Cited by 289Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Artificial intelligence in diabetes management: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges

Open access
Guan, Zhouyu, Li, Huating, Liu, Ruhan, Cai, Chun, Liu, Yuexing, Li, Jiajia, Wang, Xiangning, Huang, Shan +9 more·2023·Cell Reports Medicine

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of diabetes, high avoidable morbidity and mortality due to diabetes and diabetic complications, and related substantial economic burden make diabetes a significant health challenge worldwide. A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Recent advancements in digital health technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI), provide a significant opportunity to achieve better efficiency in diabetes care, which may diminish the increase in diabetes-related health-care expenditures. Here, we review the recent progress in the application of AI in the management of diabetes and then discuss the opportunities and challenges of AI application in clinical practice. Furthermore, we explore the possibility of combining and expanding upon existing digital health technologies to develop an AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem that includes the prevention and management of diabetes.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review summarizes how AI and machine learning are being applied across diabetes prediction, screening, classification, comprehensive management, and complication detection, and argues they could shift care toward precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization. It also outlines persistent barriers—data quality, design, clinical integration, privacy, adherence, and regulation—and proposes an AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem.

Key findings

  • AI has been applied across the diabetes care continuum: prediction of onset (e.g., ML-based logistic regression AUC 0.78 for 5-year new-onset diabetes; administrative-data model AUC 0.80; gradient-boosting model AUC 0.71 and overall accuracy 94.9%), screening/classification, management, and complication prediction/screening.
  • In diabetic retinopathy screening, reported performance is high: DeepDR achieved internal-validation AUCs of 0.943, 0.955, 0.960, and 0.972 for mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative DR, with external-validation AUCs of 0.916–0.970; IDx-DR had sensitivity 87.2% and specificity 90.7%; EyeArt had 91.3% sensitivity and 91.1% specificity for referral-warranted DR.
  • For glucose monitoring and dosing, a meta-analysis reported pooled sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.92 for predicting hypoglycemia, and pooled sensitivity 0.79 and specificity 0.80 for detecting hypoglycemia; a Ramadan-fasting model estimated normal glucose in 95.2% of readings, hyperglycemic events in 82.6%, but hypoglycemic events in only 27.9%.
  • The review identifies opportunities in precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization, but lists challenges including data quality control, poor technology design, lack of clinical integration, privacy concerns, non-adherence, and imperfect laws/regulations; LLMs are promising but may produce inconsistent or misleading information.

Methods

  • Narrative review of recent progress in AI applications in diabetes management, covering prediction and prevention, screening and classification, comprehensive management, diabetic complications, opportunities/challenges, and a proposed AI-assisted digital health-care ecosystem.
  • Synthesizes cited studies and includes Table 1 on AI methods, inputs, and performance for diabetic complications and Table 2 on challenges and mitigating strategies.
  • No primary data collection, systematic search strategy, or meta-analysis is described in the paper.

Limitations

  • The paper states limitations of AI in diabetes care: data quality and bias, poor technology design, lack of clinical integration, privacy/security risks, non-adherence, and imperfect laws/regulations; it also notes ML flaws such as data bias, overfitting, resource-intensive training, and limited transfer learning, and says LLMs may risk inconsistency or misleading information.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not report a systematic search, risk-of-bias assessment, or pooled analysis, and the cited performance metrics come from heterogeneous studies and settings, so they are not directly comparable or independently validated within the review.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101213

Cites

154 of 154 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

64 of 106 cited sources checked · 32 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Saleh et al. reported that a fuzzy RF using retinal images for DR screening yielded an accuracy of 77.32%, sensitivity of 76.89%, and specificity of 77.43% for detecting the presence of DR.

    “the best results yielded an accuracy of 77.32%, sensitivity of 76.89% and specificity of 77.43% for detecting the presence of DR”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Saleh et al.109 Saleh E. Błaszczyński J. Moreno A. Valls A. Romero-Aroca P. de la Riva-Fernández S. Słowiński R. Learning ensemble classifiers for diabetic retinopathy assessment Artif. Intell. Med. 85 2018 50 63 10.1016/j.artmed.2017.09.006 28993124 source

      Table 8 (Additional information; page not provided) assigns 77.32% accuracy, 76.89% sensitivity, and 77.43% specificity to DRSA, not the fuzzy random forest (FRF). It reports 80.29%, 80.67%, and 80.18%, respectively, for FRF. The Conclusions (page not provided) describe analysis of retinal photos as a later, still-in-progress stage rather than the input to these classifiers. (LLM, conf=0.92)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Several studies utilized risk factors (mainly from EHRs) to develop AI algorithms to predict various types of diabetes-related complications with favorable predictive performance.

    “In the prediction of diabetic complications, several studies tried to utilize risk factors (mainly from EHRs) to develop AI algorithms to predict various types of diabetes-related complications with favorable predictive performance.94,95,96,97,98,99,100”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [94] Lagani V. Chiarugi F. Manousos D. Verma V. Fursse J. Marias K. Tsamardinos I. Realization of a service for the long-term risk assessment of diabetes-related complications J. Diabet. Complicat. 29 2015 691 698 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.011 25953402 source
    • cites [95] Marini S. Trifoglio E. Barbarini N. Sambo F. Di Camillo B. Malovini A. Manfrini M. Cobelli C. Bellazzi R. A Dynamic Bayesian Network model for long-term simulation of clinical complications in type 1 diabetes J. Biomed. Inf. 57 2015 369 376 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.08.021 26325295 source

      The Discussion reports that dynamic Bayesian networks modeled two type 1 diabetes complications, nephropathy and cardiovascular disease, with less than 10% error in population-state trajectories on independent test data. However, §2.1 identifies the data as coming from the DCCT and EDIC longitudinal studies, not EHRs, and the reported performance concerns cohort simulation rather than demonstrated individual-level complication prediction. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [96] Armengol E. Palaudàries A. Plaza E. Individual prognosis of diabetes long-term risks: a CBR approach Methods Inf. Med. 40 2001 46 51 11310159 source
  • Premisecitation

    The algorithms used in closed-loop systems primarily include model predictive control, proportional-integral-derivative, fuzzy logic, and learning algorithms.

    “The algorithms used in closed-loop systems primarily include model predictive control, proportional-integral-derivative, fuzzy logic, and learning algorithms.86”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [86] Rigla M. García-Sáez G. Pons B. Hernando M.E. Artificial Intelligence Methodologies and Their Application to Diabetes J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 12 2018 303 310 10.1177/1932296817710475 28539087 PMC5851211 source
  • Premisecitation

    Modifiable factors identified using AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.

