa, N., Villa, M. L., Mahoney, E., & Bajpai, S. (2025) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-025-01692-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Automatic retinal screening and emergency alerts powered by AI algorithms enhance precision, prediction, and personalization, thereby increasing the impact of digital health [82].”
Mayya, V., Kandala, R. N. V. P. S., Gurupur, V. P., King, C., Vu, G. T., & Wan, T. T. H. (2024) · Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology · doi:10.1177/23333928241275292 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Luo, J., Zhang, K., Huang, Q., Jiang, S., & Pan, Y. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15010019 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Smart health-care provides a new direction for medical practice by integrating technologies such as AI, IoT, and big data (Guan et al., 2023).”
HealthAIoT: AIoT-driven smart healthcare system for sustainable cloud computing environments
Wang, H., Anurag, K. A., Benamer, A. R., Arora, P., Wander, G., Johnson, M. R., Anjana, R. M., Mohan, V., Gill, S. S., Uhlig, S., et al. (2025) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2025.101555 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Visual–language foundation models in medicine
Liu, C.-Y., Jin, Y.-X., Guan, Z., Li, T.-Y., Qin, Y.-M., Qian, B., Jiang, Z.-H., Wu, Y.-L., Wang, X.-N., Zheng, Y., et al. (2024) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-024-03579-w · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationDiaBD: A diabetes dataset for enhanced risk analysis and research in Bangladesh
Prama, T. T., Rahman, M. J., Zaman, M., et al. (2025) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2025.111746 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: New Diagnostics and Treatment Perspectives
Dubský, M., Sojáková, D., Fejfarová, V., & Jude, E. B. (2025) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.1007/s40266-025-01267-5 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“These tools leverage machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL) and advanced imaging techniques to address the challenges of traditional diagnostic methods, which are often time-consuming, invasive or lack specificity [52].”
The future is here: an overview of technology in diabetes
Mallik, R., Kar, P. S., Mulder, H., & Krook, A. (2024) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-024-06235-z · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Theranostic hydrogels: Construction strategies and applications
Li, X., Li, R., Wang, F., Yang, S., Zhou, F., Hu, Y., Geng, Z., & Su, J. (2025) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.159545 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Ayoade, O. B., Shahrestani, S. A., & Ruan, C. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14132583 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review
Mastro, A. L., Grassi, E., Berritto, D., Russo, A., Reginelli, A., Guerra, E., Grassi, F., & Boccia, F. (2024) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-024-01702-4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Methodology for Safe and Secure AI in Diabetes Management
Foppen, R. J. G., Gioia, V. L., Gupta, S., Johnson, C. L., Giantsidis, J., & Papademetris, M. (2024) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968241304434 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Alhaiti, A. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03435-9 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Haque, M. A., & Siddique, H. R. (2025) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108611 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Guldemond, N. (2024) · Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism · doi:10.1111/dom.15476 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“97 Regulatory provisions and financial incentives play a significant role in the implementation of IPDM and the creation of a health eco-system.”
BackgroundAI predictive modeling of survival outcomes for renal cancer patients undergoing targeted therapy
Yu, Y., Niu, J.-R., Yu, Y., Xia, S., & Sun, S. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-77638-6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Heart Failure
Cheema, B. S., Hourmozdi, J., Kline, A. S., Ahmad, F. S., & Khera, R. (2025) · Journal of Cardiac Failure · doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.02.020 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Addissouky, T. A. (2024) · Avicenna Journal of Medical Biochemistry · doi:10.34172/ajmb.2527 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“With further refinement, AI-driven platforms could revolutionize diabetes self-management (65,67).”
BackgroundSen, A., Mohanraj, P. S., Laxmi, V., Ashique, S., Vasudevan, R., Aldahish, A. A., Velu, A., Das, A., Ehsan, I., Islam, A., et al. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2025.101305 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Giorgino, F., Alzaïd, F., Stoian, A. P., Chan, J. C. N., Ji, L., Lumu, W., Manrique-Hurtado, H., Mauricio, D., Saboo, B., Senior, P. A., et al. (2025) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-025-06504-5 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Potential solutions include global financing mechanisms, learning from the best, scaling access to technology, infrastructure development, and monitoring and evaluation of clinical indicators and outcomes [3, 67, 68].”
