Cited by 18Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Evaluation of the timing and coordination of prandial insulin administration in the hospital

Alwan, Dhuha, Chipps, Esther, Yen, Po-Yin, Dungan, Kathleen·2017·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between measures of coordinated insulin delivery and capillary blood glucose (CBG) levels among hospitalized patients and to assess nurse perceptions of insulin administration. Methods Hospitalized patients (n=451) receiving rapid acting insulin analog (RAIA) using carbohydrate counting were retrospectively analyzed. Nurses (n=35) were asked to complete an 18-item anonymous survey assessing perception of RAIA dosing. Results The median time from breakfast CBG to RAIA dose was 93 (IQR 57-138) min. There was no association between timeliness measures and mean CBG at lunch or dinner. Hypoglycemia was rare (N=2). More than half (54%) of nurses were confident all of the time in determining the correct dose of RAIA, though none were confident in administering it on time. The majority of nurses perceived an electronic dosing calculator and a patient reminder to notify the nurse at the end of the meal favorably. Conclusions The data demonstrate suboptimal coordination of CBG monitoring and insulin doses using a flexible meal insulin dosing strategy, though there was minimal impact on glycemic control. Nurses reported high confidence in the ability to calculate the correct insulin dose but not in the ability to administer it on time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.021

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Errors in insulin dosing, missed doses, and/or administration errors including incorrect insulin type and/or timing of dose occur relatively frequently and include prescriber, pharmacy, and nursing errors.

    “Errors in insulin dosing, missed doses, and/or administration errors including incorrect insulin type and/or timing of dose occur relatively frequently (102-104) and include prescriber (ordering), pharmacy (dispensing), and nursing (administration) errors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alwan, D., Chipps, E., Yen, P.-Y., & Dungan, K.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Dungan, Kathleen
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
131
Pages
18-32
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2670079829
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grifols
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
prandial insulin, rapid-acting insulin analogs, carbohydrate counting, capillary blood glucose, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, nurses' perceptions, insulin administration, hospitalized patients, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Capillaries, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review