    “Modifiable factors identified using the AI method increase the risk of developing diabetes, including high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, tobacco smoking, insufficient physical activity, poor diet, and overweight or obesity.44,45,46”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [44] Wang C. Li L. Wang L. Ping Z. Flory M.T. Wang G. Xi Y. Li W. Evaluating the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus using artificial neural network: An effective classification approach Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 100 2013 111 118 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.01.023 23453177 source
    • cites [45] Gholipour K. Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Iezadi S. Jannati A. Keshavarz S. Modelling the prevalence of diabetes mellitus risk factors based on artificial neural network and multiple regression East. Mediterr. Health J. 24 2018 770 777 10.26719/emhj.18.012 30328607 source

      The Results (page unavailable) list BMI, current smoking, controlled and uncontrolled hypertension, and raised total cholesterol as predictors ranked by the artificial neural network. They do not list insufficient physical activity or poor diet as ANN-identified predictors. The paper evaluates prediction of existing type 2 diabetes, not whether each listed factor causes an increased risk of developing it. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [46] Zhang L. Shang X. Sreedharan S. Yan X. Liu J. Keel S. Wu J. Peng W. He M. Predicting the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in a Large Australian Cohort Using Machine-Learning Techniques: Longitudinal Survey Study JMIR Med. Inform. 8 2020 e16850 10.2196/16850 PMC7420582 32720912 source

      The Results (Participant Characteristics; no page number in our copy) associate later diabetes with overweight or obesity, self-reported hypertension and dyslipidemia, smoking, less physical activity, and some dietary measures. However, the machine-learning Results explicitly identify BMI as a leading predictor; they do not establish that every listed factor was identified by the models as increasing risk. The observational associations also do not establish that those factors cause diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    One study used smartphone images to estimate the likelihood of healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers with an AUC of 0.73.

    “and the other study used smartphone images to estimate the likelihood of healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers (AUC = 0.73).115”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [115] Kim R.B. Gryak J. Mishra A. Cui C. Soroushmehr S.M.R. Najarian K. Wrobel J.S. Utilization of smartphone and tablet camera photographs to predict healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers Comput. Biol. Med. 126 2020 104042 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104042 PMC9058995 33059239 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 31
  • May combine two claims. 59
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Diabetes is a significant health challenge worldwide due to increasing prevalence, high avoidable morbidity and mortality, and substantial economic burden.

    “The increasing prevalence of diabetes, high avoidable morbidity and mortality due to diabetes and diabetic complications, and related substantial economic burden make diabetes a significant health challenge worldwide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Jia W. Diabetes care in China: Innovations and implications J. Diabetes Investig. 13 2022 1795 1797 10.1111/jdi.13908 PMC9623513 36121277 source

      The opening passage links rising prevalence, avoidable morbidity and mortality, and economic burden to a major health challenge in China. The citing sentence extends that conclusion to the world, which this passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Despite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias, overfitting, resource-intensive training, and limited transfer learning.

    “Despite the rapid progress of ML methods, there are several potential flaws, including data bias,27 overfitting,28 resource-intensive training,29 and limited transfer learning.30”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [27] Gianfrancesco M.A. Tamang S. Yazdany J. Schmajuk G. Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data JAMA Intern. Med. 178 2018 1544 1547 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 30128552 PMC6347576 source
    • cites [28] Ying X. An Overview of Overfitting and its Solutions J. Phys, Conf. Ser. 1168 2019 022022 source
    • cites [29] Gómez-Carmona O. Casado-Mansilla D. López-de-Ipiña D. García-Zubia J. Optimizing computational resources for edge intelligence through model cascade strategies IEEE Internet Things J. 9 2022 7404 7417 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A targeted and reasonable diet can control blood sugar and lipids and supplement protein and other nutrients.

    “A targeted and reasonable diet can control blood sugar and lipids and supplement protein and other nutrients.65”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] Sami W. Ansari T. Butt N.S. Ab Hamid M.R. Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review Int J Health Sci-Ijh 11 2017 10.1002/dmrr.2515 PMC5426415 28539866

      The sections “Relation between Dietary Practices and Diabetes Complications” and “Dietary Knowledge of Type 2 Diabetics” say that diet affects blood sugar and lipid levels and that nutrition therapy can help manage dyslipidemia. They do not support supplementing protein or other nutrients; the latter section instead notes that protein intake in one population exceeded recommendations. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    ML methods enable the development of AI applications that facilitate the discovery of previously unrecognized patterns in the data without the need to specify decision rules for each specific task or to account for complex interactions among input features. Therefore, ML has become the preferred framework for building AI utilities.

    “In summary, ML methods enable the development of AI applications that facilitate the discovery of previously unrecognized patterns in the data without the need to specify decision rules for each specific task or to account for complex interactions among input features. Therefore, ML has become the preferred framework for building AI utilities.34”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] Roberts K. Boland M.R. Pruinelli L. Dcruz J. Berry A. Georgsson M. Hazen R. Sarmiento R.F. Backonja U. Yu K.-H. Biomedical informatics advancing the national health agenda: the AMIA 2015 year-in-review in clinical and consumer informatics J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 24 2017 e185 e190 10.1093/jamia/ocw103 PMC6080724 27497798 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    With the inputs of SMBG and non-rapid insulin, Fong et al.'s work is worth discussing today because SMBG and non-rapid insulin formulations are still used in many parts of the world.

    “With the inputs of SMBG and non-rapid insulin, this work is worth discussing today because SMBG and non-rapid insulin formulations are still used in many parts of the world.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] Fong S. Zhang Y. Fiaidhi J. Mohammed O. Mohammed S. Evaluation of stream mining classifiers for real-time clinical decision support system: A case study of blood glucose prediction in diabetes therapy BioMed Res. Int. 2013 2013 274193 10.1155/2013/274193 PMC3791638 24163813 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The prediction horizon range previously explored ranged between 5 and 180 min, with short-term predictions most frequently explored (most studies used prediction horizons below 60 min).

    “The prediction horizon range previously explored ranged between 5 and 180 min. Short-term predictions were the most frequently explored, as most studies used prediction horizons below 60 min.71”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] Contreras I. Vehi J. Artificial Intelligence for Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Literature Review J. Med. Internet Res. 20 2018 e10775 10.2196/10775 PMC6000484 29848472 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A proper diet is indispensable in managing diabetic patients by maintaining normal blood sugar levels and reducing the burden of pancreatic islet β cells.