AttenGluco: Multimodal Transformer-Based Blood Glucose Forecasting on AI-READI Dataset
Farahmand, E., Azghan, R. R., Chatrudi, N. T., et al. (2025) · doi:10.1109/embc58623.2025.11251776 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Wear-able sensors further extend coverage to physiological and behavioral metrics, such as heart rate variability and physical activity levels [3], [17].”
Qian, B., Wang, X., Guan, Z., et al. (2024) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-024-03384-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationAI-Driven Management of Type 2 Diabetes in China: Opportunities and Challenges
He, Z., & Li, W. (2025) · Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s495364 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Manzini, E., Vlacho, B., Franch‐Nadal, J., Escudero, J., Génova, A., Reixach, E., Andrés, E., Pizarro, I., Mauricio, D., & Perera-Lluna, A. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126876 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Persson, V., & Wickman, U. L. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13080950 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“This requires a multi-faceted approach involving ethical guidelines, patient education, transparent AI systems, and careful integration into clinical practice [60].”
Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
Rashidov, A., Mardonov, D., & Soliev, A. (2025) · International Russian Smart Industry Conference (SmartIndustryCon) · doi:10.1109/smartindustrycon65166.2025.10986060 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Such technologies have a great place in analyzing the collection of information stored in the medical field and making specific decisions from the data [8].”
Diabetic Foot Screening Guidelines and the Role of Artificial Intelligence: Time to Turn the Tide!
Formosa, C., Chockalingam, N., Παπάνας, Ν., et al. (2024) · The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds · doi:10.1177/15347346241234421 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Wound Screening and Early Detection
Dhankhar, S., Garg, N., Chauhan, S., & Saini, M. (2024) · Current Biotechnology · doi:10.2174/0122115501303253240408072559 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Development of a low-cost IoT-based e-health monitoring system for diabetic patients
Okubanjo, A. A., Okandeji, A. A., Odeyinka, O. F., Benjamin, A., & Oluwatoyin, O. (2024) · Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1186/s43067-024-00178-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Zhang, G., Li, K., et al. (2024) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-024-03722-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Yismaw, M. B., Tafere, C., Tefera, B. B., Demsie, D. G., Feyisa, K., Addisu, Z. D., Zeleke, T. K., Siraj, E. A., Worku, M. C., & Berihun, F. (2025) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105858 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Mo, Y., Zhao, F., Yuan, L., Xing, Q., Zhou, Y., Wu, Q., Li, C., Lin, J., Wu, H., Deng, S., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.04.013 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Nogay, H. S., Noğay, N. H., & Adeli, H. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108351 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
From silicon to solutions: AI's impending impact on research and discovery
Markowitz, D. M., Boyd, R. L., & Blackburn, K. G. (2024) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2024.1392128 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Obimba, D. C., Esteva, C., Tsicheu, E. N. N., & Wong, R. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13174979 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“…that briefly touched on using AI to personalize cancer treatment plans for an aging population [54], and a few reviews focused on how AI is used to aid older adults and other age groups with diabetes [71,72], our review is distinct in its specific focus on an older adult population with cancer.”
BackgroundPredicting pancreatic diseases from fundus images using deep learning
Wu, Y., Fang, P., Wang, X., & Shen, J. (2024) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-024-03619-5 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationAli, S. G., Wang, X., Bi, L., et al. (2024) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-024-03745-0 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationEnhancing Ophthalmic Care: The Transformative Potential of Digital Twins in Healthcare
Banoub, R. G., Sanghvi, H. A., Gill, G. S., Paredes, A. A., Bains, H. K., Patel, A., Agarwal, A., & Gupta, S. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.76209 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“This adaptive feedback loop reduces the likelihood of treatment resistance or disease relapse, making it particularly valuable in managing progressive conditions like diabetic retinopathy [49].”
InfluentialMachine learning and deep learning in diabetology: revolutionizing diabetes care
Corrao, S., Janić, M., Maggio, V., & Rizzo, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Clinical Diabetes and Healthcare · doi:10.3389/fcdhc.2025.1547689 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Machine Learning to Diagnose Complications of Diabetes
Scheideman, A. F., Shao, M. M., Zelada, H., Cuadros, J. A., Foreman, J., Sarder, P., Ho, C., Ejskjær, N., Fleischer, J., Cichosz, S. L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/19322968251365245 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“5,6 However, the performance of current machine learning (ML) algorithms remains limited, not only due to the lack of sufficient diabetes-specific databases, but also because of the scarcity of multi-center, clinically diverse data, as well as the suboptimal quality of and limited integration with…”
Use of Technology to Improve Adherence in Allergy/Immunology
Oppenheimer, J., Bender, B. G., Sousa‐Pinto, B., & Portnoy, J. M. (2024) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2024.07.017 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Alsabri, M., Rath, S., Okaruefe, C. O., Yoo, P., Aziz, M. M., Shehada, W., Abdelrahman, S. T., & Carr, L. A. (2025) · Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports · doi:10.1007/s40138-025-00311-3 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…(AI) show high accuracy in predicting disease progression and enables early diagnosis and management of complications-including diabetic retinopathy (DR), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetic neuropathy-using tools like retinal images, metabolic biomarkers, and electronic health [78].”
