Cited by 40Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Inpatient medical errors involving glucose-lowering medications and their impact on patients: review of 2,598 incidents from a voluntary electronic error-reporting database

Amori, Renee E., Pittas, Anastassios G., Siegel, Richard D., Kumar, Sanjaya, Chen, Jack S., Karnam, Suneel, Golden, Sherita H., Salem, Deeb N.·2008·Endocrine Practice

Abstract

Objective To describe characteristics of inpatient medical errors involving hypoglycemic medications and their impact on patient care. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of medical errors and associated adverse events voluntarily reported by hospital employees and staff in 21 nonprofit, nonfederal health-care organizations in the United States that implemented a Web-based electronic error-reporting system (e-ERS) between August 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005. Persons reporting the errors determined the level of impact on patient care. Results The median duration of e-ERS use was 3.1 years, and 2,598 inpatient error reports involved insulin or orally administered hypoglycemic agents. Nursing staff provided 59% of the reports; physicians reported Conclusion An e-ERS provides an accessible venue for reporting and tracking inpatient medical errors involving glucose-lowering medications. Results are limited by potential underreporting of events, particularly by physicians, and variations in the reporter perception of patient harm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4158/ep.14.5.535

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Errors in insulin dosing, missed doses, and/or administration errors including incorrect insulin type and/or timing of dose occur relatively frequently and include prescriber, pharmacy, and nursing errors.

    “Errors in insulin dosing, missed doses, and/or administration errors including incorrect insulin type and/or timing of dose occur relatively frequently (102-104) and include prescriber (ordering), pharmacy (dispensing), and nursing (administration) errors.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amori, R. E., Pittas, A. G., Siegel, R. D., Kumar, S., Chen, J. S., Karnam, S., Golden, S. H., & Salem, D. N.
Affiliations
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Amori, Renee E.
Venue
Endocrine Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
535-542
ISSN
1530-891X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090870205
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
medical errors, inpatient care, glucose-lowering medications, insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs, sulfonylureas, adverse events, patient harm, nurses, underreporting, hospital safety
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Sulfonylurea Compounds, United States, Incidence, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Medical Errors, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review