    “A proper diet is indispensable in managing diabetic patients by maintaining normal blood sugar levels and reducing the burden of pancreatic islet β cells.64”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] Kitagishi Y. Nakanishi A. Minami A. Asai Y. Yasui M. Iwaizako A. Suzuki M. Ono Y. Ogura Y. Matsuda S. Certain Diet and Lifestyle May Contribute to Islet beta-cells Protection in Type-2 Diabetes via the Modulation of Cellular PI3K/AKT Pathway Open Biochem. J. 8 2014 74 82 10.2174/1874091X01408010074 25400709 PMC4231374 source

      The section “Certain Diet and Lifestyle May Contribute to Islet β-Cells Protection” (page unavailable) says oxidative damage can be reduced by controlling hyperglycemia and calorie intake, and discusses possible dietary contributions to β-cell protection. It does not establish that a proper diet is indispensable for diabetic patients, maintains normal blood sugar levels, or reduces β-cell burden by doing so. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior AI models in diabetes management offered several advantages, such as data analysis, pattern recognition, decision support, and patient education, but faced limitations in natural language understanding, personalized treatment, accuracy, and potential biases.

    “Prior AI models in diabetes management offered several advantages, such as data analysis, pattern recognition, decision support, and patient education, but faced limitations in natural language understanding, personalized treatment, accuracy, and potential biases.71”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [71] Contreras I. Vehi J. Artificial Intelligence for Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Literature Review J. Med. Internet Res. 20 2018 e10775 10.2196/10775 PMC6000484 29848472 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    User adherence is crucial to the effectiveness of DHT applications in the real world, which can be affected by convenience, user experience, and true benefits brought by this technology.

    “User adherence is crucial to the effectiveness of DHT applications in the real world, which can be affected by convenience, user experience, and true benefits brought by this technology (for example, helping them decide when to contact their provider, being more aware of their symptoms, and feeling more connected to their provider).138,139”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [138] Blakey J.D. Bender B.G. Dima A.L. Weinman J. Safioti G. Costello R.W. Digital technologies and adherence in respiratory diseases: the road ahead Eur. Respir. J. 52 2018 1801147 10.1183/13993003.01147-2018 PMC6364097 30409819 source

      In ‘Considering the intended users of the interventions’ (page unavailable), the paper says sustained real-world use is critical to digital technologies’ success and discusses user experience, desirable features, and reasons patients disengage. It does not specifically identify convenience as a factor or substantiate the cited sentence’s examples of deciding when to contact a provider, becoming more aware of symptoms, or feeling more connected to a provider. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [139] Rudin R.S. Fanta C.H. Qureshi N. Duffy E. Edelen M.O. Dalal A.K. Bates D.W. A Clinically Integrated mHealth App and Practice Model for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes between Visits for Asthma Patients: Implementation and Feasibility Appl. Clin. Inf. 10 2019 783 793 10.1055/s-0039-1697597 PMC6795530 31618782 source

      The Patient Themes section (page not available) reports that patients valued the app’s simplicity, symptom awareness, and connection to their provider; the discussion (p. 789) says its core features helped patients decide when to seek care. The Clinical Relevance Statement reports questionnaire adherence, but this single-app feasibility study does not establish that adherence is crucial to the real-world effectiveness of DHT applications generally, or that the listed benefits caused adherence. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Federated computing approaches have been developed, wherein dedicated parameter servers are responsible for aggregating and distributing local learning; however, a remainder of a central structure is kept.

    “Federated computing approaches have further been developed, wherein dedicated parameter servers are responsible for aggregating and distributing local learning; however, a remainder of a central structure is kept.136”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [136] Warnat-Herresthal S. Schultze H. Shastry K.L. Manamohan S. Mukherjee S. Garg V. Sarveswara R. Händler K. Pickkers P. Aziz N.A. Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning Nature 594 2021 265 270 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 34040261 PMC8189907 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Participants had interest in having technology to support self-management, but reported a lack of confidence with technology, as well as frustration with design features and navigation.

    “Although participants had interest in having technology to support self-management, they reported a lack of confidence with technology, as well as frustration with design features and navigation.130”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [130] Sarkar U. Gourley G.I. Lyles C.R. Tieu L. Clarity C. Newmark L. Singh K. Bates D.W. Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients J. Gen. Intern. Med. 31 2016 1417 1426 27418347 PMC5130945 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These individuals often have the poorest understanding of the disease, low use of maintenance medications, and poor health outcomes.

    “These individuals often have the poorest understanding of the disease, low use of maintenance medications, and poor health outcomes.122”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [122] Himes B.E. Weitzman E.R. Innovations in health information technologies for chronic pulmonary diseases Respir. Res. 17 2016 38 10.1186/s12931-016-0354-3 27048618 PMC4822326 source

      The Background’s health-disparities section (page not provided) identifies health literacy and medication non-adherence as factors in chronic pulmonary disease disparities. Another Background passage links poor adherence to adverse clinical outcomes. The paper does not establish that the unspecified individuals have the poorest disease understanding or specifically low use of maintenance medications. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Application of AI systems in the real world may lead to many unintended outcomes, including alert fatigue, additional burdens for clinicians, disruption of interpersonal communications, and generation of specific threats requiring increased vigilance to recognize.

    “Application of AI systems in the real world may lead to many unintended outcomes, including alert fatigue,131 additional burdens for clinicians, disruption of interpersonal communications, and generation of specific threats requiring increased vigilance to recognize.132”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [131] Carspecken C.W. Sharek P.J. Longhurst C. Pageler N.M. A clinical case of electronic health record drug alert fatigue: consequences for patient outcome Pediatrics 131 2013 e1970 e1973 10.1542/peds.2012-3252 23713099 source
    • cites [132] Ash J.S. Berg M. Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 11 2004 104 112 10.1197/jamia.M1471 PMC353015 14633936 source

      The introduction (p. 1) says patient care information systems can add work tasks, disrupt communication routines, and create hazards requiring vigilance to detect. These points support the outcomes attached to citation 132, but the paper discusses patient care information systems rather than AI systems specifically. Alert fatigue is attached to citation 131, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Warnat-Herresthal et al. introduced a decentralized ML approach named swarm learning, which dispenses with a dedicated server, shares the parameters via the swarm network, and builds the models independently on private data at the individual sites.

    “As an alternative, Warnat-Herresthal et al. introduced a decentralized ML approach named swarm learning,136 which dispenses with a dedicated server, shares the parameters via the swarm network, and builds the models independently on private data at the individual sites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [136] Warnat-Herresthal S. Schultze H. Shastry K.L. Manamohan S. Mukherjee S. Garg V. Sarveswara R. Händler K. Pickkers P. Aziz N.A. Swarm Learning for decentralized and confidential clinical machine learning Nature 594 2021 265 270 10.1038/s41586-021-03583-3 34040261 PMC8189907 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dai et al. developed an automated, interpretable, and validated system (DeepDR) that performs real-time image quality feedback, retinal lesion detection, and early- to late-stage DR grading with high sensitivity and specificity.