The dual burden of obesity: decoding metabolism and female reproductive endocrinology
Chen, Y., Wang, R., Zhang, N., & Xu, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1627607 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Deng, M., Yang, R., Zheng, X., Deng, Y., & Jiang, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1620132 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Scientific writing in the age of artificial intelligence: trust on trial?
Vaishya, R., Misra, A., & Vaish, A. (2025) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1093/postmj/qgaf215 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Liu, Z., & Yu, X. (2024) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13193862 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Nursing approaches to self-care, self-management, and adaptation to illness
Audulv, Å., Sampaio, F., & Sousa, C. N. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-02737-2 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ragab, M., Ashary, E. B., Kateb, F., Hakeem, A., Mosli, R., Albogami, N., & Nooh, S. A. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.04.071 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Fahmy, A. (2025) · Premier Journal of Public Health · doi:10.70389/pjph.100021 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Cao, F., Guo, X., Li, M., Li, S. X., & Peng, X. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-03117-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“This underscores the robustness of their approach across different imaging modalities [16].”
Jayousi, S., Barchielli, C., Guarducci, S., Alaimo, M., Caputo, S., Zoppi, P., & Mucchi, L. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25216660 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“…early manifestations of cardiac arrhythmias by analyzing electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns [19], or to anticipate hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic episodes in diabetic patients by analyzing historical glucose levels alongside contextual variables such as nutritional intake and physical activity [20].”
Al-Jebrni, A. H., Jiang, Z., Qin, Y., Qiu, Y., Jiang, N., Li, G., Zheng, Y., Wong, T. Y., Kim, S., Jung, Y., et al. (2026) · Computational Visual Media · doi:10.26599/cvm.2026.9450530 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationDiaBD: A novel benchmark dataset for diabetes prediction
Islam, M. T., Miah, A. S. M., Raihan, M., et al. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.08.017 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Towards AI/ML-Powered Hybrid Project Management Strategy for the Healthcare Sector
Khadgi, M., & Din, F. U. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6400-9_15 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Personalized cardiometabolic care powered by artificial intelligence
Shomali, M. E., Kumbara, A., MacLeod, J., & Iyer, A. K. (2025) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1593321 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Yang, W., Mao, R., Liang, Z., Liang, Z., Wang, R., Wang, J., Luo, X., Lyu, M., Xu, D. R., & Cai, Y. (2025) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-025-02875-1 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“The increasing prevalence, avoidable morbidity, diabetic complications, and economic burden make diabetes a significant global health challenge [5, 6].”
Chen, W., Deng, Y., Xu, W., & Hu, J. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095342 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Screen for Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study
Sartore, G., Ragazzi, E., Pegoraro, F., Pagno, M. G., Lapolla, A., & Piarulli, F. (2025) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13051075 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Despite the growing potential of AI, its integration into existing healthcare systems faces barriers related to data privacy, interoperability with electronic health records, and clinician training [48].”
He, Z., Yang, L., Li, X., & Du, J. (2025) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103066 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Qi, H., Lü, J., Dalbeth, N., et al. (2024) · Lara D. Veeken · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keae616 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Diagnostic Medicine
Wheatley, M. (2024) · Premier Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.70389/pjai.100007 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Guan, Z., Li, H., Liu, R., Cai, C., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., Huang, S., Wu, L., Liu, D., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Shu, J., Hou, X., Yang, X., Jia, W., & Sheng, B.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Jia, Weiping
- Sheng, Bin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 101213
- ISSN
- 2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10591058
- OpenAlex
- W4387266347
- Semantic Scholar
- b109b616c987d6d1701a41ab418002adceceb45e
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 162
- Citations by year
- 2026: 69 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, diabetes management, digital health technologies, glycemic control, medication adherence, diabetes self-management, diabetes prevention, health care expenditure, clinical implementation barriers
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review