    “To overcome this issue, Dai et al. developed an automated, interpretable, and validated system (named DeepDR) that performs real-time image quality feedback, retinal lesion detection, and early- to late-stage DR grading with high sensitivity and specificity.103”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [103] Dai L. Wu L. Li H. Cai C. Wu Q. Kong H. Liu R. Wang X. Hou X. Liu Y. A deep learning system for detecting diabetic retinopathy across the disease spectrum Nat. Commun. 12 2021 3242 10.1038/s41467-021-23458-5 34050158 PMC8163820 source
    • Rests on an assumption: Proper intervention at an early stage could significantly delay the progression of DR and even reverse mild non-proliferative DR to a DR-free stage.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two main barriers have been identified that may undermine clinicians' enthusiasm to integrate AI systems into clinical workflows: experts may struggle to develop trust because of numerous inputs and complex data integration; and some evidence suggests AI systems could be perceived as encroaching on clinicians' professional role.

    “In addition, two main barriers have been identified that may undermine clinicians’ enthusiasm to integrate AI systems into clinical workflows.133 First, experts may struggle to develop trust with these systems because of the numerous inputs and complex data integration involved, which can make it challenging or impossible to convey the specific logic behind an alert or recommendation. Second, some”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [133] Henry K.E. Kornfield R. Sridharan A. Linton R.C. Groh C. Wang T. Wu A. Mutlu B. Saria S. Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system NPJ Digit. Med. 5 2022 97 10.1038/s41746-022-00597-7 35864312 PMC9304371 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Precision medicine is an emerging disease treatment and prevention approach that considers individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person.

    “As described by the National Institutes of Health, precision medicine is an emerging disease treatment and prevention approach that considers individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] Mesko B. The role of artificial intelligence in precision medicine Expert Review of Precision Medicine and Drug Development 2 2017 239 241 10.1080/23808993.2017.1380516 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There exist inherent disadvantages in centralized solutions, including increased data traffic and concerns about data ownership, confidentiality, privacy, and security and creating data monopolies that favor data aggregators.

    “There exist inherent disadvantages in centralized solutions, including increased data traffic and concerns about data ownership, confidentiality, privacy, and security and creating data monopolies that favor data aggregators.135”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [135] Kaissis G.A. Makowski M.R. Rückert D. Braren R.F. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging Nat. Mach. Intell. 2 2020 305 311 10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1 source

      The section ‘Decentralized data and federated machine learning’ says keeping data with its owner addresses governance and ownership concerns, while the discussion of patient-data protection addresses privacy and confidentiality. Our copy does not say centralized solutions create data monopolies favoring aggregators. It also describes burdensome communication as a limitation of decentralized learning, not as increased traffic caused by centralization; no page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The first well-established device was IDx-DR, approved by the FDA in 2018 for its high diagnostic performance in clinical trials.

    “The first well-established device was IDx-DR, approved by the FDA in 2018 for its high diagnostic performance in clinical trials.104,142”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [104] Abràmoff M.D. Lou Y. Erginay A. Clarida W. Amelon R. Folk J.C. Niemeijer M. Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57 2016 5200 5206 10.1167/iovs.16-19964 27701631 source
    • cites [142] Abràmoff M.D. Lavin P.T. Birch M. Shah N. Folk J.C. Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices NPJ Digit. Med. 1 2018 39 10.1038/s41746-018-0040-6 31304320 PMC6550188 source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    Dagliati et al. reported that RF, SVM, and LR models using risk factors to predict development of diabetes-related complications provided an accuracy up to 0.838.

    “final models, tailored in accordance with the complications, provided an accuracy up to 0.838”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dagliati et al.97 Dagliati A. Marini S. Sacchi L. Cogni G. Teliti M. Tibollo V. De Cata P. Chiovato L. Bellazzi R. Machine Learning Methods to Predict Diabetes Complications J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 12 2018 295 302 10.1177/1932296817706375 28494618 PMC5851210 source

      The Abstract (page not provided) reports complication-specific final models with accuracy up to 0.838 and lists the risk factors used. The Results (page not provided) clarify that the final retained models were LR models: RF and SVM were evaluated, but the paper does not attribute that final-model accuracy to all three methods. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Dai et al. reported that DeepDR (CNN) using retinal images for DR screening achieved AUCs of 0.943, 0.955, 0.960, and 0.972 for grading DR as mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative, respectively, in internal validation, and AUCs from 0.916 to 0.970 in external validations.

    “the grading of DR as mild, moderate, severe, and proliferative achieves AUCs of 0.943, 0.955, 0.960, and 0.972, respectively (internal validation); in external validations, AUCs for grading range from 0.916 to 0.970”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dai et al.103 Dai L. Wu L. Li H. Cai C. Wu Q. Kong H. Liu R. Wang X. Hou X. Liu Y. A deep learning system for detecting diabetic retinopathy across the disease spectrum Nat. Commun. 12 2021 3242 10.1038/s41467-021-23458-5 34050158 PMC8163820 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ljubic et al. reported that an RNN using hospitalization longitudinal data to predict development of 10 selected complications in T2D achieved prediction accuracy between 73% (myocardial infarction) and 83% (chronic ischemic heart disease), while traditional models achieved between 66% and 76%.

    “the prediction accuracy was between 73% (myocardial infarction) and 83% (chronic ischemic heart disease), while the accuracy of traditional models was between 66% and 76%”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ljubic et al.99 Ljubic B. Hai A.A. Stanojevic M. Diaz W. Polimac D. Pavlovski M. Obradovic Z. Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 27 2020 1343 1351 10.1093/jamia/ocaa120 PMC7647294 32869093 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Huang et al. reported that DT, RF, SVM, and BN using clinical and genotyping data for diabetic nephropathy screening yielded accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of 85.27%, 83.32%, and 85.24% on internal testing, and 78.50%, 80.64%, and 81.40% on a separate testing dataset.

    “the proposed method yielded accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of 85.27%, 83.32, and 85.24%, respectively (internal testing dataset); on a separate testing dataset, the classification accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 78.50%, 80.64, and 81.40%, respectively”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al.112 Huang G.M. Huang K.Y. Lee T.Y. Weng J. An interpretable rule-based diagnostic classification of diabetic nephropathy among type 2 diabetes patients BMC Bioinf. 16 Suppl 1 2015 S5 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S1-S5 PMC4331704 25707942 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LLMs are built using natural language processing techniques and designed to recognize and understand the structure and meaning of human language, classify texts according to their content or purpose, and generate responses that are appropriate and coherent.

    “LLMs are built using natural language processing techniques and designed to recognize and understand the structure and meaning of human language, classify texts according to their content or purpose, and generate responses that are appropriate and coherent.146”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] Ali S.R. Dobbs T.D. Hutchings H.A. Whitaker I.S. Using ChatGPT to write patient clinic letters Lancet. Digit. Health 5 2023 e179 e181 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00048-1 36894409 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Ting et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images for DR screening achieved an AUC of 0.936, sensitivity of 90.5%, and specificity of 91.6% for referable DR; and for vision-threatening DR, AUC was 0.958, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 91.1%.

    “the AUC of the system for referable DR was 0.936, sensitivity was 90.5%, and specificity was 91.6%; for vision-threatening DR, AUC was 0.958, sensitivity was 100%, and specificity was 91.1%”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ting et al.107 Ting D.S.W. Cheung C.Y.-L. Lim G. Tan G.S.W. Quang N.D. Gan A. Hamzah H. Garcia-Franco R. San Yeo I.Y. Lee S.Y. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes JAMA 318 2017 2211 2223 10.1001/jama.2017.18152 29234807 PMC5820739 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bora et al. reported that a CNN using retinal images and risk factors to predict risk of developing DR within 2 years achieved an AUC of 0.79 in the internal validation set and 0.70 in the external validation set with one-field color fundus photographs.

    “the three-field DL system had an AUC of 0.79 in the internal validation set; assessment of the external validation set, which contained only one-field color fundus photographs, with the one-field DL system gave an AUC of 0.70”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bora et al.102 Bora A. Balasubramanian S. Babenko B. Virmani S. Venugopalan S. Mitani A. de Oliveira Marinho G. Cuadros J. Ruamviboonsuk P. Corrado G.S. Predicting the risk of developing diabetic retinopathy using deep learning Lancet. Digit. Health 3 2021 e10 e19 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30250-8 33735063 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The emergence of DHTs, especially AI, may help address obstacles and alleviate disease burden of diabetes in the future because AI-based DHTs could help implement better prevention strategies, manage patients unable to attend appointments, deliver real-time health information, promote self-management, and save time and money.

    “The emergence of digital health technologies (DHTs), especially artificial intelligence (AI), may help address these obstacles and alleviate the disease burden of diabetes in the future, because AI-based DHTs in diabetes care could help implement better prevention strategies for high-risk populations, manage diabetic patients who are unable to attend physician appointments in person, deliver real-”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Ashrafzadeh S. Hamdy O. Patient-Driven Diabetes Care of the Future in the Technology Era Cell Metabol. 29 2019 564 575 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.09.005 30269984 source
    • Rests on an assumption: A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research, translational research, and clinical practice.

    “The application of ML in diabetes care and research has been widely explored in basic biomedical research,16 translational research,14 and clinical practice17 (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [16] Check Hayden E. The automated lab Nature 516 2014 131 132 10.1038/516131a 25471888 source
    • cites [14] Yu K.-H. Beam A.L. Kohane I.S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2 2018 719 731 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z 31015651 source
    • cites [17] Klonoff A.N. Andy Lee W.-A. Xu N.Y. Nguyen K.T. DuBord A. Kerr D. Six Digital Health Technologies That Will Transform Diabetes J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 17 2023 239 249 10.1177/19322968211043498 34558330 PMC9846384 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Recent advancements in digital health technologies, especially AI, provide a significant opportunity to achieve better efficiency in diabetes care, which may diminish the increase in diabetes-related health-care expenditures.

    “Recent advancements in digital health technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI), provide a significant opportunity to achieve better efficiency in diabetes care, which may diminish the increase in diabetes-related health-care expenditures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rule-based systems are expensive to build and brittle, and it is challenging to encode higher-order interactions between different pieces of knowledge provided by different specialists, with system effectiveness restricted by comprehensiveness of pre-existing medical knowledge.

    “However, rule-based systems are expensive to build and brittle. Furthermore, it is challenging to encode higher-order interactions between different pieces of knowledge provided by different specialists, with system effectiveness restricted by the comprehensiveness of pre-existing medical knowledge.12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Samuel A.L. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers (Reprinted from Journal of Research and Development, vol 3, 1959 IBM J. Res. Dev. 44 2000 206 226 10.1147/rd.441.0206 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI can predict the risk of diabetes onset and classify diabetes.

    “AI can predict the risk of diabetes onset and classify diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    One explanation for the shortcomings of existing treatment strategies is that the diagnosis of diabetes is based on the measurement of only one metabolite, glucose; however, the disease is heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation and progression.

    “One explanation for these shortcomings is that the diagnosis of diabetes is based on the measurement of only one metabolite, glucose; however, the disease is heterogeneous in terms of clinical presentation and progression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Existing treatment strategies for diabetes cannot stop the progressive course of the disease and prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI algorithms could be quite useful in times when it is difficult to manage diabetes.

    “Particularly, it is worth highlighting that AI algorithms could be quite useful in times when it is difficult to manage diabetes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI-based models are less invasive and highly accessible, which could effectively improve the willingness of the general population to screen and provide personalized screening plans for high-risk populations.

    “These AI-based models are less invasive and highly accessible, which could effectively improve the willingness of the general population to screen and provide personalized screening plans for high-risk populations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Health education aims to empower diabetic patients with increased knowledge and awareness of diabetes, which can further facilitate better disease self-management.

    “Health education aims to empower diabetic patients with increased knowledge and awareness of diabetes, which can further facilitate better disease self-management.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A refined classification system could provide a powerful tool to individualize treatment regimens and identify individuals with an increased risk of complications at diagnosis.

    “A refined classification system could provide a powerful tool to individualize treatment regimens and identify individuals with an increased risk of complications at diagnosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Predicting near-future BG on a minute, hour, or overnight timescale enables better diabetes management and therefore remains an active research topic.

    “Predicting near-future BG on a minute, hour, or overnight timescale enables better diabetes management and therefore remains an active research topic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Early stages of T2D are often asymptomatic, so individuals can carry the disease for years undiagnosed.

    “Considering that the early stages of T2D are often asymptomatic, individuals can carry the disease for years undiagnosed.48”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2021 Diabetes Care 44 2021 S15 S33 33298413 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These limitations have motivated the use of AI-based diagnostics that have high classification accuracy and leverage large datasets that are not easily interpreted.

    “These limitations have motivated the use of AI-based diagnostics that have high classification accuracy and leverage large datasets (including data from wearable and continuous monitoring devices) that are not easily interpreted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Unlike many other medications, insulin must be titrated, which complicates insulin dosing and requires providers to perform complex calculations to determine the best dose.

    “Unlike many other medications, insulin must be titrated, which means that the dose will change in response to real-time indicators such as current BG or based on what the patient has recently eaten. This process complicates insulin dosing and requires providers to perform complex calculations to determine the best dose.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Errors in insulin dosing can be dangerous, as incorrect dosages can lead to serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia, which can cause death.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is often poorly implemented that a scientific, personalized, and quantitative exercise prescription can potentially be an essential therapeutic agent for patients with diabetes, as clinicians lack necessary knowledge and skills, while participants have low adherence due to design defects.

    “However, it is often poorly implemented, as clinicians lack the necessary knowledge and skills, while participants have low adherence due to design defects (e.g., prescriptions fail to take individual willingness, the appeal of exercise, and complex physical conditions into account).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Clinicians provide therapeutic advice beyond insulin dosing guidance, as diabetes is often associated with multiple comorbidities, leading to complex guidelines for personalized treatment, with gaps often present in which no recommendations are available.

    “Clinicians provide therapeutic advice beyond insulin dosing guidance (particularly T2D), as diabetes is often associated with multiple comorbidities, leading to complex guidelines for personalized treatment, with gaps often present in which no recommendations are available.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Artificial neural network approaches are the most widely applied methodology for BG prediction, but other ML methodologies such as random forest and support vector machine are being adopted with increasing frequency.

    “Artificial neural network approaches are the most widely applied methodology, but other ML methodologies, such as random forest and support vector machine, are being adopted with increasing frequency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    AI can classify different types of diabetes more accurately, but further algorithm upgrading is required to meet clinical treatment needs.

    “Although AI can classify different types of diabetes more accurately,51,54,55 further algorithm upgrading is required to meet the clinical treatment needs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [51] Maniruzzaman M. Kumar N. Menhazul Abedin M. Shaykhul Islam M. Suri H.S. El-Baz A.S. Suri J.S. Comparative approaches for classification of diabetes mellitus data: Machine learning paradigm Comput. Methods Progr. Biomed. 152 2017 23 34 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.09.004 29054258 source
    • cites [54] Barakat N.H. Bradley A.P. Barakat M.N.H. Intelligible Support Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Ieee T Inf Technol B 14 2010 1114 1120 10.1109/Titb.2009.2039485 20071261 source
    • cites [55] Amit kumar D. Pragati A. Classification of Diabetes Mellitus Using Machine Learning Techniques Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2 2015

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The ability to anticipate BG excursions could provide an early warning regarding ineffective or poor treatment.

    “The ability to anticipate BG excursions could provide an early warning regarding ineffective or poor treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: It is usual for people with diabetes to experience BG variation throughout the day owing to carbohydrate ingestion and insulin action.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The prediction of diabetes onset is a part of pre-emptive medicine, accurately identifying individuals highly likely to develop diabetes at the pre-illness stage. Thus, this technology could eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes by implementing medical interventions for these people at a very early stage.

    “The prediction of diabetes onset is a part of pre-emptive medicine, accurately identifying individuals highly likely to develop diabetes at the pre-illness stage. Thus, this technology could eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes by implementing medical interventions for these people at a very early stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Previous studies have focused on optimizing the insulin dose for both patients and clinicians.

    “Previous studies have focused on optimizing the insulin dose for both patients and clinicians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Most patients with diabetes do not utilize automated insulin delivery systems on account of personal preferences or relatively high costs.

    “This treatment model is still worth discussing today, since most patients with diabetes do not utilize automated insulin delivery systems on account of personal preferences or relatively high costs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Early AI-enabled decision support systems were generally designed to assist clinicians who were authoritative in the insulin dosing strategies for their patients.

    “For clinicians, early AI-enabled decision support systems were generally designed to assist clinicians who were authoritative in the insulin dosing strategies for their patients.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The control algorithm acts as a 'brain' in the closed-loop system, analyzing data fed back by CGM and automatically adjusting insulin infusion rate; therefore, an accurate control algorithm is crucial for a closed-loop system.

    “The control algorithm acts as a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI could be employed in understanding risk factors for diabetes onset owing to human limitations and biases when dealing with large spaces of risk factors.

    “AI could be employed in understanding risk factors for diabetes onset owing to human limitations and biases when dealing with large spaces of risk factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Glycemic episode detection encompasses a set of tools that address the complexity of effective BG control, enabling detection of glycemic episodes and opportunity to respond promptly.

    “As with BG prediction, glycemic episode detection encompasses a set of tools that address the complexity of effective BG control. These tools enable us to detect the occurrence of glycemic episodes and provide us with the opportunity to respond promptly to their effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Dietary monitoring is critical in patients with diabetes, especially as self-reporting of food intake is inaccurate and often impractical; therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated solution for dietary monitoring.

    “Dietary monitoring is critical in patients with diabetes, especially as self-reporting of food intake is inaccurate and often impractical59; therefore, it is necessary to develop an automated solution for dietary monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] Schoeller D.A. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report Metabolism 44 1995 18 22 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90204-x 7869932 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Treatment escalation of diabetes is another critical aspect of drug therapy strategies, required as a patient's disease progresses, and multiple studies have aimed to identify optimal escalation points as an aid to clinicians.

    “Treatment escalation of diabetes is another critical aspect of drug therapy strategies, which is required as a patient’s disease progresses, and multiple studies have aimed to identify optimal escalation points as an aid to clinicians.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Most reviewed studies on glycemic episode detection focus on detecting hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia in situations where it is not possible to monitor BG effectively, and most dealt with real-time approaches rather than predictions of future events.

    “In contrast to BG prediction, most of the reviewed studies on this topic focus on detecting hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia in situations where it is not possible to monitor BG effectively. Therefore, most of these studies dealt with real-time approaches rather than predictions of future events.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Current diagnostic guidelines for diabetes are driven by invasive measurements in clinics, possibly influenced by behavioral and ethnic factors.

    “Current diagnostic guidelines for diabetes47 are driven by invasive measurements in clinics, possibly influenced by behavioral and ethnic factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021 Diabetes Care 44 2021 S15 S33 10.2337/dc21-S002 33298413 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A challenging aspect of measuring agreement between human expert- and AI-generated recommendations is that, even when they disagree, both can be correct, because humans often express a wide variety of priorities and risk preferences.

    “A challenging aspect of measuring the agreement between human expert- and AI-generated recommendations is that, even when they disagree, both can be correct, because humans (including AI developers) often express a wide variety of priorities and risk preferences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In diabetes management, the prediction of the onset of diabetes and diabetic complications would eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes and diabetic complications by implementing appropriate medical interventions for those at high risk at a very early stage.

    “In diabetes management, the prediction of the onset of diabetes and diabetic complications would eventually decrease the incidence of diabetes and diabetic complications by implementing appropriate medical interventions for those at high risk at a very early stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Guardian Connect System is an AI system based on CGM, has an accompanying smartphone application, and was certified by the FDA in 2018.

    “The Guardian Connect System (manufactured by Medtronic) is an example of an AI system with this functionality. This system is based on CGM, has an accompanying smartphone application,144 and was certified by the FDA in 2018.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [144] Soupal J. Haskova A. Prazny M. Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial Diabetes Care 43 2021 2744 2750 10.2337/dci20-0078 PMC7576432 32859607 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The Guardian Connect System uses AI to predict a hypoglycemic attack an hour in advance based on CGM data and alerts the patient.

    “It is characterized by using AI to predict a hypoglycemic attack an hour in advance based on the CGM data and alerts the patient.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is feasible to integrate retinal-image-based prediction algorithms into DR screening programs because retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into body homeostasis.

    “Since retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into the homeostasis of the body, it is feasible for the integration of such algorithms into DR screening programs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into body homeostasis.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Previous studies have shown that applying AI in diabetes management involves all aspects of disease control, including prediction, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

    “Previous studies have shown that applying AI in diabetes management involves all aspects of disease control, including prediction, prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two important mechanisms of the AI domain can be used to develop decisional systems for medical predictions: a knowledge-based system that involves logic and a system based on probabilistic reasoning.

    “Two important mechanisms of the AI domain can be used to develop decisional systems for medical predictions: a knowledge-based system that involves logic and a system based on probabilistic reasoning.125”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [125] Albu A. Stanciu L. Benefits of Using Artificial Intelligence in Medical Predictions 19–21 2015 IEEE 1 4 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI technology can increase the productivity of existing DR tele-ophthalmology screening programs and lower unit economic costs within the community.

    “For example, with the growing burden of DR, AI technology can increase the productivity of existing DR tele-ophthalmology screening programs and lower unit economic costs within the community.123”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [123] Xie Y. Nguyen Q.D. Hamzah H. Lim G. Bellemo V. Gunasekeran D.V. Yip M.Y.T. Qi Lee X. Hsu W. Li Lee M. Artificial intelligence for teleophthalmology-based diabetic retinopathy screening in a national programme: an economic analysis modelling study Lancet. Digit. Health 2 2020 e240 e249 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30060-1 33328056 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    With the deployment of automated AI for specific clinical tasks, the credentials needed for diagnostic, therapeutic, supportive, and paramedical tasks need to be updated, and the roles of health-care professionals will continue to evolve as various AI modules are incorporated into the standard of care.

    “With the deployment of automated AI for specific clinical tasks, the credentials needed for diagnostic, therapeutic, supportive, and paramedical tasks need to be updated, and the roles of health-care professionals will continue to evolve as various AI modules are incorporated into the standard of care.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] Yu K.-H. Beam A.L. Kohane I.S. Artificial intelligence in healthcare Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2 2018 719 731 10.1038/s41551-018-0305-z 31015651 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Integrating AI into clinical practice care could shift diabetes care toward precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization.

    “Integrating AI into clinical practice care could shift diabetes care toward precision, penetration, prediction, and personalization.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Several obstacles remain in the research and application of AI in diabetes management, including data quality control, poor technology design, privacy concerns, lack of clinical integration, non-adherence, and the establishment of laws and regulations.

    “However, several obstacles remain in the research and application of AI in diabetes management, including data quality control, poor technology design, privacy concerns, lack of clinical integration, non-adherence, and the establishment of laws and regulations (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Clinical AI systems' labels and data quality directly determine model performance.
    • Rests on an assumption: AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Armengol et al. reported that a case-based reasoning system using risk factors to estimate risk of complications was 100% correct in determining the kind of risk (progression or development) and the risk of stroke, 90% correct in determining amputation risk, and 72.45% correct in determining the global risk and the risk of infarct.

    “the results were 100% correct in determining the kind of risk (progression or development) and the risk of stroke, 90% correct in determining amputation risk, and 72.45% correct in determining the global risk and the risk of infarct”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Armengol et al.96 Armengol E. Palaudàries A. Plaza E. Individual prognosis of diabetes long-term risks: a CBR approach Methods Inf. Med. 40 2001 46 51 11310159 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation

    Lagani et al. reported that an ANN using risk factors to predict diabetes-related complications achieved internal validation C index between 0.66 and 0.833 (all significantly different from 0.5, p ≤ 0.0001), and external validation in 49 T1D patients showed similarly high and statistically significant C indexes (p < 0.05 except hypoglycemia and CVD models with p = 0.0584 and 0.0932), with good T2D

    “the results of the internal validation (T1D) reported a C index between 0.66 and 0.833, all statistically significantly different from 0.5 (p ≤ 0.0001); these results were further corroborated by the external validation (49 patients with T1D), where all models obtained similarly high and statistically significant C indexes (p < 0.05 except for the hypoglycemia and CVD model, with p = 0.0584 and 0.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lagani et al.94 Lagani V. Chiarugi F. Manousos D. Verma V. Fursse J. Marias K. Tsamardinos I. Realization of a service for the long-term risk assessment of diabetes-related complications J. Diabet. Complicat. 29 2015 691 698 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.03.011 25953402 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Abramoff et al. reported that IDx-DR (CNN) using retinal images for DR screening exceeded all pre-specified superiority endpoints with sensitivity of 87.2% (>85%), specificity of 90.7% (>82.5%), and imageability rate of 96.1% for detecting more than mild DR.

    “the AI system exceeded all pre-specified superiority endpoints at sensitivity of 87.2% (>85%), specificity of 90.7% (>82.5%), and imageability rate of 96.1% for detecting the presence of more than mild DR”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abramoff et al.104 Abràmoff M.D. Lou Y. Erginay A. Clarida W. Amelon R. Folk J.C. Niemeijer M. Improved Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy on a Publicly Available Dataset Through Integration of Deep Learning Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57 2016 5200 5206 10.1167/iovs.16-19964 27701631 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    By addressing the challenges and capitalizing on the opportunities, AI could play a pivotal role in transforming diabetes care and improving the lives of millions of people worldwide.

    “By addressing the challenges and capitalizing on the opportunities, AI could play a pivotal role in transforming diabetes care and improving the lives of millions of people worldwide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Despite these risks, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize patient monitoring, treatment personalization, and patient education, leading to improved outcomes and better quality of life for patients with diabetes.

    “Despite these risks, LLMs have the potential to revolutionize patient monitoring, treatment personalization, and patient education, leading to improved outcomes and better quality of life for patients with diabetes.149,150”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [149] Stokel-Walker C. Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science Nature 614 2023 214 216 10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 36747115 source
    • cites [150] Howard A. Hope W. Gerada A. ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor? Lancet Infect. Dis. 23 2023 405 406 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00113-5 36822213 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    AI has the potential to optimize diabetes care by providing personalized, precise, and data-driven support to patients and health-care professionals.

    “In conclusion, AI has the potential to optimize diabetes care by providing personalized, precise, and data-driven support to patients and health-care professionals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Acharya et al. reported that a system using morphological image processing and SVM on retinal images could identify different stages of DR with an average accuracy of more than 85%, a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 86%.

    “the system could identify different stages of DR with an average accuracy of more than 85%, a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 86%”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Acharya et al.108 Acharya U.R. Lim C.M. Ng E.Y.K. Chee C. Tamura T. Computer-based detection of diabetes retinopathy stages using digital fundus images Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 223 2009 545 553 10.1243/09544119jeim486 19623908 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Integrating AI-based DHTs will probably become increasingly feasible in the future as technology improves, and such integration will enable new models of diabetes care.

    “Integrating AI-based DHTs will probably become increasingly feasible in the future as technology improves, and such integration will enable new models of diabetes care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
75 of 75
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.

    “A shortage of diabetes specialists, uneven distribution of medical resources, low adherence to medications, and improper self-management contribute to poor glycemic control in patients with diabetes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.

    “Unfortunately, late-stage diagnosis can lead to health complications and lower life expectancy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Existing treatment strategies for diabetes cannot stop the progressive course of the disease and prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications.

    “Existing treatment strategies for diabetes cannot stop the progressive course of the disease and prevent the development of chronic diabetic complications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    It is usual for people with diabetes to experience BG variation throughout the day owing to carbohydrate ingestion and insulin action.

    “It is usual for people with diabetes to experience BG variation throughout the day owing to carbohydrate ingestion and insulin action.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Errors in insulin dosing can be dangerous, as incorrect dosages can lead to serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia, which can cause death.

    “Errors in insulin dosing can be dangerous, as incorrect dosages can lead to serious adverse effects, such as hypoglycemia, which can cause death.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into body homeostasis.

    “Since retinal examinations are routinely performed for patients with diabetes and the retina is a convenient window into the homeostasis of the body”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Proper intervention at an early stage could significantly delay the progression of DR and even reverse mild non-proliferative DR to a DR-free stage.

    “Evidence suggests that proper intervention at an early stage could significantly delay the progression of DR and even reverse mild non-proliferative DR to a DR-free stage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Clinical AI systems' labels and data quality directly determine model performance.

    “Since clinical AI systems are developed on a considerable amount of real-world health data, the corresponding labels and data quality will directly determine model performance.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.

    “AI in medicine inevitably results in legal challenges regarding medical negligence attributed to complex decision-support systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Several challenges exist in managing diabetes in traditional face-to-face medical practices, such as ineffective prevention systems, uneven distribution of medical resources, and improper self-management.

    “Several challenges exist in managing diabetes in traditional face-to-face medical practices, such as ineffective prevention systems, uneven distribution of medical resources, and improper self-management.”
10 of 10

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent advancements in AI, particularly predictive analytics, have significantly improved the ability to monitor and manage diabetes.

    “However, recent advancements in AI, particularly through the development of predictive analytics, have significantly improved the ability to monitor and manage diabetes (31).”

    From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Blood glucose monitoring section says AI-based prediction can provide early warnings and that predicting near-future glucose levels enables better diabetes management. It reports predictive performance, but does not establish that these advances have already significantly improved diabetes monitoring and management in clinical practice. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • LLMs can analyze patient data from a wide range of formats, including EHRs, clinical trial reports, genetic data, and patient-reported outcomes.

    “LLMs can analyze patient data from a wide range of formats, including EHRs, clinical trial reports, genetic data, and even patient-reported outcomes (31,82).”

    From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    In Conclusion and perspective > Recommendations for future directions (page unavailable), the paper says LLMs can accept image and text inputs and offer a more comprehensive understanding of patient data. It does not say that LLMs analyze each of the listed sources—EHRs, clinical trial reports, genetic data, and patient-reported outcomes. Its separate mention of EHRs and patient-reported outcomes concerns digital-health adoption, not LLM analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This capability enhances the predictive accuracy of diabetes models by combining quantitative and qualitative data.

    “This capability enhances the predictive accuracy of diabetes models by combining both quantitative and qualitative data, providing a more holistic view of the patient’s health (31).”

    From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The sections on diabetes-onset prediction and diabetic complications describe models using retinal images alongside clinical risk factors or metadata, with reported predictive performance (page not specified). They do not establish that combining quantitative and qualitative data improves accuracy over using either alone, or that it provides a more holistic view of patient health. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Generative AI models have demonstrated immense potential in the early detection and management of diabetes complications.

    “Generative AI models have demonstrated immense potential in the early detection and management of diabetes complications (31).”

    From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The section on predicting, screening, and managing diabetic complications reports promising results for AI systems and says their predictions could guide intensive management. But it does not identify those systems as generative models; the Introduction lists generative models as a class of AI without linking them to demonstrated detection or management of complications. The claim is supported for AI broadly, not for generative AI specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • By providing real-time predictions and personalized treatment recommendations, LLMs have the potential to drastically improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetes-related complications.

    “By providing real-time predictions and personalized treatment recommendations, LLMs have the potential to drastically improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetes-related complications (31).”

    From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Conclusion and perspective section says LLMs have the potential to personalize treatment and improve outcomes for patients with diabetes. It does not attribute real-time predictions or a reduced burden of diabetes-related complications to LLMs; the complication-prediction examples in the paper concern other AI methods. It also does not characterize the potential improvement in outcomes as drastic. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 162 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2021, 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2021, Diabetes Care, 44, S15, 10.2337/dc21-S002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guan, Z., Li, H., Liu, R., Cai, C., Liu, Y., Li, J., Wang, X., Huang, S., Wu, L., Liu, D., Yu, S., Wang, Z., Shu, J., Hou, X., Yang, X., Jia, W., & Sheng, B.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Jia, Weiping
  • Sheng, Bin
Venue
Cell Reports Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
4
Issue
10
Pages
101213
ISSN
2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387266347
Cited by
287
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 1
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence, diabetes management, digital health technologies, glycemic control, medication adherence, diabetes self-management, diabetes prevention, health care expenditure, clinical implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review